Search

Background: The adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) is approved in adults aged ≥60 years. We evaluated RSVPreF3 OA immunogenicity and safety in adults aged 50-59 years without or with increased risk for RSV disease due to specific chronic medical conditions., Methods: This observer-blind, phase 3, noninferiority trial included adults aged 50-59 years, stratified into 2 subcohorts: those with and those without predefined, stable, chronic medical conditions leading to an increased risk for RSV disease. Participants in both subcohorts were randomized 2:1 to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. A control group of adults aged ≥60 years received RSVPreF3 OA. Primary outcomes were RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers (geometric mean titer ratios and sero-response rate differences) 1 month post-vaccination in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds. Cell-mediated immunity and safety were also assessed., Results: The exposed population included 1152 participants aged 50-59 years and 381 participants aged ≥60 years. RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds; noninferiority criteria were met for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers in those with and those without increased risk for RSV disease. Frequencies of RSVPreF3-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased substantially from pre- to 1 month post-vaccination. Most solicited adverse events had mild-to-moderate intensity and were transient. Unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups., Conclusions: RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds compared to ≥60-year-olds, in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated. The safety profile in 50-59-year-olds was consistent with that in ≥60-year-olds., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05590403., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . H. A. H., M. d. H., B. S., S. D., M.-P. D., D. D., J. H., C. V., and V. H. are/were GSK employees at the time when the study was designed and/or conducted. H. A. H., M. d. H., B. S., S. D., M.-P. D., D. D., J. H., and V. H. hold shares in GSK as part of their employee remuneration. M.-P. D. is a co-applicant on a pending patent filed by GSK. M. F. received study-related payments for training and study conduct from GSK. T. F. S. received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Biogen, CSL-Seqirus, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Merck-Serono, Moderna, Novavax, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda; he participated on advisory boards for Bavarian Nordic, CSL-Seqirus, BioNTech, GSK, Moderna, Novavax, and Takeda. S. A. N. declares study-related payments to his institution from GSK and support from GSK to attend investigators meetings. J. R.-G. declares study-related payments from GSK and honoraria and support for attending meetings and/or travel from GSK, Pfizer, and Sanofi-MSD; he also participated on data and safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from GSK and Pfizer. C. Z. received grants from GSK for the conduct of this study and support from GSK for attending meetings. J. G. declares study-related payments from GSK; grants from Novartis, Pharmalog, New Amsterdam Pharma, Syneos, Winecker Pharma, and Lilly; and consulting fees, honoraria, payment for expert testimony, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from GSK. C. V.-P. is a former employee of QPS Netherlands B.V. The other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds., Methods: This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed., Results: Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups., Conclusions: Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT05568797., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. R. C. runs RSV studies at her trial site with Moderna and GSK and received NIHR funding to attend the World Vaccine Congress (October 2022) as part of the UK delegation; she is the Deputy Specialty Lead and the Clinical Lead for vaccine research at the North West Coast Clinical Research Network. P. L. received consulting fees from GSK and Pfizer, declares payments or honoraria from Janssen, GSK, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi, and financial support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sanofi. J.-F. N., M. R., and I. S.-M. report grants and funding from GSK to their institutions for conducting this clinical trial. N. D., S. G., M.-P. D., A. J., H. A. H., S. K., and N. M. are or were employed by GSK at the time the study was designed, initiated, and/or conducted. N. D., M.-P. D., H. A. H., S. K., and N. M. have stock options or shares from GSK. N. D. also reports stocks from Haleon and patents on vaccination against RSV (numbers 2218080.6 and 2303002.6). M.