Search

Metaphorical language describing the COVID-19 pandemic as a war has been pervasive in public discourse (e.g. "the pandemic is a war," "the virus is an enemy," and "the vaccine is a weapon"). This study employs an online survey experiment (N = 551 U.S. adults) to examine the impact of war metaphors compared to non-metaphorical literal frames and fire metaphors (e.g. "the pandemic is a wildfire"). War metaphors exhibited little advantage over literal frames across a variety of desirable outcomes (i.e. the adoption of pro-health behaviors against COVID-19, perceived solidarity and collective responsibility to curb the pandemic, and intentions to discuss and share the health news with others). However, this study revealed some benefits of war metaphors over fire metaphors. Compared with fire metaphors, health news featuring war metaphors increased both positive emotions and perceived threats of COVID-19, which in turn promoted pro-health behaviors against COVID-19 and perceived solidarity to cope with the public health crisis. Moreover, positive emotions in response to war metaphors also indirectly encouraged the retransmission of science-based COVID-19 health news. This study thus showcased the benefits and limitations of war metaphors and revealed the mediating roles of perceived threats and positive emotions in explaining war metaphorical framing effects. Implications of using war and fire metaphors for communicating about public health crises are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: As global health issues become more important, nursing education is undergoing change to reflect the changing global health environment and new knowledge. Nurses are required to be able to understand and interact with patients of diverse cultural backgrounds and characteristics and have relevant global health competencies. Objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the GHC status of nurses and to analyze the association between GHC and nurse characteristics. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional descriptive survey using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected from 473 nurses to collect information about participants' GHC and general characteristics, including gender, age, nursing experience (years), experience of caring for foreign patients, English communication skills, learning experience in global health, and global preparedness. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between GHC and nurse characteristics. Results: The mean GHC score of nurses was 2.21 out of 4. "Nursing practice in globalization" was the most important global health competency, while "resource management in globalization" was the one that was most necessary. In addition, "Resource management in globalization" was the highest priority for global health competency. Global preparedness (β =.25, p <.001) and the perceived necessity of GHC in nursing practice (β =.28, p <.001) were statistically significant factors influencing the global health competency of nurses. Conclusion: Based on the relationship identified between GHC and the characteristics of nurses, it is essential to develop an education program for enhancing global preparedness and perception of the necessity of GHC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient safety incidents lead to performance difficulties for nurses when providing nursing practice. This affects work-life balance and causes second and third-victimization. This study predicts factors affecting clinical nurses' work-life balance due to patient safety incidents using classification and regression tree analysis techniques. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of data from a cohort research project, which used a descriptive survey for data collection. Participants comprised 372 nurses. Data were collected using SurveyMonkey, a mobile-based survey software solution, from January to September 2021. Data included the general characteristics of clinical nurses, second damage, second damage support, third damage, and work-life balance. The specific variables included in the analysis chosen through rigorous Lasso analysis form the foundation for predicting work-life balance. Variables with low explanatory power were excluded, thereafter, the variables selected by Lasso were analyzed with a classification and regression tree model to predict work-life balance. Results: A regression tree was applied to predict work-life balance using seven variables—education level, marital status, position, physical distress, second-victim support, turnover intentions, and absenteeism (selected through Lasso analysis). After pruning, at tree size four, when turnover intentions were < 4.250, physical distress < 2.875, and second-victim support < 2.345, the predicted work-life balance was 3.972. However, when turnover intentions were < 4.250, physical distress < 2.875, and second-victim support ≥ 2.345, then the predicted work-life balance was 2.760. Conclusions: This study's insights offer crucial groundwork for crafting targeted workforce risk management strategies and fostering a conducive organizational culture to mitigate nursing occupational stress, potentially curbing the recurrence of patient safety incidents and improving nursing practice while enhancing patient outcomes. Future research should explore second and third victim experiences across various healthcare settings globally to understand their impact on WLB and patient safety outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To identify trends in global health competency improvement programs for nurses and to verify their effects. Design: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Data sources: Articles published from 2000–2017 in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and ProQuest and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, Cochrane Library, Research Information Sharing Service, DataBase Periodical Information Academic, Korean Studies Information Service System, and National Assembly Library. Review methods: Cochrane methods were used to conduct a systematic review, meta‐analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Results: Nineteen studies were reviewed. Among them, 12 studies were used for the meta‐analysis. The meta‐analysis indicated that global health competency improvement programs affected multicultural self‐efficacy and cultural competence. Conclusion: The findings can be used as the basis for global health competency improvement programs. More studies are needed to clarify their effectiveness. Impact: Global health competency improvement programs can be beneficial to improve cultural competence and multicultural self‐efficacy for nurses and nursing students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]