1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
James W. MacKay, Kenneth A. Miles, Jonathan R. Weir-McCall, Stella Joyce, Nagmi R. Qureshi, Gabrielle C Baxter, Robert C. Rintoul, Andrew Clegg, Fiona J. Gilbert, Lena-Marie Dendl, Weir-McCall, Jonathan [0000-0001-5842-842X], MacKay, James [0000-0001-7558-3800], Baxter, Gabrielle [0000-0002-8242-1559], Rintoul, Robert [0000-0003-3875-3780], Gilbert, Fiona [0000-0002-0124-9962], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Multi-detector computed tomography ,Solitary pulmonary nodule ,I510 ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Biopsy ,medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Neuroradiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Contrast media ,Nodule (medicine) ,General Medicine ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Meta-analysis ,Positron emission tomography ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Diagnostic odds ratio ,Radiology ,medicine.symptom ,Lung cancer ,business - Abstract
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast–enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) for the differentiation between malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published up to October 2018 on the diagnostic accuracy of DCE-CT for the characterisation of pulmonary nodules. For the index test, studies with a minimum of a pre- and post-contrast computed tomography scan were evaluated. Studies with a reference standard of biopsy for malignancy, and biopsy or 2-year follow-up for benign disease were included. Study bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). The sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a bivariate random effects model. Twenty-three studies were included, including 2397 study participants with 2514 nodules of which 55.3% were malignant (1389/2514). The pooled accuracy results were sensitivity 94.8% (95% CI 91.5; 96.9), specificity 75.5% (69.4; 80.6), and diagnostic odds ratio 56.6 (24.2–88.9). QUADAS 2 assessment showed intermediate/high risk of bias in a large proportion of the studies (52–78% across the domains). No difference was present in sensitivity or specificity between subgroups when studies were split based on CT technique, sample size, nodule size, or publication date. DCE-CT has a high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules although study quality was indeterminate in a large number of cases. • The pooled accuracy results were sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 73.8% although individual studies showed wide ranges of values. • This is comparable to the results of previous meta-analyses of PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. • Robust direct comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to determine the optimal use of DCE-CT and PET/CT in the diagnosis of SPNs.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF