Search

Background: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia is a common occurrence in patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. However, the relationship between chemotherapy‐induced anorexia and weight loss during platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear. This study explored the relationship between chemotherapy‐induced anorexia and therapeutic outcomes in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer undergoing platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 106 patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors between January 2019 and October 2022. The incidence of weight loss and its association with treatment efficacy was assessed in the chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group. Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. Progression‐free and overall survival were used to measure treatment efficacy. Results: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia was observed in 13.2% of patients. These patients exhibited significant weight loss at 6 and 9 weeks after treatment initiation compared to those in the non‐chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group. Progression‐free and overall survival were shorter in the chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group than in the non‐chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia was associated with significant weight loss and reduced treatment efficacy in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer. These results highlight the importance of implementing robust supportive care for chemotherapy‐induced anorexia to mitigate weight loss and uphold treatment effectiveness during platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Which patients benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. There have been few reports on the efficacy of ICIs based on conventional immunohistochemical neuroendocrine (NE) markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM]). In the present study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the expression of immunohistochemical NE markers and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with extensive disease (ED)‐SCLC, to assess whether conventional NE markers are predictive of ICIs. Methods: Patients with untreated ED‐SCLC who received first‐line therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2002 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the efficacy of first‐line chemotherapy according to the expression status of each immunohistochemical NE marker in patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI‐chemo group) and with chemotherapy alone (chemo group). Results: A total of 227 patients were included in the ICI‐chemo and chemo groups, respectively. The progression‐free survival (PFS) tended to be better in patients in the ICI‐chemo group than those treated with chemotherapy alone in patients with NE marker‐positive SCLC. In particular, it was statistically significant in patients with chromogranin A‐positive SCLC (p = 0.036). In patients with NE marker‐negative SCLC, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the two groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), regardless of the expression of any conventional NE marker. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the efficacy of ICIs in addition to chemotherapy may be poor in patients with NE marker‐negative SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adipose tissue induces inflammation, which desensitizes the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, several reports show that the therapeutic effect of programed cell death 1 (PD‐1)/programed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitor(s) monotherapy is significantly better in obese patients. Therefore, the effect of adipose tissue on immunotherapy is unclear. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor monotherapy between May 2016 and December 2018. We classified patients into total adipose tissue maintenance or loss groups according to adipose tissue change during the 6 months before treatment and compared the therapeutic effect of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors between these groups along with the presence or absence of cachexia, a poor prognostic factor. Results: Of the 74 patients, 40 (54.1%) were cachexic. Among cachexic patients, we found no clear difference in the overall response rate (ORR) and progression‐free survival (PFS) between the total adipose tissue maintenance and loss group. However, among noncachexic patients, the total adipose tissue loss group had a higher ORR (64.7% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.05) and longer PFS (18.5 months vs. 2.86 months, p = 0.037) than the maintenance group. Conclusions: This study showed that decreasing adipose tissue without cachexia might favor the therapeutic effects of immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background. Prognostic data on Japanese patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) are insufficient. Whether pneumonitis has prognostic implications in patients with LA-NSCLC who have received durvalumab also remains unclear. Methods. We retrospectively assessed the data of 82 consecutive patients who had received durvalumab after CRT at our institution between May 2018 and August 2020. A multi-state model was used to establish the associations between co-variables and progression-free survival (PFS). Results. The median observation period for all the censored cases was 14.5 months (5.7–28.9 months), the median PFS was 22.7 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 62.3% (95% CI: 50.2%-72.3%). The median percentage of the lung volume receiving a radiation dose in excess of 20 Gray (V20) was 22% (4%-35%). Thirteen patients (16%) had Grade 1 pneumonitis before receiving durvalumab, and 62 patients developed pneumonitis after durvalumab (Grades 1, 2, and 3 in 25 [30%], 32 [39%], and 4 [5%], respectively). Twenty-four patients (29%) completed the 1-year durvalumab treatment period, 16 patients (20%) were continuing to receive treatment, and 42 (51%) had discontinued treatment. In a multi-state analysis, patients with pneumonitis before durvalumab therapy had a poorer PFS than those without pneumonitis (HR: 4.29, p = 0.002). The development of Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis after durvalumab was not a significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 0.71, p = 0.852). Conclusion. Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis after durvalumab was not a prognostic factor of PFS in LA-NSCLC patients received durvalumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objectives In EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, approximately 80–90% of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) develops after failed initial treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). However, the efficacy of rechallenging with previously administered EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and the LM that develops following EGFR-TKI treatment failure remains unknown. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM, from November 2011 to August 2019. The patients were classified according to the LM treatment type: switched to previously unadministered EGFR-TKIs (Switch-TKI) or rechallenge with previously administered EGFR-TKIs (Rechallenge-TKI). Results In total, 50 patients treated with EGFR-TKI after LM diagnosis were included; 35 were treated with Switch-TKI and 15 with Rechallenge-TKI. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of LM diagnosis was 6.2 months in all study patients. According to the treatment type, the median OS from the time of LM diagnosis was 6.9 months in Switch-TKI patients and 4.9 months in Rechallenge-TKI patients. There was no significant difference in the OS between the Switch-TKI and Rechallenge-TKI groups (P = 0.864). Thirty-five patients were treated with erlotinib and 15 with osimertinib; Regardless of the type for EGFR-TKI, there was no significant difference in OS between patients treated with Switch-TKI and those treated with Rechallenge-TKI. Conclusion Rechallenge of previously administered EGFR-TKIs may be a therapeutic option for LM development after EGFR-TKI treatment failure in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, not only switching to previously unadministered EGFR-TKIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has exhibited efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a fatal adverse event of osimertinib treatment, and it requires treatment discontinuation. There are few reports regarding the safety and efficacy of osimertinib re-challenge in patients who experienced osimertinib-induced ILD. This retrospective study assessed this treatment option. We retrospectively collected data for patients treated with osimertinib who developed ILD at Shizuoka Cancer Center from April 2016 to March 2020. ILD was diagnosed by two doctors based on imaging tests and blood tests to exclude other causes. Among 215 patients treated with osimertinib, 28 developed ILD. The median age of patients with ILD was 69.5 years (range, 39.0–80.0). In addition, 29% of patients were men, and 46% had a history of smoking. Eleven patients were re-administered EGFR TKIs, including eight patients treated with osimertinib and three patients treated with alternative EGFR TKIs. Among patients re-challenged with osimertinib, none who previously experienced grade 1 ILD exhibited ILD relapse, even with the same osimertinib dose and without the concurrent administration of systemic steroids. Meanwhile, one of the four patients who previously exhibited grade 2 ILD experienced despite a dose reduction for osimertinib and systemic steroid administration. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who experience grade 1 ILD during osimertinib therapy, osimertinib re-challenge may be suitable when no other treatments are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]