Search

Most vertebrates have a rhodopsin gene with a five-exon structure for visual photoreception. By contrast, teleost fishes have an intron-less rhodopsin gene for visual photoreception and an intron-containing rhodopsin (exo-rhodopsin) gene for pineal photoreception. Here, our analysis of non-teleost and teleost fishes in various lineages of the Actinopterygii reveals that retroduplication after branching of the Polypteriformes produced the intron-less rhodopsin gene for visual photoreception, which converted the parental intron-containing rhodopsin gene into a pineal opsin in the common ancestor of the Teleostei. Additional analysis of a pineal opsin, pinopsin, shows that the pinopsin gene functions as a green-sensitive opsin together with the intron-containing rhodopsin gene for pineal photoreception in tarpon as an evolutionary intermediate state but is missing in other teleost fishes, probably because of the redundancy with the intron-containing rhodopsin gene. We propose an evolutionary scenario where unique retroduplication caused a "domino effect" on the functional diversification of teleost visual and pineal opsin genes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

High sensitivity of scotopic vision (vision in dim light conditions) is achieved by the rods' low background noise, which is attributed to a much lower thermal activation rate (k th ) of rhodopsin compared with cone pigments. Frogs and nocturnal geckos uniquely possess atypical rods containing noncanonical cone pigments that exhibit low k th , mimicking rhodopsin. Here, we investigated the convergent mechanism underlying the low k th of rhodopsins and noncanonical cone pigments. Our biochemical analysis revealed that the k th of canonical cone pigments depends on their absorption maximum (λ max ). However, rhodopsin and noncanonical cone pigments showed a substantially lower k th than predicted from the λ max dependency. Given that the λ max is inversely proportional to the activation energy of the pigments in the Hinshelwood distribution-based model, our findings suggest that rhodopsin and noncanonical cone pigments have convergently acquired low frequency of spontaneous-activation attempts, including thermal fluctuations of the protein moiety, in the molecular evolutionary processes from canonical cone pigments, which contributes to highly sensitive scotopic vision., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Opsins are universal photoreceptive proteins in animals. Vertebrate rhodopsin in ciliary photoreceptor cells photo-converts to a metastable active state to regulate cyclic nucleotide signaling. This active state cannot photo-convert back to the dark state, and thus vertebrate rhodopsin is categorized as a mono-stable opsin. By contrast, mollusk and arthropod rhodopsins in rhabdomeric photoreceptor cells photo-convert to a stable active state to stimulate IP 3 /calcium signaling. This active state can photo-convert back to the dark state, and thus these rhodopsins are categorized as bistable opsins. Moreover, the negatively charged counterion position crucial for the visible light sensitivity is different between vertebrate rhodopsin (Glu113) and mollusk and arthropod rhodopsins (Glu181). This can be explained by an evolutionary scenario where vertebrate rhodopsin newly acquired Glu113 as a counterion, which is thought to have led to higher signaling efficiency of vertebrate rhodopsin. However, the detailed evolutionary steps which led to the higher efficiency in vertebrate rhodopsin still remain unknown. Here, we analyzed the xenopsin group, which is phylogenetically distinct from vertebrate rhodopsin and functions in protostome ciliary cells. Xenopsins are blue-sensitive bistable opsins that regulate cAMP signaling. We found that a bistable xenopsin of Leptochiton asellus had Glu113 as a counterion but did not exhibit elevated signaling efficiency. Therefore, our results show that vertebrate rhodopsin and L. asellus xenopsin regulate cyclic nucleotide signaling in ciliary cells and displaced the counterion position from Glu181 to Glu113 via convergent evolution, whereas subsequently only vertebrate rhodopsin elevated its signaling efficiency by acquiring the mono-stable property., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Opsins are universal photoreceptive proteins in animals and can be classified into three types based on their photoreaction properties. Upon light irradiation, vertebrate rhodopsin forms a metastable active state, which cannot revert back to the original dark state via either photoreaction or thermal reaction. By contrast, after photoreception, most opsins form a stable active state which can photoconvert back to the dark state. Moreover, we recently found a novel type of opsins whose activity is regulated by photocycling. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this diversification of opsins remains unknown. In this study, we showed that vertebrate rhodopsin acquired the photocyclic and photoreversible properties upon introduction of a single mutation at position 188. This revealed that the residue at position 188 contributes to the diversification of photoreaction properties of opsins by its regulation of the recovery from the active state to the original dark state., Competing Interests: KS, YS, YI, TY No competing interests declared, (© 2022, Sakai et al.)

