Search

Objectives: To characterize immunocompromised-associated pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (I-PARDS) and contrast it to PARDS., Design: This is a secondary analysis of the 2016-2017 PARDS incidence and epidemiology (PARDIE) study, a prospective observational, cross-sectional study of children with PARDS., Setting: Dataset of 145 PICUs across 27 countries., Patients: During 10 nonconsecutive weeks (from May 2016 to June 2017), data about immunocompromising conditions (ICCs, defined as malignancy, congenital/acquired immunodeficiency, posttransplantation, or diseases requiring immunosuppression) were collected., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Of 708 subjects, 105 (14.8%) had ICC. Before the development of I-PARDS, those with ICC were more likely to be hospitalized (70% vs. 35%, p < 0.001), have more at-risk for PARDS ( p = 0.046), and spent more hours at-risk (20 [interquartile range, IQR: 8-46] vs. 11 [IQR: 4-33], [ p = 0.002]). Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use was more common in those with ICC ( p < 0.001). Of those diagnosed with PARDS on NIV ( n = 161), children with ICC were more likely to be subsequently intubated ( n = 28/40 [70%] vs n = 53/121 [44%], p = 0.004). Severe PARDS was more common (32% vs 23%, p < 0.001) in I-PARDS. Oxygenation indices were higher at diagnosis and had less improvement over the first 3 days of PARDS ( p < 0.001). Children with I-PARDS had greater nonpulmonary organ dysfunction. Adjusting for Pediatric Risk of Mortality IV and oxygenation index, children with I-PARDS had a higher severity of illness-adjusted PICU mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.0 [95% CI, 1.9-4.7] p < 0.001) and were less likely to be extubated alive within 28 days (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.47 [95% CI, 0.31-0.71] p < 0.001)., Conclusions: I-PARDS is a unique subtype of PARDS associated with hospitalization before diagnosis and increased: time at-risk for PARDS, NIV use, hypoxia, nonpulmonary organ dysfunction, and mortality. The opportunity for early detection and intervention seems to exist. Dedicated study in these patients is imperative to determine if targeted interventions will benefit these unique patients with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes., Competing Interests: Dr. Bhalla received funding from nonhealthcare stocks. Drs. Bhalla and Rowan received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Emeriaud’s institution received funding from Maquet and Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé. Dr. Fitzgerald’s institution received funding from the NIH. Dr. Thomas received funding from Bayer. Dr. Yehya received funding from AstraZeneca. Dr. Rowan’s institution received funding from the NIH (K23HL150244). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Objectives: To develop, evaluate, and explore the use of a pediatric ordinal score as a potential clinical trial outcome metric in children hospitalized with acute hypoxic respiratory failure caused by viral respiratory infections., Design: We modified the World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale for pediatric patients (CPS-Ped) and assigned CPS-Ped at admission, days 2-4, 7, and 14. We identified predictors of clinical improvement (day 14 CPS-Ped ≤ 2 or a three-point decrease) using competing risks regression and compared clinical improvement to hospital length of stay (LOS) and ventilator-free days. We estimated sample sizes (80% power) to detect a 15% clinical improvement., Setting: North American pediatric hospitals., Patients: Three cohorts of pediatric patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure receiving intensive care: two influenza (pediatric intensive care influenza [PICFLU], n = 263, 31 sites; PICFLU vaccine effectiveness [PICFLU-VE], n = 143, 17 sites) and one COVID-19 ( n = 237, 47 sites)., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Invasive mechanical ventilation rates were 71.4%, 32.9%, and 37.1% for PICFLU, PICFLU-VE, and COVID-19 with less than 5% mortality for all three cohorts. Maximum CPS-Ped (0 = home at respiratory baseline to 8 = death) was positively associated with hospital LOS ( p < 0.001, all cohorts). Across the three cohorts, many patients' CPS-Ped worsened after admission (39%, 18%, and 49%), with some patients progressing to invasive mechanical ventilation or death (19%, 11%, and 17%). Despite this, greater than 76% of patients across cohorts clinically improved by day 14. Estimated sample sizes per group using CPS-Ped to detect a percentage increase in clinical improvement were feasible (influenza 15%, n = 142; 10%, n = 225; COVID-19, 15% n = 208) compared with mortality ( n > 21,000, all), and ventilator-free days (influenza 15%, n = 167)., Conclusions: The CPS-Ped can be used to describe the time course of illness and threshold for clinical improvement in hospitalized children and adolescents with acute respiratory failure from viral infections. This outcome measure could feasibly be used in clinical trials to evaluate in-hospital recovery., Competing Interests: Drs. Newhams, Young, Maddux, Hall, Coates, Kong, Nofziger, Cullinmore, Halasa, Schuster, Gertz, Hume, and Randolph’s (contracts 75D30119C05584 and 75D30120C07725) institutions received funding