Search

Aim: There are limited outcome data for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), particularly in the West. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic LPLND at a single cancer centre., Method: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing robotic LPLND for rectal cancer between November 2012 and February 2020 was performed. The main outcomes were short-term perioperative and oncological outcomes. Major morbidity was defined as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or above., Results: Forty patients underwent robotic LPLND during the study period. The mean age was 54 years (SD ± 15 years) and 13 (31.0%) were female. The median body mass index was 28.6 kg/m 2 (IQR 25.5-32.6 kg/m 2 ). Neoadjuvant CRT was performed in all patients. Resection of the primary rectal cancer and concurrent LPLND occurred in 36 (90.0%) patients, whilst the remaining 4 (10.0%) patients had subsequent LPLND after prior rectal resection. The median operating time was 420 min (IQR 313-540 min), estimated blood loss was 150 ml (IQR 55-200 ml) and length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 3-6 days). The major morbidity rate was 10.0% (n = 4). The median lymph node harvest from the LPLND was 6 (IQR 3-9) and 13 (32.5%) patients had one or more positive LPLNs. The median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 5-33 months), with 1 (2.5%) local central recurrence and 7 (17.5%) patients developing distant disease, resulting in 3 (7.5%) deaths., Conclusion: Robotic LPLND for rectal cancer can be performed in Western patients to completely resect extra-mesorectal LPLNs and is associated with acceptable perioperative morbidity., (© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: The primary results of our phase II randomized trial suggested that compared with conventional preoperative chemoradiation (CRT), the addition of chemotherapy (CT) before CRT and surgery allows most patients receive their planned treatment with a better toxicity profile without compromising the pathological complete response and complete resection rates. We now report the 5-year outcomes., Patients and Methods: Patients with distal or middle third, T3-T4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma selected by magnetic resonance imaging, were randomly assigned to arm A-preoperative CRT followed by surgery and four cycles of postoperative adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX)-or arm B-four cycles of CAPOX followed by CRT and surgery. The following 5-year actuarial outcomes were assessed: the cumulative incidence of local relapse (LR) and distant metastases (DM), disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 108 eligible patients were randomly assigned to arm A (n = 52) or arm B (n = 56). With a median follow-up of 69.5 months, 5-year DFS was 64% in arm A and 62% in arm B (P = 0.85) and 5-year OS was 78% in arm A and 75% in arm B (P = 0.64). The 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 2% and 5% (P = 0.61) and 5-year cumulative incidence of DM was 21% and 23%; (P = 0.79) in arms A and B, respectively., Conclusion: Both treatment approaches yield similar outcomes. Given the lower acute toxicity and improved compliance with induction CT compared with adjuvant CT, integrating effective systemic therapy before CRT and surgery is a promising strategy and should be examined in phase III trials., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Knowledge of the biology and management of rectal cancer continues to improve. A multidisciplinary approach to a patient with rectal cancer by an experienced expert team is mandatory, to assure optimal diagnosis and staging, surgery, selection of the appropriate neo-adjuvant and adjuvant strategy and chemotherapeutic management. Moreover, optimal symptom management also requires a dedicated team of health care professionals. The introduction of total mesorectal excision has been associated with a decrease in the rate of local failure after surgery. High quality surgery and the achievement of pathological measures of quality are a prerequisite to adequate locoregional control. There are now randomized data in favour of chemoradiotherapy or short course radiotherapy in the preoperative setting. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is more beneficial and has less toxicity for patients with resectable rectal cancer than postoperative chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore chemoradiotherapy leads also to downsizing of locally advanced rectal cancer. New strategies that decrease the likelihood of distant metastases after initial treatment need be developed with high priority. Those involved in the care for patients with rectal cancer should be encouraged to participate in well-designed clinical trials, to increase the evidence-based knowledge and to make further progress. Health care workers involved in the care of rectal cancer patients should be encouraged to adopt quality control processes leading to increased expertise.

There are two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer. First is surgery and, if the tumor is in stage T3 or N1-2, this is followed by postoperative combined modality therapy. The second is preoperative combined modality therapy followed by surgery and postoperative combined modality therapy if the tumor is classified at ultrasound as uT3-4 or N+. A number of new chemotherapeutic agents have been developed for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Ongoing phase I and II trials are examining the use of these new chemotherapeutic agents in combination with pelvic radiation therapy, most commonly in the preoperative setting; early results suggest that the complete response rates are higher. Based on results from phase I and II trials, the standard regimen for patients who receive combined modality therapy is continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and pelvic radiation. Regimens using CPT-11 or oxaliplatin-based combined modality therapy plus either continuous infusion 5-FU or capecitibine are under active development.

In North America there are two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer. First is surgery and, if the tumour is T3 and/or N1-2, this is followed by postoperative combined modality therapy. The second, for patients with ultrasound T3 or clinical T4 disease, is pre-operative combined modality therapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Pre-operative therapy (most commonly combined modality therapy) has gained acceptance as a standard adjuvant therapy. The potential advantages of this approach compared with postoperative therapy include less acute toxicity and enhanced sphincter preservation. Recently completed randomized trials in the US and Germany will provide a definitive answer to this theory. In contrast to the combined modality approach to pre-operative therapy a number of European centres advocate an intensive short course of radiation (5 Gy x 5 followed one week later by surgery). The only randomized trial which has revealed a significant advantage in survival is the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. The Dutch CKVO 95-04 TME trial did not confirm a survival advantage and two metanalyses report conflicting results. Due to selection bias, it is not possible accurately to compare the local recurrence and survival results of intensive short course radiation with conventional pre-operative combined modality therapy. The intensive short course radiation approach is not used in North America due to its higher toxicity and lack of sphincter preservation. In the Dutch trial the 5-year local recurrence was 12% with TME and was significantly decreased to 6% with pre-operative radiation. The 5-year local recurrence rate in the 324 patients with stage III disease who underwent a TME alone with negative margins was 20%. Therefore, despite TME surgery, radiation therapy is still a necessary component in the adjuvant management of rectal cancer.

Background: Although sharp mesorectal excision reduces circumferential margin involvement and local recurrence, a concomitant partial vaginectomy may be required in women with locally advanced rectal cancer., Methods: Sixty-four patients requiring a partial vaginectomy during resection of primary rectal cancer were identified. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and distributions were compared by the log-rank test., Results: Locally advanced disease was reflected by presentation with malignant rectovaginal fistulae (n = 6) or cancers described as bulky or adherent/tethered to the rectovaginal septum (n = 32). Thirty-five patients received adjuvant radiation with or without chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 22 months, 27 (42%) patients developed recurrent disease, with most of these occurring at distant sites. The 5-year overall survival was 46%, with a median survival of 44 months. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival was 84%. The crude local failure rate was 16% (10 of 64), and local recurrence was more common in patients with a positive as opposed to a negative microscopic margin (2 [50%] of 4 vs. 8 [13%] of 60, respectively). Positive nodal status had a significant effect on overall survival (P <.001)., Conclusions: Partial vaginectomy is indicated for locally advanced rectal cancers involving the vagina. The results are most favorable in patients with negative surgical margins and node-negative disease.

Background and Aims: To evaluate the clinical outcome of selected patients with distal rectal cancer treated by preoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy and full-thickness local excision (FTLE)., Patients and Methods: Ten patients with invasive distal rectal cancer (six T2, four T3) were treated with preoperative radiotherapy (3600-5040 cGy) with or without 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. FTLE was performed 4-6 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, primarily because of comorbid diseases or patient refusal of a permanent colostomy. Median follow-up was 28.5 months., Results: There were no prolonged wound complications, and only one positive microscopic margin was detected. Among three cases of complete pathological response, two remain without evidence of disease. All patients retained sphincter function and avoided creation of a stoma. Two patients developed recurrence, one with widespread disease including pelvic recurrence 26 months after surgery and the other with distant disease only at 23 months. There were four deaths: two unrelated to cancer, one of undetermined cause after 7 years, and one after widespread recurrence at 26 months, with death 4 months later. Two-year actuarial survival was 78%., Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that preoperative radiotherapy and FTLE avoids major abdominal surgery yet facilitates sphincter preservation, excision with negative margins, and short-term local control in selected patients with distal rectal cancer.

Purpose: To examine the relationship between patient characteristics and the use of adjuvant pelvic radiation with and without chemotherapy among patients aged 65 years and older with stage II and III rectal cancer., Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database identified 1,411 patients aged 65 and older with resected stage II and III rectal cancers diagnosed between 1992 and 1996. From claims submitted to Medicare, we measured the use of pelvic radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy and pre- or postoperatively., Results: Fifty-seven percent of patients received radiation, 42% received chemotherapy and radiation, and 7% had treatment delivered preoperatively. Age was the strongest determinant of treatment: 73% of patients aged 65 to 69, 66% aged 70 to 75, 52% aged 75 to 79, 39% aged 80 to 84, and 21% aged 85 to 89 received radiation. The age trend remained strong after adjusting for other factors that predict receipt of treatment and after exclusion of patients with any evident comorbidity (P <.001). Patients were more likely to receive radiation treatment if they had an abdominal perineal resection, stage III disease, or a T4 tumor., Conclusion: Because pelvic recurrences are a substantial cause of morbidity, further efforts are needed to ensure that elderly patients have the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding adjuvant treatment.

Combined modality therapy is an effective adjuvant therapy for many patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer. The indications for adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer are based on the pattern of failure after surgery. Despite radical surgery, local-regional failure frequently occurs in patients with transmural or node-positive rectal cancers. The incidence of treatment failure in the pelvis is directly correlated with the extent of transmural penetration (microscopic vs gross) and the additional risk of lymph node metastases. In the post-operative setting its use is dictated by pathologic stage and the type of operation (i.e. conventional surgery or a local excision). The choice of which post-operative adjuvant regimen to recommend in the non-protocol setting remains controversial. If 5-FU alone is used, then it is best administered by continuous infusion. In the preoperative setting, the use of adjuvant therapy depends on the clinical stage and the need for sphincter preservation. Phase I/II trials examining the use of newer chemotherapeutic agents such as Tomudex, UFT/leucovorin, CPT-11, oxaliplatin, eniluracil and capecitabine with preoperative radiation therapy are in progress. This review examines both the selection criteria and results of adjuvant combined modality therapy for patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer.

