Search

Peach varieties that differ in red coloration due to varied anthocyanin accumulation result from transcriptional regulation by PpMYB10s, a group of specific R2R3 MYBs. Here we investigated the mechanisms driving a lack of anthocyanin in yellow‐skinned 'Jinxiu' peach peel, as well as accumulation induced by UV irradiance. It was found that PpMYB10.1, PpMYB10.2 and PpMYB10.3 were positive regulators of anthocyanin accumulation, but the stimulation by PpMYB10.2 was weak. Low expression of PpMYB10.1 causes natural anthocyanin deficiency in 'Jinxiu' peel. However, the promoter sequences of PpMYB10.1 were identical in 'Jinxiu' and a naturally red‐coloured peach 'Hujingmilu'. Therefore, potential negative regulator(s) upstream of PpMYB10.1 were explored. A novel R2R3‐MYB repressor termed PpMYB80 was identified through comparative transcriptomic analysis and then functionally confirmed via transiently overexpressing and silencing in peach fruit, as well as transformation in tobacco. PpMYB80 directly binds to the promoter of PpMYB10.1 and inhibits its expression, but does not affect PpMYB10.3. In UV‐exposed 'Jinxiu' fruit, expression of PpMYB10.3 was upregulated, while PpMYB10.1 remained low and PpMYB80 enhanced, which results in accumulation of anthocyanin in peel. This study revealed a transcriptional cascade involving PpMYB activators and repressors in regulating basal and UV‐induced anthocyanin accumulation in peach peel. Summary Statement: To explore the mechanisms for natural deficient and UV‐induced anthocyanin accumulation in 'Jinxiu' peach peel, the study was conducted and it was revealed that anthocyanin accumulation is regulated by a transcriptional cascade involving activators PpMYB10.1/10.3 and repressor PpMYB80. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) form one of the largest families of bacterial regulators. They are widely distributed and contribute to all aspects of metabolism and physiology. Most are homotetramers, with each subunit composed of an N-terminal DNA-binding domain followed by a long helix connecting to an effector-binding domain. LTTRs typically bind DNA in the presence or absence of a small-molecule ligand (effector). In response to cellular signals, conformational changes alter DNA interactions, contact with RNA polymerase, and sometimes contact with other proteins. Many are dual-function repressor–activators, although different modes of regulation may occur at multiple promoters. This review presents an update on the molecular basis of regulation, the complexity of regulatory schemes, and applications in biotechnology and medicine. The abundance of LTTRs reflects their versatility and importance. While a single regulatory model cannot describe all family members, a comparison of similarities and differences provides a framework for future study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Anthocyanins are visual cues for pollination and seed dispersal. Fruit containing anthocyanins also appeals to consumers due to its appearance and health benefits. In kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) studies have identified at least two MYB activators of anthocyanin, but their functions in fruit and the mechanisms by which they act are not fully understood.Here, transcriptome and small RNA high‐throughput sequencing were used to comprehensively identify contributors to anthocyanin accumulation in kiwifruit.Stable overexpression in vines showed that both 35S::MYB10 and MYB110 can upregulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in Actinidia chinensis fruit, and that MYB10 overexpression resulted in anthocyanin accumulation which was limited to the inner pericarp, suggesting that repressive mechanisms underlie anthocyanin biosynthesis in this species. Furthermore, motifs in the C‐terminal region of MYB10/110 were shown to be responsible for the strength of activation of the anthocyanic response. Transient assays showed that both MYB10 and MYB110 were not directly cleaved by miRNAs, but that miR828 and its phased small RNA AcTAS4‐D4(−) efficiently targeted MYB110. Other miRNAs were identified, which were differentially expressed between the inner and outer pericarp, and cleavage of SPL13, ARF16, SCL6 and F‐box1, all of which are repressors of MYB10, was observed.We conclude that it is the differential expression and subsequent repression of MYB activators that is responsible for variation in anthocyanin accumulation in kiwifruit species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition affecting millions of people worldwide, and an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of chronic pain is urgently needed. Nociceptors are the sensory neurons that alert the nervous system to potentially harmful stimuli such as mechanical pressure or noxious thermal temperature. When an injury occurs, the nociceptive threshold for pain is reduced and an increased pain signal is produced. This process is called nociceptive sensitization. This sensitization normally subsides after the injury is healed. However, dysregulation can occur which results in sensitization that persists after the injury has healed. This process is thought to perpetuate chronic pain. The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway has been previously implicated in nociceptive sensitization in response to injury in Drosophila melanogaster. Downstream of Hh signaling, the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) pathway has also been shown to be necessary for this process. Here, we describe a role for