Search

In African countries, the lack of observed rainfall data is a major obstacle for efficient water resources management. The objective of this study is to evaluate satellite rainfall products' ability to estimate river runoff over 12 basins in Morocco using four hydrological models: IHACRES, MISDc, GR4J, and CREST. Satellite products available with a short latency are compared: EUMETSAT H SAF, SM2RAIN-ASCAT, and IMERG. The best results to reproduce river runoff were obtained with SM2RAIN-ASCAT in combination with the IHACRES model, with the highest Kling-Gupta efficiency criterion and probability of detection of extreme runoff. The hydrological model performances differed across catchments and satellite rainfall products, which highlights the need to carefully select hydrological models for a given application. Thus, it is advisable to evaluate satellite rainfall products with different types of hydrological models. This first evaluation over Moroccan basins suggests that SM2RAIN-ASCAT could be a reliable alternative to observed rainfall for hydrological modelling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The global availability of satellite rainfall products (SRPs) at an increasingly high temporal and spatial resolution has made their exploitation in hydrological applications possible, especially in data-scarce regions. In this context, understanding how uncertainties transfer from SRPs to river discharge simulations, through the hydrological model, is a main research question. SRPs' accuracy is normally characterized by comparing them with ground observations via the calculation of categorical (e.g. threat score, false alarm ratio and probability of detection) and/or continuous (e.g. bias, root mean square error, Nash–Sutcliffe index, Kling–Gupta efficiency index and correlation coefficient) performance scores. However, whether these scores are informative about the associated performance in river discharge simulations (when the SRP is used as input to a hydrological model) is an under-discussed research topic. This study aims to relate the accuracy of different SRPs both in terms of rainfall and in terms of river discharge simulation. That is, the following research questions are addressed: is there any performance score that can be used to select the best performing rainfall product for river discharge simulation? Are multiple scores needed? And, which are these scores? To answer these questions, three SRPs, namely the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRRM) Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA), the Climate Prediction Center MORPHing (CMORPH) algorithm and the SM2RAIN algorithm applied to the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) soil moisture product (SM2RAIN–ASCAT) have been used as input into a lumped hydrologic model, "Modello Idrologico Semi-Distribuito in continuo" (MISDc), for 1318 basins over Europe with different physiographic characteristics. Results suggest that, among the continuous scores, the correlation coefficient and Kling–Gupta efficiency index are not reliable indices to select the best performing rainfall product for hydrological modelling, whereas bias and root mean square error seem more appropriate. In particular, by constraining the relative bias to absolute values lower than 0.2 and the relative root mean square error to values lower than 2, good hydrological performances (Kling–Gupta efficiency index on river discharge greater than 0.5) are ensured for almost 75 % of the basins fulfilling these criteria. Conversely, the categorical scores have not provided suitable information for addressing the SRP selection for hydrological modelling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Satellite precipitation products have been largely improved in the recent years particularly with the launch of the global precipitation measurement (GPM) core satellite. Moreover, the development of techniques for exploiting the information provided by satellite soil moisture to complement/enhance precipitation products have improved the accuracy of accumulated rainfall estimates over land. Such satellite enhanced precipitation products, available with a short latency (< 1 day), represent an important and new source of information for river flow prediction and water resources management, particularly in developing countries in which ground observations are scarcely available and the access to such data is not always ensured. In this study, three recently developed rainfall products obtained from the integration of GPM rainfall and satellite soil moisture products have been used; namely GPM+SM2RAIN, PRISM-SMOS, and PRISM-SMAP. The prediction of observed daily river discharge at 10 basins located in Europe (4), West Africa (3) and South Africa (3) is carried out. For comparison, we have also considered three rainfall products based on: (1) GPM only, i.e., the Early Run version of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for GPM (GPM-ER), (2) rain gauges, i.e., the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre, and (3) the latest European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis, ERA5. Three different conceptual and lumped rainfall-runoff models are employed to obtain robust and reliable results over the 3-year data period 2015–2017. Results indicate that, particularly over scarcely gauged areas (West Africa), the integrated products outperform both ground- and reanalysis-based rainfall estimates. For all basins, the GPM+SM2RAIN product is performing the best among the short latency products with mean Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) equal to 0.87, and significantly better than GPM-ER (mean KGE = 0.77). The integrated products are found to reproduce particularly well the high flows. These results highlight the strong need to disseminate such integrated satellite rainfall products for hydrological (and agricultural) applications in poorly gauged areas such as Africa and South America. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-term gridded precipitation products are crucial for several applications in hydrology, agriculture and climate sciences. Currently available precipitation products suffer from space and time inconsistency due to the non-uniform density of ground networks and the difficulties in merging multiple satellite sensors. The recent "bottom-up" approach that exploits satellite soil moisture observations for estimating rainfall through the SM2RAIN (Soil Moisture to Rain) algorithm is suited to build a consistent rainfall data record as a single polar orbiting satellite sensor is used. Here we exploit the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) on board three Meteorological Operational (MetOp) satellites, launched in 2006, 2012, and 2018, as part of the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) Polar System programme. The continuity of the scatterometer sensor is ensured until the mid-2040s through the MetOp Second Generation Programme. Therefore, by applying the SM2RAIN algorithm to ASCAT soil moisture observations, a long-term rainfall data record will be obtained, starting in 2007 and lasting until the mid-2040s. The paper describes the recent improvements in data pre-processing, SM2RAIN algorithm formulation, and data post-processing for obtaining the SM2RAIN–ASCAT quasi-global (only over land) daily rainfall data record at a 12.5 km spatial sampling from 2007 to 2018. The quality of the SM2RAIN–ASCAT data record is assessed on a regional scale through comparison with high-quality ground networks in Europe, the United States, India, and Australia. Moreover, an assessment on a global scale is provided by using the triple-collocation (TC) technique allowing us also to compare these data with the latest, fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA5), the Early Run version of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG), and the gauge-based Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) products. Results show that the SM2RAIN–ASCAT rainfall data record performs relatively well at both a regional and global scale, mainly in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) when compared to other products. Specifically, the SM2RAIN–ASCAT data record provides performance better than IMERG and GPCC in data-scarce regions of the world, such as Africa and South America. In these areas, we expect larger benefits in using SM2RAIN–ASCAT for hydrological and agricultural applications. The limitations of the SM2RAIN–ASCAT data record consist of the underestimation of peak rainfall events and the presence of spurious rainfall events due to high-frequency soil moisture fluctuations that might be corrected in the future with more advanced bias correction techniques. The SM2RAIN–ASCAT data record is freely available at 10.5281/zenodo.3405563 (Brocca et al., 2019) (recently extended to the end of August 2019). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-term gridded precipitation products are crucial for several applications in hydrology, agriculture and climate sciences. Currently available precipitation products obtained from rain gauges, remote sensing and meteorological modelling suffer from space and time inconsistency due to non-uniform density of ground networks and the difficulties in merging multiple satellite sensors. The recent "bottom up" approach that uses satellite soil moisture observations for estimating rainfall through the SM2RAIN algorithm is suited to build long-term and consistent rainfall data record as a single polar orbiting satellite sensor is used. We exploit here the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) on board three Metop satellites, launched in 2006, 2012 and 2018. The continuity of the scatterometer sensor on European operational weather satellites is ensured until mid-2040s through the Metop Second Generation Programme. By applying SM2RAIN algorithm to ASCAT soil moisture observations a long-term rainfall data record can be obtained, also operationally available in near real time. The paper describes the recent improvements in data pre-processing, SM2RAIN algorithm formulation, and data post-processing for obtaining the SM2RAIN-ASCAT global daily rainfall dataset at 12.5 km sampling (2007–2018). The quality of SM2RAIN-ASCAT dataset is assessed on a regional scale through the comparison with high-quality ground networks in Europe, United States, India and Australia. Moreover, an assessment on a global scale is provided by using the Triple Collocation technique allowing us also the comparison with other global products such as the latest European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERA5), the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, and the gauge-based Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) product. Results show that the SM2RAIN-ASCAT rainfall dataset performs relatively well both at regional and global scale, mainly in terms of root mean square error when compared to other datasets. Specifically, SM2RAIN-ASCAT dataset provides better