Search

Purpose: To report the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis (PE) after immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in Sweden., Design: Retrospective cohort registry study., Participants: Patient data from 1 457 172 cataract extractions, including 1 364 934 unilateral surgeries and 92 238 ISBCSs., Methods: Endophthalmitis cases reported to the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR) during a 16-year period (2002-2017) were analyzed in comparison to all control cases with regard to patient characteristics, surgical technique, and capsule complication., Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and determinants for PE in ISBCS compared with unilateral surgeries., Results: A total of 422 cases of PE were identified in 1 457 172 cataract extractions, yielding an overall incidence of 0.029% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0262-0.0317). For unilateral procedures, the rate was 0.0299% (95% CI, 0.0270-0.0328) or 408 cases in 1 364 934 operations, whereas that for ISBCS was 0.0152% (95% CI, 0.0072-0.0231) or 14 incidents in 92 238 operations (P = 0.01). In a logistic regression model including all cataract procedures, nonuse of intracameral (IC) antibiotics (ABs), capsule complication, age 85 years or more, male gender, and ocular comorbidity were found to be independent risk factors for PE. All these parameters were less frequent in ISBCS. Notwithstanding, in the same multivariate analysis, ISBCS in itself was associated with a significantly lower risk for PE. At follow-up, 5 of the 14 PE cases in the ISBCS cohort had a visual acuity (VA) of 20/200 or worse. Of these, one 93-year-old ISBCS patient developed bilateral infection., Conclusions: After ISBCS in Sweden, PE occurred once in 6600 surgeries. The risk of sustaining a final VA of 20/200 or less was 1 incident in 18 000 operated eyes. When counseling potential ISBCS patients about the risk of PE, it seems reasonable to state that the reported risk in the literature is lower than that with unilateral surgery but not negligible. Precautions remain necessary., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To characterize pre- and perioperative factors associated with treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD) after cataract surgery., Methods: This register-based cohort study with data from the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR) and the Swedish Macula Register (SMR) from 2010 to 2017 compared eyes with and without preoperative AMD that had undergone cataract surgery and was subsequently treated for wet AMD to eyes not treated within the study period. All first-eye surgeries registered in the NCR from 2010 to 2017 and matching eyes found in the SMR that had undergone treatment for wet AMD ≥ 1 year after the cataract procedure were included. Data for cataract surgery date, age and gender, use of a blue-blocking IOL, preoperative visual acuity, ocular comorbidities, posterior capsule rupture and date of AMD treatment initiation were extracted., Results: The only independent factor associated with postoperative treatment of wet AMD in both groups was female gender (67.3% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001 and 66.4% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.001, respectively). Older age was an independent factor in eyes without preoperative AMD (78.4 ± 6.5 vs. 73.4 ± 9.6 years, p < 0.001). A blue-blocking IOL appeared to decrease the likelihood of subsequent wet AMD treatment slightly but not statistically significant in eyes with preoperative AMD (52.7% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.110)., Conclusions: Some factors (female gender, high age) are associated with undergoing subsequent treatment for wet AMD to a higher extent. If the use of a blue-blocking IOL offers any protection from undergoing AMD treatment after cataract surgery, such an effect must be very small., (© 2020 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

The Board of EAO (European Association for Osseointegration) has discussed an initiative to explore the conditions to establish a Dental Implant Register. It was suggested to bring this issue to the EAO Consensus Conference 2018 for a discussion and to possibly propose relevant and manageable parameters. This article presents some select examples from quality registers in the medical field. Based on the experience of established registers, essentially in the medical field, factors considered to be of importance, if and when establishing a Dental Implant Register are introduced and discussed., (© 2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To study associations between intraoperative difficulties and changes in patient-perceived and postoperative visual function and visual satisfaction after cataract surgery., Methods: Swedish multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional, nonrandomized, National Cataract Register study. A total of 10 979 patients (n = 10 979) who underwent cataract surgery from 2008 to 2011 completed the Catquest-9SF questionnaire before and 3 months postoperatively. Using Rasch analysis, we converted