from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Drs. Newhams and Randolph’s institutions received funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Drs. Newhams, Nofziger, Cvijanovich, Flori, and Randolph (AI084011 and AI154470) received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Khemani received funding from Orange Med/Nihon Kohden and Bayer Pharmaceutical. Dr. Marshall’s institution received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; he received funding from AM-Pharma and Adrenomed. Drs. Maddux, Kong, Nofziger, Cullimore, Cvijanovich, Schuster, Flori, and Hume’s institutions received funding from the NIH. Dr. Hall received funding from Abbvie, Kiadis, and the American Board of Pediatrics. Dr. Coates’ institution received funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the American Lung Association, the American Thoracic Society, and the Doris Duke Foundation/Walder Foundation; she received funding from Sobi and Triplett Woolf Garretson LLC. Drs. Kong, Nofziger, Cullimore, Gertz, and Hume received support for article research from the CDC. Drs. Thomas and Cvijanovich’s institution received funding from Boston Children’s Hospital. Dr. Thomas received funding from Bayer AG. Dr. Halasa’s institution received funding from Sanofi and Quidel. Dr. Cvijanovich’s institution received funding from the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Dr. Shuster’s institution received funding from the AAMC; she received funding from the AAP Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Flori received funding from Nota Laboratories and Lucira Health; she disclosed that they are a commissioner for a Lancet Child Health report and that they worked as an expert for the NIH-funded pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome Master Protocol development. Drs. Olson and Patel disclosed government work. Dr. Randolph received funding from UpToDate, Inc. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has become more studied in immunocompromised patients. However, it has not been studied in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients, who have higher mortality and higher pulmonary complication rates than other immunocompromised patients. This population may be prone to negative effects from this treatment modality. The aim of this study was to determine whether NIV use is associated with worse outcomes in this vulnerable patient population., Methods: A secondary analysis of a retrospective multi-center database was performed. Twelve pediatric ICUs across the United States enrolled HCT subjects from 2009-2014 that were admitted to the pediatric ICU (PICU) with the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. Subjects exposed to NIV prior to intubation were compared against those not exposed to NIV. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 d; secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days (VFD) at 28 d and development of pediatric ARDS. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were constructed using variables significant on univariable analysis., Results: Two-hundred eleven subjects were included. Of these, 82 (39%) received NIV prior to intubation. Those that received NIV prior to intubation were older (13 vs 6 y, P < .001) and more commonly diagnosed with respiratory distress (90% vs 74%, P = .004). On multivariable analysis, NIV use prior to intubation was associated with a higher PICU mortality (hazard ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.18-2.28], P = .02) and fewer VFD at 28 d (β -3.50 [95% CI -6.09 to 0.91], P = .008). Those with NIV exposure prior to intubation also had higher rates of development of pediatric ARDS (95% vs 78%, P = .001)., Conclusions: In this cohort of children post-HCT, NIV use prior to intubation was associated with worse outcomes. The benefits and risks of NIV in this patient population should be carefully evaluated prior to its use, and careful patient selection is crucial for its optimal utilization., Competing Interests: Dr Rowan is funded by the NIH (1K23HL150244-01A21) The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

In this multicenter study, we investigated the kinetics of neutrophil recovery in relation to acuity and survival among 125 children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Recovery of neutrophils, whether prior to or after initiation of IMV, was associated with a significantly decreased risk of death relative to never achieving neutrophil recovery. A transient increase in acuity (by oxygenation index and vasopressor requirements) occurred among a subset of the patients who achieved neutrophil recovery after initiation of IMV; 61.5% of these patients survived to discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Improved survival among patients who subsequently achieved neutrophil recovery on IMV was not limited to those with peri-engraftment respiratory distress syndrome. The presence of a respiratory pathogen did not affect the risk of death while on IMV but was associated with an increased length of IMV (p < 0.01). Among patients undergoing HCT who develop respiratory failure and require advanced therapeutic support, neutrophil recovery at time of IMV and/or presence of a respiratory pathogen should not be used as determining factors when counseling families about survival.

