Search

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a diverse and variable group of rare human disorders [...].

Thirty percent of all inherited retinal disease (IRD) is accounted for by conditions with extra-ocular features. This study aimed to establish the genetic diagnostic pick-up rate for IRD patients with one or more extra-ocular features undergoing panel-based screening in a clinical setting. One hundred and six participants, tested on a gene panel which contained both isolated and syndromic IRD genes, were retrospectively ascertained from the Manchester Genomic Diagnostics Laboratory database spanning 6 years (2012-2017). Phenotypic features were extracted from the clinical notes and classified according to Human Phenotype Ontology; all identified genetic variants were interpreted in accordance to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Overall, 49% (n = 52) of patients received a probable genetic diagnosis. A further 6% (n = 6) had a single disease-associated variant in an autosomal recessive disease-relevant gene. Fifty-two percent (n = 55) of patients had a clinical diagnosis at the time of testing. Of these, 71% (n = 39) received a probable genetic diagnosis. By contrast, for those without a provisional clinical diagnosis (n = 51), only 25% (n = 13) received a probable genetic diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis of Usher (n = 33) and Bardet-Biedl syndrome (n = 10) was confirmed in 67% (n = 22) and 80% (n = 8), respectively. The testing diagnostic rate in patients with clinically diagnosed multisystemic IRD conditions was significantly higher than those without one (71% versus 25%; p value < 0.001). The lower pick-up rate in patients without a clinical diagnosis suggests that panel-based approaches are unlikely to be the most effective means of achieving a molecular diagnosis for this group. Here, we suggest that genome-wide approaches (whole exome or genome) are more appropriate.

Purpose: A key property to consider in all genetic tests is clinical utility, the ability of the test to influence patient management and health outcomes. Here we assess the current clinical utility of genetic testing in diverse pediatric inherited eye disorders (IEDs)., Methods: Two hundred one unrelated children (0-5 years old) with IEDs were ascertained through the database of the North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester, UK. The cohort was collected over a 7-year period (2011-2018) and included 74 children with bilateral cataracts, 8 with bilateral ectopia lentis, 28 with bilateral anterior segment dysgenesis, 32 with albinism, and 59 with inherited retinal disorders. All participants underwent panel-based genetic testing., Results: The diagnostic yield of genetic testing for the cohort was 64% (ranging from 39% to 91% depending on the condition). The test result led to altered management (including preventing additional investigations or resulting in the introduction of personalized surveillance measures) in 33% of probands (75% for ectopia lentis, 50% for cataracts, 33% for inherited retinal disorders, 7% for anterior segment dysgenesis, 3% for albinism)., Conclusion: Genetic testing helped identify an etiological diagnosis in the majority of preschool children with IEDs. This prevented additional unnecessary testing and provided the opportunity for anticipatory guidance in significant subsets of patients.