The standard surgical treatment of distal, resectable, invasive rectal cancers is an abdominoperineal resection or a low anterior resection. Given the morbidity associated with these standard treatments and the frequent need for postoperative adjuvant therapy, the use of a more conservative approach, such as local excision with adjuvant therapy as primary therapy for selected cases of rectal cancer is appealing. Data from single-institution series as well as recent data from prospective, multi-institutional studies, suggest that local excision with adjuvant therapy is a reasonable alternative to radical surgery in selected patients. Local excision alone is acceptable treatment only for T1 tumors without adverse pathologic features, while local excision with adjuvant therapy is an alternative treatment for T1 tumors with adverse pathologic features and T2 tumors. Some series suggest that preoperative therapy with local excision may be a possible treatment for selected T3 tumors; however, the high local failure rates seen in T3 tumors treated with local excision and postoperative therapy cautions against this approach. Functional results with local excision are generally good, and postoperative morbidity and mortality is acceptable. In summary, the results of local excision and radiation therapy are encouraging. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether this approach has local control and survival rates comparable to those of radical surgery.

Purpose: To determine the acute toxicity, outcome, and sphincter preservation rates in patients with clinically resectable uT3 adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with preoperative combined modality therapy., Methods and Materials: A total of 72 patients were treated from 12/90-7/98 with preoperative 50.4 Gy plus 2 cycles of concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) bolus daily x 5 followed by sharp or total mesorectal excision and 4 cycles of postoperative 5-FU and LV., Results: Individual Grade 3+ toxicities during preoperative therapy included diarrhea, 11%; bowel movements, 9%; leukopenia, 18%; tenesmus, 1%; and thrombocytopenia, 1%. Total Grade 3+ toxicity was 28%. The pathologic complete response (CR) rate was 13%, and an additional 9% had a clinical CR for a total CR rate of 22%. Of the 35 patients who were judged clinically by their operating surgeon to require an abdominoperineal resection (APR) and were therefore treated with the goal of sphincter preservation, 89% were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery. Of the 21 patients eligible for analysis, 81% had good to excellent sphincter function. The 3-year actuarial patterns of failure were 2% local, 8% abdominal, and 13% distant. The 3-year actuarial survival was 95%., Conclusions: Our data confirm our preliminary reports of encouraging rates of acute toxicity, local control, survival, sphincter preservation and function with preoperative combined modality therapy. It is an alternative approach for the treatment of uT3 clinically resectable rectal cancer.

Postoperative combined-modality therapy with fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation therapy is accepted practice for high-risk rectal cancer. Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy alone may improve pelvic control, but is not associated with an improvement in survival. Protracted infusional 5-FU has been associated with decreased tumor recurrence and improved survival when combined with postoperative adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy. The use of new drugs and alternative ways of administering 5-FU is desirable. UFT plus leucovorin is an oral 5-FU prodrug with efficacy equal to 5-FU plus leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer. A combination of postoperative adjuvant UFT plus leucovorin concurrent with radiation therapy should be feasible, and the design of an ongoing phase I trial is presented.

Purpose: Management of locally recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma represents a significant challenge. Many of these tumors adhere to or invade into vital pelvic structures rendering surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as palliative treatment. Therefore, a treatment approach was developed to evaluate the role of high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (HDR-IORT) and surgery as a component of therapy in the management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer. This is an update of our preliminary report with longer follow-up and larger patient numbers., Methods and Materials: Between January 1992 and September 1998, 74 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with surgery and HDR-IORT. Additional EBRT was given to 29 patients, and 33 patients received 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. All patients underwent complete gross resection, and 21 of 74 had positive microscopic margin. The dose of HDR-IORT ranged from 10 to 18 Gy., Results: With a median follow-up of 22 months, the 5-year local control, distant metastasis disease-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 39%, 39%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. The only predictor of improved local control was a negative margin of resection with a 5-year local control rate of 43%, compared to 26% in those with positive margin (p = 0.02). For overall survival, a negative microscopic margin (p = 0.04) and the use of IORT + EBRT (p = 0.04) were significant predictors of improved survival. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 16%., Conclusion: The results with HDR-IORT in this group of patients are encouraging. Further improvements in local and distant control are still needed.

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the ability of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to assess extent of pathologically confirmed rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy., Methods: Patients with primary rectal cancer deemed eligible for preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy because of a clinically bulky or tethered tumor or endorectal ultrasound evidence of T3 and/or N1 were prospectively enrolled. Positron emission tomography and CT scans were obtained before preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (5,040 cGy to the pelvis and 2 cycles of bolus 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin) and repeated four to five weeks after completion of radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. In addition to routine pathologic staging, detailed assessment of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was performed independently by two pathologists. Positron emission tomography parameters studied included conventional measures such as standardized uptake value (average and maximum), positron emission tomography-derived tumor volume (size), and two novel parameters: visual response score and change in total lesion glycolysis., Results: Of 21 patients enrolled, prospective data (pretreatment and posttreatment positron emission tomography, and complete pathologic assessment) were available on 15 patients. All 15 demonstrated pathologic response to preoperative radiation and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. This was confirmed in 100 percent of the cases by positron emission tomography compared with 78 percent (7/9) by CT. In addition, one positron emission tomography parameter (visual response score) accurately estimated the extent of pathologic response in 60 percent (9/15) of cases compared with 22 percent (2/9) of cases with CT., Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging adds incremental information to the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal cancer. However, further studies in a larger series of patients are needed to verify these findings and to determine the value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in a preoperative strategy aimed at identifying patients suitable for sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery.

Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy following resection of T3N0 rectal cancer is recommended in order to reduce the incidence of local recurrence and improve survival. However, recent experience with rectal cancer resection utilizing sharp dissection and total mesorectal excision has resulted in a reduction in local recurrence rates to as low as 5% without adjuvant treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine if rectal cancer resection utilizing sharp mesorectal excision alone is adequate treatment for local control of T3N0 rectal cancer. Between July 1986 and December 1993, 95 patients with T3N0M0 rectal cancer underwent resection with sharp mesorectal excision and did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Various prognostic factors were analyzed for their association with local recurrence and survival. Seventy-nine patients had a low anterior resection, 10 of whom had a coloanal anastomosis, and 16 had an abdominoperineal resection. The median follow-up was 53.3 months. Six patients had local recurrence, 12 had distant recurrence, and three had local and distant recurrences. The overall local recurrence rate was 9% crude and 12% 5-year actuarial. The overall crude recurrence rate was 22%. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 86.6% with an overall survival of 75%. Postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (19%). Five patients (6%) had a documented anastomotic leak. Perioperative mortality was 3%. No technical factors, including type of resection (low anterior vs. abdominoperineal), location of tumor, or extent of resection margin, were significant for determining local recurrence. The only histopathologic marker significant for determining local recurrence was lymphatic invasion (P <0.04). Sharp mesorectal excision with low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection for T3N0M0 rectal cancer results in a local recurrence rate of less than 10% without the use of adjuvant therapy. Therefore, in select patients with T3N0M0 rectal cancer, the standard use of adjuvant therapy for local control may not be justified.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with leiomyosarcoma of the rectum or anus treated with local excision and brachytherapy., Methods: Eight patients with leiomyosarcoma of the rectum (7 patients) or anus (1 patient) were treated with a transanal excision followed by a temporary iridium-192 interstitial implant to 4,500 cGy. Median tumor size was 4.2 (range, 1.5-5) cm. Margins were positive in six patients, negative in one patient, and close in one patient., Results: With a median follow-up of 53 months, median survival time was 53 months and the three-year actuarial survival rate was 71 percent. The cumulative incidence of failure as a component of failure for local was 25 percent (2/8), for abdominal was 0 percent (0/8), and for distant was 25 percent (2/8). Four patients eligible for functional analysis all had excellent sphincter function (1-2 bowel movements per day, no soilage)., Conclusion: In selected patients the use of conservative surgery followed by brachytherapy is a reasonable alternative to an abdominoperineal resection. However, more experience and longer follow-up are needed before this approach can be recommended routinely.

Combined modality therapy is the standard adjuvant therapy for selected patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum. In the postoperative setting, the primary goal is to decrease local recurrence and improve overall survival. In the preoperative setting, adjuvant therapy has the additional potential benefit of enhancing sphincter preservation and less acute toxicity as compared with postoperative adjuvant therapy. Investigational trials are in progress to examine new systemic chemotherapeutic agents and altered radiation fractionation schemes., (Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

For patients with clinically resectable stage T3 and/or node-positive rectal cancer, adjuvant radiation therapy decreases the rate of local recurrence. The addition of systemic chemotherapy further enhances local control and improves survival. Compared with postoperative therapy, preoperative treatment may have less toxicity and may increase the chance of sphincter preservation. The acute and long-term toxicity of pelvic radiation is related to the technique of delivery. Therefore, appropriate conventional radiation doses and techniques are recommended. Randomized trials comparing preoperative and postoperative combined modality therapy are in progress.

A number of advances have been made in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer. Whereas pelvic radiation therapy has been shown to increase local control in patients with clinically resectable disease, systemic chemotherapy is needed in addition to further improve local control and overall survival. In this review, the experience treating patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer in the postoperative adjuvant setting will be examined. Data from ongoing and recently completed randomized trials as well as the design of innovative phase I/II programs will be discussed.

Background: To determine the local control, survival, and functional outcome of local excision plus postoperative therapy for patients with rectal cancer., Methods: A total of 39 patients underwent a local excision (2 with snare excision of a T1 polyp and 37 with full-thickness local excision) followed by postoperative radiation therapy +/- 5-FU-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 41 months, and 11 patients had positive margins., Results: The 5-year actuarial colostomy-free survival was 87% and overall survival was 70%. Crude local failure increased with T stage: 0% T1, 24% T2, and 25% T3. Of the 8 patients (21%) who developed local failure, 5 underwent salvage APR and were locally controlled. Actuarial local failure at 5 years was 31% for T2 disease and 27% for the total patient group. In the 32 patients with an intact sphincter, 94% had good to excellent sphincter function., Conclusion: Although local failure in patients with T2 tumors has increased since our prior report, the survival, sphincter function, and local salvage rates are acceptable. Local excision and postoperative therapy remains a reasonable alternative to APR in selected patients.

