Search

Purpose: Understanding motion characteristics of liver such as, interfractional and intrafractional motion variability, difference in motion within different locations in the organ, and their complex relationship with the breathing cycles are particularly important for image-guided liver SBRT. The purpose of this study was to investigate such motion characteristics based on fiducial markers tracked with the x-ray projections of the CBCT scans, taken immediately prior to the treatments. Methods: Twenty liver SBRT patients were analyzed. Each patient had three fiducial markers (2 × 5-mm gold) percutaneously implanted around the gross tumor. The prescription ranged from 2 to 8 fractions per patient. The CBCT projections data for each fraction (∼650 projections/scan), for each patient, were analyzed and the 2D positions of the markers were extracted using an in-house algorithm. In total, >55 000 x-ray projections were analyzed from 85 CBCT scans. From the 2D extracted positions, a 3D motion trajectory of the markers was constructed, from each CBCT scans, resulting in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranio-caudal (CC) location information of the markers with >55 000 data points. The authors then analyzed the interfraction and intrafraction liver motion variability, within different locations in the organ, and as a function of the breathing cycle. The authors also compared the motion characteristics against the planning 4DCT and the RPM™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) breathing traces. Variations in the appropriate gating window (defined as the percent of the maximum range at which 50% of the marker positions are contained), between fractions were calculated as well. Results: The range of motion for the 20 patients were 3.0 ± 2.0 mm, 5.1 ± 3.1 mm, and 17.9 ± 5.1 mm in the planning 4DCT, and 2.8 ± 1.6 mm, 5.3 ± 3.1 mm, and 16.5 ± 5.7 mm in the treatment CBCT, for LR, AP, and CC directions, respectively. The range of respiratory period was 3.9 ± 0.7 and 4.2 ± 0.8 s during the 4DCT simulation and the CBCT scans, respectively. The authors found that breathing-induced AP and CC motions are highly correlated. That is, all markers moved cranially also moved posteriorly and vice versa, irrespective of the location. The LR motion had a more variable relationship with the AP/CC motions, and appeared random with respect to the location. That is, when the markers moved toward cranial-posterior direction, 58% of the markers moved to the patient-right, 22% of the markers moved to the patient-left, and 20% of the markers had minimal/none motion. The absolute difference in the motion magnitude between the markers, in different locations within the liver, had a positive correlation with the absolute distance between the markers (R2 = 0.69, linear-fit). The interfractional gating window varied significantly for some patients, with the largest having 29.4%-56.4% range between fractions. Conclusions: This study analyzed the liver motion characteristics of 20 patients undergoing SBRT. A large variation in motion was observed, interfractionally and intrafractionally, and that as the distance between the markers increased, the difference in the absolute range of motion also increased. This suggests that marker(s) in closest proximity to the target be used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the temporal and spatial accuracy of the GateCT™ system (VisionRT, London, UK), a recently released respiratory tracking system for 4DCT, under both ideal and nonideal respiratory conditions. Methods: Three experiments were performed by benchmarking and comparing its results with the ground-truth input data and those generated by the widely used Varian RPM™ system (Real-time Position Management, Varian, Palo Alto, CA). The first experiment used 10 sinusoidal breathing patterns (constant amplitude and frequency using sin6ωt), 10 'consistent' patient breathing patterns, and 10 'sporadic' patient breathing patterns. Motion was simulated with the quasar™ Programmable Respiratory Motion Platform (MODUS, London, Canada) as the surrogate. The GateCT™ and RPM™ systems were used to track the breathing patterns. The data from both systems were then analyzed in the Fourier domain, to evaluate temporal/phase accuracy, using the Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC). The analysis correlated the ground-truth input data against the GateCT™ and RPM™ tracking results, respectively. The second experiment used 10 ideal sinusoidal breathing patterns, five of period 2.0 s, and five of period 5.0 s, with varying abdominal amplitudes found in clinical cases (peak-to-peak range: 1.67-10 mm) to test