Search

While DRAM cannot easily scale below a 20-nm technology node, RRAM suffers far less from scalability issues. Moreover, RRAM's resistivity enables its use for processing-in-memory (PIM), potentially alleviating the von Neumann bottleneck. Unfortunately, because of technological idiosyncrasies, existing DRAM-centric memory controllers cannot exploit the full potential of resistive RAM (RRAM). In this paper, we present the design of a memory controller called CONCEPT. The controller is optimized to exploit unique properties of RRAM to enhance its performance and energy efficiency as well as exploiting RRAM's PIM capability. We show that with CONCEPT, RRAM can achieve DRAM-like performance and energy efficiency on SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks. Furthermore, using RRAM PIM capabilities, we show a 5× performance gain on a data-intensive in-memory database workload compared to a state-of-the-art CPU-memory computing model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Using memristive devices within a crossbar array could pave the way for memories with higher density and speed than state‐of‐the‐art Flash memory, while maintaining relatively low energy. However, memristive crossbar arrays have great difficulty distinguishing logical states because of sneak path currents. The row grounding technique eliminates the sneak path effect, allowing reliable sampling of the memristor state. In this paper, we analyze the row grounding technique and propose several methods and constraints for the design of memristive crossbar arrays. When the row grounding technique is used for these arrays, our analysis shows that increasing the number of rows can help reduce read latency and energy, in contrast to the case of capacitive memory arrays. Simulation results confirm the theoretical analysis proposed in this paper. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Realizing logic operations within passive crossbar memory arrays is a promising approach to enable novel computer architectures, different from conventional von Neumann architecture. Attractive candidates to enable such architectures are memristors, nonvolatile memory elements commonly used within a crossbar, that can also perform logic operations. In such novel architectures, data are stored and processed within the same entity, which we term as memristive memory processing unit (MPU). In this paper, Memristor-Aided loGIC (MAGIC) family is discussed with various design considerations and novel techniques to execute logic within an MPU. We present a novel resistive memory—the transpose memory, which adds additional functionality to the memristive memory, and compare it with a conventional memristive memory. A case study of an adder is presented to demonstrate the design issues discussed in this paper. We compare the proposed design techniques with the memristive IMPLY logic in terms of speed, area, and energy. Our evaluation shows that the proposed MAGIC design is 2.4 $\times$ faster and consumes 66.3% less energy as compared with the IMPLY-based computing for N-bit addition within memristive crossbar memory. Additionally, we compare the proposed design with IMPLY logic family on ISCAS-85 benchmarks, which shows significant improvements in speed (2$\times$) and energy (10 $\times$), with similar area. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In recent years, memristive technologies, such as resistive random access memory (RRAM), have emerged. These technologies are usually considered as alternates for static RAM, dynamic RAM, and Flash. In this paper, a novel digital circuit, the multistate register, is proposed. The multistate register is different from conventional types of memory, and is used to store multiple data bits, where only a single bit is active and the remaining data bits are idle. The active bit is stored within a CMOS flip flop, while the idle bits are stored in an RRAM crossbar co-located with the flip flop. It is demonstrated that additional states require an area overhead of 1.4% per state for a 64-state register. The use of multistate registers as pipeline registers is demonstrated for a novel multithreading architecture—continuous flow multithreading (CFMT), where the total area overhead in the CPU pipeline is only 2.5% for 16 threads compared with a single thread CMOS pipeline. The use of multistate registers in the CFMT microarchitecture enables higher performance processors (40% average performance improvement) with relatively low energy (6.5% average energy reduction) and area overhead. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Associative Processor (AP) combines data storage and data processing, and functions simultaneously as a massively parallel array SIMD processor and memory. Traditionally, AP is based on CMOS technology, similar to other classes of massively parallel SIMD processors. The main component of AP is a Content Addressable Memory (CAM) array. As CMOS feature scaling slows down, CAM experiences scalability problems. In this work, we propose and investigate an AP based on resistive CAM—the Resistive AP (ReAP). We show that resistive memory technology potentially allows scaling the AP from a few millions to a few hundred millions of processing units on a single silicon die. We compare the performance and power consumption of a ReAP to a CMOS AP and a conventional SIMD accelerator (GPU) and show that ReAP, although exhibiting higher power density, allows better scalability and higher performance. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Memristors are passive components with a varying resistance that depends on the previous voltage applied across the device. While memristors are naturally used as memory, memristors can also be used for other applications, including logic circuits. In this brief, a memristor-only logic family, i.e., memristor-aided logic (MAGIC), is presented. In each MAGIC logic gate, memristors serve as an input with previously stored data, and an additional memristor serves as an output. The topology of a MAGIC nor gate is similar to the structure of a common memristor-based crossbar memory array. A MAGIC nor gate can therefore be placed within memory, providing opportunities for novel non-von Neumann computer architectures. Other MAGIC gates also exist (e.g., and, or, not, and nand) and are described in this brief. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]