Search

In the multicentre prospective randomized HD2002 trial, rituximab maintenance therapy (375 mg/m(2) every 3 months for 2 years) versus observation was evaluated for CD20(+) B-cell lymphoma. Out of 321 patients [161 randomized to the treatment group (TG), 160 to the observation group (OG)], 295 data sets were evaluable for statistical analysis. Estimated 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 81% in the TG and 70% in the OG (logrank test, P = 0·047). In the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) subgroup (n = 152), 5-year RFS was excellent, at 87% in the TG and 84% in the OG (logrank test, P = 0·35). Of note, only in male patients of the DLBCL subgroup was RFS significantly superior in the TG in comparison to the OG (5-year RFS: 88% vs. 74%; logrank test, P = 0·05). Cox regression analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and gender regarding overall survival (OS) (P = 0·006) and RFS (P = 0·02), with a lower hazard in females than males in the OG [OS: hazard ratio (HR) (female:male) = 0·11; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0·00-1·03; RFS: HR (female:male) = 0·27; 95% CI = 0·05-0·97], and no significant differences between males and females in the TG. We conclude that Rituximab maintenance therapy improves survival in male patients with DLBCL., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate the real‐world effectiveness and tolerability of rituximab‐containing chemoimmunotherapies, which have become the standard of care for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), particularly for physically fit patients. Furthermore, current treatment patterns in clinical practice were documented, and an unselected real‐life population was compared with older, comorbid patients. Methods: Prospective, multicentre, observational study with rituximab‐containing chemoimmunotherapy in CLL patients. Results: Of 681 patients in total, 485 were enroled in cohort 1 (unselected) and 196 in cohort 2 (comorbid “slow‐go” patients). The median patient age was higher than in most randomised controlled trials (cohort 1: 70 years and cohort 2: 75 years). The most common treatment regimen in both first‐line and relapsed patients was rituximab‐bendamustine. Two‐year progression‐free survival rate for first‐line therapy was 84.1% for cohort 1 and 69.8% for cohort 2 (with best overall response rate 81.8% for cohort 1 and 76.6% for cohort 2). General and B‐symptoms declined during treatment and remained at low level or decreased further until study end. The safety profile observed in randomised clinical trials was confirmed. Conclusion: Chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab is feasible and safe in a wide variety of clinical settings in CLL, including the treatment of older patients with comorbidities (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01178086). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The chemoimmunotherapy FCR (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with rituximab) is the standard first-line treatment for physically fit chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. To assess the risks and benefits, we investigated health-related quality of life (HRQOL). 817 untreated CLL patients received either FC or FCR within the GCLLSG CLL8 trial. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire C30 was sent to all patients at baseline, after 3, 6, and 12 months and then yearly as follow-up. A total of 769 (94%) of 817 patients completed at least one questionnaire. Comparing HRQOL of CLL patients with the general German population, CLL patients’ health declined in most scales except for global health and pain. No major differences in HRQOL were found during treatment or follow-up between both treatment arms. Females were more likely to have treatment-related symptoms than males. Although FCR was associated with more side effects, this did not influence HRQOL. During follow-up after FCR only minor improvement of HRQOL compared with FC was assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent lym phomaand is responsive to therapy regimens containing alkylating agents, purine analogs and rituximab if treatment becomes necessary. We initiated a multicenter phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a regimen containing pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PER) in patients with WM. Between May 2005 and December 2010, 25 patients with WM were included in the study. Twenty-one patients received PER as first-line therapy. In these patients, 2-year progression-free survival was 83.6% and 2-year overall survival was 100%. Thirteen patients (52%) received R maintenance therapy. In these patients, the 2-year progression-free survival was 91.67% and 2-year overall survival was 100%. We have provided evidence that PER is a safe and effective regimen for WM. Although R maintenance therapy after PER seemed to induce a better long-term outcome, this study was not powered to address this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal treatment of early stage follicular Lymphoma is a matter of debate. Radiation therapy has frequently been applied with a curative approach beside watchful waiting. Involved field, extended field and total nodal radiation techniques are used in various protocols, but the optimal radiation field still has to be defined. Follicular lymphoma is characterized by stable expression of the CD20 antigen on the tumour cells surface. The anti CD20 antibody Rituximab (Mabthera®) has shown to be effective in systemic therapy of FL in primary treatment, relapse and maintenance therapy. Methods/design: The MIR (Mabthera® and Involved field Radiation) study is a prospective multicenter trial combining systemic treatment with the anti CD20 antibody Rituximab (Mabthera®) in combination with involved field radiotherapy (30 - 40 Gy). This trial aims at testing the combination's efficacy and safety with an accrual of 85 patients. Primary endpoint of the study is progression free survival. Secondary endpoints are response rate to Rituximab, complete remission rate at week 18, relapse rate, relapse pattern, relapse free survival, overall survival, toxicity and quality of life. Discussion: The trial evaluates the efficacy of Rituximab to prevent out-filed recurrences in early stage nodal follicular lymphoma and the safety of the combination of Rituximab and involved field radiotherapy. It also might show additional risk factors for a later recurrence (e.g. remission state after Rituximab only). Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00509184 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The strategy to apply involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) after immunochemotherapy in patients with bulky follicular lymphoma (FL) remains controversial. Patients and methods: To evaluate the benefit of consolidating IF-RT, we retrospectively analysed relapse patterns and survival of patients with bulky FL. All patients were treated within a multicenter prospective randomized trial on 126 patients with one, three or six cycles Rituximab and six cycles CHOP. According to the protocol, patients presenting with bulky disease were to undergo consolidating IF-RT after immunochemotherapy. Forty-two eligible patients with bulky disease were identified, of which 26 were irradiated and 16 were not, contrary to the demand of the protocol. Results: There was no significant difference between the irradiated and the non-irradiated group regarding presenting characteristics ( P > 0.05). After a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients relapsed. In the irradiated group, relapse occurred in 12 of 26 patients. Fifty percent of relapses were located within the original bulk or within the bulk plus a new location. In the non-irradiated group, 9 of 16 patients relapsed. There was no statistically significant difference between exposure to IF-RT and the likelihood of a relapse per se ( P = 0.751) or at a specific location ( P = 0.66). Six-yr-PFS- ( P = 1.0) and OS-rates ( P = 0.68) were 52% and 80% after IF-RT and 48% and 73% without IF-RT. Conclusion: There was no difference in relapse rate, PFS and OS between patients treated with and without consolidating IF-RT. This is the first analysis of its kind conducted in the Rituximab era. However, these results are based on a relatively small cohort size and are derived from a retrospective analysis, with the limitations of such an analysis being well known. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has been shown to improve outcome in first-line therapy. However, in patients with relapsed or refractory disease, the value of adding rituximab to salvage chemotherapy is less clearly defined. This study performed a matched-pair analysis of patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL by comparing the combination of dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatin (DHAP) with rituximab to DHAP alone. Sixty-seven patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL were collected from two prospective phase II trials from Germany and Italy. Twenty-three patient pairs treated with either DHAP in combination with rituximab or DHAP alone could be analysed after matching for important prognostic factors. The addition of rituximab to the DHAP regimen led to higher complete and similar overall remission rates. However, differences with regard to complete remission rates failed to reach statistical significance, thereby necessitating further evaluation of the role of combined immunochemotherapy in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We designed a multicenter Phase II trial to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of rituximab with the DHAP regimen (dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, cisplatin) in patients who relapsed after or were resistant to a CHOP-like regimen. A total of 53 patients with relapsed or resistant aggressive B-cell NHL were analyzed. The overall response rate was 62.3 percent. With a median follow-up of 24.9 months, median overall and progression-free survivals were 8.5 and 6.7 months, respectively. Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and DHAP proved to be feasible and effective in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the efficacy of rituximab, amonoclonal anti-cd20 antibody in the treatment of patients with relapsing B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Correlation between CD20 expression and the efficacy of rituximab treatment; Detection of disease progression; Determination of malignant lymphocytes in peripheral blood.

Abstract: Accurate monitoring of the t(14;18) translocation is regarded as highly desirable in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) as absence of bcl-2/IgH positive cells has been correlated with a reduced risk of recurrence and, more recently, pre-treatment t(14;18) load with response to rituximab (R; Blood 2004;103:4416-23). With the arrival of R clinical and molecular remission rates for various lymphoma entities improved significantly, creating the need to carefully review and reassess the role of PCR negativity for clinical outcome, specifically when considering the prolonged presence of the drug as compared to chemotherapy. To determine the rate of molecular clearance achieved by the addition of different doses of R 16 newly diagnosed, t(14;18) positive patients with FL (Ann Arbor stages III/IV) were investigated before, during and after primary chemotherapy with six cycles of CHOP combined with varying (1, 3 or 6) cycle numbers of R (varR1-, varR3- or varR6-CHOP, respectively) regarding molecular remission status. For this purpose classic nested PCR as well as a newly established RQ-PCR employing juxtaposed hybridisation probes were employed to assess molecular remission prior, during and post therapy. Interestingly, administering just a single cycle of R (varR1-CHOP) in combination with a standard regimen of CHOP resulted in rapid and effective clearance of t(14;18) carrying cells from the peripheral blood of 4/5 patients in this treatment group. 6/8 (6/8) varR1-/varR3-CHOP patients were fully cleared and 8/8 (7/8) var6-CHOP patients as assessed by RQ- (nested) PCR. This indicates the high clearance capacity of this combination therapy approach even when adding a very low cycle number of R (1 and 3, respectively) to CHOP in primary therapy of FL. In summary, the relationship established between molecular clearance and minimal residual disease/risk of recurrence may have to be redefined in the times of R. Upcoming large prospective trials will have to elucidate to what degree the clearance of peripheral blood from t(14;18) positive cells can still be regarded as informative regarding absence of minimal residual disease, remission status and/or risk of recurrence. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]