-P. D. is a co-applicant on a pending patent filed by GSK. S. N. M. declares being a Principal Investigator on the current trial. S. D., J. L., H. M. M., M. P. V., and M. H. R. -R. have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors declare no other financial or non-financial relationships. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: The adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) was efficacious against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (RSV-LRTD) in ≥60-years-olds over 1 RSV season. We evaluated efficacy and safety of 1 RSVPreF3 OA dose and of 2 RSVPreF3 OA doses given 1 year apart against RSV-LRTD over 2 RSV seasons post-dose 1., Methods: In this phase 3, blinded trial, ≥60-year-olds were randomized (1:1) to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo pre-season 1. RSVPreF3 OA recipients were re-randomized (1:1) to receive a second RSVPreF3 OA dose (RSV_revaccination group) or placebo (RSV_1dose group) pre-season 2; participants who received placebo pre-season 1 received placebo pre-season 2 (placebo group). Efficacy of both vaccine regimens against RSV-LRTD was evaluated over 2 seasons combined (confirmatory secondary objective, success criterion: lower limits of 2-sided CIs around efficacy estimates >20%)., Results: The efficacy analysis comprised 24 967 participants (RSV_1dose: 6227; RSV_revaccination: 6242; placebo: 12 498). Median efficacy follow-up was 17.8 months. Efficacy over 2 seasons of 1 RSVPreF3 OA dose was 67.2% (97.5% CI: 48.2-80.0%) against RSV-LRTD and 78.8% (95% CI: 52.6-92.0%) against severe RSV-LRTD. Efficacy over 2 seasons of a first dose followed by revaccination was 67.1% (97.5% CI: 48.1-80.0%) against RSV-LRTD and 78.8% (95% CI: 52.5-92.0%) against severe RSV-LRTD. Reactogenicity/safety of the revaccination dose were similar to dose 1., Conclusions: One RSVPreF3 OA dose was efficacious against RSV-LRTD over 2 RSV seasons in ≥60-year-olds. Revaccination 1 year post-dose 1 was well tolerated but did not seem to provide additional efficacy benefit in the overall study population., Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04886596., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . M. G. I. declares that research support from GSK was paid to his previous institution, Northwestern University; he received consulting fees from Adagio Therapeutics, ADMA Biologics, Adamis Pharmaceuticals, AlloVir, Atea, Cidara Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Shionogi, Takeda, Talaris, and Eurofins Viracor; and payment for participating in data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from Adamis Pharmaceuticals, AlloVir, National Institutes of Health, CSL Behring, Janssen, Merck, Seqirus, Takeda, and Talaris; all of these ended in December 2022; M. G. I. also receives author royalties from UpToDate, which is ongoing, and serves as Chair of the International Society for Influenza and other Respiratory Virus Diseases Antiviral Group and was Editor-in-Chief of Transplant Infectious Disease. A. P. declares funding from GSK for conducting the trial. A. P. also declares that his institution received grants from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, and Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco; that he received consulting fees from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, Avillion, and ELPEN Pharmaceuticals; payment for participation in advisory boards from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, IQVIA, Avillion, and ELPEN Pharmaceuticals; and honoraria from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Menarini, Novartis, Zambon, Mundipharma, Sanofi, Edmond Pharmaceuticals, IQVIA, Avillion, and ELPEN Pharmaceuticals. R. G. F. declares having received payment from GSK for lectures and support for travel related to these activities. J. M. L. reports grants from GSK paid to her institution for the conduct of the trial and from GSK, Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, Sanofi, Inventprise, and VBI Vaccines for other trials; J. M. L. also reports being a board member of Seqirus and participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Vaxcyte; she is an expert panelist for Canada's Drug and Health Technology Agency for the review of nirsevimab. I. L.-R. declares that her institution received funding from GSK for conducting this trial; from Icosavax, Virometix, Janssen Vaccines, Curevac, Moderna, Osivax, MSD, ICON Genetics, and OSE Immunotherapeutics for other vaccine trials; from Janssen Vaccines and MSD for consulting services; and from Janssen Vaccines for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board. F. M.-T. declares that his institution received payment from GSK for conducting this trial and from Ablynx, Abbott, Seqirus, Sanofi, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Regeneron, Janssen, Medimmune, Novavax, Novartis, and GSK for other vaccine trials; F. M.