the nonparametric grading of the answers to parametric data and performed parametric statistical analyses. Multiple regression models were used to examine possible predictors associated with self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery., Results: Greater improvement in self-assessed visual function was seen in patients in whom trypan blue dye was used; those without a posterior capsular tear or an ocular comorbidity; and those who were younger, female and had low preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) or high postoperative CDVA compared with their counterparts. Significantly higher self-assessed postoperative visual function was seen in patients in whom trypan blue dye was used and those with no posterior capsular tear or ocular comorbidity and no use of capsular hooks; and those who were younger and had low preoperative or high postoperative CDVA compared with their counterparts. The risk of general dissatisfaction after cataract surgery was significantly greater in patients with a posterior capsule tear, ocular comorbidity or low postoperative CDVA, and those in whom mechanical pupillary stretching was performed., Conclusion: Several intraoperative difficulties, posterior capsular tear, ocular comorbidity, age, gender, and preoperative and postoperative CDVAs affect patient improvement and self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery., (© 2018 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To explore patients' obtaining and use of spectacles after routine cataract surgery., Methods: The study included 1329 patients who underwent bilateral surgery with the second eye operated during March 2013 at 38 different clinics in Sweden. Five months after the second-eye surgery, patients completed a five-item questionnaire about their spectacle use preoperatively and postoperatively. The responses were linked to data from the registry on multiple variables including postoperative refraction, age and gender., Results: Of the 387 patients who were advised by their surgeons to obtain distance spectacles postoperatively, most did so (77.3%, n = 299), while of the 691 patients who were not so advised, most did not obtain spectacles (78.9%, n = 545). Nevertheless, almost 50% of patients with both spherical and cylindrical errors exceeding 1 dioptre (D) did not obtain new distance spectacles postoperatively, while about 25% of patients with bilateral emmetropia (spherical error <0.5 D, cylinder <1 D) obtained new distance spectacles postoperatively., Conclusion: Patients' choices regarding obtaining and using new spectacles postoperatively are strongly correlated with advice given by the surgeon about the need for distance correction. The large difference between groups who were and were not advised to obtain spectacles for distance correction was only partially reflected in the postoperative refractive errors. Similarly, the patterns of preoperative spectacle use and gender or age differences did not explain this difference., (© 2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To analyze risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery and provide a benchmark for refractive outcomes after standard cataract surgery., Setting: One hundred cataract surgery clinics from 12 European countries., Design: Multicenter database study., Methods: Data on consecutive cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015 were analyzed in terms of demographics, preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), target refraction, coexisting eye diseases, surgical difficulties including previous ophthalmic interventions, type of surgery, intraocular lens (IOL), and surgical complications. For clinics committed to reporting follow-up data within 7 to 60 days after surgery, postoperative CDVA and refraction were analyzed., Results: Of the 548 392 cases analyzed, follow-up data were available for 282 811 cases. The absolute mean biometry prediction error in spherical equivalent was 0.42 diopters (D). A biometry prediction error within ±0.50 D was achieved for 205 675 eyes (72.7%). A biometry prediction error within ±1.0 D was achieved for 263 015 eyes (93.0%). Poor preoperative CDVA, target refraction, coexisting eye diseases, surgical difficulties including previous ophthalmic interventions, and surgical complications were in varying degrees related to a postoperative refractive error., Conclusions: Several risk factors (poor preoperative CDVA, ocular comorbidity, and previous eye surgery) were related to poor refractive outcomes after cataract extraction. When these risk factors are present, care should be taken with the preoperative examination and choice of IOL to avoid a refractive surprise. The average outcomes can be used as a refractive outcome benchmark., (Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze visual outcomes after cataract surgery in patients with previous corneal refractive surgery., Setting: Cataract surgery clinics in 18 European countries and Australia., Design: Database study., Methods: Cases of cataract extraction with corneal refractive surgery eyes (corneal refractive cases) were identified from all cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database over a 5-year period. Preoperative and postoperative measurements and trends over time were analyzed., Results: Of 807,220 cataract extractions, 1229 (0.15%) were corneal refractive cases. There was a significant increase, over time, in the number of corneal refractive cases (P < .001). Corneal refractive patients were younger than patients without corneal refractive surgery (nonrefractive patients) (62.9 years versus 74.0 years; P < .001) but had similar mean preoperative and postoperative corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA) (preoperative logMAR 0.44[6/16] for both [P = .286]; postoperative logMAR 0.06[6/7] for both [P = .245]). Postoperative CDVA was worse than preoperative CDVA in 35 (4%) corneal refractive and 8,999 (1.5%) nonrefractive patients (P < .001). In all, 74 (8.5%) of 873 corneal refractive versus 16,566 (2.8%) /584,496 nonrefractive patients, having cataract surgery, had preoperative CDVA of logMAR 0.0[6/6] or better (P < .001). Nineteen (54.3%) of 35 corneal refractive case patients who had worse postoperative CDVA had preoperative CDVA of logMAR 0.0(6/6) or better., Conclusion: Cataract surgery has been reported with increasing frequency in corneal refractive surgery patients, since 2008. These patients had preoperative CDVA similar to those of patients without previous corneal refractive surgery but were younger and were at higher risk of worse postoperative CDVA, especially if they had preoperative CDVA of logMAR 0.0(6/6) or better., Financial Disclosure: No author has any financial or proprietary interest in any material, or method, mentioned., (Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) after cataract surgery based on data from the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR)., Setting: Ophthalmic surgery units in Sweden., Design: Prospective database study., Methods: Data for 2012 through 2014 were obtained prospectively from the NCR. The outcome register of the NCR has collected data on IOP before and a mean of 37.7 days ± 29.1 (SD) after cataract surgery since 2012., Results: The analyses were based on 20 437 cataract extractions reported during 1 month each year to the outcome registry of the NCR. Cataract surgery was found to reduce IOP by a mean of 1.46 mm Hg, which was statistically significant (P < .001). A larger IOP reduction was seen in cases with a higher preoperative IOP (r = 0.557, P < .001). Older patients and shorter eyes had a greater IOP reduction after surgery (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). Women had a greater IOP reduction than men (P = .04) When high IOP was given as an indication for surgery, the IOP reduction after cataract surgery was 5.50 mm Hg compared with a reduction of 1.40 mm Hg in patients for whom this indication was not given (P < .001). Patients with glaucoma or pseudoexfoliation (PXF) had a more pronounced IOP reduction than patients without these diagnoses (P < .001)., Conclusion: Cataract surgery had an IOP-lowering effect, in particular in older patients, women, short eyes, eyes with high preoperative IOP, and eyes with glaucoma or PXF., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: A project aimed at creating a multi-national database for cataract and refractive surgery was initiated in 2008. The database was intended for learning and clinical improvement, not supervision. The project was co-funded by the European Union, under the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) and supported by 11 national societies for cataract and refractive surgery. The purpose of this article is to describe the setup of the database and the ensuing achievements within cataract surgery after four years., Design/methodology/approach: A web-based system was created for input and output of data, with a software interface to two databases, one for cataract surgery and one for refractive surgery. Data can be put in either manually through web forms or by transfer of data from existing national registries or large electronic medical record systems. Output of reports from the system or export of one's own data is available on the web. The data are anonymous to all users, with the sole exception that reporting surgeons and clinics have access to their own data. The system does not include any patient identification., Findings: After four years, data from 16 countries have been entered into the system, including reports of more than 900,000 cataract extractions. The database has been used by individual clinics for benchmarking and clinical improvement work, and has also served as the basis for new clinical guidelines for cataract surgery. The ESCRS has guaranteed the sustainability of the database after the project period., Originality/value: A European quality registry with data input from surgeons and clinics in 16 European countries has been established. Close to one million surgeries have been entered into the system during the first four years. Evidence-based guidelines have been published based on data in the registry. The system is used for benchmarking by both experienced surgeons and trainees.