Purpose: Although local excision can be curative in patients with early-stage rectal cancer, approximately 20 percent of patients will develop local recurrence, many as a result of unrecognized and unresected regional lymph node metastases. Our objective was to determine if standard pathologic factors can predict lymph node metastases in small intramural rectal cancers and provide a basis for patient selection for nonradical surgery., Methods: Between June 1986 and September 1996, 318 patients with T1 or T2 rectal cancers underwent radical resection at our institution. Of these, 159 patients (48 T1 and 111 T2) were potentially eligible for curative local excision (< or =4 cm in size, < or =10 cm from the anal verge, no synchronous metastases), and the prevalence of lymph node metastases based on T stage and other pathologic factors was analyzed in this group., Results: The overall frequency of lymph node metastasis was 15 percent (24/159 patients). T stage (T1, 10 percent; T2, 17 percent), differentiation (well-differentiated or moderately differentiated, 14 percent and poorly differentiated, 30 percent), and lymphatic vessel invasion (lymphatic vessel invasion-negative, 14 percent and lymphatic vessel invasion-positive, 33 percent) influenced the risk of lymph node metastasis. However, only blood vessel invasion (blood vessel invasion-negative, 13 percent and blood vessel invasion-positive, 33 percent) reached statistical significance as a single predictive factor (P=0.04). Tumors with no adverse pathologic features (low-risk group) had a lower overall frequency of lymph node metastasis (11 percent) compared with the remaining tumors (high-risk group, 31 percent; P=0.008). However, even in the most favorable group (T1 cancers with no adverse pathologic features) lymph node metastases were present in 7 percent of patients., Conclusion: In rectal cancer patients potentially eligible for local excision, the overall risk of undetected and untreated lymph node metastases is considerable (15 percent). The use of pathologic factors alone after local excision does not reliably assure the absence of lymph node metastases.

Background: Local recurrence after resection of rectal carcinoma is a difficult clinical problem that adversely affects both survival and quality of life. Surgical resection is possible for a subset of patients with localized recurrences. We reviewed our experience with surgical salvage of recurrent rectal carcinoma, to determine predictors of resectability and postsalvage survival rates., Methods: A 10-year, retrospective analysis of 131 patients who underwent exploration with curative intent for local recurrence after radical resection of rectal carcinomas, in a single referral institution, was performed. Preoperative and pathological factors were examined for their ability to predict postresection survival rates and resectability., Results: The overall 5-year survival rate for patients who underwent exploration with curative intent was 24%. Resection of recurrent disease was possible for 103 of 131 (79%) patients, with a resulting 5-year survival rate of 31%. Patients who were treated initially with abdomino-perineal resection (n = 35) presented later and were less likely to have resectable tumors than were those treated initially with some form of sphincter-preserving resection (n = 96). Among patients who could undergo resection, normal carcinoembryonic antigen levels and recurrent disease limited to the bowel wall were both favorable features., Conclusions: Surgical salvage of local recurrence after radical resection of rectal carcinoma can be performed safely and can result in substantial long-term survival benefits for selected patients.

Purpose: Primary unresectable and locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer presents a significant clinical challenge. Local failure rates are high in both situations. Under such circumstances, there is a significant need to safely deliver tumoricidal doses of radiation in an attempt to improve local control. For this reason, we have incorporated a new approach utilizing high dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT)., Methods and Materials: Between 11/92-12/96, a total of 112 patients were explored, of which 68 patients were treated with HDR-IORT, and 66 are evaluable. The majority of the 44 patients were excluded for unresectable disease or for distant metastases which eluded preoperative imaging. There were 22 patients with primary unresectable disease, and 46 patients who presented with recurrent disease. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 64 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma in four patients. In general, the patients with primary unresectable disease received preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, and external beam irradiation to 4500-5040 cGy, followed by surgical resection and HDR-IORT (1000-2000 cGy). In general, the patients with recurrent disease were treated with surgical resection and HDR-IORT (1000-2000 cGy) alone. All surgical procedures were done in a dedicated operating room in the brachytherapy suite, so that HDR-IORT could be delivered using the Harrison-Anderson-Mick (HAM) applicator. The median follow-up is 17.5 months (1-48 mo)., Results: In primary cases, the actuarial 2-year local control is 81%. For patients with negative margins, the local control was 92% vs. 38% for those with positive margins (p = 0.002). The 2-year actuarial disease-free survival was 69%; 77% for patients with negative margins vs. 38% for patients with positive margins (p = 0.03). For patients with recurrent disease, the 2-year actuarial local control rate was 63%. For patients with negative margins, it was 82%, while it was 19% for those with positive margins (p = 0.02). The disease-free survival was 47% (71% for negative margins and 0% for positive margins) (p = 0.04). Prospective data gathering indicated that significant complications occurred in approximately 38% of patients and were multifactorial in nature, and manageable to complete recovery., Conclusion: HDR-IORT using our technique is versatile, safe, and effective. The local control rates for primary disease compare quite well with other published series, especially for patients with negative margins. For patients with recurrent disease, locoregional control and survival are especially encouraging in patients with negative resection margins. Further follow-up is needed to see whether these encouraging data will continue.