-T. also reports receiving honoraria for lectures from Sanofi, MSD, Moderna, GSK, Biofabri, AstraZeneca, Novavax, Janssen, and Pfizer; payment of travel expenses and meeting fees from Pfizer, MSD, GSK, and Sanofi; and participation on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Pfizer and Biofabri; F. M.-T. is also a member of the World Health Organization’s (WHO's) European Technical Advisory Group of Experts, coordinator of the Spanish Pediatric Clinical Trials Network, and coordinator of the WHO Collaborating Center for Vaccine Safety of Santiago de Compostela. T. F. S. reports honoraria and/or participation on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Biogen, Biontech, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Merck-Serono, Moderna, MSD, Novavax, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Seqirus, Synlab, Takeda, and va-Q-tec. R. N. v. Z.-S. reports that his institution received support from Boehringer Ingelheim for the Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) registry and that he received consulting fees from GSK and honoraria for lectures from Glenmark, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cipla, and Novartis; R. N. v. Z.-S. also participated on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for OnQ SA; he is president of the South African Thoracic Society and co-chair of the International Health Committee of the American Thoracic Society. C. V., N. D., O. G., L. F., M.-P. D., L. K., V. H., A. O., M. V. d. W., and D. D. are employed by GSK and have stock options or shares from GSK. N. D. is co-applicant on a pending patent for vaccination against RSV and has stock options from Haleon. L. F., M.-P. D., A. O., and M. V. d. W. are co-applicants on a pending patent filed by GSK. The other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: In the previous (parent) study, 2 doses of different formulations of an investigational vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus (RSVPreF3 OA) were well tolerated and immunogenic in older adults. This multicenter phase 2b extension study assessed safety and immunogenicity of a revaccination (third) dose of the 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E formulation., Methods: In total, 122 older adults (60-80 years), previously vaccinated with 2 doses of RSVPreF3-AS01E formulations (containing 30, 60, or 120 μg RSVPreF3 antigen), received an additional 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E dose 18 months after dose 2. Vaccine safety was evaluated in all participants up to 6 months and immunogenicity in participants who received 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E doses until 1 month after dose 3., Results: Similar to the parent study, mostly mild-to-moderate solicited adverse events and no vaccine-related serious adverse events or potential immune-mediated disorders were reported. Neutralizing titers and cell-mediated immune responses persisted for 18 months after 2-dose vaccination. Dose 3 increased RSV-specific neutralizing titers against RSV-A and RSV-B and median CD4+ T-cell frequencies. After dose 3, RSV-specific neutralizing titers but not CD4+ T-cell frequencies were below levels detected 1 month after dose 1., Conclusions: Revaccination with 120 μg RSVPreF3-AS01E 18 months after dose 2 is well tolerated and immunogenic in older adults., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04657198; EudraCT, 2020-000692-21., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. I. L. R. reports funding from Icosavax and Virometix to her institution for the conduct of RSV vaccine trials, and from GSK to her institution for conduct of this clinical trial. M. V. R. reports GSK funding to the Leuven University Vaccinology Center for the conduct of the clinical trial. C. Vm. reports GSK funding to her institution for the conduct of the clinical trial as at the time of the execution of the clinical trial she was an investigator; C. Vm. joined GSK after the close of the study at her institution and is currently an employee of GSK; however, she does not hold any shares. C. V. A., N. D. S., B. S., C. V., M. P. D., S. K., and V. H. were employees of GSK at the time of the study conduct. N. D. S., B. S., M. P. D., C. V., S. K., and V. H. hold shares from GSK as part of their past/current employee remuneration. All current/previous employees of GSK declare financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Older adults with chronic cardiorespiratory or endocrine/metabolic conditions are at increased risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related acute respiratory illness (RSV-ARI) and severe respiratory disease. In an ongoing, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicountry, phase 3 trial in ≥60-year-old participants, an