Search

Objectives: The standard-of-care for postoperative care following elective craniotomy has historically been ICU admission. However, recent literature interrogating complications and interventions during this postoperative ICU stay suggests that all patients may not require this level of care. Thus, hospitals began implementing non-ICU postoperative care pathways for elective craniotomy. This systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate the existing literature regarding outcomes and costs for patients receiving non-ICU care after elective craniotomy.Data Sources: A systematic review of the PubMed database was performed following PRISMA guidelines from database inception to August 2021.Study Selection: Included studies were published in peer-reviewed journals, in English, and described outcomes for patients undergoing elective craniotomies without postoperative ICU care.Data Extraction: Data regarding study design, patient characteristics, and postoperative care pathways were extracted independently by two authors. Quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions tool, respectively.Data Synthesis: In total, 1,131 unique articles were identified through the database search, with 27 meeting inclusion criteria. Included articles were published from 2001 to 2021 and included non-ICU inpatient care and same-day discharge pathways. Overall, the studies demonstrated that postoperative non-ICU care for elective craniotomies led to length of stay reduction ranging from 6 hours to 4 days and notable cost reductions. Across 13 studies, 53 of the 2,469 patients (2.1%) intended for postoperative management in a non-ICU setting required subsequent care escalation.Conclusions: Overall, these studies suggest that non-ICU care pathways for appropriately selected postcraniotomy patients may represent a meaningful opportunity to improve care value. However, included studies varied greatly in patient selection, postoperative care protocol, and outcomes reporting. Standardization and multi-institutional collaboration are needed to draw definitive conclusions regarding non-ICU postoperative care for elective craniotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Metastases to the spine are a common source of severe pain in cancer patients. The secondary effects of spinal metastases include pain, bone fractures, hypercalcemia, and neurological deficits. As the disease progresses, pain severity can increase until it becomes refractory to medical treatments and leads to a decreased quality of life for patients. A key obstacle in the study of pain-induced spinal cancer is the lack of reliable and reproducible spine cancer animal models. In the present study, we developed a reproducible and reliable rat model of spinal cancer using human-derived tumor tissue to evaluate neurological decline using imaging and behavioral techniques.Purpose: The present study outlines the development and characterization of an orthotopic model of human breast cancer to the spine in immunocompromised rats.Study Design/setting: This is a basic science study.Methods: Female immunocompromised rats were randomized into three groups: tumor (n=8), RBC3 mammary adenocarcinoma tissue engrafted in the L5 vertebra body; sham (n=6), surgery performed but not tumor engrafted; and control (n=6), naive rats, no surgery performed. To evaluate the neurological impairment due to tumor invasion, functional assessment was done in all rodents at day 40 after tumor engraftment using locomotion gait analysis and pain response to a mechanical stimulus (Randall-Selitto test). Bioluminescence (BLI) was used to evaluate tumor growth in vivo and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed to evaluate bone changes due to tumor invasion. The animals were euthanized at day 45 and their spines were harvested and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.Results: Tumor growth in the spine was confirmed by BLI imaging and corroborated by histological analysis. Cone beam computed tomography images were characterized by a decrease in the bone intensity in the lumbar spine consistent with tumor location on BLI. On H&E staining of tumor-engrafted animals, there was a near-complete ablation of the ventral and posterior elements of the L5 vertebra with severe tumor invasion in the bony components displacing the spinal cord. Locomotion gait analysis of tumor-engrafted rats showed a disruption in the normal gait pattern with asignificant reduction in length (p=.02), duration (p=.002), and velocity (p=.002) of right leg strides and only in duration (p=.0006) and velocity (p=.001) of left leg strides, as compared with control and sham rats. Tumor-engrafted animals were hypersensitive to pain stimulus shown as a significantly reduced response in time (p=.02) and pressure (p=.01) applied when compared with control groups.Conclusions: We developed a system for the quantitative analysis of pain and locomotion in an animal model of metastatic human breast cancer of the spine. Tumor-engrafted animals showed locomotor and sensory deficits that are in accordance with clinical manifestation in patients with spine metastasis. Pain response and locomotion gait analysis were performed during follow-up. The Randall-Selitto test was a sensitive method to evaluate pain in the rat's spine. We present a model for the study of bone-associated cancer pain secondary to cancer metastasis to the spine, as well as for the study of new therapies and treatments to lessen pain from metastatic cancer to the neuroaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]