Search

Purpose This study aimed to describe recovery of dysphagia after stroke. We determined the proportion of stroke survivors with dysphagia on admission, discharge, and 6 months after stroke. Additionally, the factors affecting oral feeding 6 months after stroke were explored. Methods A total of 427 acute stroke patients were recruited prospectively. Presence of dysphagia was evaluated on admission, weekly until recovery was achieved, and at discharge. We compared stroke survivors with dysphagia who had complete recovery, who had dysphagia but achieved oral feeding, and who required tube feeding. Patient-reported eating ability was evaluated at 6 months. Patients who achieved oral feeding by 6 months were compared to those who had persistent tube feeding need. Results Fifty-five percent of stroke survivors had dysphagia on initial evaluation (3.1 ± 1.4 days after admission) and 37% at discharge (21.1 ± 12.4 days). At 6 months, 5% of patients required tube feeding. Among those who had dysphagia at initial evaluation, 32% had resolution of dysphagia within two weeks, 44% had dysphagia but started oral feeding before discharge, and 23% required alternative means of alimentation (nasogastric tube feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, parental nutrition) throughout hospitalization. At 6 months, 90% of stroke survivors who achieved oral feeding by discharge continued with oral feeding. Patients who achieved oral feeding after discharge had less cognitive impairments on admission and a higher speech therapist intervention rate after discharge. Conclusions More than half of stroke survivors had dysphagia but the vast majority were able to return to oral feeding by 6 months. Cognitive function and dysphagia rehabilitation interventions were associated with return to oral feeding after hospital discharge.

Background In highly invasive diseases, metabolism commonly changes. Hypercatabolism is frequent in acute stroke, and nitrogen balance tends to be negative. However, there has been no study describing nitrogen balance in subacute and chronic stroke patients. The present study aimed to examine nitrogen balance in the subacute and chronic phases and to identify the factors related to it. Methods Nitrogen balance was calculated from the collected urine of 56 patients with subacute stroke [mean (SD) 53.8 (18.4) days post-stroke] who were admitted for rehabilitation for their first-ever ischaemic or nonsurgical haemorrhagic stroke. In the first experiment, their nitrogen balance was measured during the rehabilitation phase, and factors (type, severity of hemiparesis, activities of daily living, dysphagia and malnutrition status) related to it were evaluated. The second experiment was performed to describe the time course of nitrogen balance in 31 consecutive patients, with assessments made at admission and at discharge. Results Nitrogen balance was positive in all patients in the subacute phase. A significant difference was seen in nitrogen balance between high and low fat-free mass in male patients. In the chronic phase, nitrogen balance was positive in 96% of the patients. There was no significant difference in nitrogen balance between discharge and admission. Conclusions In the subacute and chronic phases of stroke, it was confirmed that hypercatabolism had resolved and that intensive rehabilitation is possible in the convalescent period of stroke.

Background Various robotic technologies have been developed recently for objective and quantitative assessment of movement. Among them, robotic measures derived from a reaching task in the KINARM Exoskeleton device are characterized by their potential to reveal underlying motor control in reaching movements. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical usefulness and validity of these robot-derived measures in hemiparetic stroke patients. Methods Fifty-six participants with a hemiparetic arm due to chronic stroke were enrolled. The robotic assessment was performed using the Visually Guided Reaching (VGR) task in the KINARM Exoskeleton, which allows free arm movements in the horizontal plane. Twelve parameters were derived based on motor control theory. The following clinical assessments were also administered: the proximal upper limb section in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE(A)), the proximal upper limb part in the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS-KM), the Modified Ashworth Scale for the affected elbow flexor muscles (MAS elbow), and seven proximal upper limb tasks in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). To explore which robotic measures represent deficits of motor control in the affected arm, the VGR parameters in the paretic arm were compared with those in the non-paretic arm using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Then, to explore which VGR parameters were related to overall motor control regardless of the paresis, correlations between the paretic and non-paretic arms were examined. Finally, to investigate the relationships between the robotic measures and the clinical scales, correlations between the VGR parameters and clinical scales were investigated. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used for all correlational analyses. Results Eleven VGR parameters on the paretic side were significantly different from those on the non-paretic side with large effect sizes (|effect size| = 0.76–0.87). Ten VGR parameters correlated significantly with FMA-UE(A) (|r| = 0.32–0.60). Eight VGR parameters also showed significant correlations with SIAS-KM (|r| = 0.42–0.49), MAS elbow (|r| = 0.44–0.48), and the Functional Ability Scale of the WMFT (|r| = 0.52–0.64). Conclusions The robot-derived measures could successfully differentiate between the paretic arm and the non-paretic arm and were valid in comparison to the well-established clinical scales.