Search

BackgroundPediatric renal trauma is rare and lacks sufficient population-specific data to generate evidence-based management guidelines. A nonoperative approach is preferred and has been shown to be safe. However, bleeding risk assessment and management of collecting system injury are not well understood. We introduce the Multi-institutional Pediatric Acute Renal Trauma Study (Mi-PARTS), a retrospective cohort study designed to address these questions. This article describes the demographics and contemporary management of pediatric renal trauma at Level I trauma centers in the United States.MethodsRetrospective data were collected at 13 participating Level I trauma centers on pediatric patients presenting with renal trauma between 2010 and 2019. Data were gathered on demographics, injury characteristics, management, and short-term outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to report on demographics, acute management, and outcomes.ResultsIn total, 1,216 cases were included in this study. Of all patients, 67.2% were male, and 93.8% had a blunt injury mechanism. In addition, 29.3% had isolated renal injuries, and 65.6% were high-grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Grades III-V) injuries. The mean Injury Severity Score was 20.5. Most patients were managed nonoperatively (86.4%), and 3.9% had an open surgical intervention, including 2.7% having nephrectomy. Angioembolization was performed in 0.9%. Collecting system intervention was performed in 7.9%. Overall mortality was 3.3% and was only observed in patients with multiple injuries. The rate of avoidable transfer was 28.2%.ConclusionThe management and outcomes of pediatric renal trauma lack data to inform evidence-based guidelines. Nonoperative management of bleeding following renal injury is a well-established practice. Intervention for renal trauma is rare. Our findings reinforce differences from the adult population and highlights opportunities for further investigation. With data made available through Mi-PARTS, we aimed to answer pediatric specific questions, including a pediatric-specific bleeding risk nomogram, and better understanding indications for interventions for collecting system injuries.Level of evidencePrognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a guidelines-based best practice alerts (BPA) in the electronic health record (EHR) on adherence to American Urological Association (AUA) vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) guidelines.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged 0-17 years old with primary VUR with an initial urology clinic visit the year before or year after BPA implementation was done. Primary outcomes include obtaining vital signs, urinalysis, and ultrasound at initial and 1-year follow-up visit.Results: We identified 123 patients with initial visits during the study period, 58 of whom returned for 1-year follow-up visits. Patients seen post-BPA were more likely to have height measured at initial visit than those seen pre-BPA (47.3% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001). The majority of patients were screened with weight (98.3%) and ultrasound (87.9%) at 1-year follow-up both before and after BPA implementation. Neither blood pressure measurements (59.1% vs. 55.6%, p > 0.5) nor urinalysis orders (23.8% vs. 19.4%, p > 0.05) significantly increased post-BPA.Conclusion: The use of an EHR-based BPA increased the likelihood of obtaining height measurements by clinic intake staff but did not significantly affect provider adherence to other practice guideline recommendations. Our findings suggest that BPA implementation alone is not sufficient to impact provider uptake of VUR guideline recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surgery cancellations in the pediatric population are often due to preventable causes and can lead to decreased operating room efficiency. We hypothesized that clinical and demographic patient factors are associated with preventable cancellations of scheduled outpatient pediatric urology procedures at our institution. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of cancelled outpatient pediatric urology procedures from January 1 to July 31, 2010 was performed. Data regarding demographics, procedure type, time to surgery from preoperative visit, reason for cancellation, potential operating room and surgeon lost revenue, and ultimate patient outcome were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: We identified 114 cancellations during the study period, comprising 13.3% of scheduled outpatient procedures. Preventable cancellations included insurance/financial related (11.4%), preoperative fasting violation (8.8%) and condition improved the day of surgery (4.4%). Nonpreventable cancellations included patient illness (40.3%), weather/traffic related (1.7%) and other nonspecified reasons (29%). Compared to nonpreventable cancellations, preventable cancellations were more likely associated with circumcision (OR 2.39, CI 1.04–5.46). Preventable cancellations were also associated with a shorter distance to the hospital (p = 0.03). There was no significant association between preventable cancellations and age, race/ethnicity, caregiver type or time to surgery. Potential associated lost revenue averaged $4,802 per cancellation. Conclusions: While the most common cause of surgical cancellation is patient illness, a significant number of cancellations are preventable. These findings suggest that future targeted hospital interventions, including improved evaluation of insurance status and preoperative parental education regarding preoperative requirements, may improve operating room use. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]