Search

* OBJECTIVE: To describe the variation in outcomes and number of visits before and after implementing a care guideline for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation. * DESIGN: Nonrandomized intervention study. * METHODS: We compared 2558 patients with TKA who received care that was not standardized (non--care guideline [NCG] group) to 9797 patients with TKA who received care according to the care guideline (CG). We fit 2 Bayesian hierarchical linear regression models using the Knee Outcome Survey -- Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADL) change score and number of physical therapy (PT) visits as the response variables, controlling for relevant predictor variables. We also compared the ratio of the standard deviations of the KOS-ADL change scores and the number of PT visits within and between clinics. * RESULTS: The overall estimated mean improvement in KOS-ADL change score was 23.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3, 25.7) in the NCG group and 28.7 points (95% CI: 27.5, 29.7) in the CG group; the mean difference was 5.6 (2.7-8.6). Mean KOS-ADL change scores were higher in the CG group than the NCG group in every clinic, although only 8 clinics improved significantly. The number of PT visits did not change meaningfully (NCG: mean, 10.7 [95% CI: 9.9, 11.5]; CG: mean, 10.5 [95% CI: 9.9, 10.9]). Variation in KOS-ADL change score decreased by 4% within clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.93, 0.99]) and 63% between clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.37 [95% CI: 0.21, 0.62]). Variation in number of visits decreased by 7% within clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.96]) and 19% between clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.39, 1.49]). * CONCLUSION: Implementing a care guideline for TKA rehabilitation may improve outcomes and reduce unwarranted variation in practice within clinics and especially between clinics within a large health care system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

* OBJECTIVE: To describe the application and examine the influence of a continuous quality improvement intervention, which had a goal of standardizing care to reduce the proportion of patients who do not have a meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). * DESIGN: Continuous quality improvement. * METHODS: A physical therapy (PT) care guideline was initiated in 2013 for patients following TKA. The Knee Outcome Survey -- Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADL) was measured at every visit, and scores were extracted from a clinical outcomes database to calculate the proportion of patients who did not achieve a minimal clinically important difference. Based on logistic regression analysis, we compared the proportion of patients who did not progress on the KOS-ADL in a non--care guideline group (2008-2012) to a care guideline (CG) group (2014-2019). * RESULTS: This study included 12 355 patients (aged 18-92 years) following TKA incurring at least 3 PT visits from 2008 to 2019. The percentage of patients who did not progress in the non--care guideline group was 25.8% and in the care guideline group 14.3% (P<0.001). The relationship between care guideline adherence and lack of progression on the KOS-ADL was statistically significant, X² (df = 1) = 148.7, P<.001. * CONCLUSION: The percentage of patients who did not achieve meaningful progress on the KOSADL declined significantly in the 6 years after implementing a TKA care guideline without an increase in the number of clinical visits. The standardized care guideline was associated with meaningful improvements for patients following TKA when applied in conjunction with PT access to outcome data, feedback through audits, performance goals, and financial incentives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe concerns, advantages, and disadvantages encountered in an evidence-based physical therapy (PT) program for persons with chronic low back pain (CLBP) delivered by telehealth. Mixed methods survey and semistructured interview of persons with CLBP. Prospective observational cohort study of persons with CLBP from 3 health care systems receiving 8 sessions of evidence-based telehealth PT. Participants were selected after completing week 10 (from baseline) assessment from an ongoing cohort study. We enrolled 31 of 126 participants (mean age, 42.4 years; 71.0% female) from the cohort study (N=31). Participants had completed 8 sessions of evidence-based telehealth PT and participated in semistructured interviews. Baseline and week 10 and 26 assessments assessed psychosocial risk (StarTBack Screening Tool), working alliance (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form), pain (Oswestry Disability Index), and health-related quality of life (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 profile, version 2). Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone and consisted of open-ended questions assessing perception, satisfaction, and likelihood of recommending telehealth PT. Participants identified advantages and disadvantages to telehealth PT. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using an iterative qualitative process. Statistical comparisons by experience were made using analysis of variance (continuous) and Fisher exact test (categorical). Compared with the negative experience group (n=5), participants in positive (n=16) and neutral (n=10) experience groups endorsed higher bond working alliance with their therapist. Participants with a positive experience were more likely to view telehealth PT as cost-saving (n=10, 62.5%) compared with those with a neutral (n=1, 10.0%) or negative (n=1, 20.0%) experience and less likely to view telehealth PT as lower quality (n=0, 0.0%; n=1, 10.0%; n=2, 40.0%, respectively). Prior to starting telehealth, based on semistructured interviews, 18 participants (58.1%) had concerns and these persisted after starting in half of this group. Concerns regarded telehealth being different from or inferior to in-person PT, lack of physical correction, and worries of not using technology appropriately. Convenience, time savings, and personalization were seen as advantages. Difficulty making a personal connection with the therapist, lack of physical correction, and problems with technology were seen as disadvantages. Many participants endorsed a hybrid approach that included in-person and telehealth PT. Providing necessary equipment and technology assistance was seen as ways to improve telehealth PT experience. Telehealth is an acceptable modality to deliver PT for patients with CLBP with most having a positive experience and reporting advantages. Improvements could include offering a hybrid approach (in-person and telehealth combined) and providing necessary equipment and technical support. More research is needed to optimize the most effective strategies for providing telehealth PT for patients with CLBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] To describe the feasibility of an evidence-based physical therapy (PT) program for persons with chronic low back pain (LBP) originally designed for in-person delivery, adapted for telehealth using videoconferencing. Prospective, longitudinal cohort. Three health care systems in the United States. Adults, aged 18-64 years (N=126), with chronic LBP recruited from August through December 2020. Up to 8 weekly sessions of telehealth PT. Follow-up assessments were 10 and 26 weeks after baseline. Participant outcomes collected were the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 health domains, and pain self-efficacy. Implementation outcomes included acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and fidelity assessed using participant surveys and compliance with session attendance. We enrolled 126 participants (mean age, 51.5 years; 62.7% female). Baseline perceptions about telehealth were generally positive. Eighty-eight participants (69.8%) initiated telehealth PT, with a median of 5 sessions attended. Participants in telehealth PT were generally satisfied (76.3%), although only 39.5% perceived the quality equal to in-person PT. Telehealth PT participants reported significant improvement in LBP-related disability, pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance at 10- and 26-week follow-ups. The findings generally support the feasibility of telehealth PT using videoconferencing. Implementation and participant outcomes were similar to in-person PT as delivered in the participating health care systems. We identified barriers that may detract from the patient experience and likelihood of benefitting from telehealth PT. More research is needed to optimize and evaluate the most effective strategies for providing telehealth PT for patients with chronic LBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research examining care process variables and their relationship to clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty has focused primarily on inpatient variables. Care process factors related to outpatient rehabilitation have not been adequately examined. We conducted a retrospective review of 321 patients evaluating outpatient care process variables including use of continuous passive motion, home health physical therapy, number of days from inpatient discharge to beginning outpatient physical therapy, and aspects of outpatient physical therapy (number of visits, length of stay) as possible predictors of pain and disability outcomes of outpatient physical therapy. Only the number of days between inpatient discharge and outpatient physical therapy predicted better outcomes, suggesting that this may be a target for improving outcomes after total knee arthroplasty for patients discharged directly home. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To describe the utilization of physical therapy following a new primary care consultation for low back pain (LBP) and to examine the relations between physical therapy utilization and other variables with health care utilization and costs in the year after consultation. Design: Retrospective cohort obtained from electronic medical records and insurance claims data. Setting: Single health care delivery system. Participants: Individuals (N=2184) older than 18 years with a new consultation for LBP from 2004 to 2008. Interventions: Patients were categorized as receiving initial physical therapy management if care occurred within 14 days after consultation. Main Outcome Measures: Total health care costs for all LBP-related care received in the year after consultation were calculated from claims data. Predictors of utilization of emergency care, advanced imaging, epidural injections, specialist visits, and surgery were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The generalized linear model was used to compare LBP-related costs based on physical therapy utilization and identify other cost determinants. Results: Initial physical therapy was received by 286 of the 2184 patients (13.1%), and was not a determinant of LBP-related health care costs or utilization of specific services in the year after consultation. Older age, mental health, or neck pain comorbidity and initial management with opioids were determinants of cost and several utilization outcomes. Conclusions: Initial physical therapy management was not associated with increased health care costs or utilization of specific services following a new primary care LBP consultation. Additional research is needed to examine the cost consequences of initial management decisions made following a new consultation for LBP. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]