nuclear components of BMP's signaling pathway in the formation of injury-induced nociceptive sensitization. Brinker (Brk), and Schnurri (Shn) were suppressed in nociceptors using an RNA-interference (RNAi) "knockdown" approach. Knockdown of Brk resulted in hypersensitivity in the absence of injury, indicating that it normally acts to suppress nociceptive sensitivity. Animals in which transcriptional activator Shn was knocked down in nociceptors failed to develop normal allodynia after ultraviolet irradiation injury, indicating that Shn normally acts to promote hypersensitivity after injury. These results indicate that Brk-related transcription regulators play a crucial role in the formation of nociceptive sensitization and may therefore represent valuable new targets for pain-relieving medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Morphogen concentration changes in space as well as over time during development. However, how these dynamics are interpreted by cells to specify fate is not well understood. Here, we focus on two morphogens: the maternal transcription factors Bicoid and Dorsal, which directly regulate target genes to pattern Drosophila embryos. The actions of these factors at enhancers has been thoroughly dissected and provides a rich platform for understanding direct input by morphogens and their changing roles over time. Importantly, Bicoid and Dorsal do not work alone; we also discuss additional inputs that work with morphogens to control spatiotemporal gene expression in embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anthocyanins are preferentially accumulated in certain tissues of particular species of citrus. A R2R3-MYB transcription factor (named Ruby1) has been well documented as an activator of citrus anthocyanin biosynthesis. In this study, we characterized CsMYB3, a transcriptional repressor that regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in citrus. CsMYB3 was expressed in anthocyaninpigmented tissues, and the expression was closely associated with that of Ruby1, which is a key anthocyanin activator. Overexpression of CsMYB3 in Arabidopsis resulted in a decrease in anthocyanins under nitrogen stress. Overexpression of CsMYB3 in the background of CsRuby1-overexpressing strawberry and Arabidopsis reduced the anthocyanin accumulation level. Transient promoter activation assays revealed that CsMYB3 could repress the activation capacity of the complex formed by CsRuby1/CsbHLH1 for the anthocyanin biosynthetic genes. Moreover, CsMYB3 could be transcriptionally activated by CsRuby1 via promoter binding, thus forming an ‘activator-and repressor’ loop to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in citrus. This study shows that CsMYB3 plays a repressor role in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis and proposes an ‘activator-and-repressor’ loop model constituted by CsRuby1 and CsMYB3 in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in citrus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

'Jimba', a well-known white flowered chrysanthemum cultivar, occasionally and spontaneously produces red colored petals under natural cultivation, but there is little information about the molecular regulatory mechanism underlying this process. We analysed the expression patterns of 91 MYB transcription factors in 'Jimba' and 'Turning red Jimba' and identified an R3 MYB, CmMYB#7 , whose expression was significantly decreased in 'Turning red Jimba' compared with 'Jimba', and confirmed it is a passive repressor of anthocyanin biosynthesis. CmMYB#7 competed with CmMYB6, which together with CmbHLH2 is an essential component of the anthocyanin activation complex, for interaction with CmbHLH2 through the bHLH binding site in the R3 MYB domain. This reduced binding of the CmMYB6–CmbHLH2 complex and inhibited its ability to activate CmDFR and CmUFGT promoters. Moreover, using transient expression assays we demonstrated that changes in the expression of CmMYB#7 accounted for alterations in anthocyanin content. Taken together, our findings illustrate that CmMYB#7 is a negative regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in chrysanthemum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

NagR, belonging to the GntR/HutC family, is a negative regulator that directly represses the nagP and nagAB genes, which are involved in GlcNAc transport and utilization in Bacillus subtilis. Our previous work confirmed that the chitinase B gene (chiB) of Bacillus thuringiensis strain Bti75 is also negatively controlled by YvoABt, the ortholog of NagR from B. subtilis. In this work, we investigated its regulatory network in Bti75 and found that YvoABt is an N-acetylglucosamine utilization regulator primarily involved in GlcNAc catabolism; therefore YvoABt is renamed as NagRBt. The RNA-seq data revealed that 27 genes were upregulated and 14 genes were downregulated in the ΔnagR mutant compared with the wild-type strain. The regulon (exponential phase) was characterized by RNA-seq, bioinformatics software, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR. In the Bti75 genome, 19 genes that were directly regulated and 30 genes that were indirectly regulated by NagRBt were identified. We compiled in silico, in vitro, and in vivo evidence that NagRBt behaves as a repressor and activator to directly or indirectly influence major biological processes involved in amino sugar metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, phosphotransferase system, and the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway.

