Search

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) with bicanalicular silicone tube intubation for treating chronic dacryocystitis secondary to nasolacrimal duct stent (NDS) incarceration. METHODS: En-DCRs were performed on 44 chronic dacryocystitis patients (46 eyes) secondary to NDS incarceration from April 2016 to October 2022. The granuloma and scar tissues were separated, and the removal of NDS incarceration was achieved during the surgery; the flap of the lacrimal sac was trimmed and anastomosed with nasal mucosal, a bicanalicular silicone tube was implanted, and lacrimal size and condition were assessed. The tube was removed 3mo after surgery. During the final follow-up of 12mo when the surgery was completed, the complications and the rates of surgical success were assessed. RESULTS: This study covered 40 patients (42 eyes). Intraoperatively, it was found that the lacrimal sac became small, and the sac wall had granulation and scar tissue attached to the incarcerated NDS in all eyes. At 12mo after surgery completed, the rates of the functional and anatomical success reached 80.95% (34/42) and 83.33% (35/42), respectively. Under the effect of intranasal ostial closure, seven eyes failed to achieve anatomical success. No serious complications (e.g., visual impairment, sinusitis, and orbital fat prolapse) was observed. CONCLUSION: With the success rate over 80% and no serious complications, En-DCR with bicanalicular silicone tube implantation is effective in treating chronic dacryocystitis secondary to NDS incarceration.

AIM: To investigate the effect of bicanalicular silicone tube intubation (BSTI) in the treatment of functional epiphora after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR). METHODS: Clinical data of 84 patients (95 eyes) with functional epiphora after En-DCR were retrospectively analyzed. Functional epiphora was confirmed as persistent or recurrent epiphora by fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT), lacrimal irrigation test, as well as endoscopic examination. Secondary BSTIs were recommended for patients with functional epiphora. These tubes were removed 1mo after surgery. Functional success and associated complications were assessed after 2y of follow-up. RESULTS: Seven patients (9 eyes) refused intervention, 5 patients (6 eyes) did not complete postoperative follow-up, and 1 patient (1 eye) developed tube prolapse within 1mo after surgery. Seventy-one patients (79 eyes) were included at last. Functional success ratios at six months, one year, as well as two years post-operation were 94.9% (75/79), 92.4% (73/79), and 91.1% (72/79), respectively. Three eyes presented with punctal slitting (2 eyes without epiphora), 1 eye with proximal canaliculus slitting, 1 eye with canaliculus stenosis and 4 eyes with still present functional epiphora without detectable abnormal at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Secondary intubation is an effective procedure with low recurrence probability for functional epiphora after En-DCR. Punctal and canaliculus injury are the main tube-associated complications after secondary intubation.

Objectives:To identify microbiological growth on bicanalicular silicone tubes (BST) placed during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery and to analyze the association between culture results and surgical outcomes and BST removal time.Materials and Methods:A total of 80 lacrimal drainage systems of 68 patients who had external DCR with bicanalicular silicone intubation were included the study. Twenty-five tubes (31.3%) were removed up to 8 weeks, 28 tubes (35.0%) were removed between 9 and 11 weeks, and the remaining 27 tubes (33.7%) were removed 12 weeks or more after surgery. The tubes were transferred to Stuart medium and sent for microbiologic examination. The disc diffusion method was used to determine antibiotic resistance.Results:Culture positivity was observed for 96.2% of the tubes. Among a total of 109 isolates, 63 were gram-positive bacteria (57.8%), 37 were gram-negative bacteria (34%), and 9 were fungi (8.2%). The most commonly isolated gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (66.6%) and Enterobacter spp. (29.7%), respectively. Penicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline resistances were higher among gram-positive pathogens. Cephalothin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and ampicillin resistances were higher among gram-negative pathogens. There was no significant difference in terms of the microbiological profile between the three groups of removed tubes. Haemophilus influenzae was isolated at a significantly higher rate in patients with surgical failure (p=0.04).Conclusion:Although a variety of agents were isolated from removed BST, gram-positive organisms were more frequent than gramnegatives and fungi. S. aureus and Enterobacter were the most common gram-positive and gram-negative isolates. Later BST removal was associated with the isolation of significantly more bacterial strains per tube. There was no correlation between multiple infections and surgical failure. H. influenzae was more common in failed DCR cases.