Inherited eye disorders (IED) are a heterogeneous group of Mendelian conditions that are associated with visual impairment. Although these disorders often exhibit incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity, the scale and mechanisms of these phenomena remain largely unknown. Here, we utilize publicly-available genomic and transcriptomic datasets to gain insights into variable penetrance in IED. Variants in a curated set of 340 IED-implicated genes were extracted from the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) 2019.1 and cross-checked with the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) 2.1 control-only dataset. Genes for which >1 variants were encountered in both HGMD and gnomAD were considered to be associated with variable penetrance ( n = 56). Variability in gene expression levels was then estimated for the subset of these genes that was found to be adequately expressed in two relevant resources: the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) and Eye Genotype Expression (EyeGEx) datasets. We found that genes suspected to be associated with variable penetrance tended to have significantly more variability in gene expression levels in the general population ( p = 0.0000015); this finding was consistent across tissue types. The results of this study point to the possible influence of cis and/or trans -acting elements on the expressivity of variants causing Mendelian disorders. They also highlight the potential utility of quantifying gene expression as part of the investigation of families showing evidence of variable penetrance.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of whole genome sequencing (WGS) with targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the diagnosis of inherited retinal disease (IRD)., Design: Case series., Participants: A total of 562 patients diagnosed with IRD., Methods: We performed a direct comparative analysis of current molecular diagnostics with WGS. We retrospectively reviewed the findings from a diagnostic NGS DNA test for 562 patients with IRD. A subset of 46 of 562 patients (encompassing potential clinical outcomes of diagnostic analysis) also underwent WGS, and we compared mutation detection rates and molecular diagnostic yields. In addition, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of the 2 techniques to identify known single nucleotide variants (SNVs) using 6 control samples with publically available genotype data., Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic yield of genomic testing., Results: Across known disease-causing genes, targeted NGS and WGS achieved similar levels of sensitivity and specificity for SNV detection. However, WGS also identified 14 clinically relevant genetic variants through WGS that had not been identified by NGS diagnostic testing for the 46 individuals with IRD. These variants included large deletions and variants in noncoding regions of the genome. Identification of these variants confirmed a molecular diagnosis of IRD for 11 of the 33 individuals referred for WGS who had not obtained a molecular diagnosis through targeted NGS testing. Weighted estimates, accounting for population structure, suggest that WGS methods could result in an overall 29% (95% confidence interval, 15-45) uplift in diagnostic yield., Conclusions: We show that WGS methods can detect disease-causing genetic variants missed by current NGS diagnostic methodologies for IRD and thereby demonstrate the clinical utility and additional value of WGS., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is a heterogeneous group of Mendelian retinal disorders that present in childhood. Biallelic variants altering the protein‐coding region of the TRPM1 gene are one of the commonest causes of CSNB. Here, we report the clinical and genetic findings in 10 unrelated individuals with TRPM1‐retinopathy. Methods: Study subjects were recruited through a tertiary clinical ophthalmic genetic service at Manchester, UK. All participants underwent visual electrodiagnostic testing and panel‐based genetic analysis. Results: Study subjects had a median age of 8 years (range: 3–20 years). All probands were myopic and had electroretinographic findings in keeping with complete CSNB. Notably, three probands reported no night vision problems. Fourteen different disease‐associated TRPM1 variants were detected. One individual was homozygous for the NM_001252024.2 (TRPM1):c.965 + 29G>A variant and a mini‐gene assay highlighted that this change results in mis‐splicing and premature protein termination. Additionally, two unrelated probands who had CSNB and mild neurodevelopmental abnormalities were found to carry a 15q13.3 microdeletion. This copy number variant encompasses seven genes, including TRPM1, and was encountered in the heterozygous state and in trans with a missense TRPM1 variant in each case. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the importance of comprehensive genomic analysis, beyond the exons and protein‐coding regions of genes, for individuals with CSNB. When this characteristic retinal phenotype is accompanied by extraocular findings (including learning and/or behavioural difficulties), a 15q13.3 microdeletion should be suspected. Focused analysis (e.g. microarray testing) is recommended to look for large‐scale deletions encompassing TRPM1 in patients with CSNB and neurodevelopmental abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To assess the clinical usefulness of genetic testing in a pediatric population with inherited retinal disease (IRD). Design Single-center retrospective case series. Participants Eighty-five unrelated children with a diagnosis of isolated or syndromic IRD who were referred for clinical genetic testing between January 2014 and July 2016. Methods Participants underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination, accompanied by electrodiagnostic testing (EDT) and dysmorphologic assessment where appropriate. Ocular and extraocular features were recorded using Human Phenotype Ontology terms. Subsequently, multigene panel testing (105 or 177 IRD-associated genes) was performed in an accredited diagnostic laboratory, followed by clinical variant interpretation. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield and clinical usefulness of genetic testing. Results Overall, 78.8% of patients (n = 67) received a probable molecular diagnosis; 7.5% (n = 5) of these had autosomal dominant disease, 25.4% (n = 17) had X-linked disease, and 67.2% (n = 45) had autosomal recessive disease. In a further 5.9% of patients (n = 5), a single heterozygous ABCA4 variant was identified; all these participants had a spectrum of clinical features consistent with ABCA4 retinopathy. Most participants (84.7%; n = 72) had undergone EDT and 81.9% (n = 59) of these patients received a probable molecular diagnosis. The genes most frequently mutated in the present cohort were CACNA1F and ABCA4 , accounting for 14.9% (n = 10) and 11.9% (n = 8) of diagnoses respectively. Notably, in many cases, genetic testing helped to distinguish stationary from progressive IRD subtypes and to establish a precise diagnosis in a timely fashion. Conclusions Multigene panel testing pointed to a molecular diagnosis in 84.7% of children with IRD. The diagnostic yield in the study population was significantly higher compared with that in previously reported unselected IRD cohorts. Approaches similar to the one described herein are expected to become a standard component of care in pediatric ophthalmology. We propose the introduction of genetic testing early in the diagnostic pathway in children with clinical and/or electrophysiologic findings, suggestive of IRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although the majority of small in-frame insertions/deletions (indels) has no/little affect on protein function, a small subset of these changes has been causally associated with genetic disorders. Notably, the molecular mechanisms and frequency by which they give rise to disease phenotypes remain largely unknown. The aim of this study is to provide insights into the role of in-frame indels (≤21 nucleotides) in two genetically heterogeneous eye disorders.Results: One hundred eighty-one probands with childhood cataracts and 486 probands with retinal dystrophy underwent multigene panel testing in a clinical diagnostic laboratory. In-frame indels were collected and evaluated both clinically and in silico. Variants that could be modeled in the context of protein structure were identified and analysed using integrative structural modeling. Overall, 55 small in-frame indels were detected in 112 of 667 probands (16.8 %); 17 of these changes were novel to this study and 18 variants were reported clinically. A reliable model of the corresponding protein sequence could be generated for 8 variants. Structural modeling indicated a diverse range of molecular mechanisms of disease including disruption of secondary and tertiary protein structure and alteration of protein-DNA binding sites.Conclusions: In childhood cataract and retinal dystrophy subjects, one small in-frame indel is clinically reported in every ~37 individuals tested. The clinical utility of computational tools evaluating these changes increases when the full complexity of the involved molecular mechanisms is embraced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]