performance better than GPM and GPCC in the data scarce regions of the world, such as Africa and South America. In these areas we expect the larger benefits in using SM2RAIN-ASCAT for hydrological and agricultural applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many satellite soil moisture products are today globally available in near real-time. These observations are of paramount importance for enhancing the understanding of the hydrological cycle and particularly useful for flood forecasting purposes. In recent decades, several studies assimilated satellite soil moisture observations into rainfall-runoff models to improve their flood forecasting skills. The rationale is that a better representation of the catchment states leads to a better stream flow estimation. By exploiting the strong physical connection between the soil moisture dynamic and rainfall, some recent studies demonstrated that satellite soil moisture observations can be also used for enhancing the quality of rainfall observations. Given that the quality of the rainfall is one of the main drivers of the hydrological model uncertainty, this begs the question--to what extent updating soil moisture states leads to better flood forecasting skills than correcting rainfall forcing? In this study, we try to answer this question by using rainfall-runoff observations from 10 catchments throughout the Mediterranean area and a continuous rainfall-runoff model--MISDc--forced with reanalysis- and satellite-based rainfall observations. Satellite soil moisture retrievals from the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT) are either assimilated into MISDc model via the Ensemble Kalman filter to update model states or, alternatively, used to correct rainfall observations derived from a reanalysis and a satellite-based product through the integration with soil moisture-based rainfall estimates. 4-9 years (depending on the catchment) of stream flow observations are organized into calibration and validation periods to test the two different schemes. Results show that the rainfall correction is favourable if the target is the predictions of high flows while for low flows there is a small advantage of the state correction scheme with respect to the rainfall correction. The improvements for high flows are particularly large when the quality of the rainfall is relatively poor with important implications for large-scale flood forecasting in the Mediterranean area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditionally, slope stability assessments are based on stationary expected extreme rainfalls, provided by the Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves. More recent approaches are based on projected rainfall scenarios, considering the expected climatic trends provided by General Circulation Models (GCMs). The projected rainfalls used in this study have been obtained by climate simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Different GCMs emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways 2.6, 4.5, 8.5) and time horizons (e.g., 2010-2039; 2040-2069; 2070-2099) are analysed. In order to fill the scale gap between the spatial resolution of GCMs and the resolution required for impact studies, statistically downscaled climate projections provided by [1,2] are used as input into PG_TRIGRS [3] to predict the effect of climatic change on landslide activity. A hydrological basin located in the Umbria region of central Italy is used as case study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rainfall is the primary input for hydrologic models that simulate the rainfall-runoff processes at basin scale. Because rainfall is highly variable in space and time, accurate hydrological simulations require accurate rainfall data at the best possible resolution. The conventional rain gauge observations in many parts of the world are sparse and unevenly distributed. Satellite-based rainfall products (SRPs) could be an alternative to traditional rain gauge observations and nowadays are available on a global scale at ever increasing spatial and temporal resolution.This study proposes a comprehensive assessment of SRPs for flood modeling in Europe. For this purpose, multiple SRPs (i.e., the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis TMPA; the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Morphing algorithm, CMORPH, the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks, PERSIANN; the SM2RAIN‐ASCAT rainfall product obtained from ASCAT satellite soil moisture through the SM2RAIN algorithm) will be used to force different lumped hydrologic models (e.g., MISDc, GR4J, HYMOD) over several (+900) basins throughout Europe with different sizes and physiographic characteristics. In particular, this study will allow to: 1) assess the quality of different SRPs for flood modelling and its relationship with climatic/geomorphological conditions; 2) explore the connection between the accuracy of SRPs and their performance in terms of flood modeling taking into account the rainfall-runoff model structure as well. Preliminary results indicated that: 1) satellite rainfall products are not completely reliable for flood forecasting; 2) the hydrological performances of satellite rainfall products depend both on the product and on the selected hydrological model making general guidelines for the optimal use of SRPs in flood modeling difficult to be drawn. To overcome this issue a multimodel-multiproduct approach would help to exploit relative skills of each satellite product-hydrological