Background: To determine if preoperative radiation therapy allows sphincter preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer., Methods: Thirty six patients with the diagnosis of invasive, resectable, primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis were enrolled on a Phase I/II trial of preoperative radiation therapy plus low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. By preoperative assessment, all patients had invasive tumors (5,T2; 31,T3) involving the distal half of the rectum and clinically required an abdominoperineal resection. The median tumor size was 3.8 cm [range: 1.5-7 cm] and the median distance from the anal verge was 4 cm [range: 3-7 cm]. The whole pelvis received 46.80 Gy followed by a 3.60 Gy boost to the primary tumor bed. The median follow-up was 56 months [range: 4-121 months]., Results: Of the 35 patients who underwent resection, 5 (14%) had a complete pathologic response and 27 (77%) were able to successfully undergo a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. The incidence of local failure was crude: 17% and 5-year actuarial: 21%. The 5-year actuarial survival was 64%. Analysis of sphincter function using a previously published scale was performed at the time of last follow-up in the 27 patients who underwent a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. Function was good or excellent in 85%. The median number of bowel movements/day was 2 (range: 0-8)., Conclusions: Our data suggest that preoperative radiation therapy allows sphincter preservation in 77% of selected patients who would otherwise require an abdominoperineal resection, and 85% have good to excellent sphincter function. Given the moderate local failure rate, we now routinely use preoperative combined modality therapy plus postoperative chemotherapy for patients with clinical T3 disease.

During the past decade, advances have been made in the adjuvant treatment of resectable rectal cancer. Postoperative combined-modality therapy significantly improves local control and survival. Recent Inter-group postoperative trials have focused on the identification of optimal chemotherapeutic agents and their method of administration. Preoperative therapy has the potential advantages of producing less acute toxicity and increasing the likelihood of sphincter preservation. New chemotherapeutic agents and radiation techniques are active areas of investigation.

Purpose: To determine the US national practice standards for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated in radiation oncology facilities., Materials and Methods: A national survey of 57 institutions identified 507 eligible patients who received radiation therapy as a component of their treatment for rectal cancer. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling with simple random sampling at each stage for each stratum was used and on-site surveys were performed., Results: Of the 507 patients, 378 (75%) received postoperative therapy, 110 (22%) received preoperative therapy, 17 (2%) received both preoperative and postoperative therapy, and less than 0.5% received intraoperative radiation alone. To more accurately assess the utilization of modern radiation techniques as well as recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored, randomized, postoperative, adjuvant combined modality therapy rectal cancer trials into current practice, the analysis was limited to the 243 (48%) patients with tumor, node, and metastasis staging system classification T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease who underwent conventional surgery with negative margins. Although only 7% were treated on a clinical trial, 90% received chemotherapy for a median of 21 weeks. Most were treated with modern radiation treatment techniques. In contrast, techniques to identify and help exclude the small bowel from the radiation field were not routinely used., Conclusion: Despite the fact that only 7% of patients with T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease were treated on a clinical trial, such trials appear to have resulted in a positive influence on the standard of practice within the oncology community. Although there are still some deficiencies, the majority of these patients received combined modality therapy and were treated with modern radiation therapy techniques.

Background: Stage I rectal cancer (T1, T2 N0) is currently treated by surgical resection alone. Despite adequate surgical resection, approximately 10-15% of patients will develop recurrence. Identification of patients at high risk for recurrence could potentially lead to an improvement in outcome by selection of these patients for adjuvant therapy., Methods: Between June 1986 and September 1996, 211 patients with primary rectal cancer (stage I) were treated by radical surgical resection alone. The medical data of all patients were entered into a database and prospectively followed. The following 10 prognostic factors were correlated with recurrence and tumor-related mortality: patient factors: age, gender, and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level; tumor factors: location from the anal verge (< 6 cm vs. > or = 6 cm), T stage (T1 vs. T2), intratumoral blood vessel invasion (BVI), intratumoral lymphatic vessel invasion, presence of tumor ulceration, and histologic differentiation; and treatment-related factors: extent of surgical resection--abdominal perineal resection versus low anterior resection. Univariate analysis of the effect of the prognostic factors on recurrence and tumor-related mortality were performed by the method of Kaplan-Meier and log rank test. Independent prognostic factors were determined by a multivariate analysis performed using the Cox proportional hazards model., Results: The overall 5-year actuarial recurrence was 12% and tumor-related mortality was 10%. Independent predictors of recurrence were male gender and BVI. Independent predictors of tumor-related mortality were male gender, BVI, and poorly differentiated tumors., Conclusions: Despite radical resection, patients with stage I rectal cancer with male gender, BVI, and poorly differentiated tumors should be considered high-risk patients.

Purpose: The Patterns of Care Rectal Cancer Committee was formed to develop consensus recommendations for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis., Methods and Materials: The Committee was composed of a multidisciplinary group of oncologists, and clinical scenarios were chosen to address most of the major treatment controversies in the combined modality treatment of rectal cancer. A literature search was then conducted and the major articles were identified. A modified Delphi technique was used to arrive at consensus. Serial surveys were conducted by distributing questionnaires to the Committee members to consolidate expert opinion. Voting was conducted using a scoring system and opinions were unified to the highest degree possible., Results: Consensus voting was performed for 4 clinical scenarios. Acceptability ratings for treatment were grouped into 3 broad categories: not acceptable, acceptable, and most acceptable. Based on the treatment options, a decision tree was developed that reflects the consensus of the committee., Conclusion: These options may help guide treatment decisions in rectal cancer.

