Search

Short-duration rainfall extremes can cause flash flooding with associated impacts. Previous studies of climate impacts on extreme precipitation have focused mainly on daily rain totals. Subdaily extremes are often generated in small areas that can be missed by gauge networks or satellites and are not resolved by climate models. Here, we show a robust positive trend of at least 20% per decade in subhourly extreme rainfall near Sydney, Australia, over 20 years, despite no evidence of trends at hourly or daily scales. This trend is seen consistently in storms tracked using multiple independent ground radars, is consistent with rain-gauge data, and does not appear to be associated with known natural variations. This finding suggests that subhourly rainfall extremes may be increasing substantially faster than those on more widely reported time scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accuracy of rainfall quantification is one of the most important concerns in meteorological and hydrological modelling. Satellites and weather radars can provide meteorological information with higher temporal and spatial resolution than ground stations. Rain gauges measure rain rate directly; however, weather radars estimate rain rate by converting radar reflectivity aloft to rain rate at ground level. This conversion with a power law relation between radar reflectivity and rain rate could be altered from place to place or in various precipitation types. This variety may be the source of errors and uncertainty of radar rainfall estimates. One way to assess the uncertainty of radar rainfall is simulation of rainfall fields. In this article, after calibrating two radars located in the south-western and northern parts of Iran, uncertainty of rainfall estimates of these radars has been analysed using the Gaussian Copula model. Reliability of this model was examined for 10% of the rainfall events that were not included in the simulation process. Obtained results of the current research indicate that recalibration of radars can considerably reduce bias and root mean error. In addition, the Copula-based model can generate rainfall fields with similarly spatial structures to those of observed rainfall data. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Ground observation absence in many parts of the world highlights the importance of merged satellite precipitation products. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effect of different sources of data in the uncertainties of a merged satellite product, by comparing the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Final product (V06B) with a ground-based radar product, Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS), using both pixel-based and object-based approaches. This study is focused on the eastern United States (land-only) during the hurricane days that occurred in 2016–2018. The results showed that IMERG had better agreement in terms of the average precipitation intensity and area with a bias reduction of 75% and 65%, respectively, when the passive microwave (PMW) sensor overpass is matched instantaneously with MRMS compared to temporally averaged MRMS data (MRMS-Averaged). PMW observations tend to show storms with smaller areas in the IMERG Final product in comparison with MRMS, possibly due to the effect of light precipitation not detected properly by PMW sensors. However, by removing the light precipitation (less than 1 mm/h) in the object-based approach, hurricane objects in the IMERG Final product tend to be larger during the PMW observations, which might be related to different viewing angles of sensors contributing to MRMS and IMERG products. Precipitation estimates have smaller areas with higher average intensity during the PMW observations in the IMERG Final product compared to data estimated by Morphed or IR (morph/IR) observations, which is probably related to the effect of morphing technique, leading to homogenization of the varying rainstorm characteristics. In addition, with the longer absence of PMW observations, the quality of morph/IR estimates in IMERG Final product deteriorates with a decreasing correlation coefficient, a growth in precipitation area and a downward trend in average precipitation intensity. Finally, the inter-comparison of PMW sensors showed the priority of imagers over sounders with GMI as the best among imagers and MHS as the best among sounders in terms of correlation and average intensity compared to MRMS; however, SSMIS was the best in capturing the precipitation area. • PMW estimates in IMERG have better agreement with MRMS when matched instantaneously. • PMW sensors often represent the storms with smaller areas in IMERG compared to MRMS. • PMW sensors show the storms smaller with higher intensity compared to morphed/IR • Morphed/IR data quality in IMERG decreases with the longer absence of PMW sensors. • PMW sensors in IMERG should be prioritized based on the precipitation properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]