Light-induced extrasynaptic dopamine release in the retina reduces adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) in rod photoreceptor cells, which is thought to mediate light-dependent desensitization. However, the fine time course of the cAMP dynamics in rods remains elusive due to technical difficulty. Here, we visualized the spatiotemporal regulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in mouse rods by two-photon live imaging of retinal explants of PKAchu mice, which express a fluorescent biosensor for PKA. Unexpectedly, in addition to the light-on-induced suppression, we observed prominent light-off-induced PKA activation. This activation required photopic light intensity and was confined to the illuminated rods. The estimated maximum spectral sensitivity of 489 nm and loss of the light-off-induced PKA activation in rod-transducin-knockout retinas strongly suggest the involvement of rhodopsin. In support of this notion, rhodopsin-deficient retinal explants showed only the light-on-induced PKA suppression. Taken together, these results suggest that, upon photopic light stimulation, rhodopsin and dopamine signals are integrated to shape the light-off-induced cAMP production and following PKA activation. This may support the dark adaptation of rods., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest.

Numerous rhodopsin mutations have been implicated in night blindness and retinal degeneration, often with unclear etiology. D190N-rhodopsin (D190N-Rho) is a well-known inherited human mutation causing retinitis pigmentosa. Both higher-than-normal spontaneous-isomerization activity and misfolding/mistargeting of the mutant protein have been proposed as causes of the disease, but neither explanation has been thoroughly examined. We replaced wild-type rhodopsin (WT-Rho) in Rho mouse rods with a largely "functionally silenced" rhodopsin mutant to isolate electrical responses triggered by D190N-Rho activity, and found that D190N-Rho at the single-molecule level indeed isomerizes more frequently than WT-Rho by over an order of magnitude. Importantly, however, this higher molecular dark activity does not translate into an overall higher cellular dark noise, owing to diminished D190N-Rho content in the rod outer segment. Separately, we found that much of the degeneration and shortened outer-segment length of D190N/WT mouse rods with a largely "functionally silenced" rhodopsin mutant to isolate electrical responses triggered by D190N-Rho activity, and found that D190N-Rho at the single-molecule level indeed isomerizes more frequently than WT-Rho by over an order of magnitude. Importantly, however, this higher molecular dark activity does not translate into an overall higher cellular dark noise, owing to diminished D190N-Rho content in the rod outer segment. Separately, we found that much of the degeneration and shortened outer-segment length of Rho D190N/WT mouse rods was not averted by ablating rod transducin in phototransduction-also consistent with D190N-Rho's higher isomerization activity not being the primary cause of disease. Instead, the low pigment content, shortened outer-segment length, and a moderate unfolded protein response implicate protein misfolding as the major pathogenic problem. Finally, D190N-Rho also provided some insight into the mechanism of spontaneous pigment excitation., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest.

Recent progress in whole genome sequencing has revealed that animals have various kinds of opsin genes for photoreception. Among them, most opsin genes have introns in their coding regions. However, it has been known for a long time that teleost retinas express intron-less rhodopsin genes, which are presumed to have been formed by retroduplication from an ancestral intron-containing rhodopsin gene. In addition, teleosts have an intron-containing rhodopsin gene (exo-rhodopsin) exclusively for pineal photoreception. In this study, to unravel the evolutionary origin of the two teleost rhodopsin genes, we analyzed the rhodopsin genes of non-teleost fishes in the Actinopterygii. The phylogenetic analysis of full-length sequences of bichir, sturgeon and gar rhodopsins revealed that retroduplication of the rhodopsin gene occurred after branching of the bichir lineage. In addition, analysis of the tissue distribution and the molecular properties of bichir, sturgeon and gar rhodopsins showed that the abundant and exclusive expression of intron-containing rhodopsin in the pineal gland and the short lifetime of its meta II intermediate, which leads to optimization for pineal photoreception, were achieved after branching of the gar lineage. Based on these results, we propose a stepwise evolutionary model of teleost intron-containing and intron-less rhodopsin genes.

