Search

Background: The structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan was surveyed in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution, and compared with the structure in other radiotherapy facilities and the previous survey. Methods: The Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology surveyed the national structure of radiation oncology in 2009. The structures of 365 designated cancer care hospitals and 335 other radiotherapy facilities were compared. Results: Designated cancer care hospitals accounted for 50.0 % of all the radiotherapy facilities in Japan. The patterns of equipment and personnel in designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were, respectively, as follows: linear accelerators per facility: 1.4 and 1.0; dual-energy function: 78.6 and 61.3 %; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy function: 88.5 and 70.0 %; intensity-modulated radiotherapy function: 51.6 and 25.3 %; annual number of patients per linear accelerator: 301.3 and 185.2; Ir-192 remote-controlled after-loading systems: 31.8 and 4.2 %; and average number of full-time equivalent radiation oncologists per facility: 1.8 and 0.8. Compared with the previous survey, the ownership ratio of equipment and personnel improved in both designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities. Annual patient loads per full-time equivalent radiation oncologist in the designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were 225.5 and 247.6, respectively. These values exceeded the standard guidelines level of 200. Conclusions: The structure of radiation oncology in designated Japanese cancer care hospitals was more mature than that in the other radiotherapy facilities. There is still a shortage of personnel. The serious understaffing problem in radiation oncology should be corrected in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Patterns of Care Study (PCS) conducted a nationwide audit survey in order to establish the national practice process of radiation therapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and examined the influence of institutional stratification on the process of care in Japan. The PCS randomly sampled institutions and patients using a two-stage cluster method and surveyed the process of radiation therapy for 174 stage I–III SCLC patients according to the category of institution, stratified as follows: A1, academic institutions treating ≥300 patients a year; A2, <300 patients; B1, non-academic institutions treating ≥120 patients a year; and B2, <120 patients. Karnofsky performance status distributions showed significant variance by stratification of institutions (P=0.013). Patients treated on an outpatient basis accounted for 32% in A1, 23% in A2, 8% in B1, but only 5% in B2 (P=0.007). A photon energy ≥10 MV was used for 87% of patients in A1, 69% in A2, 54% in B1 and 23% in B2 (P=0.001). Contralateral hilus was irradiated for 11% of patients in A1, 17% in A2, 29% in B1 and 3% in B2 (P=0.001). Field size reduction during the treatment course was done for 77% of patients in A1, 54% in A2, 60% in B1 and 42% in B2 (P=0.007). Ninety-two percent of patients received combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and the most frequently used drugs were etoposide (91%) and cisplatin (69%). The results of clinical studies on SCLC had favorably penetrated into the clinical practice. However, the stratification of institutions significantly affected the process of radiation therapy in Japan. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: The role of elective nodal irradiation of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with radiotherapy remains unclear. We investigated the significance of treating clinically uninvolved lymph nodes by retrospectively analyzing the relationship between loco-regional failure and the irradiated volume. Methods: Between 1998 and 2003, patients with IA–IIIB NSCLC were treated with radiotherapy. The eligibility criteria for this study were an irradiation dose of 60Gy or more and a clinical response better than stable disease. Typical radiotherapy consisted of 40Gy/20fr to the tumor volumes (clinical target volume of the primary tumor [CTVp], of the metastatic lymph nodes [CTVn], and of the subclinical nodal region [CTVs]), followed by off-cord boost to CTVp+n to a total dose 60–68Gy/30–34fr. The relationship between the sites of recurrence and irradiated volumes was analyzed. Results: A total of 127 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Their median overall and progression-free survival times were 23.5 (range, 4.2–109.7) and 9.0 months (2.2–109.7), respectively. At a median follow-up time of 50.5 months (range, 14.2–83.0) for the surviving patients, the first treatment failure was observed in 95 patients (loco-regional; 41, distant; 42, both; 12). Among the patients with loco-regional failure, in-field recurrence occurred in 38 patients, and four CTVs recurrences associated with CTVp+n failure were observed. No isolated recurrence in CTVs was observed. Conclusions: In-field loco-regional failure, as well as distant metastasis, was a major type of failure, and there was no isolated elective nodal failure. Radiation volume adequacy did not seem to affect elective nodal failure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals in Japan was investigated in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution, and compared with the structure in other radiotherapy facilities. The Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) conducted a questionnaire survey about the national structure of radiation oncology in 2005. In the current study, the structures of 326 designated cancer care hospitals and the other 386 radiotherapy facilities in Japan were compared. Designated cancer care hospitals accounted for 45.3% of all radiotherapy facilities. The patterns of equipment and personnel in designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were as follows: linear accelerators/facility, 1.2 and 1.0; dual-energy function, 73.1% and 56.3%; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy function, 67.5% and 52.7%; intensity-modulated radiotherapy function, 30.0% and 13.9%; annual number of patients/linear accelerator, 289.7 and 175.1; 192Ir remote-controlled afterloading systems, 27.6% and 8.6%; and average number of full-time equivalent radiation oncologists/facility, 1.4 and 0.9 ( P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in equipment and personnel between the two types of facilities. Annual patient loads/full-time equivalent radiation oncologist in the designated cancer care hospitals and the other radiotherapy facilities were 252 and 240. Geographically, the number of designated cancer care hospitals was associated with the population, and the number of JASTRO-certified physicians was associated with the number of patients undergoing radiotherapy. The Japanese structure of radiation oncology in designated cancer care hospitals was more mature than that in the other radiotherapy facilities in terms of equipment, although a shortage of personnel still exists. The serious understaffing problem in radiation oncology should be corrected in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution to identify and improve any deficiencies. Methods and Materials: A questionnaire-based national structure survey was conducted between March 2006 and February 2007 by the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. These data were analyzed