Search

Abstract Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss in the elderly, with dry AMD (d-AMD) leading to geographic atrophy (GA) and significant visual impairment. Multimodal imaging plays a crucial role in d-AMD diagnosis and management, allowing for detailed classification of patient phenotypes and aiding in treatment planning and prognosis determination. Treatment approaches for d-AMD have recently witnessed profound change with the development of specific drugs targeting the complement cascade, with the first anticomplement agents recently approved for GA treatment. Additionally, emerging strategies such as gene therapy and laser treatments may offer potential benefits, though further research is needed to fully establish their efficacy. However, the lack of effective therapies capable of restoring damaged retinal cells remains a major challenge. In the future, genetic treatments aimed at preventing the progression of d-AMD may emerge as a powerful approach. Currently, however, their development is still in the early stages.

Abstract Introduction To characterize the response to antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of macular neovascularization (MNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with subclinical angioid streaks (AS) during a 2-year follow-up. Methods Retrospective, longitudinal, case-control, and multicentric study. Among a cohort of neovascular AMD population, we selected patients with subclinical AS and treatment-naïve MNV treated with anti-VEGF for a 2-year follow-up. An age- and sex-matched control group with treatment-naïve MNV secondary to AMD without subclinical AS was selected. Demographics and differences in treatment response (i.e., number of injections needed, anatomical and functional outcomes) between the two groups were analyzed. Results Among 102 eyes of 102 patients with neovascular AMD, 34 eyes of 34 patients (82 ± 6 years old) were included in the subclinical AS group, whereas 68 eyes of 68 patients (81 ± 6 years old, p = 0.342) in the control group. All eyes with subclinical AS presented RPD compared to 56% of eyes without subclinical AS (p