Aim: To study which eye-screening protocol prevails in Swedish maternity/neonatal wards, evaluate efficacy in a prospective study and compare results with earlier Swedish retrospective results., Methods: Surveys were sent in 2006 to maternity/neonatal and women's health departments regarding screening policy. Response frequency was 96% (122/127). Data were derived from the Paediatric Cataract Register (PECARE), Sweden. All Swedish children diagnosed with congenital cataract and operated on before 1 year of age between January 2007 and December 2009 were included. Statistical comparison with earlier retrospective results was performed., Results: Eye screening is a routine protocol at a rate of 90% of Swedish maternity wards. Sixty-one children were included in the study. An increase was shown in case referrals from maternity wards compared to 10 years ago (64% vs. 50%). Detection was performed within 6 weeks of age in 75% of the cases. A significant difference between the probabilities of early referral (0.38; p < 0.001, < 6 weeks of age) and early surgery (0.36; p < 0.001) (PECARE) was found in comparison with the historical data of no maternity-ward screening. Well-baby clinics were instrumental in early detection, as well., Conclusion: Eye screening in maternity wards is effective. Clear Swedish directives are to be preferred., (©2012 The Author(s)/Acta Paediatrica ©2012 Foundation Acta Paediatrica.)

Purpose: To assess and analyze refractive outcome after cataract surgery in Sweden from 2008 through 2010., Setting: Swedish cataract surgery units participating in outcome registration of National Cataract Register., Design: Cohort study., Methods: Planned and actual postoperative refractions were analyzed for cataract procedures and preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism for procedures performed in 2008 though 2010. Induced astigmatism was calculated with Naeser and Behrens polar coordinates., Results: Postoperative refraction was analyzed for 17,056 procedures and corneal astigmatism for 7448 procedures. Emmetropia was targeted in 78.1% of eyes and achieved in 52.7%; 43.0% had less than 1.00 diopter (D) of astigmatism. "Reading myopia" of -3.5 to -1.6 D was targeted in 7.0% of eyes and achieved in 7.8%. Planned hyperopia greater than 1.0 D or myopia greater than -3.5 D was rare. The mean absolute biometry prediction error was 0.402 D ± 0.338 (SD) in all eyes; however, astigmatic eyes and eyes planned for myopia or hyperopia had higher biometry prediction errors. Younger patients were more often astigmatic and planned for a more myopic outcome. Preoperatively, one third of eyes had more than 1.0 D of corneal astigmatism; postoperatively this figure was largely unaltered. The mean induced astigmatism was 0.525 ± 0.804 D in all eyes., Conclusions: Emmetropia (spherical equivalent -0.5 to +0.5 D and <1.0 D astigmatism) is the goal in most cataract cases but was reached in only 55% of eyes planned for emmetropia. Factors precluding emmetropia included remaining corneal astigmatism and biometry prediction errors in astigmatic and ametropic eyes., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In March 2008, the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) commenced. This 3-year project was cofunded by the European Union (EU) and the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). The ESCRS became the lead partner in the project with 11 national societies as associated partners. The aims of the project were to improve treatment and standards of care for cataract and refractive surgery and to develop evidence-based guidelines for cataract and refractive surgery across Europe. Surgeons from all participating societies contributed to the database, which contained data on 820,000 cataract surgeries in November 2011. The present guidelines are based on data entered from January 1, 2009, to August 28, 2011 (523,921 cataract extractions). The guidelines include only those steps in the cataract surgery process that can be analyzed by the database., (Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As health care systems worldwide struggle with rising costs, a consensus is emerging to refocus reform efforts on value, as determined by the evaluation of patient outcomes relative to costs. One method of using outcome data to improve health care value is the disease registry. An international study of thirteen registries in five countries (Australia, Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States) suggests that by making outcome data transparent to both practitioners and the public, well-managed registries enable medical professionals to engage in continuous learning and to identify and share best clinical practices. The apparent result: improved health outcomes, often at lower cost. For example, we calculate that if the United States had a registry for hip replacement surgery comparable to one in Sweden that enabled reductions in the rates at which these surgeries are performed a second time to replace or repair hip prostheses, the United States would avoid $2 billion of an expected $24 billion in total costs for these surgeries in 2015.

