Search

The physical properties of particles used in radiation therapy, such as protons, have been well characterized, and their dose distributions are superior to photon-based treatments. However, proton therapy may also have inherent biologic advantages that have not been capitalized on. Unlike photon beams, the linear energy transfer (LET) and hence biologic effectiveness of particle beams varies along the beam path. Selective placement of areas of high effectiveness could enhance tumor cell kill and simultaneously spare normal tissues. However, previous methods for mapping spatial variations in biologic effectiveness are time-consuming and often yield inconsistent results with large uncertainties. Thus the data needed to accurately model relative biological effectiveness to guide novel treatment planning approaches are limited. We used Monte Carlo modeling and high-content automated clonogenic survival assays to spatially map the biologic effectiveness of scanned proton beams with high accuracy and throughput while minimizing biological uncertainties. We found that the relationship between cell kill, dose, and LET, is complex and non-unique. Measured biologic effects were substantially greater than in most previous reports, and non-linear surviving fraction response was observed even for the highest LET values. Extension of this approach could generate data needed to optimize proton therapy plans incorporating variable RBE.

Objective: A newly developed GafchromicTM EBT4 film model was released recently. According to the vendor‐stated specifications, this new model maintains major features of its more recent predecessor, EBT3, but has a great improvement in the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). The purpose of this study was to fully characterize the EBT4 model by testing its dose response dependence on beam energy using clinical photon and electron beams and validating its improvement in SNR. Methods: In the beam energy dependence experiments, 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams, 6 MeV, 12 MeV and 20 MeV electron beams, 120 kVp and two 250 kVp x‐ray beams (with different half‐layer values) were selected, representing different clinical beam energies and radiation types. In the noise and SNR analyses, only the 6 MV photon beam was selected as the representative to compare between EBT4 and EBT3 models. Results: The energy dependence test results showed that there was a slight difference (<2% at most dose levels) in the dose response among the clinical MV photons and MeV electrons. However, a large deviation (>10%) in the dose response was found for the 120 kVp x‐ray beam. For the two 250 kVp x‐ray beams, the difference in the dose response was moderate (<5%), but not negligible. The noise and SNR results showed a reduced noise and strengthened SNR in EBT4. Conclusion: We conclude that the EBT4 film has a minimal energy dependence for MV photon and MeV electron beams but has a notable energy dependence for kilovoltage x‐ray beams, and the vendor‐stated features of the reduced noise and improved SNR in EBT4 are validated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. To compare five techniques for the postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials and Methods. Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were retrospectively selected. Five treatment plans were created for each patient: TomoDirect (TD), unblocked helical TomoTherapy (unb-HT), blocked HT (b-HT), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hy-IMRT), and fixed-field IMRT (ff-IMRT). A dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVtotal and 60.2 Gy in 28 fractions to PTVboost were prescribed. The dosimetric parameters for targets and organs at risk (OARs), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), the second cancer complication probability (SCCP) for OARs, and the treatment efficiency were assessed and compared. Results. TD plans and hy-IMRT plans had similar good dose coverage and homogeneity for both PTVboost and PTVtotal and superior dose sparing for the lungs and heart. The ff-IMRT plans had similar dosimetric results for the target volumes compared with the TD and hy-IMRT plans, but gave a relatively higher NTCP and SCCP for the lungs. The unb-HT plans exhibited the highest OAR mean dose, highest NTCP for the lungs (0.97 ± 1.25 ‰) and heart (4.58 ± 3.62 %), and highest SCCP for the lungs (3.57 ± 0.05 %) and contralateral breast (2.75 ± 0.29 %) among all techniques. The b-HT plans significantly outperformed unb-HT plans with respect to the sparing of the lungs and heart. This technique also showed the best conformity index (0.73 ± 0.08) for PTVboost and the optimal NTCP for the lungs (0.03 ± 0.03 ‰) and heart (0.61 ± 0.73 %). Concerning the delivery efficiency, the hy-IMRT and ff-IMRT achieved much higher delivery efficiency compared with TomoTherapy plans. Conclusion. Of the five techniques studied, TD and hy-IMRT are considered the preferable options for PMRT with SIB for left-sided breast cancer treatment and can be routinely applied in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy is a promising image-guided cancer radiotherapy method. For MRI-guided radiotherapy, the proper energy of a therapeutic beam is important for beam-designing processes, and the magnetic-induced dose perturbation would be mainly influenced, especially the perturbation surrounding the tissue-air or air-tissue interfaces. Thus, it was necessary to investigate the impact of beam energy from photon, proton, and carbon ion beams on the magnetic-induced dose perturbations.Materials and Methods: Using a phantom of a water-air-water structure, the dose distributions were calculated with or without the presence of a 1.5 T uniform magnetic field through GEANT4. Based on the calculated doses, magnetic-induced dose perturbations were then obtained. For investigating the effects of beam energies on magnetic-induced dose perturbations, low-, middle-, and high-beam energies were adopted for each beam type.Results and Discussion: For photon beams, the dose perturbations were increased as the beam energies increased. At the up water-air interface, the maximum perturbations exceeded 50%. Near the edge of the radiation field, perturbations of 5%-20% were achieved. For proton and carbon ion beams, their Bragg peaks were shifted from original positions, and the shifting distances were increased with the increased beam energies. However, no evident magnetic-induced dose perturbations were noted at the up water-air interface and bottom air-water interface for all the beam energies. To some extent, this study provided references for assessing the effects of beam energies on magnetic-induced dose perturbations, especially the perturbations around the air cavities inside cancer patients.Conclusion: In MRI-guided cancer radiotherapy, the dose perturbation effects for therapeutic beams are relatively obvious, and the beam energies of therapeutic beams have large impacts on the magnetic-induced dose perturbations with the presence of a 1.5 T transverse magnetic field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We compared differences in patterns of locoregional failure, and the influence of adaptive planning on those patterns, in patients who received passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) versus intensity modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer.Methods and Materials: Treatment simulation computed tomography scans and dose distributions were registered with images depicting the recurrence. Local failure (LF) was defined as failure within the internal target volume (ITV); marginal failure (MF) as failure between the ITV and planning target volume (PTV) plus a 10-mm margin (PTV+10mm); and regional failure (RF) as outside the PTV+10mm. Weekly during-treatment 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation and verification plans were obtained for all patients. Adaptive plans were developed if the verification plan showed deviations in protocol-specified dose distribution, and failure locations were recorded for those patients as well.Results: Of the 212 patients analyzed, most (152 [72%]) had no failure; of the 60 patients with failure, 27 (45%) had LF (within the ITV), 23 (38%) had MF (between the ITV and PTV+10mm), and 10 (17%) had RF (>10 mm outside the PTV). MF rates were no different for IMRT patients (16 of 136 [12%]) or PSPT patients (7 of 76 [9%], log-rank P = .558). The only independent predictor of MF on Cox proportional hazards analysis was T3-4 status. Large tumors and use of PSPT independently predicted the need for adaptive planning. Although 5-year overall survival rates were poorer for patients with large tumors versus small tumors (P < .001), the rates were similar for patients with large tumors who received adaptive planning versus small tumors.Conclusions: No differences in LF, MF, or RF patterns were found for IMRT versus PSPT. Proton therapy more often required adaptive planning, and the techniques used for adaptive planning did not compromise tumor control. Response to chemoradiation by larger tumors predicted favorable survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]