Constitutively active mutants (CAMs) of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) cause various kinds of diseases. Rhodopsin, a light-absorbing GPCR in animal retinas, has retinal as an endogenous ligand; only very low levels of activation of G-protein can be obtained with the ligand-free opsin. However, the CAM of opsin activates G-protein much more efficiently than the wild type, but the mechanism underlying this remains unclear. The present work revisits the constitutive activity of rhodopsin from the standpoint of conformational dynamics. Single-molecule observation of the M257Y mutant of bovine rhodopsin demonstrated that the switch between active and inactive conformations frequently occurred in M257Y opsin, and frequent generation of the active state results in the population shift toward the active state, which accounts for the constitutive activity of M257Y opsin. Our findings demonstrate that the protein function has a direct connection with the structural dynamics.

Red-shifted channelrhodopsins (ChRs) are attractive for optogenetic tools. We developed a new type of red-shifted ChRs that utilized noncovalent incorporation of retinal and 3,4-dehydroretinal-based enamine-type Schiff bases and mutated channelopsin, C1C2-K296G. These ChRs exhibited absorption maxima that were shifted 10-30 nm toward longer wavelengths than that of C1C2-ChR regenerated with all-trans-retinal.

Low dark noise is a prerequisite for rod cells, which mediate our dim-light vision. The low dark noise is achieved by the extremely stable character of the rod visual pigment, rhodopsin, which evolved from less stable cone visual pigments. We have developed a biochemical method to quickly evaluate the thermal activation rate of visual pigments. Using an isomerization locked chromophore, we confirmed that thermal isomerization of the chromophore is the sole cause of thermal activation. Interestingly, we revealed an unexpected correlation between the thermal stability of the dark state and that of the active intermediate MetaII. Furthermore, we assessed key residues in rhodopsin and cone visual pigments by mutation analysis and identified two critical residues (E122 and I189) in the retinal binding pocket which account for the extremely low thermal activation rate of rhodopsin.

Rhodopsin is a G protein-coupled receptor specialized for photoreception and contains a light-absorbing chromophore retinal that binds to the lysine residue of opsin through a protonated Schiff base linkage. Light converts rhodopsin to an equilibrium mixture of the active state metarhodopsin II (MII) and its precursor, metarhodopsin I (MI), which have deprotonated and protonated Schiff base chromophores, respectively. This equilibrium was thought to depend on the pKa of not the Schiff base chromophore but glutamic acid E134 in the highly conserved E/DRY triad in helix III. We performed mutational analyses of E134 and nearby residues to examine whether the equilibrium is really dependent on the pKa of E134 and to obtain clues about the contribution of E134 to the G protein activation characteristics of rhodopsin. All the single mutants at position 134 except for E134D lost the characteristic pH-dependent equilibrium, indicating that the carboxyl group of E134 is responsible for the equilibrium. Interestingly, mutation at position 134 caused little change in the MI or MII spectra or G protein activation efficiency of MII, while it caused a shift of the MI-MII equilibrium. The mutants containing hydrophobic or amide-containing residues at position 134 formed an equilibrium in favor of MII, resulting in an increase in light-induced G protein activation efficiency. On the other hand, the wild type exhibited an opsin activity lower than those of the mutants, which exhibited reasonable light-dependent activities. These results strongly suggest that the evolutionary significance of E134 is not an increase in G protein activity but rather suppression of the opsin activity.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit stimuli to intracellular signaling systems. Rhodopsin (Rh), which is a prototypical GPCR, possesses an 11-cis retinal. Photoisomerization of 11-cis to all-trans leads to structural changes in the protein of cytoplasmic loops, activating G-protein. Microbial rhodopsins are similar heptahelical membrane proteins that function as bacterial sensors, light-driven ion-pumps, or light-gated channels. They possess an all-trans retinal, and photoisomerization to 13-cis triggers structural changes in protein. Despite these similarities, there is no sequence homology between visual and microbial rhodopsins, and microbial rhodopsins do not activate G-proteins. In this study, new chimeric proton-pumping rhodopsins, proteorhodopsin (PR) and Gloeobacter rhodopsin (GR) were designed by replacing cytoplasmic loops with bovine Rh loops. Although G-protein was not activated by the PR chimeras, all 12 GR chimeras activated G-protein. The GR chimera containing the second cytoplasmic loop of bovine Rh did not activate G-protein. However, the chimera with a second and third double-loop further enhanced G-protein activation. Introduction of an E132Q mutation slowed the photocycle 30-fold and enhanced activation. The highest catalytic activity of the GR chimera was still 3,200 times lower than bovine Rh but only 64 times lower than amphioxus Go-rhodopsin. This GR chimera showed a strong absorption change of the amide-I band on a light-minus-dark difference FTIR spectrum which could represent a larger helical opening, important for G-protein activation. The light-dependent catalytic activity of this GR chimera makes it a potential optogenetic tool for enzymatic activation by light.

