Search

Composting municipal food waste is a key strategy for beneficially reusing methane-producing waste that would otherwise occupy landfill space. However, land-applied compost can cycle per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) back into the food supply and the environment. We partnered with a pilot-scale windrow composting facility to investigate the sources and fate of 40 PFAS in food waste compost. A comparison of feedstock materials yielded concentrations of ∑PFAS under 1 ng g -1 in mulch and food waste and at 1380 ng g -1 in leachate from used compostable food contact materials. Concentrations of targeted ∑PFAS increased with compost maturity along the windrow (1.85-23.1 ng g -1 ) and in mature stockpiles of increasing curing age (12.6-84.3 ng g -1 ). Among 15 PFAS quantified in compost, short-chain perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) - C5 and C6 PFCAs in particular - led the increasing trend, suggesting biotransformation of precursor PFAS into these terminal PFAS through aerobic decomposition. Several precursor PFAS were also measured, including fluorotelomer carboxylic acids (FTCAs) and polyfluorinated phosphate diesters (PAPs). However, since most targeted analytical methods and proposed regulations prioritize terminal PFAS, testing fully matured compost would provide the most relevant snapshot of PFAS that could be land applied. In addition, removing co-disposed food contact materials from the FW feedstock onsite yielded only a 37 % reduction of PFAS loads in subsequent compost, likely due to PFAS leaching during co-disposal. Source-separation of food contact materials is currently the best management practice for meaningful reduction of PFAS in food waste composts intended for land application., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: John A. Bowden reports financial support was provided by US Environmental Protection Agency. John A. Bowden reports financial support was provided by Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. Timothy G. Townsend reports financial support was provided by US Environmental Protection Agency. Timothy G. Townsend reports financial support was provided by Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. Co-author Stephan Barron is the owner and operator of the composting facility from which samples for this study were collected. We felt that it was important to include Stephan as a co-author because he had to facilitate our access to sample collection and provide information about his composting process, which was then incorporated into the manuscript. Stephan was not involved in any way in sample processing, data analysis and interpretation, or manuscript writing. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Antimony is used extensively in consumer goods, including single use plastic bottles, electronics, textiles and automobile brakes, which are disposed of in landfills at the end of their service lives. As a result, Sb is a constituent of concern in landfill emissions. Previous research has focused on leachate (liquid) and waste incineration flue gas emissions; however, Sb has the potential to volatilize through chemical and microbial processes within a landfill. In this study, iron-amended granular activated carbon was used to adsorb volatile metals directly from gas in a full-scale landfill gas collection system. Metals were quantified using acid digestion and ICP-AES analysis. Antimony concentrations far exceeded those previously reported, at up to 733 μg m -3 (mean: 254 μg m -3 ). In addition to Sb, As was also measured at high levels compared to previous research, as high as 740 μg m -3 (mean: 178 μg m -3 ). Using US EPA landfill and landfill gas databases, total Sb emissions via landfill gas are estimated to be approximately 27.3 kg day -1 in the US. Based on other estimates of national and global Sb emissions, this corresponds to approximately 4.5% of total US atmospheric emissions of Sb and 0.42% of global atmospheric emissions. Sb mass release via landfill gas is approximately 3.9 times higher than via leachate emissions. Although gas emissions are higher than expected, the vast majority (99.9%) of Sb present in landfilled MSW remains within the waste mass indefinitely. In addition to these mass release estimates, this experiment suggests that iron-amended activated carbon may offer significant metals removal from LFG, especially in the first months of new well operation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Large volumes of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)-contaminated wastewaters, such as municipal solid waste landfill leachates, pose a challenge for PFAS treatment technologies in practice today. In this study, the surfactant properties of PFAS were exploited to concentrate the compounds in foam produced via the bubble aeration of landfill leachate. The effectiveness of the foaming technique for concentrating PFAS varied by compound, with a mean removal percentage (the percent difference between PFAS in leachate before and after foam removal) of 69% and a median removal percentage of 92% among the 10 replicate foaming experiments. This technique appears to be similarly effective at sequestering sulfonates and carboxylate PFAS compounds and is less effective at concentrating the smallest and largest PFAS molecules. The results of this study suggest that for the pretreatment or preconcentration of landfill leachates, foaming to sequester PFAS may provide a practical approach that could be strategically coupled to high-energy PFAS-destructive treatment technologies. The process described herein is simple and could feasibly be applied at a relatively low cost at most landfills, where leachate aeration is already commonplace.