Search

Abstract Background Risk stratification of kidney cancer patients after nephrectomy may tailor surveillance intensity and selection for adjuvant therapy. Transcriptomic approaches are effective in predicting recurrence, but whether they add value to clinicopathologic models remains unclear. Methods Data from patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Clinicopathologic variables were used to calculate SSIGN (stage, size, grade, and necrosis) scores. The 16 gene recurrence score (RS) signature was generated using RNA‐seq data. Transcriptomic risk groups were calculated using the original thresholds. SSIGN groups were divided into low, intermediate, and high risk. Disease‐free status was the primary endpoint assessed. Results SSIGN and RS were calculated for 428 patients with non‐metastatic ccRCC. SSIGN low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups demonstrated 2.7%, 15.2%, and 27.5%, 3‐year recurrence risk, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the RS was associated with disease‐free status (sub‐distribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.43 per 25 RS [95% CI (1.00–1.43)], p = 0.05). By risk groups, RS further risk stratified the SSIGN intermediate‐risk group (sHR 2.22 [95% CI 1.10–4.50], p = 0.03). SSIGN intermediate‐risk patients with low and high RS had a 3‐year recurrence rate of 8.0% and 25.2%, respectively. Within this risk group, the area under the curve (AUC) at 3 years was 0.69 for SSIGN, 0.74 for RS, and 0.78 for their combination. Conclusions Transcriptomic recurrence scores improve risk prediction even when controlling for clinicopathologic factors. Utility may be best suited for intermediate‐risk patients who have heterogeneous outcomes and further refinement for clinical utility is warranted.

Belzutifan was recently approved for the management of Von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL). Given the morbidity of recurrent treatment, systemic therapy to reduce or eliminate the need for surgery has been long-awaited. Herein, we sought to gain insight about future utilization by surveying VHL experts in the United States. A survey developed by members of the VHL Alliance (VHLA) Clinical Advisory Council was distributed to kidney cancer providers at VHLA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) centers. Surveys were administered on a secure web-based platform. A total of 60 respondents from 29 institutions participated. Urologists (50%) and medical oncologists (43%) represented the majority of participants. The majority (98%) of respondents anticipated that belzutifan’s approval would signifi-cantly change the current treatment landscape. Most reported that therapy should be continuous (76%). There was a difference in willingness to prescribe belzutifan by specialty (38% of urologists vs 91% of medical oncologists (P = 0.02). In individuals with renal tumors