Search

Treatment with sirolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, has improved the prognosis of patients with kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE). However, the efficacy, durability and tolerability of long‐term sirolimus treatment in patients with KHE have not been well elucidated. We performed efficacy and safety assessments based on more than 4.5 years of follow‐up in patients receiving sirolimus therapy for KHE. One hundred sixty‐seven patients were analyzed, including 102 (61.1%) patients with the Kasabach‐Merritt phenomenon (KMP). Follow‐up was conducted after a median of 56.0 months. A total of 154 (92.2%) patients had a durable response to sirolimus treatment. No difference in durable response was found between patients without KMP and patients with KMP (95.4% vs 90.2%; difference, 5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.0% to 13.1%). Rebound growth occurred in 17.3% of patients upon sirolimus discontinuation. Early treatment discontinuation (odds ratio [OR]: 3.103; 95% CI: 1.529‐6.299; P =.002) and mixed lesion type (OR: 2.271; 95% CI: 0.901‐5.727; P =.047) were associated with tumor rebound growth. No KHE‐related deaths occurred in this cohort. At the last follow‐up, approximately 17.4% of patients had active disease and/or changes in body structures to a variable extent. Serious adverse events occurred most commonly during the first year of sirolimus therapy. Follow‐up of almost 4.5 years demonstrated that the efficacy of sirolimus persisted over time and that long‐term treatment with sirolimus was not associated with unacceptable cumulative toxicities. However, nonresponse, tumor relapse and long‐term sequelae remained challenges despite intensified and prolonged sirolimus therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Patients with vascular anomalies (VAs) who receive oral sirolimus may be at high risk of infectious complications. Antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) has been advocated. However, there have been few evidence-based analyses on this topic. This study assessed the effect of prophylactic TMP-SMZ on the incidence of infections in VA patients receiving sirolimus monotherapy. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter chart review was performed on all VA patients receiving sirolimus treatment from August, 2013 to January, 2021. Results: Before January 2017, 112 patients were treated with sirolimus without antibiotic prophylaxis. In the subsequent period, 195 patients were treated with TMP-SMZ for at least 12 months during sirolimus therapy. The percentage of patients with at least one serious infection during the initial 12 months of sirolimus treatment did not differ between the groups (difference, 1.1%; 95% CI − 7.0–8.0%). We observed no difference in the incidence of individual infection or total adverse events between the groups. The rate of sirolimus discontinuation due to adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: We demonstrated that prophylactic TMP-SMZ does not decrease the incidence of infection or improve tolerance in VA patients receiving sirolimus monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has been widely used in pediatric patients, but the safety of sirolimus in pediatric patients has not been well determined. Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate prospective studies reporting the safety of sirolimus in the treatment of childhood diseases. Methods: The following data were extracted in a standardized manner: study design, demographic characteristics, intervention, and safety outcomes. Results: In total, 9 studies were included, encompassing 575 patients who received oral sirolimus for at least 6 months. Various adverse events occurred. The most common adverse event was oral mucositis (8.2%, 95% CI: 0.054 to 0.110). Through comparative analysis of the subgroups based on the targeted concentration range, we discovered that many adverse events were significantly higher in the high concentration group (≥10 ng/mL) than in the low concentration group (<10 ng/mL) (p < 0.01). More interestingly, we found that oral mucositis was more frequently reported in children with vascular anomalies than tuberous sclerosis complex. Conclusions: This study shows that oral sirolimus in the treatment of childhood diseases is safe and reliable. However, sirolimus treatment in the pediatric population should be strictly monitored to reduce the occurrence of serious or fatal adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Kaposiform lymphangiomatosis (KLA), which is a new subtype of generalized lymphatic anomaly, is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Currently, there is no standard treatment due to the poor understanding of KLA. Sirolimus, which is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, has been shown to have promising potential in the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies. The aim of this study was to introduce the use of sirolimus for the treatment of KLA and to highlight the challenges of managing this refractory disease.Results: We reported seven patients with KLA who received sirolimus therapy in our center. Combined with previously reported cases, 58.3% achieved a partial response, 25.0% had stable disease, and 16.7% experienced disease progression. No severe sirolimus-related adverse events occurred during treatment.Conclusions: This study suggests that sirolimus is currently an option for the treatment of KLA, and it is hoped that more specific therapies will be developed in the future. Rapid advances in basic science and clinical practice may facilitate the development of important new treatments for KLA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Kaposiform haemangioendothelioma (KHE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening vascular tumour that is often associated with thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy, known as the Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon (KMP). Because of the rarity and complexity of KHE, the optimal paradigm for treating KHE has yet to be elucidated. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of vincristine and sirolimus for the treatment of KHE.Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted from January 1993 to June 2018. A total of 15 studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Five studies included 75 individuals and reported the response and side effects to vincristine in the treatment of KHE with or without KMP. A total of 10 studies that included 127 individuals reported the response and safety of sirolimus for treating KHE with or without KMP.Results: The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the effectiveness of vincristine was 0.72. The pooled OR for the effectiveness of sirolimus was 0.91. The side effects associated with vincristine during the treatment included neuropathy, abdominal pain, loss of appetite and mild elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The side effects associated with sirolimus therapy included bronchitis; lymphopenia; elevated AST, ALT and platelets; hyperlipidaemia; opportunistic infection; mild reversible leukopenia; mucositis; fever; pain and skin rash/vomiting and diarrhoea.Conclusions: This systematic review showed a high efficacy of vincristine and sirolimus in the treatment of KHE. Based on the available data in the literature, it appears that sirolimus is potentially an efficacious and safe treatment option for KHE. Further randomised, controlled trials are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sirolimus and everolimus have been widely used in children. These mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have shown excellent efficacy not only in organ transplant patients as immunosuppressive agents but also in patients with some other diseases. However, whether mTOR inhibitors can affect the growth and development of children is of great concern. In this study, using zebrafish models, we discovered that sirolimus and everolimus could slow the development of zebrafish, affecting indicators such as survival, hatching, deformities, body length, and movement. In addition to these basic indicators, sirolimus and everolimus had certain slowing effects on the growth and development of the nervous system, blood vessels, and the immune system. These effects were dose dependent. When the drug concentration reached or exceeded 0.5 μM, the impacts of sirolimus and everolimus were very significant. More interestingly, the impact was transient. Over time, the various manifestations of experimental embryos gradually approached those of control embryos. We also compared the effects of sirolimus and everolimus on zebrafish, and we revealed that there was no significant difference between these drugs in terms of their effects. In summary, the dose of sirolimus and everolimus in children should be strictly controlled, and the drug concentration should be monitored over time. Otherwise, drug overdosing may have a certain impact on the growth and development of children. • Sirolimus and everolimus had certain effects on the growth and development. • No significant difference between sirolimus and everolimus. • Standardize the drug dose and regularly monitor the blood drug concentration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]