Purpose: To define the incidence of capsule complication and its risk factors in Sweden over an 8-year period., Setting: Fifty-two ophthalmic surgery units in Sweden., Design: Database study., Methods: Data were collected prospectively in the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR) from 2002 through 2009. The NCR contains 97.3% of the total number of cataract extractions in Sweden over the 8-year study period. One mandatory variable in the register is capsule complications during surgery. As a means to validate the accuracy of register data on capsule complications, a randomly selected sample of 2400 registrations was compared with corresponding medical records., Results: The analyses were based on 602,553 cataract extractions reported to the NCR. A capsule complication was reported in 12,574 cataract extractions, corresponding to a frequency of 2.09%. The incidence of this complication consistently decreased each year from 2002 to 2006, after which it stabilized. Poor corrected distance visual acuity in the surgical eye (≤ 0.1), the occurrence of glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and age were among the parameters significantly related to a capsule complication. Some of these parameters also decreased over time. However, even after adjusting for this, there was an obvious decrease in capsule complications over time. The validity test showed a certain underreporting of capsule complications to the registry, but it was not significant and did not change over time., Conclusion: The incidence of capsule complications decreased over time. This may be partly the result of fewer risk factors and of better surgical quality., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This review summarizes data collected by the Swedish National Cataract Register, which now contains data pertaining to more than a million cataract surgery procedures, representing 95.6% of the surgeries performed in Sweden during 1992-2009. During this period, the rate of cataract surgery rose from 4.47 to 9.00 per 1000 inhabitants. The mean patient age increased until 1999 but has slowly decreased since then. Preoperative visual acuity has risen steadily. The distribution between the sexes was stable until 2000, after which the proportion of women slowly decreased. Registration of subjective benefit has brought new knowledge regarding indications and expectations. An improved questionnaire, Catquest-9SF has been used since 2008. The outcome register generally shows good results from the surgery. Endophthalmitis has decreased from 0.10% to below 0.040%., (Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze which factors influence the mean absolute prediction error after cataract surgery., Setting: Forty-nine eye departments participating in the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR)., Methods: In this prospective multicenter comparative nonrandomized study, ophthalmology departments in Sweden voluntarily reported to the NCR the outcomes of every cataract extraction performed during the month of March from 2000 through 2005. During this period, 49 of 55 ophthalmology departments in Sweden reported data. Perioperative data describing visual acuity, sex, age, other eye diseases, target postoperative refraction, and achieved postoperative refraction were included in the study. Factors that could be related to the mean absolute prediction error were evaluated. Of the cataract extractions, 23244 were eligible for analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using multiple regression and logistic regression., Results: During the study years, the mean absolute prediction error decreased significantly (P < .0001). The mean absolute prediction error was larger in women than in men (P < .001) and in patients with low preoperative visual acuity (P < .0001). Glaucoma in the surgical eye was also significantly related to a large deviation from the target refraction. The precision in reaching the target refraction was not better in second-eye surgery than in first-eye surgery. Some clinics had a significantly smaller mean absolute prediction error than other clinics (P < .0001)., Conclusions: Some preoperative factors were related to less success in reaching the planned postoperative refraction. Taking this into consideration, extra care is warranted in cases with these preoperative risk factors.