Introduction: The effectiveness of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant patient has not been established. We sought to identify current practice patterns of HFOV, investigate parameters during HFOV and their association with mortality, and compare the use of HFOV to conventional mechanical ventilation in severe pediatric ARDS., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a multi-center database of pediatric and young adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant subjects requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for critical illness from 2009 through 2014. Twelve United States pediatric centers contributed data. Continuous variables were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test or a Kruskal-Wallis analysis. For categorical variables, univariate analysis with logistic regression was performed., Results: The database contains 222 patients, of which 85 subjects were managed with HFOV. Of this HFOV cohort, the overall pediatric ICU survival was 23.5% ( n = 20). HFOV survivors were transitioned to HFOV at a lower oxygenation index than nonsurvivors (25.6, interquartile range 21.1-36.8, vs 37.2, interquartile range 26.5-52.2, P = .046). Survivors were transitioned to HFOV earlier in the course of mechanical ventilation, (day 0 vs day 2, P = .002). No subject survived who was transitioned to HFOV after 1 week of invasive mechanical ventilation. We compared subjects with severe pediatric ARDS treated only with conventional mechanical ventilation versus early HFOV (within 2 d of invasive mechanical ventilation) versus late HFOV. There was a trend toward difference in survival (conventional mechanical ventilation 24%, early HFOV 30%, and late HFOV 9%, P = .08)., Conclusions: In this large database of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant subjects who had acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for critical illness with severe pediatric ARDS, early use of HFOV was associated with improved survival compared to late implementation of HFOV, and the subjects had outcomes similar to those treated only with conventional mechanical ventilation., Competing Interests: The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2018 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Objective: Immunodeficiency is both a preexisting condition and a risk factor for mortality in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. We describe a series of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome based on the recent Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference guidelines with the objective to better define survival of this population., Design: Secondary analysis of a retrospective database., Setting: Twelve U.S. pediatric centers., Patients: Pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients requiring mechanical ventilation., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: During the first week of mechanical ventilation, patients were categorized as: no pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome or mild, moderate, or severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome based on oxygenation index or oxygen saturation index. Univariable logistic regression evaluated the association between pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and PICU mortality. A total of 91.5% of the 211 patients met criteria for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference definition: 61.1% were severe, 27.5% moderate, and 11.4% mild. Overall survival was 39.3%. Survival decreased with worsening pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: no pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome 66.7%, mild 63.6%, odds ratio = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.3-4.2; p = 0.84), moderate 52.8%, odds ratio = 1.8 (95% CI, 0.6-5.5; p = 0.31), and severe 24.6%, odds ratio = 6.1 (95% CI, 2.1-17.8; p < 0.001). Nonsurvivors were more likely to have multiple consecutive days at moderate and severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (p < 0.001). Moderate and severe patients had longer PICU length of stay (p = 0.01) and longer mechanical ventilation course (p = 0.02) when compared with those with mild or no pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nonsurvivors had a higher median maximum oxygenation index than survivors at 28.6 (interquartile range, 15.5-49.9) versus 15.0 (interquartile range, 8.4-29.6) (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: In this multicenter cohort, the majority of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients with respiratory failure met oxygenation criteria for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome based on the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference definition within the first week of invasive mechanical ventilation. Length of invasive mechanical ventilation, length of PICU stay, and mortality increased as the severity of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome worsened.