Search

Objective: To evaluate the subsequent rate of thrombosis among women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (Ob-APS) in a multicentre database of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients, and the clinical utility of the adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (aGAPSS), a validated tool to assess the likelihood of developing new thrombosis, in this group of patients.Design: Retrospective study.Setting: The Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking Clinical Database and Repository.Population: Women with Ob-APS.Methods: Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics and measurement of aGAPSS in women with Ob-APS, with or without thrombosis, after initial pregnancy morbidity (PM).Main Outcome Measures: Risk factors for thrombosis and aGAPSS.Results: Of 550 patients, 126 had Ob-APS; 74/126 (59%) presented with thrombosis, and 47 (63%) of these women developed thrombosis after initial PM, in a mean time of 7.6 ± 8.2 years (4.9/100 patient years). Younger age at diagnosis of Ob-APS, additional cardiovascular risk factors, superficial vein thrombosis, heart valve disease, and multiple aPL positivity increased the risk of first thrombosis after PM. Women with thrombosis after PM had a higher aGAPSS compared with women with Ob-APS alone [median 11.5 (4-16) versus 9 (4-13); P = 0.0089].Conclusion: Based on a retrospective analysis of our multicentre aPL database, 63% of women with Ob-APS developed thrombosis after initial obstetric morbidity; additional thrombosis risk factors, selected clinical manifestations, and high-risk aPL profile increased the risk. Women with subsequent thrombosis after Ob-APS had a higher aGAPSS at entry to the registry. We believe that aGAPSS is a valid tool to improve risk stratification in aPL-positive women.Tweetable Abstract: More than 60% of women with obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome had thrombosis after initial pregnancy morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors conducted a clinical trial to examine the efficacy and safety of nortriptyline in the treatment of major depression in elderly medical inpatients. The diagnosis of major depression was made by a psychiatrist in 41 of 680 patients 65 years of age or older. The study was balted at the midpoint because of inadequate patient recruitment, primarily a consequence of medical illnesses that prevented more than 80% of eligible patients from participating in or completing the clinical trial. Major or minor medical contraindications to the use of antidepressants were present in over 90% of depressed patients. Short-term follow-up was conducted on untreated depressed patients, those receiving antidepressants at the time of assessment, and those in whom antidepressant treatment was initiated after assessment. Non-randomized exposure to antidepressants did not predict remission of depression at follow-up due to spontaneous remission in the untreated group. Given the prevalence of medical contraindications to antidepressant use among depressed elderly patients and the problems with side effects in treated patients, there were few depressed, elderly hospitalized patients who were candidates for antidepressant therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective: To evaluate the impact of a geriatric consultation team on the functional status of hospitalized elderly patients.Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial.Setting: University-affiliated referral Veterans Administration Medical Center.Patients: One hundred and seventy-eight hospitalized elderly men 75 years or older admitted to medical, surgical, and psychiatry services, but excluding patients admitted to intensive care units.Intervention: Eighty-eight intervention group patients received multidimensional evaluation by an interdisciplinary geriatric consultation team composed of a faculty geriatrician, geriatrics fellow, geriatric clinical nurse specialist, and a social worker trained in geriatrics. Results of the evaluation, including problem identification and recommendations, were given to the patients' physicians. Ninety control group patients received only usual care.Measurements and Main Results: Intervention and control groups were comparable initially. The major outcome variable was the Index of Independence in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Katz). Thirty-nine percent of the total study population was functionally independent on admission, 27% required assistance with one to three ADL, 22% required assistance with four to six ADL, and 12% were completely dependent. Many patients remained unchanged from admission to discharge: intervention group, 38%; control group, 39%. In the intervention group, 34% improved and 28% declined; in the control group, 26% improved and 36% declined. Although these changes reflected a trend toward greater improvement in the intervention group, the results were not statistically significant.Conclusions: Among elderly patients entering an acute-care hospital, approximately 60% had some degree of, and one third had serious functional disability. Such patients are at risk for further decline during hospitalization. A geriatric consultation team was unable to alter the degree of functional decline. Geriatric units or consultation teams may have to offer direct preventive or restorative services in addition to advice if improvements are to be made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]