Search

Simple Summary: The lattice technique is a particular form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, which was demonstrated to be safe and effective for treating advanced cancers. Bulky tumor disease is difficult to treat. In this clinical scenario, radiotherapy has a role in the palliation of symptoms. The lattice technique allows high doses to be delivered within tumor masses. Combining lattice delivery with IMRT/VMAT to bulky tumors offers optimal symptom control and could emerge as the best therapeutic option in this setting of patients. Purpose: To evaluate feasibility, toxicities, and clinical response in Stage IV patients treated with palliative "metabolism-guided" lattice technique. Patients and Methods: From June 2020 to December 2021, 30 consecutive clinical stage IV patients with 31 bulky lesions were included in this study. All patients received palliative irradiation consisting of a spatially fractionated high radiation dose delivered in spherical deposits (vertices, Vs) within the bulky disease. The Vs were placed at the edges of tumor areas with different metabolisms at the PET exam following a non-geometric arrangement. Precisely, the Vs overlapped the interfaces between the tumor areas of higher 18F-FDG uptake (>75% SUV max) and areas with lower 18F-FDG uptake. A median dose of 15 Gy/1 fraction (range 10–27 Gy in 1/3 fractions) was delivered to the Vs. Within 7 days after the Vs boost, all the gross tumor volume (GTV) was homogeneously treated with hypo-fractionated radiation therapy (RT). Results: The rate of symptomatic response was 100%, and it was observed immediately after lattice RT delivery in 3/30 patients, while 27/30 patients had a symptomatic response within 8 days from the end of GTV irradiation. Radiation-related acute grade ≥1 toxicities were observed in 6/30 (20%) patients. The rate of overall clinical response was 89%, including 23% of complete remission. The 1-year overall survival rate was 86.4%. Conclusions: "Metabolism-guided" lattice radiotherapy is feasible and well-tolerated, being able to yield very impressive results both in terms of symptom relief and overall clinical response rate in stage IV bulky disease patients. These preliminary results seem to indicate that this kind of therapy could emerge as the best therapeutic option for this patient setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The field of precision radiation therapy has seen remarkable advancements in both experimental and computational methods. Recent literature has introduced various approaches such as Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT). This unconventional treatment, demanding high-precision radiotherapy, has shown promising clinical outcomes. A comprehensive computational scheme for SFRT, extrapolated from a case report, is proposed. This framework exhibits exceptional flexibility, accommodating diverse initial conditions (shape, inhomogeneity, etc.) and enabling specific choices for sub-volume selection with administrated higher radiation doses. The approach integrates the standard linear quadratic model and, significantly, considers the activation of the immune system due to radiotherapy. This activation enhances the immune response in comparison to the untreated case. We delve into the distinct roles of the native immune system, immune activation by radiation, and post-radiotherapy immunotherapy, discussing their implications for either complete recovery or disease regrowth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Spine giant cell tumors (SGCTs) are intermediate malignant bone tumors, sometimes aggressive and responsible for debilitating axial pain and sensorimotor impairments. Non-surgical therapies, including denosumab, radiotherapy, and selective arterial embolization (SAE), have shown promising results in the treatment of patients with inoperable SGCTs. In this systematic review, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the current literature on denosumab, radiotherapy, and SAE for inoperable SGCTs, comparing treatment outcomes and complications using a random-effect model meta-analysis. We found that all three treatments were equally effective in providing symptom improvement and radiological tumor response, also showing low and comparable rates of treatment-related complications. Patients treated with denosumab showed lower rates of local recurrences and distant metastases. Background: Surgical resection remains the preferred treatment in spine giant cell tumors (SGCTs), but it is not always feasible. Conservative strategies have been studied for inoperable cases. We systematically reviewed the literature on inoperable SGCTs treated with denosumab, radiotherapy or selective arterial embolization (SAE). Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to include studies of inoperable SGCTs treated with denosumab, radiotherapy or SAE. Treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared with a random-effect model meta-analysis. Results: Among the 17 studies included, 128 patients received denosumab, 59 radiotherapy, and 43 SAE. No significant differences in baseline patient characteristics were found between the three groups. All strategies were equally effective in providing symptom improvement (p = 0.187, I2 = 0%) and reduction in tumor volume (p = 0.738, I2 = 56.8%). Rates of treatment-related complications were low (denosumab: 12.5%; radiotherapy: 8.5%; SAE: 18.6%) and comparable (p = 0.311, I2 = 0%). Patients receiving denosumab had significantly lower rates of local tumor recurrence (10.9%) and distant metastases (0%) compared to patients receiving radiotherapy (30.5%; 8.5%) or SAE (35.6%; 7%) (p = 0.003, I2 = 32%; p = 0.002, I2 = 47%). Denosumab was also correlated with significantly higher overall survival rates at 18 months (99.2%) and 24 months (99.2%) compared to radiotherapy (91.5%; 89.6%) and SAE (92.5%; 89.4%) (p = 0.019, I2 = 8%; p = 0.004, I2 = 23%). Mortality was higher in patients receiving SAE (20.9%) or radiotherapy (13.6%) compared to denosumab (0.8%) (p < 0.001), but deaths mostly occurred for unrelated diseases. Conclusions: Denosumab, radiotherapy, and SAE are safe and effective for inoperable SGCTs. Clinical and radiological outcomes are mostly comparable, but denosumab may provide superior tumor control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is nowadays treated with a multimodal therapeutic approach including immunotherapy, targeted therapy and radiotherapy. Radiation therapy, in addition to immune checkpoint inhibitors, gives rise to a particular radiobiological effect known as "bystander effect" consisting of the radiation-induced damage in nearby unirradiated cells. Case report: We report a case of a 79-year-old female patient with stage IV NSCLC treated with concomitant immuno-radiotherapy who showed a bystander effect on bone. Management and outcome: Primary tumour biopsy revealed an adenocarcinoma with a PDL1 expression >50%, while staging exams showed a right pulmonary lesion with a partial involvement of the contiguous rib and a single brain metastasis. The patient refused chemotherapy, so that Pembrolizumab 2 mg/Kg was administered every 3 weeks. After two administrations, the single brain metastasis was treated using stereotactic radiosurgery while the site of primitive lung cancer received an 8 Gy-single fraction 3 D-conformal radiotherapy. Three months after irradiation a chest CT showed a radiological remission of about 10% of the GTV and a partial eburnation of the vertebra located nearby the target volume. The CT images of a PET/CT at six months showed a complete vertebral eburnation. At the last follow-up, the patient was free of disease (brain MRI, spinal MRI and PET/CT). Discussion: The present case alerts for unusual side effects provoked by bystander phenomenon in patients treated with a combination of immunotherapy and irradiation. Immune activation exacerbates the bystander effect causing normal tissues toxicities beyond what immunotherapies are causing by themselves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]