Bacterial antibiotic resistance is a worldwide health problem that deserves important research attention in order to develop new therapeutic strategies. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified Pseudomonas aeruginosa as one of the priority bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. In this opportunistic pathogen, antibiotics efflux is one of the most prevalent mechanisms where the drug is efficiently expulsed through the cell-wall. This resistance mechanism is highly correlated to the expression level of efflux pumps of the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family, which is finely tuned by gene regulators. Thus, it is worthwhile considering the efflux pump regulators of P. aeruginosa as promising therapeutical targets alternative. Several families of regulators have been identified, including activators and repressors that control the genetic expression of the pumps in response to an extracellular signal, such as the presence of the antibiotic or other environmental modifications. In this review, based on different crystallographic structures solved from archetypal bacteria, we will first focus on the molecular mechanism of the regulator families involved in the RND efflux pump expression in P. aeruginosa, which are TetR, LysR, MarR, AraC, and the two-components system (TCS). Finally, the regulators of known structure from P. aeruginosa will be presented.

NagR, belonging to the GntR/HutC family, is a negative regulator that directly represses the nagP and nagAB genes, which are involved in GlcNAc transport and utilization in Bacillus subtilis. Our previous work confirmed that the chitinase B gene (chiB) of Bacillus thuringiensis strain Bti75 is also negatively controlled by YvoABt, the ortholog of NagR from B. subtilis. In this work, we investigated its regulatory network in Bti75 and found that YvoABt is an N-acetylglucosamine utilization regulator primarily involved in GlcNAc catabolism; therefore YvoABt is renamed as NagRBt. The RNA-seq data revealed that 27 genes were upregulated and 14 genes were downregulated in the Δ nagR mutant compared with the wild-type strain. The regulon (exponential phase) was characterized by RNA-seq, bioinformatics software, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR. In the Bti75 genome, 19 genes that were directly regulated and 30 genes that were indirectly regulated by NagRBt were identified. We compiled in silico, in vitro , and in vivo evidence that NagRBt behaves as a repressor and activator to directly or indirectly influence major biological processes involved in amino sugar metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, phosphotransferase system, and the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

* SARD1 is an activator of plant immunity that promotes production of the hormone salicylic acid (SA) and activation of defense gene expression. SARD1 itself is strongly inducible by infection. Here, we investigated the transcriptional control of SARD1. * We used yeast one-hybrid assays to identify WRKY70. The WRKY70 binding site was defined using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and its importance was investigated using an Arabidopsis thaliana protoplast system. The effect of wrky70 mutations was studied by measurements of pathogen growth, SA concentrations, and gene expression by RNA-seq. * WRKY70 binds to a GACTTTT motif in the SARD1 promoter in yeast and Arabidopsis protoplasts. Plants with wrky70 mutations have elevated expression of SARD1 in the absence of pathogens, but not when infected. Expression profiling revealed that WRKY70 represses many pathogen-inducible genes in the absence of pathogens, yet is required for activation of many other pathogen-inducible genes in infected plants. The GACTTTT motif is enriched in the promoters of both these gene sets, and conserved in SARD1 orthologs within the Brassicaceae. * WRKY70 represses SARD1 by binding the motif GACTTTT in the absence of pathogens. Conservation of the WRKY70 binding among the Brassicaceae suggests that WRKY70 repression of SARD1 is important for fitness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transcription factors (TFs) are among the most frequently detected targets of sumoylation, and effects of the modification have been studied for about 200 individual TFs to date. TF sumoylation is most often associated with reduced target gene expression, which can be mediated by enhanced interactions with corepressors or by interference with protein modifications that promote transcription. However, recent studies show that sumoylation also regulates gene expression by controlling the levels of TFs that are associated with chromatin. SUMO can mediate this by modulating TF DNA-binding activity, promoting clearance of TFs from chromatin, or indirectly, by influencing TF abundance or localization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contrast to somatic mammalian cells, which cannot alter their fate, plant cells can dedifferentiate to form totipotent callus cells and regenerate a whole plant, following treatment with specific phytohormones. However, the regulatory mechanisms and key factors that control differentiation-dedifferentiation and cell totipotency have not been completely clarified in plants. Recently, several plant transcription factors that regulate meristem formation and dedifferentiation have been identified and include members of the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR (TCP), WUSCHEL (WUS), and WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION (WIND1) families. WUS and WIND positively control plant cell totipotency, while TCP negatively controls it. Interestingly, TCP is a transcriptional activator that acts as a negative regulator of shoot meristem formation, and WUS is a transcriptional repressor that positively maintains totipotency of the stem cells of the shoot meristem. We describe here the functions of TCP, WUS and WIND transcription factors in the regulation of differentiation-dedifferentiation by positive and negative transcriptional regulators.