Rhodopsin is a G-protein-coupled receptor, in which retinal chromophore acts as inverse-agonist or agonist depending on its configuration and protonation state. Photostimulation of rhodopsin results in a pH-dependent equilibrium between the active state (Meta-II) and its inactive precursor (Meta-I). Here, we monitored conformational changes of rhodopsin using a fluorescent probe Alexa594 at the cytoplasmic surface, which shows fluorescence increase upon the generation of active state, by single-molecule measurements. The fluorescence intensity of a single photoactivated rhodopsin molecule alternated between two states. Interestingly, such a fluorescence alternation was also observed for ligand-free rhodopsin (opsin), but not for dark-state rhodopsin. In addition, the pH-dependences of Meta-I/Meta-II equilibrium estimated by fluorescence measurements deviated notably from estimates based on absorption spectra, indicating that both Meta-I and Meta-II are mixtures of two conformers. Our observations indicate that rhodopsin molecules intrinsically adopt both active and inactive conformations, and the ligand retinal shifts the conformational equilibrium. These findings provide dynamical insights into the activation mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptors., (Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Parietopsin is a nonvisual green light-sensitive opsin closely related to vertebrate visual opsins and was originally identified in lizard parietal eye photoreceptor cells. To obtain insight into the functional diversity of opsins, we investigated by UV-visible absorption spectroscopy the molecular properties of parietopsin and its mutants exogenously expressed in cultured cells and compared the properties to those of vertebrate and invertebrate visual opsins. Our mutational analysis revealed that the counterion in parietopsin is the glutamic acid (Glu) in the second extracellular loop, corresponding to Glu181 in bovine rhodopsin. This arrangement is characteristic of invertebrate rather than vertebrate visual opsins. The photosensitivity and the molar extinction coefficient of parietopsin were also lower than those of vertebrate visual opsins, features likewise characteristic of invertebrate visual opsins. On the other hand, irradiation of parietopsin yielded meta-I, meta-II, and meta-III intermediates after batho and lumi intermediates, similar to vertebrate visual opsins. The pH-dependent equilibrium profile between meta-I and meta-II intermediates was, however, similar to that between acid and alkaline metarhodopsins in invertebrate visual opsins. Thus, parietopsin behaves as an "evolutionary intermediate" between invertebrate and vertebrate visual opsins.