model configuration and would bring to a more reliable flood forecasting system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A Bayesian approach has been used for merging multiple satellite rainfall products. • We created a superior product that can be efficiently run in near-real time. • Soil moisture can provide useful information for improving satellite rainfall. This work investigates the potential of using the Bayesian-based Model Conditional Processor (MCP) for complementing satellite precipitation products with a rainfall dataset derived from satellite soil moisture observations. MCP – which is a Bayesian Inversion approach – was originally developed for predictive uncertainty estimates of water level and discharge to support real-time flood forecasting. It is applied here for the first time to precipitation to provide its probability distribution conditional on multiple satellite precipitation estimates derived from TRMM Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis real-time product v.7.0 (3B42RT) and the soil moisture-based rainfall product SM2RAIN-CCI. In MCP, 3B42RT and SM2RAIN-CCI represent a priori information (predictors) about the "true" precipitation (predictand) and are used to provide its real-time a posteriori probabilistic estimate by means of the Bayes theorem. MCP is tested across Italy during a 6-year period (2010–2015) at daily/0.25 deg temporal/spatial scale. Results demonstrate that the proposed methodology provides rainfall estimates that are superior to both 3B42RT (as well as its successor IMERG-early run) and SM2RAIN-CCI in terms of both median bias, random errors and categorical scores. The study confirms that satellite soil moisture-derived rainfall can provide valuable information for improving state-of-the-art satellite precipitation products, thus making them more attractive for water resource management and large scale flood forecasting applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, the effects of remotely-sensed soil moisture (SM) data assimilation (DA) on rainfall-runoff model performances have been extensively explored, through a large experiment involving numerous catchments located across Europe (>700), and the use of different observations preprocessing and error characterization approaches. ESA-CCI SM products, that merged several available active and passive observations datasets, are employed, also in order to evaluate the role of the type of sensors on DA performances. Daily discharge time series and basin characteristics are obtained from the Global Runoff Data Centre, while daily rainfall and mean temperature data are collected from the European Climate Assessment & Dataset E-OBS. The MISDc-2L model (Brocca et al., 2012) is used for hydrological simulations.In the preprocessing phase, the exponential filter is adopted to address the depth mismatch between model estimates and observations. Two alternative approaches are considered for satellite data rescaling between reference and rescaled datasets, namely CDF-matching and Triple Collocation analysis (TC), which imply the matching of the total variance and of the signal component, respectively. Then, TC is used for observation error characterization by using different triplet configurations in order to test the impact of different observation weights in DA performances. Finally, the Ensemble Kalman Filter is employed to assimilate the rescaled satellite-based observations into MISDc-2L model.The model performance in open-loop (OL) can be considered generally good, while the effects of remotely-sensed SM assimilation are contrasting. The improvements due to DA are substantially limited to catchments in Mediterranean area, while a degradation of model results is almost systematically observed at northern latitudes. Spatial patterns in DA performances are inversely related with both those of model OL performances and of provided rainfall accuracies; in this sense the assimilation of satellite SM shows skills where model does not work so well and/or higher errors in precipitation data could be expected. No remarkable differences in performances attributable to the different ESA-CCI products or rescaling procedures are observed. However, adopting TC for rescaling appears to be more effective in limiting multiplicative bias (i.e. state-dependent systematic errors) evidences in simulated discharges. The use of lagged model as third variable in error variance characterization, that in this case implies higher uncertainties attributed to satellite-based observations, lead to better DA performances with respect to the integration of two satellite-based datasets in the triplet configuration. In conclusion, this study confirms in some way the contrasting results available in literature on satellite SM data assimilation in hydrological models (e.g., Massari et al., 2015). Here, the integration of remotely-sensed data seems suitable for specific areas, and shows a high potential to correct for uncertainties associated with rainfall estimates. REFERENCESBrocca, L.; Moramarco, T.; Melone, F.; Wagner, W.; Hasenauer, S.; Hahn, S. Assimilation of surface- and root-zone ASCAT soil moisture products into rainfall–runoff modeling. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 2542–2555. Massari, C.; Brocca, L.; Tarpanelli, A.; Moramarco, T. Data assimilation of satellite soil moisture into rainfall-runoff modelling: a complex recipe? Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 11403–11433. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]