Search

Study objective: To evaluate whether the use of remifentanil to supplement propofol during spontaneous respiration confers any benefits in terms of quality of sedation and recovery, or in terms of reduction in propofol requirements.Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.Setting: University hospital.Patients: 50 ambulatory adult ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for total colonoscopy.Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either propofol alone or propofol plus remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min, while independently maintaining spontaneous respiration.Measurements: Cardiovascular and respiratory variables were measured before induction and at 1-minute intervals thereafter. Recovery from anesthesia was assessed using simple verbal commands and the Steward Post Recovery Score. Patient satisfaction was measured with a visual analog scale. Computer simulation was used to calculate the effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil.Main results: The depressant effects on blood pressure and respiratory function were significantly higher when propofol and remifentanil were combined. Although the addition of remifentanil resulted in a decrease of propofol usage, recovery of anesthesia was faster and patient satisfaction was higher when using propofol alone.Conclusions: The addition of remifentanil to propofol during spontaneous ventilation offered no benefits compared with the use of propofol alone. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Propofol and remifentanil are frequently combined for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia. Both propofol and remifentanil cause vasodilation and potentially reduce arterial BP. We aimed to develop a mechanism-based model that characterises the haemodynamic interactions between remifentanil and propofol. Data from two clinical trials in healthy volunteers were analysed using remifentanil-alone, propofol-alone, and combination groups. We evaluated remifentanil effects on haemodynamics using a previously developed mechanism-based haemodynamic model of propofol. The interaction between propofol and remifentanil was explored using the principles of the general pharmacodynamic interaction (GPDI) model. Remifentanil alone increased the dissipation rate of total peripheral resistance by 50% at 3.0 ng ml−1. Additionally, the dissipation rates of HR and stroke volume were attenuated by 4.8% and 4.9% per 1 ng ml−1 increase in remifentanil concentration, respectively. The maximal effect of propofol alone in decreasing the production rate of total peripheral resistance was 78%, which decreased to 32% when combined with remifentanil 4 ng ml−1. The effects of remifentanil on HR and stroke volume were attenuated by propofol with maximum decreases of 11.9% and 21.2%, respectively. Goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive check plots showed good predictive performance of the models. The structure of the previous mechanism-based haemodynamic model for propofol was able to describe the effects of remifentanil alone on haemodynamic variables. The GPDI model provided a good framework for characterising the pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and propofol on haemodynamic properties. NCT02043938; NCT03143972. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems use pharmacokinetic (PK) models to predict the drug infusion rates necessary to achieve a desired target plasma or effect-site concentration. As new PK models are developed and implemented in TCI systems, there can be uncertainty as to which target concentrations are appropriate. Existing dose recommendations can serve as a point of reference to identify target concentrations suitable for clinical applications.Methods: Simulations of remifentanil TCI were performed using three PK models (Minto, Eleveld, and Kim). We sought to identify models and target concentrations for remifentanil administration in children, adult, older people, and severely obese individuals, consistent with the remifentanil product label. In a typical adult this is an induction dose of 0.5-1 μg kg-1 and starting maintenance infusion rate of 0.25 μg kg-1 min-1.Results: For the Minto, Eleveld, and Kim remifentanil models, a plasma target concentration of ∼ 4 ng ml-1 achieves drug administration consistent with product label recommended initial doses for all groups with minor exceptions. With effect-site targeting in older individuals, a target concentration of ∼2 ng ml-1 is required for induction and ∼4 ng ml-1 for starting maintenance to achieve drug dosages close to product label recommendations.Conclusions: We identified remifentanil TCI target concentrations that resulted in drug administration similar to product label dosing recommendations. This approach did not necessarily identify target concentrations that achieve desired clinical effect, only those that are consistent with the product label recommended doses. We estimate that plasma target concentrations of 3.1-5.3 ng ml-1 are suitable for initial dosing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anaesthetic agents are likely to alter circulating cytokine concentrations. Because preceding studies have not been able to exclude the contribution of surgical trauma, perioperative stress, or both to circulating cytokine concentrations, the effects of anaesthesia remain unclear. The aim of this study was to quantify serum cytokines in healthy volunteers administered i.v. anaesthetic agents in the absence of surgical trauma and perioperative stress.Methods: Serum samples obtained during previous standardised studies from healthy volunteers were compared before and 6-8 h after induction of anaesthesia with propofol (n=31), propofol/remifentanil (n=30), dexmedetomidine (n=17) or dexmedetomidine/remifentanil (n=15). Anaesthetic regimens were standardised and volunteers did not undergo any surgical intervention. Serum concentrations of interleukin (IL)2, IL4, IL6, IL10, IL17, IL18, IL21, IL22, IL23, C-X-C motif ligand 8, interferon gamma, E-selectin, L-selectin, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-polypeptide-related sequence (MIC)A, MICB, Granzyme A, and Granzyme B were quantified using a multiplexed antibody-based assay (Luminex).Results: Samples were obtained from volunteers of either sex aged 18-70 yr. After anaesthesia with propofol alone, concentrations of IL4 (P=0.012), IL6 (P=0.027), IL21 (P=0.035), IL22 (P=0.002), C-X-C motif ligand 8 (P=0.004), MICB (P=0.046), and Granzyme A (P=0.045) increased. After anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, IL17 (P=0.013), interferon gamma (P=0.003), and MICA (P=0.001) decreased, but IL6 (P=0.006) and L-selectin (P=0.001) increased. After dexmedetomidine alone, IL18 (P=0.002), L-selectin (P=0.017), E-selectin (P=0.002), and Granzyme B (P=0.023) decreased. After dexmedetomidine with remifentanil no changes were observed.Conclusions: In healthy volunteers not undergoing surgery, different i.v. anaesthesia regimens were associated with differential effects on circulating cytokines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]