Search

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and advancing cardiovascular disorder that impacts 1-2% of the worldwide population, particularly the elderly. Studies indicate that the intravenous administration of apelin may yield advantageous effects in preventing heart failure subsequent to myocardial injury. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of exogenous apelin administration on heart failure in animal models, in light of the lack of a definitive consensus on the matter. Method: An extensive search was performed in the Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases till the end of January 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and summarized the relevant articles. Outcomes related to cardiac function, including ejection fraction (EF), maximum and minimum rate of left ventricle systolic pressure (+dp/dt and –dp/dt, respectively), heart rate, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) were assessed. Findings were reported as a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: 12 studies were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated that early treatment with apelin following myocardial injury significantly increases +dp/dt (SMD = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.58 to 3.15; p < 0.001) and decreases -dp/dt (SMD = -3.31; 95% CI: -4.46 to -2.17; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the administration of apelin resulted in a significant increase in EF (SMD = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.44; p = 0.02) and LVSP (SMD = 2.09; 95% CI: 0.82 to 3.36; p < 0.001), while it led to a decrease in LVEDP in the animals (SMD = -1.85; 95% CI: -2.81 to -0.88; p < 0.001). Noteworthy, apelin treatment was shown to have no significant influence on the heart rate of the animals (SMD = -0.12; 95% CI: -0.82 to -0.58; p = 0.73). Conclusion: The current study demonstrated that the early administration of apelin has the potential to improve cardiac function and mitigate the onset of heart failure subsequent to myocardial injury. Further, in vivo research is essential to lay the groundwork for the integration of apelin into clinical practice.

Introduction: A comprehensive conclusion has yet to be made about the predictive value of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for stroke/systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to review the evidence for evaluating the value of NT-proBNP in predicting the risk of stroke/SEE in patients with AF through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: Two independent reviewers screened all relevant studies that were retrieved from the database of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until December 7th, 2021. The predictive value of NT-proBNP in the prediction of stroke/SEE was recorded as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Nine articles (38,093 patients, 3.10% stroke/SEE) were included in our analysis. There was no publication bias in these studies (P=0.320). Our analysis showed that NT-proBNP can be a good predictor of stroke/SEE risk in AF patients, even at different cut-off values (HR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.51, 2.02; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that diabetes could have a possible effect on the predictive value of NT-proBNP (meta-regression coefficient = 0.042; P = 0.037). Conclusion: Measurement of NT-proBNP during the first admission could be used to assess the short- or long-term risk of stroke/SEE in patients with AF. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible applicability of serum NT-proBNP measurement in the settings in which stroke is the sole outcome of the investigation.

Introduction: Hypertension is a medical emergency that requires immediate medical attention. Recent studies have suggested that peripheral injection of Apelin may lower blood pressure. However, there is no comprehensive conclusion on the role of Apelin in treatment of hypertension. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of Apelin on blood pressure in animal studies. Method: Extensive search and data gathering were conducted using keywords related to blood pressure and Apelin on Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases at the end of July 2022. Two researchers screened and summarized the articles independently. Analysis was then conducted based on Apelin dose, route of administration, and follow-up. The findings were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Data from 10 animal studies were included in the present systematic review. Time interval between Apelin administration and blood pressure assessment was 1 to 21 minutes. Findings showed that administration of Apelin immediately reduces mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD=-3.13; 95% CI: -4.43 to -1.82; p