AS01E-adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) was efficacious against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (RSV-LRTD), severe RSV-LRTD, and RSV-ARI. We evaluated efficacy and immunogenicity among participants with coexisting cardiorespiratory or endocrine/metabolic conditions that increase the risk of severe RSV disease ("conditions of interest")., Methods: Medically stable ≥60-year-old participants received 1 dose of RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. Efficacy against first RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI episodes was assessed in subgroups with/without coexisting cardiorespiratory or endocrine/metabolic conditions of interest. Immunogenicity was analyzed post hoc in these subgroups., Results: In total, 12 467 participants received RSVPreF3 OA and 12 499 received placebo. Of these, 39.6% (RSVPreF3 OA) and 38.9% (placebo) had ≥1 coexisting condition of interest. The median efficacy follow-up was 6.7 months. Efficacy against RSV-LRTD was high in participants with ≥1 condition of interest (94.6%), ≥1 cardiorespiratory (92.1%), ≥1 endocrine/metabolic (100%), and ≥2 conditions of interest (92.0%). Efficacy against RSV-ARI was 81.0% in participants with ≥1 condition of interest (88.1% for cardiorespiratory, 79.4% for endocrine/metabolic conditions) and 88.0% in participants with ≥2 conditions of interest. Postvaccination neutralizing titers were at least as high in participants with ≥1 condition of interest as in those without., Conclusions: RSVPreF3 OA was efficacious against RSV-LRTD and RSV-ARI in older adults with coexisting medical conditions associated with an increased risk of severe RSV disease., Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04886596., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. R. G. F. declares having received payment from GSK as a speaker for promotional programs and support for travel related to these activities. R. A. I. declares that his institution received a grant from GSK for conducting the trial. K. S. declares that her institution received funding from GSK for conducting the trial and that she is a member of the independent data monitoring committee for the AReSVi-006 trial (without receiving payment). D. G. L. and A. P. declare funding from GSK for conducting the trial. A. P. declares that his institution received grants from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, and Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco; that he received consulting fees from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, Avillion, and ELPEN Pharmaceuticals; payment for participation in data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, IQVIA, Avillion, and ELPEN Pharmaceuticals; and honoraria from Chiesi, AstraZeneca, GSK, Menarini, Novartis, Zambon, Mundipharma, Sanofi, Edmond Pharmaceuticals, IQVIA, Avillion, and ELPEN Pharmaceuticals. M. G. I. declares that his institution received funding from GSK for RSV vaccine trials; he also received author royalties from UpToDate, consulting fees from Adagio Therapeutics, ADMA Biologics, AlloVir, Atea, Cidara Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Shionogi, Takeda, and Eurofins Viracor, and payment for participating in data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards from Adamis Pharmaceuticals, AlloVir, CSL Behring, Janssen, Merck, Seqirus, Takeda, and Talaris. L. F., M. P. D., C. M., M. V. d. W., L. K., and V. H. are employed by GSK; L. F., M. P. D., C. M., M. V. d. W., V. H., and L. K. have stock options or shares from GSK. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The RSVPreF3-AS01 vaccine, containing the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein and the AS01 adjuvant, was previously shown to boost neutralization responses against historical RSV strains and to be efficacious in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract diseases in older adults. Although RSV F is highly conserved, variation does exist between strains. Here, we characterized variations in the major viral antigenic sites among contemporary RSV sequences when compared with RSVPreF3 and showed that, in older adults, RSVPreF3-AS01 broadly boosts neutralization responses against currently dominant and antigenically distant RSV strains. RSV-neutralizing responses are thought to play a central role in preventing RSV infection. Therefore, the breadth of RSVPreF3-AS01-elicited neutralization responses may contribute to vaccine efficacy against contemporary RSV strains and those that may emerge in the future.