Search

Problem: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affecting neonates with fetal exposure to opioids, is defined by expression and severity of symptoms. The pathophysiology behind symptoms variability is lacking. The study aims were to examine (a) differences in gut microbiota of neonates with and without NAS, (b) the relationships between gut microbiota and symptom expression and NAS severity, and (c) the changes in the neonate gut microbiota diversity during the course of NAS treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design was used to examine differences in microbiota and a longitudinal, repeated measures approach was used to determine relationships between gut microbiota and NAS symptoms. Symptom data were collected using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool and the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale. Stool samples were collected for microbiome analyses with 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Results: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS were seen. Relative abundance results revealed 18 taxa were different in neonates with NAS compared to neonates without NAS. No differences were found in alpha or beta diversity in neonates with NAS between enrollment and hospital discharge. There was increased abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Bacteriodes genera related to higher symptom scores. Discussion: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS may be due to differences in birth mode and type of feeding. The findings of specific increased bacteria related to increased symptoms in the neonates with NAS may also be influenced by birth mode and type of feeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We hoped to understand (1) how parents of seriously ill neonatal intensive care unit patients conceptualize neonatal serious illness, and (2) how parent and physician perspectives on neonatal serious illness might differ. Design: This was a prospective survey study. Setting/Subjects: Parent members of the Courageous Parents Network. Measurements: We circulated a modified version of a previously developed survey. Participants were presented with a list of potential definition components and asked to rank components by importance and suggest modifications to the definition as needed. Thematic analysis of free-text responses was conducted to identify key themes in parent responses Results: Eighty-eight percent of parent participants agreed or strongly agreed with our working definition of neonatal serious illness. Parents agreed with the content of the definition but suggested using different language (especially less jargon) when using the definition to inform conversations with parents. Conclusions: The majority of parents surveyed for this study supported our definition of neonatal serious illness, which suggests that it may be useful for clinical and research applications. At the same time, parent responses revealed important differences in perceptions about serious illness between parents and physicians. In addition, parents will likely use any definition of neonatal serious illness differently than clinicians. We therefore propose that our definition be used to identify neonates with serious illness for the purposes of research and clinical care, but should not be used verbatim for communication with parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore (1) how neonatal nurses (NN) and social workers (SW) define serious illness and (2) how physician, nurse, and SW perceptions of serious illness differ. Design: Prospective survey study. Setting/Subjects: Members of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses or the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers. Measurements: We circulated a modified version of a previously developed survey. Participants were given a list of definition components and asked to rank components by importance and to suggest modifications. Results: Eighty-eight percent of participants agreed with our definition of neonatal serious illness. NN and SW differ in important ways in their views of neonatal serious illness when compared with physicians and parents. Conclusions: Our definition of neonatal serious illness has broad acceptability and may be useful for clinical care and research. Future work should prospectively identify patients with neonatal serious illness and establish the usefulness of our definition in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: About 16,000 infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) each year with many experiencing invasive medical treatments and high number of symptoms.1 To inform better management, we characterized diagnoses, symptoms, and patterns of care among infants who died in the NICU. Method: Retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review of 476 infants who died following admission to a large regional level IV NICU in the United States over a 10-year period. Demographic, symptom, diagnosis, treatment, and end-of-life characteristics were extracted. Results: About half of infants were male (55.9%, n = 266), average gestational age was 31.3 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 6.5), and average age at death was 40.1 days (SD = 84.5; median = 12; range: 0–835). Race was documented for 65% of infants, and most were White (67.0%). One-third of infants (n = 138) were seen by fetal medicine. Most infants experienced pain through both the month and week before death (79.6%), however, infants with necrotizing enterocolitis had more symptoms in the week before death. Based on EMR, infants had more symptoms, and received more medical interventions and comfort measures during the week before death compared with the month prior. Only 35% (n = 166) received a palliative care referral. Conclusions: Although the medical profiles of infants who die in the NICU are complex, the overall number of symptoms was less than in older pediatric populations. For infants at high risk of mortality rate, providers should assess for common symptoms over time. To manage symptoms as effectively as possible, both timely and continuous communication with parents and early referral to palliative care are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The original pediatric complex chronic conditions (CCC) classification system developed in 2000/2001 is the gold standard in classifying children with life-limiting illnesses. It was significantly modified in 2014; yet the two systems have not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement and validity of the original versus the modified CCC classification systems. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) data from 2012 was used with a sample of infant decedents less than 1 years. The agreement (i.e., Cohen's Kappa Statistic) and validity (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value [PPV]) statistics were calculated. Among the 10,175 infants that were classified, the modified system performed well in identifying infants who had a CCC, and it captured infants that the original classification did not. The modified system represents an improvement over the original, but additional testing is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]