G-protein-coupled receptors transmit stimuli (light, taste, hormone, neurotransmitter, etc.) to the intracellular signaling systems, and rhodopsin (Rh) is the most-studied G-protein-coupled receptor. Rh possesses an 11-cis retinal as the chromophore, and 11-cis to all-trans photoisomerization leads to the protein structural changes in the cytoplasmic loops to activate G-protein. Microbial rhodopsins are similar heptahelical membrane proteins that function as bacterial sensors, light-driven ion-pumps, or light-gated channels. Microbial rhodopsins possess an all-trans retinal, and all-trans to 13-cis photoisomerization triggers protein structural changes for each function. Despite these similarities, there is no sequence homology between visual and microbial rhodopsins, and microbial rhodopsins do not activate G-proteins. However, it was reported that bacteriorhodopsin (BR) chimeras containing the third cytoplasmic loop of bovine Rh are able to activate G-protein, suggesting a common mechanism of protein structural changes. Here we design chimeric proteins for Natronomonas pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II (SRII, also called pharaonis phoborhodopsin), which has a two-orders-of-magnitude slower photocycle than BR. Light-dependent transducin activation was observed for most of the nine SRII chimeras containing the third cytoplasmic loop of bovine Rh (from Y223, G224, Q225 to T251, R252, and M253), but the activation level was 30,000-140,000 times lower than that of bovine Rh. The BR chimera, BR/Rh223-253, activates a G-protein transducin, whereas the activation level was 37,000 times lower than that of bovine Rh. We interpret the low activation by the chimeric proteins as reasonable, because bovine Rh must have been optimized for activating a G-protein transducin during its evolution. On the other hand, similar activation level of the SRII and BR chimeras suggests that the lifetime of the M intermediates is not the simple determinant of activation, because SRII chimeras have two-orders-of-magnitude's slower photocycle than the BR chimera. Activation mechanism of visual and microbial rhodopsins is discussed on the basis of these results., (Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The second extracellular loop (ECL2) of the family 1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) is known to function in ligand recognition and to show structural diversity in a variety of GPCRs. In rhodopsin, ECL2 forms a rigid structure including a beta-sheet and interacts with the transmembrane region via a disulfide bond, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions. It forms the chromophore-binding pocket with transmembrane helices and directly interacts with the 11-cis-retinal chromophore. To clarify the functional role of the rigid ECL2 in bovine rhodopsin, we designed split rhodopsins in which the polypeptide chain of rhodopsin was cleaved at the C-terminal end and/or N-terminal end of ECL2 by genetic engineering. A reconstitution study of pigment from two peptide fragments and 11-cis-retinal showed that fixation of the N-terminus of ECL2 to the transmembrane region is essential for folding into the native rhodopsin structure. Split rhodopsin was resistant to hydroxylamine and activated transducin upon light absorption similarly to wild-type rhodopsin, but was readily disassembled by photobleaching. Analyses of the photobleaching processes of split rhodopsins and rhodopsin mutant lacking disulfide bond showed that the rigid structure of ECL2 is required for facilitating the formation of the active state. These results suggest that ECL2 'mechanically' drives the conformational change of rhodopsin.

Rhodopsin is an extensively studied member of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although rhodopsin shares many features with the other GPCRs, it exhibits unique features as a photoreceptor molecule. A hallmark in the molecular structure of rhodopsin is the covalently bound chromophore that regulates the activity of the receptor acting as an agonist or inverse agonist. Here we show the pivotal role of the covalent bond between the retinal chromophore and the lysine residue at position 296 in the activation pathway of bovine rhodopsin, by use of a rhodopsin mutant K296G reconstituted with retinylidene Schiff bases. Our results show that photoreceptive functions of rhodopsin, such as regiospecific photoisomerization of the ligand, and its quantum yield were not affected by the absence of the covalent bond, whereas the activation mechanism triggered by photoisomerization of the retinal was severely affected. Furthermore, our results show that an active state similar to the Meta-II intermediate of wild-type rhodopsin did not form in the bleaching process of this mutant, although it exhibited relatively weak G protein activity after light irradiation because of an increased basal activity of the receptor. We propose that the covalent bond is required for transmitting structural changes from the photoisomerized agonist to the receptor and that the covalent bond forcibly keeps the low affinity agonist in the receptor, resulting in a more efficient G protein activation.

