Search

Objectives: To study clinical and patient reported outcomes for the Virtual Monitoring Clinic (VMC), a remote nurse‐led telemonitoring service for monitoring Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients treated with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: Patients with stable RA enrolled in the VMC were followed up prospectively. The primary outcomes evaluated at 1‐year follow‐up were: Disease Activity Score‐28 (DAS28), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and patient satisfaction assessed using an 11‐point Likert scale. Results: Of the 251 patients enrolled, 186 completed 1‐year of follow‐up. There was a 2.3% (n = 450) reduction in the annual workload from the rheumatology specialist outpatient clinic as a result of the VMC. Statistically significant improvement was seen in the mean patient satisfaction score (7.70‐8.16, P ≤ 0.001), with 61.5% of patients opting for the VMC alternating with rheumatology outpatient clinic visits as their preferred mode of follow‐up vis‐à‐vis standard care. There was a marginal increase in mean DAS28 and RAPID3 scores from 2.56 to 2.78 (P < 0.05) and 5.28 to 6.03 (P < 0.05), respectively. However, given that at 1‐year follow‐up more than half (72.0% and 63.4% based on DAS28 and RAPID3) of the patients' disease activity had improved or remained stable, and was in remission or low activity (73.1% and 53.2% based on DAS28 and RAPID3), the VMC seemed to maintain a stable RA disease activity for the majority of patients. Conclusions: The VMC is an effective and well‐accepted novel approach for the management of patients with stable RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: To explore the feasibility of using SMS to conduct health surveys in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Using a two-way SMS system, we conducted a baseline survey using a short and a long quality of life instrument, with two follow-up administrations of the short survey among patients with RA on follow-up at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Our outcome variables were survey response rate, question response time, proportion of replies following the format instructions, and survey administration cost. Results: Among 85 participants (of 99 eligible patients approached), the response rate was 67% for the long survey, 80% for the short survey at baseline, and 74% and 70% at the first and second follow-ups, respectively. Survey response rate varied with the employment status of respondents. Approximately 78% of all replies followed the format instructions. All these replies were received within the stipulated 24-h timeline and half of them were received within 29min. Response time for the other 22% of replies that did not follow the format instructions was much longer. The average administration cost per survey was S$0.34 (equivalent of US$0.26). Conclusions: Two-way SMS is a promising tool to conduct short health surveys. Evidence for implementing long surveys over SMS is still weak. The post survey interviews with survey participants suggested that sequential delivery of survey questions coupled with SMS reminders in the interim, tailoring survey questions to individual health conditions, and providing feedback on individual survey results can potentially improve the response rate of such surveys. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: Early detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases is crucial given their high morbidity and mortality and short window of opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Self-administered screening questionnaires such as the connective tissue disease screening questionnaire (CSQ) have been shown to promote early detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. However, optimal scoring of screening questionnaires may differ with prevalence of clinical features and changes in classification criteria. We compared the performance of 3 scoring methods for the CSQ for early detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Methods: Patients who were newly referred for evaluation of possible autoimmune rheumatic diseases were invited to answer the cross-culturally adapted CSQ. Detection of autoimmune rheumatic diseases using 1) the original CSQ scoring, 2) a modified CSQ scoring and 3) a scoring based on current classification criteria, were compared to classification of autoimmune rheumatic diseases by classification criteria. Results: Of 819 participants, 85 were classified as having autoimmune rheumatic diseases screened for by the adapted CSQ. The original CSQ scoring yielded relatively lower sensitivities in detecting both any and individual autoimmune rheumatic diseases (67% and 20-57%, respectively) compared to the modified CSQ scoring (81% and 60-73%, respectively) and the scoring based on current classification criteria (89% and 50-88%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted CSQ with the classification criteria-based scoring achieved relatively high sensitivities in detecting autoimmune rheumatic diseases, suggesting this could be employed as the first step in population screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To cross-culturally adapt the Connective Tissue Disease (CTD) Screening Questionnaire (CSQ) in a multi-ethnic Asian population in Singapore. Methods: An expert panel of accredited rheumatologists evaluated the content validity of the original CSQ. Consenting participants newly referred from primary care to a rheumatology specialist outpatient clinic for evaluation of possible CTDs were studied. Cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs) using the original CSQ were conducted with English-speaking participants, with modifications made based on their inputs and in discussion with a second expert panel (rheumatologists and the CSQ developers). Forward and back translations of the adapted English version were reviewed by the second expert panel. The common translation produced was tested in CDIs with Chinese-speaking participants. Adapted English and Chinese versions were pilot tested in a separate group of newly referred patients. Results: Content validity of the original CSQ was confirmed by the expert panel. A total of 30 and 15 participants were recruited for English and Chinese CDIs, respectively. Alternative terms and explanatory notes were added to difficult medical terms in the adapted English CSQ. A further explanatory note was added to one difficult item, and English medical terms were retained in the Chinese version. Pilot testing of the adapted CSQ was performed on 116 participants, which exhibited an overall sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 58%, respectively, in identifying CTDs. Conclusions: The adapted CSQ demonstrated satisfactory sensitivity in the pilot testing and appears to be a promising tool for facilitating early identification of CTDs in the multi-ethnic Asian population. Key Points: • Early identification and management of patients with CTDs is crucial given their high disease burden and short "windows of opportunity." • High reliability and validity of original CSQ and its cross-culturally adapted versions have been reported; however, the CSQ has not been validated in Southeast Asia where CTDs are associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to other countries. • Our cross-culturally adapted CSQ demonstrated satisfactory sensitivity in identifying CTDs in the multi-ethnic Asian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]