Background Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a significant health care burden in developed countries. However, the molecular events leading from cardiac hypertrophy to CHF are unclear and preventive therapeutic approaches are limited. We have previously described that microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is a key regulator of cardiac hypertrophy, but its cardiac targets are still uncharacterized. Methods and results Gene array analysis of hearts from MITF-mutated mice indicated that ErbB2 interacting protein (Erbin) is a candidate target gene for MITF. We have recently demonstrated that Erbin is decreased in human heart failure and plays a role as a negative modulator of pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Here we show that Erbin expression is regulated by MITF. Under basal conditions MITF activates Erbin expression by direct binding to its promoter. However, under β-adrenergic stimulation Erbin expression is decreased only in wild type mice, but not in MITF-mutated mice. Yeast two-hybrid screening, using MITF as bait, identified an interaction with the cardiac-predominant four-and-a-half LIM domain protein 2 (FHL2), which was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation in both mouse and human hearts. Upon β-adrenergic stimulation, FHL2 and MITF bind Erbin promoter as a complex and repress MITF-directed Erbin expression. Overexpression of FHL2 alone had no effect on Erbin expression, but in the presence of MITF, Erbin expression was decreased. FHL2-MITF association was also increased in biopsies of heart failure patients. Conclusion MITF unexpectedly regulates both the activation and the repression of Erbin expression. This ligand mediated fine tuning of its gene expression could be an important mechanism in the process of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway appears to have a complex role in synaptic plasticity, but its various functions remain to be elucidated. Using late phase long-term potentiation (L-LTP) in the hippocampus of the mouse as a model for long-term synaptic plasticity, we previously showed that inhibition of the proteasome enhances induction but blocks maintenance of L-LTP. In this study, we investigated the possible mechanisms by which proteasome inhibition has opposite effects on L-LTP induction and maintenance. Our results show that inhibiting phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinase or blocking the interaction between eukaryotic initiation factors 4E (eIF4E) and 4G (eIF4G) reduces the enhancement of L-LTP induction brought about by proteasome inhibition suggesting interplay between proteolysis and the signaling pathway mediated by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Also, proteasome inhibition leads to accumulation of translational activators in the mTOR pathway such as eIF4E and eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) early during L-LTP causing increased induction. Furthermore, inhibition of the proteasome causes a buildup of translational repressors, such as polyadenylate-binding protein interacting protein 2 (Paip2) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 2 (4E-BP2), during late stages of L-LTP contributing to the blockade of L-LTP maintenance. Thus, the proteasome plays a critical role in regulating protein synthesis during L-LTP by tightly controlling translation. Our results provide novel mechanistic insights into the interplay between protein degradation and protein synthesis in long-term synaptic plasticity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] DOF transcription factors have roles in plant-specific processes. [•] They can activate or repress target genes. [•] They share a conserved DNA-binding domain and a series of more class-specific motifs. [•] Their action is subject to post-transcriptional events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Bacterial genes are commonly encoded in clusters, known as operons, which share transcriptional regulatory control and often encode functionally related proteins that take part in certain biological pathways. Operons that are coregulated are known to colocalize in the genome, suggesting that their spatial organization is under selection for efficient expression regulation. However, the internal order of genes within operons is believed to be poorly conserved, and hence expression requirements are claimed to be too weak to oppose gene rearrangements. In light of these opposing views, we set out to investigate whether the internal location of the regulatory genes within operons is under selection. Our analysis shows that transcription factors (TFs) are preferentially encoded as either first or last in their operons, in the two diverged model bacteria Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. In a higher resolution, we find that TFs that repress transcription of the operon in which they are encoded (autorepressors), contribute most of this signal by specific preference of the first operon position. We show that this trend is strikingly conserved throughout highly diverged bacterial phyla. Moreover, these autorepressors regulate operons that carry out highly diverse biological functions. We propose a model according to which autorepressors are selected to be located first in their operons in order to optimize transcription regulation. Specifically, the first operon position helps autorepressors to