Over the past four decades, closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) interventions have saved many lives, but overall survival after cardiac arrest remains quite low, with survival rates of less than 5% reported in most studies. 3,15 The poor survival rates can be attributed to one or more of the following factors: (1) use of aggressive resuscitative measures in patients with end-stage disease processes for whom even optimal resuscitative efforts are unlikely to prove successful, (2) delays in initiation of effective therapies within the critical therapeutic window, and (3) ineffective or suboptimal therapeutic interventions. The first factor is complex and involves clinical judgment, advanced directives, medicolegal concerns, and societal expectations that are beyond the scope of this article. The second factor is primarily a problem for out-of-hospital victims and for nonmonitored in-hospital patients. The third factor is an ongoing challenge for the resuscitation research community. Resuscitative interventions can be classified as electrical therapy, artificial ventilation, artificial perfusion, or pharmacologic therapies. Although advances continue to be made in the areas of electrical therapy and artificial ventilation, presently available interventions are highly effective if they can be initiated in a timely manner. Thus, electrical therapy and artificial ventilation are usually not the limiting factors in a resuscitation. Pharmacologic agents given during cardiac arrest are primarily directed toward reversing the adverse effects of tissue hypoperfusion. The principal therapeutic effect of vasoconstrictor agents, traditionally epinephrine, is to restore peripheral arterial resistance to improve blood flow generated by closed-chest CPR. 29,38 The contributions of adrenergic agents and other drugs to improving survival from cardiac arrest have not been clearly demonstrated. Artificial perfusion is the principal weak link in the resuscitation armamentarium. Closed-chest CPR has been shown to generate blood flow equivalent to about 25% to 33% of normal cardiac output under optimal conditions. 4,13 If there is any time delay before the initiation of CPR, as commonly occurs, the progressive loss of peripheral arterial resistance substantially decreases the blood flow generated by CPR, even if performed well technically. 25 Thus, one of the greatest challenges in the development of better resuscitative interventions is to develop more effective methods of artificial perfusion support that can be initiated within the criticial time window allowing for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) with good neurologic recovery. Therefore, interventions to improve vital organ perfusion during cardiac arrest are the major focus of this article. Although significant underlying disease is prevalent in the general population of patients suffering cardiac arrest, this is especially true for patients in the intensive care unit setting. Myocardial dysfunction, pulmonary disease, metabolic disturbances, and sepsis only serve to complicate the task of the intensivist who is attempting to resuscitate patients in cardiac arrest. The monitoring sophistication of the ICU provides for early recognition of lethal dysrhythmias or other acute cardiovascular decompensation events. Also, patients in the ICU frequently have monitoring parameters available that can be used to guide the resuscitation. These parameters include arterial pressure, central venous pressure, central venous oximetry, and end-tidal carbon dioxide. This article discusses how these parameters can be used to optimize CPR techniques and to assess the effect of pharmacologic agents administered.