the sensitivity of the system to reconstruct various range of motion. And, the third experiment used 12 consecutive clinical patients to track the abdominal motion simultaneously by the GateCT™ and RPM™ systems. The baseline of the tracking results from both the two systems was analyzed via the mean-position-estimate (MPE) calculations. All experiments were tracked for at least 120 s. Results: In the first experiment, the average PCC values (±SD) of all thirty breathing patterns were 0.9995 ± 0.00035 and 0.9994 ± 0.00041 for the GateCT™ and the RPM™ system, respectively. These nearly identical results demonstrated similar temporal/phase tracking accuracy for the two systems. The results in the second experiment, however, revealed a pattern for the GateCT™ system in which the uncertainty of its mean-position tracking increased as the amplitude of the breathing pattern decreased. For example, a non-negligible baseline drift of up to 29.3% with respect to the peak-to-peak amplitude of 1.67-mm was observed. On the contrary, the RPM™ system displayed a more consistent recording of amplitudes over time with the greatest drift being <7.7%. The third experiment confirmed these findings in the clinical setting. Consistent decrease in PCC values due to the increase in artificial amplitude drifts, as the breathing amplitude decreased, was found. The lowest PCC value was 0.7239 for a patient with 1.57-mm peak-to-peak amplitude. Conclusions: The GateCT™ system revealed its consistency in temporal/phase tracking but had limitations in accurately tracking the absolute abdominal positions, thus suggesting its appropriateness for phase-sorting of 4DCT rather than amplitude-sorting. In contrast, the RPM™ system demonstrated stable respiratory signal tracking in all ranges and accurately both in phase and amplitude, and is a robust system to use for both phase-sorting and amplitude-sorting techniques. The impact of the observed mean-position drift in the GateCT™ system on the resulting 4DCT image quality, in amplitude-sorting, needs further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Utilization of respiratory correlated four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4DCBCT) has enabled verification of internal target motion and volume immediately prior to treatment. However, with current standard CBCT scan, 4DCBCT poses challenge for reconstruction due to the fact that multiple phase binning leads to insufficient number of projection data to reconstruct and thus cause streaking artifacts. The purpose of this study is to develop a novel 4DCBCT reconstruction algorithm framework called motion-map constrained image reconstruction (MCIR), that allows reconstruction of high quality and high phase resolution 4DCBCT images with no more than the imaging dose as well as projections used in a standard free breathing 3DCBCT (FB-3DCBCT) scan. Methods: The unknown 4DCBCT volume at each phase was mathematically modeled as a combination of FB-3DCBCT and phase-specific update vector which has an associated motion-map matrix. The motion-map matrix, which is the key innovation of the MCIR algorithm, was defined as the matrix that distinguishes voxels that are moving from stationary ones. This 4DCBCT model was then reconstructed with compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction framework such that the voxels with high motion would be aggressively updated by the phase-wise sorted projections and the voxels with less motion would be minimally updated to preserve the FB-3DCBCT. To evaluate the performance of our proposed MCIR algorithm, we evaluated both numerical phantoms and a lung cancer patient. The results were then compared with the (1) clinical FB-3DCBCT reconstructed using the FDK, (2) 4DCBCT reconstructed using the FDK, and (3) 4DCBCT reconstructed using the well-known prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS). Results: Examination of the MCIR algorithm showed that high phase-resolved 4DCBCT with sets of up to 20 phases using a typical FB-3DCBCT scan could be reconstructed without compromising the image quality. Moreover, in comparison with other published algorithms, the image quality of the MCIR algorithm is shown to be excellent. Conclusions: This work demonstrates the potential for providing high-quality 4DCBCT during on-line image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), without increasing the imaging dose. The results showed that (at least) 20 phase images could be reconstructed using the same projections data, used to reconstruct a single FB-3DCBCT, without streak artifacts that are caused by insufficient projections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]