1. Effect of Er: YAG laser and different surface treatment methods on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to self adhesive resin cement.
- Author
-
Elalfy NSM and Elbasty RS
- Subjects
- Humans, Surface Properties, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Bicuspid, Materials Testing, Silanes chemistry, Hydrogen Peroxide chemistry, Lasers, Solid-State therapeutic use, Resin Cements chemistry, Resin Cements radiation effects, Glass chemistry, Dental Bonding methods, Post and Core Technique instrumentation
- Abstract
To compare the push-out bond strength of adhesive resin cement and glass fiber posts (GFP) at different root levels after exposure to Er: YAG laser irradiation compared to other conventional surface treatment procedures. A total of 24 mandibular premolars were decoronated, root canal treatment was done, post spaces were prepared, and roots were mounted in acrylic resin blocks. Fiber posts were divided into four groups (n = 6) according to surface treatment methods: (1) silane only (control group), (2) Er: YAG laser 1.5 W + silane, (3) 30% hydrogen peroxide + silane, (4) sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles + silane. GFP were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement. Scanning electron microscope images with 500x magnification were taken for all groups. Push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine at different root levels. The difference between groups was statistically significant with laser group recording the highest mean ± SD value of push-out bond strength (5.668042 ± 1.16 MPa), followed by the H2O2 group, then the control group, meanwhile the lowest value was recorded with Sand-blasting group. There were no statistically significant differences between the Control group and Er: YAG group; Control group and sandblasted group. The difference between the radicular regions was not statistically significant, with the middle region recorded the highest push-out bond strength (4.746851 ± 0.73 MPa). GPF surface treatment using an Er: YAG laser is effective as it increases the retention to resin cement, while sandblasting decreases fiber post retention to resin cement. The hydrogen peroxide and the control groups give similar bond strength. The middle and apical regions of GFP have better retention to resin cement than the coronal one., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was an in-vitro study conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. All procedures carried out followed the ethical standards of Cairo University, and were approved by the institutional review board and research ethical committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. The selected teeth were extracted from diabetic patients due to periodontal reasons who signed medico-legal consent for their approval to be used in research. Consent for publication: Not applicable Informed consent: The selected teeth were extracted from diabetic patients due to periodontal reasons who signed medico-legal consent for their approval to be used in research. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF