Search

Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard treatment for rectal cancer. Although TME has managed to decrease the rates of local recurrence after rectal cancer resection, local recurrence is still recorded at varying rates. The present study aimed to validate the PREDICT score in the prediction of local recurrence of rectal cancer after TME with curative intent., Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study on patients with nonmetastatic low or middle rectal cancer who underwent TME. The total PREDICT score was calculated for every patient and related to the onset of local recurrence. According to the final score, patients were allocated to one of three risk groups: low, moderate, and high, and the rates of local recurrence in each group were calculated and compared., Results: The present study included 262 patients (50.4% males) with a mean age of 47.1 years. The overall local recurrence rate was 12.6%. 29.4% of patients were in the low-risk group, 63.7% in the moderate-risk group, and 6.9% in the high-risk group. The local recurrence rate was 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-10.9) in the low-risk group, 13.2% (95% CI: 8.4-19.3) in the moderate risk group, and 44.4% (95% CI: 21.5-69.2) in the high-risk group (p < 0.0001). The sensitivity of the PREDICT score was 72.7%, the specificity was 88.1%, and the accuracy was 86.3%., Conclusions: The PREDICT score had good diagnostic accuracy in the prediction of local recurrence after TME and a good discriminatory ability in the differentiation between patients at different risks to develop local recurrence., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Early-onset colon and rectal cancer has increased in alarming rates. The present study reviewed the characteristics and outcome of early-onset rectal cancer in patients aged ≤40 years., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study on rectal cancer patients who were treated in a tertiary center in the Middle East. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤40 years were compared with patients >40 years. Main outcome measures were patients' and tumor characteristics, local recurrence, distance metastasis, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)., Results: Among 244 patients with rectal cancer, 81 (33.2%) aged 40 years or less. 56.8% of patients ≤40 years and 49.7% of patients >40 years presented with stage III/IV disease (p = 0.36). Local recurrence and distant metastasis were detected in 10.3% and 13.2% of patients ≤40 years and in 16.9% and 13.9% of patients >40 years (p = 0.29 and 0.88). The 3-year OS and DFS rates of patients ≤40 years were 75% and 80.9% versus 74.2% and 76.5% in patients >40 years (p = 0.9 and 0.59). Patients ≤40 years presented with ulcerative carcinoma (38.3% vs 21.5%, p = 0.01) and signet-ring carcinoma (12.3% vs 2.5%, p = 0.008) more than patients > 40 years., Conclusion: Early-onset rectal cancer accounted for one-third of all patients presenting with rectal cancer. Patients younger than 40 years had higher incidence of mucinous and signet-ring rectal carcinoma, and presented more with advanced stage. The age of patients did not have a significant impact on the oncologic outcome of rectal cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) faced many obstacles in obese male with narrow pelvis and bulky mesorectum with increased risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) and distal resection margin (DRM). Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is reported to result in a better quality total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen, lower incidence of CRM and DRM involvement, and higher rates of sphincter preservation. To date, there is still a debate about the feasibility and efficacy of transanal versus the laparoscopic approach for TME in middle and low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective controlled clinical trial where 38 patients of middle or low rectal cancer from two tertiary centers were nonrandomly assigned to either TaTME or LapTME. Results: Eighteen patients were operated by TaTME versus 20 patients by LapTME. Mean body mass index was significantly higher in the TaTME group (30.74 ± 7.79) than in the LapTME group (25.99 ± 4.68) ( P  = .03). TaTME was associated with more transanal specimen extraction (55.5% versus 20%, P  = .06). No significant differences were detected in CRM, DRM, peri- or postoperative complications, or conversion rates with more reported Clavien-Dindo grade III complications in the TaTME group ( P  = .29). Conclusions: TaTME facilitated rectal cancer surgery in obese patients and increased the chance of transanal specimen extraction with equivalent oncological outcomes to conventional LapTME. Further studies are recommended to build better evidence.

Introduction: The introduction of new energy vessel sealing devices in minimally invasive proctectomy led to better hemostatic effect, less blood loss, and shorter operating time. At present, the available evidence from literature about the use of electro-thermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS) in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is weak where most studies are retrospective with non-homogenous patient groups., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study where 40 rectal cancer patients operated by laparoscopic TME or laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision were classified in two groups according to approach of inferior mesenteric vessels ligation (EBVS versus Clipping)., Results: The operative time was significantly longer and the blood loss was significantly more in the EBVS group. However, hospital stay, time to oral, time to starting stoma function, and number of retrieved lymph nodes were not significantly affected by the method of vascular control., Conclusion: Both methods for control of vascular pedicle during minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery are safe, as such it is at the discretion of the operating surgeon to which method to use. Prospective well-designed trials are awaited to provide stronger evidence., (Copyright: © 2020 Permanyer.)

Background: Rectal cancer is now an increasing problem in both developed and developing countries. In the last 7 years, minimally invasive surgery for this disease has entered a new era of transanal resection with/without laparoscopic assistance., Materials and Methods: We present here a prospective study done in Egypt (probably the earliest experience) and Spain on the feasibility of hybrid NOTES in rectal cancer., Results: From September 2015 till November 2017, 18 cases underwent transanal total mesorectal excision with no detected mortality and with morbidities in 44% of cases, from which 5 were class III on Clavien-Dindo scale requiring intervention. Good quality total mesorectal excision was obtained in more than three quarters of our patients., Conclusions: In our experience, the technique was technically demanding with a long learning curve; however, the short term results were very good in alliance with other few similar reports.