The advantage of preoperative therapy in patients with clinically resectable transmural rectal cancer is to increase sphincter preservation while obtaining a high likelihood of local control. In patients who undergo a prospective clinical assessment and are declared to require an abdominoperineal resection, preoperative radiation therapy, either alone or when combined with chemotherapy, allows approximately 80% of patients to undergo a low anterior resection with or without colo anal anastomosis. The majority have good-to-excellent sphincter function. This conservative approach may be an alternative to an abdominoperineal resection in selected patients.

Radiation therapy is an effective but local modality in the treatment of colorectal cancer, with a more clearly defined role in rectal cancer than in colon cancer. In patients with resectable rectal cancer, randomized trials reveal an improvement in local control and survival with postoperative combined modality therapy. Radiation therapy combined with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy appears to be the most effective regimen. Additional benefits with preoperative combined modality therapy may include greater sphincter preservation and less acute toxicity than with postoperative therapy. In patients with locally advanced/unresectable disease, preoperative combined modality therapy increases resectability and may improve local failure rates and overall survival.

Standard adjuvant therapy for transmural (T3) and/or node-positive rectal cancer is pelvic radiation therapy plus fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Randomized trials are in progress to help determine the ideal chemotherapeutic agents and their optimal routes of administration in this setting, as well as to compare the efficacy and functional results of the pre- and postoperative bolus 5-FU/leucovorin combined-modality therapy approaches. New phase I trials will determine the recommended doses of tegafur and uracil (UFT) with oral leucovorin plus pre- or postoperative radiation therapy.

Purpose: We report the downstaging, sphincter preservation, acute toxicity, and preliminary local control and survival results of preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), low-dose leucovorin (LV), and concurrent radiation therapy followed by postoperative LV/5-FU for treatment of patients with clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer., Materials and Methods: A total of 32 patients received two monthly cycles of preoperative LV/5-FU (bolus daily X 5). Radiation therapy (5,040 cGy) began concurrently on day 1. Postoperatively, patients received a median of two monthly cycles of LV/5-FU (range, 0-10)., Results: The complete response rate was 9 percent pathologic and 13 percent clinical, for a total of 22 percent. Total Grade 3+ acute toxicity during the preoperative combined modality segment was 25 percent (8/32). Of the 20 patients who were thought to initially require an abdominoperineal resection and for whom the intent of treatment was sphincter preservation, 17 (85 percent) were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery. With a median follow-up of 22 (3-59) months, none have developed local failure, and the three-year actuarial disease-free survival rate was 60 percent., Conclusion: Our data reveal encouraging downstaging, sphincter preservation and acute toxicity with this regimen. Additional follow-up is needed to assess the long-term local control and survival rates.

Purpose: We report the local control and survival of two Phase I dose escalation trials of combined preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), low-dose leucovorin (LV), and radiation therapy followed by postoperative LV/5-FU for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer., Methods and Materials: A total of 36 patients (30 primary and 6 recurrent) received two monthly cycles of LV/5-FU (bolus daily x 5). Radiation therapy (50.40 Gy) began on day 1 in the 25 patients who received concurrent treatment and on day 8 in the 11 patients who received sequential treatment. Postoperatively, patients received a median of four monthly cycles of LV/5-FU., Results: The resectability rate with negative margins was 97%. The complete response rate was 11% pathologic and 14% clinical for a total of 25%. The 4-year actuarial disease-free survival was 67% and the overall survival was 76%. The crude local failure rate was 14% and the 4-year actuarial local failure rate was 30%. Crude local failure was lower in the four patients who had a pathologic complete response (0%) compared with those who either did not have a pathologic complete response (16%) or who had a clinical complete response (20%)., Conclusion: Our preliminary data with the low-dose LV regimen reveal encouraging downstaging, local control, and survival rates. Additional follow-up is needed to determine the 5-year results. The benefit of downstaging on local control is greatest in patients who achieve a pathologic complete response.

There is increasing interest in the use of local excision and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) as a sphincter-sparing approach for selected rectal cancers. The data suggest that this treatment approach should be limited to patients with either T1 tumors with adverse pathologic factors or T2 tumors. Transmural (T3) tumors have a 25% local recurrence rate with this technique and are treated more effectively with standard surgery and pre- or postoperative therapy. The results of local excision and postoperative RT are encouraging, however, more experience is needed to determine if this approach will have similar local control and survival rates as standard surgery.

The standard adjuvant therapy for resectable T3 and/or N1-2 rectal cancer is pelvic radiation therapy plus fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Two randomized intergroup trials, INT 0114 and INT 0144, will help determine the ideal chemotherapeutic agents and their routes of administration in the postoperative setting. The randomized National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast and Bowel Cancers trial NSABP R-03 and the INT 0147 trial will compare the efficacy and functional results of the preoperative and postoperative combined-modality therapy approaches. The delivery of effective therapies, as well as the development of more innovative approaches, is enhanced by a multidisciplinary collaboration among medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists.