Purpose: To study the incidence of aphakia after cataract extraction and evaluate the relative risk for this outcome in subgroups of patients based on preoperative conditions., Setting: Sixty-two community-run or private clinics participating in the Swedish National Cataract Register., Methods: Data on cataract extractions were collected prospectively from 1997 through 2001. The set of data also covered type of surgery and type of intraocular lens (IOL), including a "no lens implanted" option. All data were stored in a database. Database calculations were made of frequencies and risk ratios of postoperative aphakia in the subgroups of patients based on preoperative conditions., Results: For the entire study period, postoperative aphakia was reported in 1410 of 287,951 surgeries for which complete IOL data were available, corresponding to an overall frequency of 0.49%. The occurrence of ocular comorbidity and poor preoperative visual acuity (< or = 0.1) in the eye to be operated on was significantly related to postoperative aphakia for each year of the study (P<.001). Glaucoma and poor visual acuity (< or =0.1) in the surgical eye meant a 12.8 higher risk for aphakia after surgery than a better visual acuity (>0.1) and no ocular comorbidity., Conclusions: This national 5-year survey showed that in routine cataract surgery performed during the study, 1 of every 200 operations ended in postoperative aphakia. Poor visual acuity (< or =0.1) in the eye to be operated on combined with ocular comorbidity was the highest risk factor for postoperative aphakia.

To develop a method to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with cataract surgery using large patient registries.Four centers in Sweden. Five hundred patients scheduled for cataract extraction in 1 eye at 1 of 4 centers in Sweden during March 1999 were asked to complete the EQ-5D, a preference-based quality-of-life instrument, and the Catquest, a disease-specific disability measure, before surgery. Multiple regression analysis was used to study the correlation between utility and visual acuity and/or disability and utility and QALY gain through the intervention estimated. Visual acuity and Catquest scores were available for 484 patients. The mean age was 76.1 years; the mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.59 in the surgical eye and 0.26 in the other eye. The mean Catquest disability score was 13.79 and the mean utility, 0.74. Utilities correlated significantly with visual acuity and disability scores, and the correlations remained significant when both were included in a regression model, indicating that the 2 measure different concepts. The hypothetical cost per QALY gained (discounted at 3%) was estimated at 45000 SKr (4500 US dollars) using the Swedish Cataract Registry. The results indicate that visual acuity and visual disability significantly affect utilities controlled for age and ophthalmic comorbidity. It is thus possible to use data on visual acuity and disability in large registries to estimate the cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery and to compare the cost per QALY gained with other health care interventions.

The Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR) has been collecting data on cataract extractions in Sweden since 1992. This unique national database now contains data pertaining to more than 400 000 operations, representing 93.4% of all operations performed nationwide during 1992-2000. Clinic participation in the NCR is voluntary. Tests have shown NCR data to be extremely reliable, while the participation of nearly all providers of cataract surgery in Sweden makes the data highly representative of cataract surgery throughout the country. The NCR collects pre- and per-operative data for every cataract extraction performed at participating clinics. Surgical outcome data and data about patients' self-assessed visual function is collected in approximately 10% of cases. Since 1998, all cases of suspected postoperative endophthalmitis have also been reported to the NCR. The rate of surgery has increased from 4.47 to 7.26 per 1000 inhabitants during the period. Female subjects have constituted about 66% of all operated subjects each year and the mean age of patients has slowly increased from 75.2 to 76.1 years. Average pre-operative visual acuity has improved each year. Second eye surgery has increased from 28.5% to 36.8% of all surgeries. Phacoemulsification has reached 98% as type of surgery (in 2000) and 92.7% of all intraocular lenses are foldable. Surgical outcome has improved by achieving a final refraction closer to the target refraction and less surgically induced astigmatism. The positive impact of cataract surgery in very elderly people has been demonstrated, as has the positive effect of second eye surgery, especially in young subjects. The NCR has served to enhance knowledge about trends and results of cataract surgery in Sweden. This review article describes some of the activities carried out and their results.