Bovine rhodopsin contains 11-cis-retinal as a light-absorbing chromophore that binds to a lysine residue of the apoprotein opsin via a protonated Schiff base linkage. Light isomerizes 11-cis-retinal into the all-trans form, which eventually leads to the formation of an enzymatically active state, metarhodopsin II (MII). It is widely believed that MII forms a pH-dependent equilibrium with metarhodopsin I (MI), but direct evidence for this equilibrium has not been reported. Here, we confirmed this equilibrium by direct observation of the mutual conversions of MI and MII upon changing the pH of the MI/MII mixture. We also observed a reversible binding of the synthetic peptide constituting the C-terminal 11 amino acids of the transducin alpha-subunit to MII, which resulted in change of the amounts of MI and MII in the equilibrium. Interestingly, addition of the peptide did not induce a simple pK(a) shift but rather induced an increase of the MII fraction at high pH. These results indicate that in addition to the MII that is formed from MI in a pH-dependent manner there also exists another MII, which is in equilibrium with MI in a pH-independent manner and can bind to the peptide. Therefore, there is no need for proton uptake by the protein moiety of opsin for the binding to the peptide.

Rhodopsin is one of the members of the G protein-coupled receptor family that can catalyze a GDP-GTP exchange reaction on the retinal G protein transducin (Gt) upon photon absorption. There are at least two intermediate states, meta-Ib and meta-II, which exhibit direct interaction with Gt. Meta-Ib binds to GDP-bound Gt, while meta-II forms a complex with Gt having no nucleotide, suggesting that meta-Ib is a state that initially interacts with Gt. Here we investigated whether or not meta-Ib exhibits specific interaction with G protein similar to meta-II, by examining the binding efficiencies of meta-Ib and meta-II to Gialpha and its mutants whose C-terminal 11 amino acids were replaced with those of Goalpha, Gqalpha and Gsalpha. The affinity of meta-Ib to the C-terminal 11 amino acids of Gtalpha was similar to those of Gialpha and its mutant with Goalpha's C-terminal 11 amino acids, whereas meta-II exhibited affinity to the C-terminal 11 amino acids of Gialpha mutant with Goalpha's C-terminal 11 amino acids about half of what was seen for Gtalpha and Gialpha. Both intermediates exhibited no affinity to the Gialpha mutants containing the C-terminal 11 amino acids of Gqalpha and Gsalpha. These results suggested that meta-Ib is the state that exhibits specific interaction with G protein as meta-II does, although meta-Ib exhibits a slightly lenient binding selectivity compared to that of meta-II.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are classified into several families based on their amino acid sequences. In family 1, GPCRs such as rhodopsin and adrenergic receptor, the structure-function relationship has been extensively investigated to demonstrate that exposure of the third cytoplasmic loop is essential for selective G protein activation. In contrast, much less is known about other families. Here we prepared chimeric mutants between Gt-coupled rhodopsin and Gi/Go- and Gs-coupled glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor of family 2 and tried to identify the loop region that functions at the third cytoplasmic loop position of rhodopsin. We succeeded in expressing a mutant having the first cytoplasmic loop of GLP-1 receptor and found that this mutant activated Gi and Go efficiently but did not activate Gt. Moreover, the rhodopsin mutant having the first loop of Gs-coupled secretin receptor of family 2 decreased the Gi and Go activation efficiencies. Therefore, the first loop of GLP-1 receptor would share a similar role to the third loop of rhodopsin in G protein activation. This result strongly suggested that different families of GPCRs have maintained molecular architectures of their ancestral types to generate a common mechanism, namely exposure of the cytoplasmic loop, to activate peripheral G protein.