in terms of the institutional stratification of the Patterns of Care Study. Results: The total numbers of new cancer patients and total cancer patients (new and repeat) treated with radiotherapy in 2005 were estimated at approximately 162,000 and 198,000, respectively. In actual use were 765 linear accelerators, 11 telecobalt machines, 48 GammaKnife machines, 64 60Co remote-controlled after-loading systems, and 119 192Ir remote-controlled after-loading systems. The linear accelerator systems used dual-energy function in 498 systems (65%), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 462 (60%), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in 170 (22%). There were 426 Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 774 full-time equivalent radiation oncologists, 117 medical physicists, and 1,635 radiation therapists. Geographically, a significant variation was found in the use of radiotherapy, from 0.9 to 2.1 patients/1,000 population. The annual patient load/FTE radiation oncologist was 247, exceeding the Blue Book guidelines level. Patterns of Care Study stratification can clearly discriminate the maturity of structures according to their academic nature and caseload. Conclusions: The Japanese structure has clearly improved during the past 15 years in terms of equipment and its use, although the shortage of manpower and variations in maturity disclosed by this Patterns of Care Study stratification remain problematic. These constitute the targets for nationwide improvement in quality assurance and quality control. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: To investigate the practice process of postoperative radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. Between April 2002 and March 2004, the Patterns of Care Study conducted an extramural audit survey for 76 of 556 institutions using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling. Data on treatment process of 627 patients with NSCLC who received radiation therapy were collected. Ninety-nine (16%) patients received postoperative radiation therapy between 1999 and 2001 (median age, 65 years). Pathological stage was stage I in 8%, II in 17%, IIIA in 44%, and IIIB in 20%. The median field size was 9cm×11cm, and median total dose was 50Gy. Photon energies of 6MV or higher were used for 64 patients, whereas a cobalt-60 unit was used for five patients. Three-dimensional conformal treatment was used infrequently. Institutional stratification influenced several radiotherapy parameters such as photon energy and planning target volume. Smaller non-academic institutions provided worse quality of care. The study confirmed continuing variation in the practice of radiotherapy according to stratified institutions. Outdated equipment such as Cobalt-60 units was used, especially in non-academic institutions treating only a small number of patients per year. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Methods and Materials: A trial testing external beam radiotherapy (66 Gy within 6.5 weeks) as a single-modality treatment was performed for biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus clinically staged as Stage I and IIA (T1–T3N0M0, International Union Against Cancer, 1987) in patients aged ≥80 years. Results: From January 1999 through December 2002, 51 evaluable patients (35 men and 16 women) with a median age of 83 years (range, 80–91 years) were enrolled from 22 institutions. Of the 51 patients, 18 (35%) had Stage T1 and 33 (65%) had Stage T2–T3 disease. Radiotherapy could be completed in 47 patients (92%) within 43–58 days (median, 49). The actuarial incidence of Grade 3 or worse cardiopulmonary complications at 3 years was 26%, with 3 early deaths, and correlated significantly with the size of the anteroposterior radiotherapy portals. The median survival time and overall survival rate at 3 years was 30 months and 39% (95% confidence interval, 25–52%), respectively. Conclusion: The results of high-dose radiotherapy in octogenarians are comparable to those in younger patients, but meticulous treatment planning and quality control is required. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: Chemoradiotherapy, which is one of the standard treatments for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma, is considered a high-risk procedure in elderly patients. This study investigated the outcome and tolerability of this treatment in elderly patients. Methods: We reviewed our database from November 1993 to March 2003 and retrospectively examined the clinical data of patients with histologically confirmed exocrine pancreatic carcinomas that were nonresectable but confined to the pancreatic region, who were treated with protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion (200 mg/m2/day) and concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks). We evaluated the outcome of patients ≥70 years and those <70 years. Results: There were 19 patients ≥70 and 39 patients <70. On pretreatment evaluation, the elderly patients showed lower serum albumin levels, lower transaminase levels, better ECOG performance status, more frequent body weight loss and less frequent abdominal and/or back pain with the administration of morphine than the younger patients. There were no significant differences in the frequency of severe toxicity. Neither the response rate nor the incidence of treatment discontinuation differed significantly between the two groups. The median survival time was longer in the elderly patients than in the younger patients (11.3 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.04). Conclusions: With careful patient selection, chemoradiotherapy can be one of the treatment options for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma in elderly patients. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of small-field radiotherapy in combination with concomitant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or cisplatin for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.Materials and methods: From November 1993 to January 1999, 53 patients underwent continuous 5FU infusion at 200 mg/m2 (27 patients) or a 30-min cisplatin infusion at 5 mg/m2/day (26 patients) just prior to each irradiation. The radiation field was limited to cover the primary and the paraaortic regions at celiac and supramesenteric axis levels. A total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 sessions was given in 5.6 weeks.Results: Median and 1-year survival rates were 10.2 months and 35.2%, respectively. Local failure occurred in 19 patients (36%) and liver metastases in 16 patients (30%). All local recurrences occurred only within the radiation field.Conclusions: Median survival rates were comparable to other studies. Because local failure occurred only within the radiation field, the use of relatively small-field radiotherapy may be justified in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma in addition to concurrent administration of either 5FU or cisplatin. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

A 60-year-old man with choroidal melanoma was treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and followed for 6 years. During this period, the tumor has not changed in size, and the patient has experienced only a slight decrease in visual acuity. In this case, stereotactic radiotherapy appears to have been safe and effective and may also be a cost-effective alternative to particle or plaque therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]