Search

Bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs attempt to approximate natural knee mechanics. Multiple surgical techniques, including gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR), have been developed to provide optimal implant positioning and soft-tissue balance. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of surgical technique on BCS TKA contact kinematics. Secondary goals included investigating the change of kinematics over time and comparing BCS TKA kinematics to a posterior-stabilized (PS) design. The study included the BCS-GB, BCS-MR, and PS-MR groups. The BCS-GB and BCS-MR groups underwent weight-bearing radiostereometric analysis for multiple knee flexion angles at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, whereas the PS-MR group was imaged at 1 year postoperatively. The medial and lateral contact kinematics were determined from implant poses. There were no differences in BCS TKA kinematics between the GB and MR techniques. There were differences in the mid-flexion ranges when comparing the 3-month and 1-year kinematics of the BCS design; however, they were less than 1.5 mm. Differences existed between the kinematics of the BCS and PS designs at all flexion angles for the medial condyle (P <.0006) and at 0° of flexion on the lateral condyle (P <.0001). Contact kinematics for a BCS design were similar for both surgical techniques, suggesting both are appropriate for this design. Small, likely clinically insignificant differences were found between 3-month and 1-year kinematics. The BCS TKA kinematics differed from the PS design; however, it is unclear whether these differences improve clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contact kinematics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to affect tibial component migration. However, previous studies correlating kinematic variables to implant migration were completed with older TKA designs. The goal of this study was to determine if there are associations between contact kinematics and tibial component migration for a cemented, bicruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA system. A total of 54 knees implanted with a BCS TKA system were analyzed using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients underwent RSA exams at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post operation to measure tibial component migration. At 1 year, contact kinematics was evaluated during a quasi-static deep knee bend. Linear regression analyses were performed between kinematic variables and migration values. Significant correlations were found between contact kinematics and tibial component migration. Excursion on the lateral condyle was the most consistent variable correlating with implant migration. Six patients had > 0.2 mm migrations from 1 to 2 years post operation indicating continuously migrating tibial components, and most had atypical contact kinematics. Kinematics was shown to influence tibial component migration. Reduced lateral excursion, suggesting a more constrained lateral condyle, resulted in greater implant migration. The 6 patients who had continuously migrating tibial components had demographic factors that may limit the ability to endure unintended force transmissions caused by abnormal kinematics. These results highlight the importance of restoring knee kinematics with this BCS TKA design to minimize improper force transmissions and resultant increased implant migrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The goal of this study is to investigate the migration and inducible displacement of a bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty implanted using gap balancing (GB) or measured resection (MR) surgical techniques. We hypothesized equal migration and displacement between the techniques.Methods: The study is a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial, with allocation of 71 patients to either GB or MR groups. Fifteen patients were withdrawn, resulting in 31 patients in the GB group and 25 in the MR group. Patients received the JOURNEY II™ BCS implant. Migration and inducible displacement were evaluated using radiostereometric analysis and patient examinations were performed at a 2-week baseline, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperation.Results: No differences (P > .05) existed between GB and MR groups for any measurement of tibial or femoral migration. Both groups had tibial migrations below 0.5 mm from baseline to 6 months, and below 0.2 mm from both 6 months to 1 year and 1-2 years postoperation. No differences (P > .05) were found between GB and MR groups for inducible displacement.Conclusion: No differences were found in implant migration or inducible displacement between GB and MR groups. The BCS implant can be expected to have migration risks on par with industry standards and both surgical techniques are safe and effective options for implantation of this implant design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]