The counterion, a negatively charged amino acid residue that stabilizes a positive charge on the retinylidene chromophore, is essential for rhodopsin to receive visible light. The counterion in vertebrate rhodopsins, Glu113 in the third transmembrane helix, has an additional role as an intramolecular switch to activate G protein efficiently. Here we show on the basis of mutational analyses that Glu181 in the second extracellular loop acts as the counterion in invertebrate rhodopsins. Like invertebrate rhodopsins, UV-absorbing parapinopsin has a Glu181 counterion in its G protein-activating state. Its G protein activation efficiency is similar to that of the invertebrate rhodopsins, but significantly lower than that of bovine rhodopsin, with which it shares greater sequence identity. Thus an ancestral vertebrate rhodopsin probably acquired the Glu113 counterion, followed by structural optimization for efficient G protein activation during molecular evolution.

To elucidate the mechanisms of specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with the G protein transducin (G(t)), we have constructed the bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop (loop 2 or 3) was replaced with the corresponding loop of the G(o)-coupled scallop rhodopsin and investigated the difference in the activation abilities for G(t), G(o), and G(i) among these mutants and wild type. We have also prepared the Galpha(i) mutants whose C-terminal 11 or 5 amino acids were replaced with those of Galpha(t), Galpha(o), and Galpha(q) to evaluate the role of the C-terminal tail of the alpha-subunit on the specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with G(t). Replacement of loop 2 of bovine rhodopsin with that of the scallop rhodopsin caused about a 40% loss of G(t) and G(o) activation, whereas that of loop 3 enhanced the G(o) activation four times with a 60% decrease in the G(t) activation. These results indicated that loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is one of the regions responsible for the specific coupling with G(t). Loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin discriminates the difference of the 6-amino acid sequence (region A) at a position adjacent to the C-terminal 5 amino acids of the G protein, resulting in the different activation efficiency between G(t) and G(o). In addition, the binding of region A to loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is essential for activation of G(t) but not G(i), even though the sequence of the region A is almost identical between Galpha(t) and Galpha(i). These results suggest that the binding of loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin to region A in Galpha(t) is one of the mechanisms of specific G(t) activation by bovine rhodopsin.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), a prototypical family 3 G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), has served as a model for studying GPCR dimerization, and growing evidence has revealed that a glutamate-induced dimeric rearrangement promotes activation of the receptor. However, structural information of the seven-transmembrane domain is severely limited, in contrast to the well studied family 1 GPCRs including rhodopsins and adrenergic receptors. Homology modeling of mGluR8 transmembrane domain with rhodopsin as a template suggested the presence of a conserved water-mediated hydrogen-bonding network between helices VI and VII, which presumably constrains the receptor in an inactive conformation. We therefore conducted a mutational analysis to assess structural similarities between mGluR and family 1 GPCRs. Mutational experiments confirmed that the disruption of the hydrogen-bonding network by T789Y6.43 mutation induced high constitutive activity. Unexpectedly, this high constitutive activity was suppressed by glutamate, the natural agonist ligand, indicating that glutamate acts as a partial inverse agonist to this mutant. Fluorescence energy transfer analysis of T789Y6.43 suggested that the glutamate-induced reduction of the activity originated not from the dimeric rearrangement but from conformational changes within each protomer. Double mutational analysis showed that the specific interaction between Tyr-7896.43 and Gly-8317.45 in T789Y6.43 mutant was important for this phenotype. Therefore, the present study is consistent with the notion that the metabotropic glutamate receptor shares a common activation mechanism with family 1 GPCRs, where rearrangement between helices VI and VII causes the active state formation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most vertebrates have one type of rhodopsin and multiple types of cone visual pigments with different absorption maxima in their retinas. The spectral sensitivities of multiple cone visual pigments contribute to color discrimination in these animals. Vertebrate cone visual pigments are classified into four groups based on their amino acid sequences. Among these groups, many pigments in the longer wavelength-sensitive group (L-group) have a unique spectral tuning mechanism, that is, the red-shift of absorption maximum induced by the binding of chloride to His181 of the protein moiety (chloride effect). However, a few pigments such as mouse green and guinea pig green pigments in L-group have a tyrosine residue instead of a histidine at position 181. Interestingly, mouse green shows no chloride effect, whereas guinea pig green shows a