Background: We performed a study to assess sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for primary carcinoma of the rectum., Study Design: We studied retrospectively postoperative sexual and urinary function in 136 (78 percent) of 175 eligible patients (82 males and 54 females) who responded to a standardized questionnaire., Results: The ability to engage in intercourse was maintained by 86 percent of the patients younger than 60 years of age, and by 67 percent of patients 60 years and older. Eighty-seven percent of male patients maintained their ability to achieve orgasm. The type of surgery (abdominoperineal resection compared to low anterior resection), and age equal to or greater than 60 years were significantly associated with male sexual dysfunction. Of the female patients, 85 percent were able to experience arousal with vaginal lubrication and 91 percent could achieve orgasm. The majority of patients had few or no complaints related to urinary function. Serious urinary dysfunction such as neurogenic bladder was not encountered., Conclusions: Autonomic nerve preservation in association with total mesorectal excision reduces the operative morbidity rate and is successful in minimizing sexual and urinary dysfunction in the operative treatment of patients with carcinoma of the rectum.

Purpose: Expression of disaccharidase sucrase-isomaltase (SI) is significantly enhanced during neoplastic transformation of colonic epithelium. Our study was designed to determine whether expression of SI within primary tumors was significantly associated with survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC)., Methods: SI expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in paraffin sections from 182 Stage I to III CRC that had been resected for cure at the New England Deaconess Hospital between 1965 and 1977. Expression was scored as absent or present in 1 to 50 percent or more than 50 percent of tumor cells. Associations were explored among SI expression, other clinical or pathologic variables, and overall survival. The data set is mature, with 91 (56 percent) patients who had died of CRC at a median follow-up of 96 months., Results: Fifty-five percent of primary CRC expressed SI. When the multivariate Cox analysis was performed, nodal status, T stage, primary site, grade, and SI expression were independent covariates. SI expression was not associated with the expression of other clinicopathologic variables but increased the risk of death from colorectal carcinoma by 1.83-fold., Discussion: These results indicate that SI is a prognostic marker for CRC that is independent of stage-related variables in patients who have undergone potentially curative resections.

We report the impact of selected clinicopathologic features on local failure and disease-free survival in 22 patients with localized, mobile, primary resectable rectal cancer treated with local excision and postoperative radiation therapy. Full thickness local excisions with negative margins were performed in 21 patients. One patient had a transanal snare excision of a T1 polyp. Postoperatively patients received 4500-4950 cGy (medial 4680 cGy) whole pelvis, and in 15 this was followed by a conedown of 360-1000 cGy (median 360 cGy). Two received 5-FU. Tumors were evaluated for size, gross appearance, distance from the ana verge, T stage, blood vessel invasion, lymphatic vessel invasion, and DNA content (ploidy, DNA index, and proliferation index). The median follow-up was 37 months (range 5-73). With increasing T stage there was a corresponding increase in local failure (T1: 0%, T2: 17%, and T3: 33%) and a decrease in disease-free survival (T1: 100%, T2: 67%, and T3: 50%). When accounting for the effect of T stage, tumors which were either BVI-or ulcerative were associated with an increase in local failure, and tumors which were < or = 3 cm, ulcerative, or nonaneuploid were associated with a decrease in disease-free survival. However, none of the differences reached statistical significance. Although other clinicopathologic features may have an impact, T stage remains the most reliable clinicopathologic feature by which to predict local failure and disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer who undergo local excision and postoperative radiation therapy.

The conventional surgical treatment for patients with potentially curable transmural and/or node positive rectal cancer is a low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the use of local excision and postoperative radiation therapy as primary therapy for selected rectal cancers. The limited data suggest that the approach of local excision and postoperative radiation therapy should be limited to patients with either T1 tumours with adverse pathological factors or T2 tumours. Transmural tumours, which have a 24% local failure rate, are treated more effectively with standard surgery and pre- or postoperative therapy. The results of local excision and postoperative radiation therapy are encouraging, but more experience is needed to determine if this approach ultimately has similar local control and survival rates as standard surgery.

Purpose: To determine the relationship between acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity during the combined modality segment and the volume of small bowel in the pelvic radiation field in patients who receive either preoperative or postoperative therapy for rectal cancer., Patients and Methods: The patient population was derived from four consecutive phase I dose-escalation trials. Combined modality therapy included fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin ([LV] bolus daily x 5, days 1 and 29), and pelvic radiation., Results: Twenty patients who received postoperative therapy had a larger volume of small bowel in the pelvic radiation field as compared with 60 who received preoperative therapy (462 +/- 129 v 212 +/- 44 cm3, P = .002). The most significant relationship between acute GI toxicity and volume of small bowel was seen in 12 patients who were treated on the preoperative sequential low-dose LV trial, all of whom received the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU. The volume of small bowel in patients who experienced grade 3+ toxicity was 731 +/- 274 cm3, as compared with 145 +/- 58 in those who experienced grade 0 to 2 toxicity (P = .005). Likewise, logistic regression analysis showed that 26 patients who received the MTD of 5-FU had the most significant association between GI toxicity and volume of small bowel (P = .036)., Conclusion: Our data suggest that the volume of small bowel in the pelvic radiation field may be dose-limiting in the delivery of high-dose 5-FU when combined with LV and radiation therapy.