minimize leaky transcription of the operon structural genes, thus minimizing energy waste. Our analysis provides statistically robust evidence for a paradigm of bacterial autorepressor preferential operonic location. Corroborated with our suggested model, an additional layer of operon expression control that is common throughout the bacterial domain is revealed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The concept of activation in transcriptional regulation is based on the assumption that product mRNA increases monotonically as a function of regulator concentration. We analyze the Shea-Ackers model of transcription and find this assumption to be correct only for the simplest of promoters. We define a new regulatory constant that is a nonlinear combination of association and transcription initiation constants characterizing activation and repression for more complicated promoters. Our results can guide the synthesis of new promoters and lead to a deeper understanding of the constraints guiding the natural promoters evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The X-ray structure of the N-terminal domain of TyrR has been solved to a resolution of 2.3 Å. It reveals a modular protein containing an ACT domain, a connecting helix, a PAS domain and a C-terminal helix. Two dimers are present in the asymmetric unit with one monomer of each pair exhibiting a large rigid-body movement that results in a hinging around residue 74 of ∼50°. The structure of the dimer is discussed with reference to other transcription regulator proteins. Putative binding sites are identified for the aromatic amino acid cofactors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) leader protein (EBNALP) Co. activates promoters with EBNA2 and is important for Epstein-Barr virus immortalization of B cells. Investigation of the role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in EBNALP and EBNA2 promoter regulation has now identified EBNALP and EBNA2 to be associated with HDAC4 in a lymphoblastoid cell line. Furthermore, a transcription- deficient EBNALP point mutant did not associate with HDAC4. HDAC4 and 5 overexpression repressed EBNA2 activation and EBNALP coactivation, whereas other HDACs had little effect. More- over, EBNALP expression decreased nuclear HDAC4. Expression of 14-3-3 anchors HDAC4 in the cytoplasm, increased EBNALP effects, and reversed HDAC4 or 5 repression. HDAC4 reversal depended on the HDAC4 nuclear export sequence. Consistent with EBNALP coactivation being mediated by nuclear HDAC4 depletion, HDAC4 overexpression increased nuclear HDAC4 and specifically repressed EBNA2-dependent activation as well as EBNALP-dependent coactivation. Also, EBNALP, HDAC4, and 14-3-3 could be immunoprecipitated in a single complex. Thus, these data strongly support a model in which EBNALP coactivates transcription by relocalizing HDAC4 and 5 from EBNA2 activated promoters to the cytoplasm. The observed EBNALP effects are likely also in part through HDAC5, which is highly homologous to HDAC4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Inducible promoter fusions are commonly employed to study the biological functions of genes as well as to investigate mechanisms of transcription regulation. A concern for many studies of heterologous gene expression is that steady state transcription may be too high under non-inducing conditions, producing undesired phenotypes prior to induction. Fusions containing the galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter joined to PvuII, a bacterial DNA endonuclease gene, are toxic to yeast cells even under non-inducing conditions, i.e., in glucose media. This toxicity was utilized in conjunction with PCR-based mutagenesis of the GAL1 regulatory region to isolate mutant promoters that retained high inducibility but exhibited reduced basal level expression. The Mig1 repressor binding and putative TATA box regions were unchanged among four mutant promoters examined in detail. However, each promoter contained one or more mutations within previously identified binding sites for the Gal4 activator protein. Genetic assays developed to monitor GAL1p::I-SceI endonuclease-induced recombination demonstrated that basal expression from two of the new promoters (designated GAL1-V4 and GAL1-V10) was strongly reduced. These experiments and additional quantitative luciferase reporter gene assays demonstrate the utility of the approach for identifying promoters that permit more tightly controlled gene expression. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Vimentin exhibits a complex pattern of developmental- and tissue-specific expression and is aberrantly expressed in most metastatic tumors. The human vimentin promoter contains multiple DNA elements, some of which enhance gene expression and one that inhibits. A silencer element (at -319) binds the repressor ZBP-89. Further upstream (at -757) is an element, which acts positively in the presence of the silencer element and, thus, is referred to as an antisilencer (ASE). Previously, we showed that Stat1a binds to this element upon induction by IFN-?. However, substantial binding and reporter gene activity was still present in nontreated cells. Here, we have found that Stat3 binds to the ASE element in vitro. Transfection experiments in COS-1 cells with various vimentin promoter--reporter constructs show that gene activity is dependent upon the cotransfection and activation of Stat3. Moreover, activated Stat3 can overcome ZBP-89 repression. Coimmunoprecipitation studies demonstrate that Stat3 and ZBP-89 can interact and confocal microscopy detects these factors to be colocalized in the nucleus. Moreover, a correlation exists between the presence of activated Stat3 and vimentin expression in MDA-MB-231 cells, which is lacking in MCF7 cells where vimentin is not expressed. In the light of these results, we propose that the interaction of Stat3 and ZBP-89 may be crucial for overcoming the effects of the repressor ZBP-89, which suggests a novel mode for Stat3 gene activation.Oncogene (2004) 23, 168-178. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207003 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highly specific expression patterns can be caused by the overlapping activities of activator and repressor sequences in enhancers. However, few studies illuminate how these sequences evolve in the origin of new enhancers. Here, we show that expression of the bond gene in the semicircular wall epithelium (swe) of the Drosophila melanogaster male ejaculatory bulb (EB) is controlled by an enhancer consisting of an activator region that requires Abdominal-B driving expression in the entire EB and a repressor region that restricts this expression to the EB swe. Although this expression pattern is independently gained in the distantly related Scaptodrosophila lebanonensis and does not require Abdominal-B , we show that functionally similar repressor sequences are present in Scaptodrosophila and also in species that do not express bond in the EB. We suggest that during enhancer evolution, repressor sequences can precede the evolution of activator sequences and may lead to similar but independently evolved expression patterns. [Display omitted] • An enhancer controls a highly specific EB expression of bond in Drosophila • This enhancer contains activator and repressor sequences • A similar enhancer is independently gained in the distantly related S. lebanonensis • Similar repressor sequences are present in other species without bond EB expression Pu et al. show that the independent gain of a highly specific expression pattern across distantly related species may be because of the preexistence of repressor sequences that precedes the diversification of these species. This may reflect a general mechanism underlying the evolution of highly specific enhancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The SoxR protein of Escherichia coli responds to redox signals by activating the transcription of soxS, which encodes another transcription activator that directly stimulates oxidative stress genes. We show here that transcription of the soxR gene, which is positioned head-to-head with soxS in the chromosome, initiates in the intergenic region and is itself repressed by SoxR protein in in vitro transcription experiments. Analysis of single-copy operon fusions to soxR, combined with the results of Northern blotting experiments, verified this regulation and the transcription start site in vivo. The structure of the overlapping promoters is such that the single SoxR-binding site is located in the −10/−35 spacer of the soxS promoter, but just downstream of the −10 element of the soxR promoter. Activated and non-activated SoxR bind this site equally well, exerting nearly constant repression of soxR; activated SoxR simultaneously stimulates the soxS promoter ≥30-fold. The functional soxR promoter depresses soxS transcription when SoxR is not activated and enhances soxS transcription when SoxR is activated, as shown by comparing the expression of soxS9::lacZ fusions with and without the soxR −35 element (induction ratio only ∼7-fold). SoxR thus represents a highly polar, redox-regulated transcriptional switch that maximizes the change in expression of soxS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Organization of the vertebrate inner ear is mainly dependent on localized signals from surrounding tissues. Previous studies demonstrated that sonic hedgehog (Shh) secreted from the floor plate and notochord is required for specification of ventral (auditory) and dorsal (vestibular) inner ear structures, yet it was not clear how this signaling activity is propagated. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which Shh regulates inner ear development, we examined embryos with various combinations of mutant alleles for Shh, Gli2 and Gli3. Our study shows that Gli3 repressor (R) is required for patterning dorsal inner ear structures, whereas Gli activator (A) proteins are essential for ventral inner ear structures. A proper balance of Gli3R and Gli2/3A is required along the length of the dorsoventral axis of the inner ear to mediate graded levels of Shh signaling, emanating from ventral midline tissues. Formation of the ventral-most otic region, the distal cochlear duct, requires robust Gli2/3A function. By contrast, the formation of the proximal cochlear duct and saccule, which requires less Shh signaling, is achieved by antagonizing Gli3R. The dorsal vestibular region requires the least amount of Shh signaling in order to generate the correct dose of Gli3R required for the development of this otic region. Taken together, our data suggest that reciprocal gradients of GliA and GliR mediate the responses to Shh signaling along the dorsoventral axis of the inner ear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]