significant chloride effect. In the present site-directed mutational analysis, we revealed that this difference in the chloride effect in rodent pigments is completely explained by the replacements of two residues at positions 289 and 292. In addition, mutations at positions 181, 289, and 292 abolished 80% of the chloride effect in monkey red and green. Further analysis with chimeras showed that the residual 20% of the chloride effect could be attributed to helical interactions within the pigments. Thus, we concluded that these three amino acid residues are the main determinants of the chloride-dependent spectral shift in L-group pigments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors are classified into several families on the basis of their amino acid sequences and the members of the same family exhibit sequence similarity but those of different families do not. In family 1 GPCRs such as rhodopsin and adrenergic receptor, extensive studies have revealed the stimulus-dependent conformational change of the receptor: the rearrangement of transmembrane helices III and VI is essential for G protein activation. In contrast, in family 3 GPCRs such as metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), the inter-protomer relocation upon ligand binding has been observed but there is much less information about the structural changes of the transmsmbrane helices and the cytoplasmic domains. Here we identified constitutively active mutation sites at the cytoplasmic borders of helices II and IV of mGluR8 and successfully inhibited the G protein activation ability by engineering disulfide cross-linking between these cytoplasmic regions. The analysis of all possible single substitution mutants of these residues revealed that some steric interactions around these sites would be important to keep the receptor protein inactive. These results provided the model that the conformational changes at the cytoplasmic ends of helices II and IV of mGluR are involved in the efficient G protein coupling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors identified so far are classified into at least three major families based on their amino acid sequences. For the family of receptors homologous to rhodopsin (family 1), the G protein activation mechanism has been investigated in detail, but much less for the receptors of other families. To functionally compare the G protein activation mechanism between rhodopsin and metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), which belong to distinct families, we prepared a set of bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop was replaced with either the second or third loop of Gi/Go- or Gq-coupled mGluR (mGluR6 or mGluR1). Among these mutants, the mutants in which the second or third loop was replaced with the corresponding loop of mGluR exhibited no G protein activation ability. In contrast, the mutant whose third loop was replaced with the second loop of Gi/Go-coupled mGluR6 efficiently activated Gi but not Gt: this activation profile is almost identical with those of the mutant rhodop-sins whose third loop was replaced with those of the Gi/Go-coupled receptors in family 1 [Yamashita et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34272-34279]. The mutant whose third loop was replaced with the second loop of Gq-coupled mGluR1 partially retained the Gi coupling ability of rhodopsin, which is in contrast to the fact that all the rhodopsin mutants having the third loops of Gq-coupled receptors in family 1 exhibit no detectable Gi activation. These results strongly suggest that the molecular architectures of rhodopsin and mGluR are different, although the G protein activation mechanism involving the cyto-plasmic loops is common. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How the light-induced transducin (Gt) activation process differs biochemically between cone visual pigments and rod visual pigment (rhodopsin) has remained unclear, because the Gt-activating state (Meta-II) of cone visual pigment decays too fast to precisely measure the activation efficiency by conventional biochemical methods such as the GTPγS binding assay. Here we measured the activation efficiencies of chicken green-sensitive cone visual pigment (cG) and bovine rhodopsin (bRh) in real time by monitoring the intrinsic fluorescence of tryptophan residues in the pigments and Gt. Michaelis-Menten analysis of Gt activation showed that the initial velocity for cG was approximately half that for bRh, while their Michaelis constants were comparable. Gt activation by cG was immediately slowed because of the fast hydrolysis of the retinal Schiff base in Meta-II, but this hydrolysis was suppressed by forming the complex with Gt. Using mutants of cG and bRh for positions 122 and 189, which exhibit altered rates of chromophore hydrolysis in Meta-II, we found that the initial velocity of Gt activation is negatively correlated with the rate of chromophore hydrolysis. These results suggest that the amino acid residues at positions 122 and 189 account for not only the resistance to the chromophore hydrolysis in Meta-II but also the conformation of Meta-II for efficient Gt activation. The substantially longer lifetime of the Gt activating state of Rh would be necessary to suppress the spontaneous quenching by the stochastic decay of the Gt-activating state when a rod responds to a single photon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]