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate safety and immunogenicity of vaccine formulations against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) containing the stabilized prefusion conformation of RSV fusion protein (RSVPreF3)., Methods: This phase 1/2, randomized controlled, observer-blind study enrolled 48 young adults (YAs; aged 18-40 years) and 1005 older adults (OAs; aged 60-80 years) between January and August 2019. Participants were randomized into equally sized groups to receive 2 doses of unadjuvanted (YAs and OAs) or AS01-adjuvanted (OAs) vaccine or placebo 2 months apart. Vaccine safety and immunogenicity were assessed until 1 month (YAs) or 12 months (OAs) after second vaccination., Results: The RSVPreF3 vaccines boosted humoral (RSVPreF3-specific immunoglobulin G [IgG] and RSV-A neutralizing antibody) responses, which increased in an antigen concentration-dependent manner and were highest after dose 1. Compared to prevaccination, the geometric mean frequencies of polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased after each dose and were significantly higher in adjuvanted than unadjuvanted vaccinees. Postvaccination immune responses persisted until end of follow-up. Solicited adverse events were mostly mild to moderate and transient. Despite a higher observed reactogenicity of AS01-containing vaccines, no safety concerns were identified for any assessed formulation., Conclusions: Based on safety and immunogenicity profiles, the AS01E-adjuvanted vaccine containing 120 μg of RSVPreF3 was selected for further clinical development., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03814590., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. C., M.-P. D., M. d. H., N. D. S., N. D., L. F., V. H., J. K., N. M., B. S., F. S., J. T., C. V. A., and C. Ve. are/were employees of the GSK group of companies at the time of the study conduct. C. Va. is currently an employee of the GSK group of companies. D. C., M.-P. D., M. d. H., N. D. S., N. D., B. S., F. S., and C. Ve. hold shares from the GSK group of companies as part of their past/current employee remuneration. F. S. is currently an employee of Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson and holds restricted shares from Johnson & Johnson as part of his employee remuneration. All current/previous employees of the GSK groups of companies declare financial and nonfinancial relationships and activities. C. P. A., E. K., I. L.-R., K. S., and C. Va. report grant/research support from the GSK group of companies to their institution for study conduct and, except for C. Va., they have no nonfinancial relationships and activities to declare. E. K. has served as consultant, in advisory boards, in speaker’s bureaus, or received travel reimbursement from Amphastar, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Forest, Cipla, Chiesi, GSK, Mylan, Novartis, Sunovion, Teva, Pearl Pharmaceuticals, and Theravance. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes lower respiratory tract infection, with a high burden of disease among adults ≥60 years. This study assessed the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of an investigational adjuvanted RSV vaccine (RSVPreF3/AS01 B ) in Japanese adults aged 60-80 years., Methods: Forty participants were randomized to receive two doses of RSVPreF3/AS01 B or the placebo, in a 1:1 ratio, two months apart, in this placebo-controlled study. Solicited administration-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected within 7 days and unsolicited AEs within 30 days post-vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were collected throughout the study (12 months post-dose 2). RSVPreF3-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody concentrations and neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers against RSV-A were evaluated on day (D)1, D31, D61, D91 and those against RSV-B on D1, D31, D91., Results: Solicited AEs were reported more frequently in RSVPreF3/AS01 B recipients (80.0%-90.0%) than in placebo recipients (10.0%-20.0%). Two RSVPreF3/AS01 B recipients experienced grade 3 solicited AEs. Rate of unsolicited AEs were similar (30.0%-35.0%) in both groups. No RSVPreF3/AS01 B recipient reported SAEs/pIMDs, while one placebo recipient reported two SAEs that were unrelated to vaccination. Baseline RSVPreF3-specific IgG and RSV-A/-B nAb levels were above the assay cut-off values. In the RSVPreF3/AS01 B group, RSVPreF3-specific IgG concentrations increased 12.8-fold on D31 and 9.2-fold on D91 versus baseline while nAb titers increased 7.3-fold (RSV-A) and 8.4-fold (RSV-B) on D31 and 6.3-fold (RSV-A) and 9.9-fold (RSV-B) on D91., Conclusions: The RSVPreF3/AS01 B vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic in older Japanese adults., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04090658., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest SK, NF, PN, CV, NDeS, MPD, NM and VH are or were employees of the GSK group of companies and declare financial and non-financial relationships and activities. SK, CV, NDeS, MPD, NM and VH hold or held shares in the GSK group of companies as part of their employee remuneration. MH has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 [The Author/The Authors]. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of acute respiratory infection, lower respiratory tract disease, clinical complications, and death in older adults. There is currently no licensed vaccine against RSV infection., Methods: In an ongoing, international, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adults 60 years of age or older to receive a single dose of an AS01 E -adjuvanted RSV prefusion F protein-based candidate vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) or placebo before the RSV season. The primary objective was to show vaccine efficacy of one dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease, confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), during one RSV season. The criterion for meeting the primary objective was a lower limit of the confidence interval around the efficacy estimate of more than 20%. Efficacy against severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease and RSV-related acute respiratory infection was assessed, and analyses according to RSV subtype (A and B) were performed. Safety was evaluated., Results: A total of 24,966 participants received one dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine (12,467 participants) or placebo (12,499). Over a median follow-up of 6.7 months, vaccine efficacy against RT-PCR-confirmed RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease was 82.6% (96.95% confidence interval [CI], 57.9 to 94.1), with 7 cases (1.0 per 1000 participant-years) in the vaccine group and 40 cases (5.8 per 1000 participant-years) in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 62.4 to 99.9) against severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (assessed on the basis of clinical signs or by the investigator) and 71.7% (95% CI, 56.2 to 82.3) against RSV-related acute respiratory infection. Vaccine efficacy was similar against the RSV A and B subtypes (for RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease: 84.6% and 80.9%, respectively; for RSV-related acute respiratory infection: 71.9% and 70.6%, respectively). High vaccine efficacy was observed in various age groups and in participants with coexisting conditions. The RSVPreF3 OA vaccine was more reactogenic than placebo, but most adverse events for which reports were solicited were transient, with mild-to-moderate severity. The incidences of serious adverse events and potential immune-mediated diseases were similar in the two groups., Conclusions: A single dose of the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine had an acceptable safety profile and prevented RSV-related acute respiratory infection and lower respiratory tract disease and severe RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease in adults 60 years of age or older, regardless of RSV subtype and the presence of underlying coexisting conditions. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; AReSVi-006 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04886596.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia in neonates and infants. RSV vaccination during pregnancy could boost preexisting neutralizing antibody titers, providing passive protection to newborns., Methods: Two observer-blinded, controlled studies (RSV F-020 [clinical trials registration NCT02360475] and RSV F-024 [NCT02753413]) evaluated immunogenicity and safety of an investigational RSV vaccine in healthy, nonpregnant 18-45-year-old women. Both studies used a licensed adult formulation of combined tetanus toxoid-diphtheria toxoid-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine as a control. RSV F-020 evaluated immunogenicity and safety: participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive 1 dose of RSV-prefusion F protein (PreF) vaccine containing 30 µg or 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF, 60 µg of aluminum-adjuvanted RSV-PreF, or Tdap. RSV F-024 evaluated safety: participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1 dose of 60 µg of nonadjuvanted RSV-PreF or Tdap., Results: Both studies showed similar reactogenicity profiles for RSV-PreF and Tdap. No serious adverse events were considered vaccine related. In RSV F-020, geometric mean ratios of RSV-A neutralizing antibody levels at day 30 versus prevaccination were 3.1-3.9 in RSV-PreF recipients and 0.9 in controls. Palivizumab-competing antibody concentrations increased >14-fold in RSV-PreF recipients on day 30. RSV antibody titers waned after day 30 but remained well above baseline through day 90., Conclusions: All formulations of RSV-PreF boosted preexisting immune responses in 18-45-year old women with comparable immunogenicity. The RSV-PreF safety profile was similar to that of Tdap vaccine.