Search

Background: Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) of renal tumors is a well-established alternative to partial nephrectomy, but the effects on renal function after the procedure are not well-documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate renal function after computed tomography–guided PCA. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study including 259 patients treated with PCA at Odense University Hospital, Denmark from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Both patients with malignant (96%) and benign tumors (4%) were included. Mean age of patients was 66.5 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.9, range: 27–91) and 174 (67%) patients were men. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was recorded at baseline and 12 months after cryoablation. Results: Mean tumor size was 27.5 mm (SD = 10.0) distributed in seven different histopathological types, mainly clear cell renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) (64%) and papillary RCC (22%). Mean eGFR at baseline was 73.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD = 23.2) with a follow-up mean eGFR of 69.7 (SD = 23.7) (p < 0.0001). At baseline before intervention 190 patients (73%) had eGFR matching chronic kidney disease (CKD) groups 1 and 2 (normal to mild CKD), 64 patients (24%) matching CKD group 3 (average CKD), and 1% in groups 4 and 5. At 12-month follow-up, 171 patients (66%) had eGFR matching CKD groups 1 and 2, 77 patients (30%) matching CKD group 3 and 11 patients (4%) matching CKD groups 4 and 5. In patients with skewed renography who had PCA in the kidney with better excretion, eGFR at baseline was 64.7 and 61.2 at follow-up (p = 0.703). Conclusions: This study showed minimal decline in renal function 12 months after PCA, even for patients with reduced renal function. PCA is therefore considered a safe and relevant intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cryoablation is a promising minimally invasive, nephron-sparing treatment of small renal carcinoma (RCC) in co-morbid patients. Purpose: To assess the safety, efficacy, and cancer-specific outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided cryoablation of stage T1 (RCC). Material and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 122 consecutive patients with 128 tumors treated with cryoablation during 2016–2017. All patients had biopsy-verified T1 RCC. Results: Median age was 69 years (IQR=59–76); 69% were male. Median tumor size was 26 mm (± 20–33); 9% were stage T1b. Mean follow-up time was 36.3±12.0 months. In total, 14 (11%) procedures led to complications, of which 4 (3%) were intraoperative, 5 (4%) appeared ≤30 days and 5 (4%) >30 days after treatment. Major complications arose after 4 (3%) procedures. Statistically significant associations were found between major complications and stage T1b (P = 0.039), RENAL score (P = 0.010), and number of needles used in cryoablation (P = 0.004). Residual tumor was detected after 4 (3%) procedures and 5 (4%) tumors had local tumor progression. Of 122 patients, 3 (2%) advanced to metastatic disease. Significant statistical associations were found between local tumor progression and T1b stage tumors and number of needles used in cryoablation (P = 0.05 and P = 0.004, respectively). For patients with T1a tumors, the one- and three-year disease-free survival was 98% and 95%, respectively, and for T1b 100% after one year and 75% after three years. Conclusions: This study showed that cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment of stage T1 RCC and suggests that in selecting candidates for cryoablation of RCC, the tumor characteristics are more critical than patients' baseline health status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]