Search

Objective: To determine the usefulness of cell-associated HIV-1-DNA quantification during the follow-up of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-treated primary-infected patients with persistently undetectable plasma RNA loads., Patients and Methods: In 27 patients given HAART within a median of 24 days after symptomatic primary HIV infection, plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) HIV-1 RNA were less than 50 copies/ml and less than 50 copies/10(6) cells after 18 months of treatment. HIV-1 RNA and DNA were quantified every 6 months in PBMC in these 27 patients, 14 of whom accepted excision lymph node biopsy after month 18 for HIV-1-RNA and -DNA quantification in lymph node mononuclear cells (LNMC)., Results: The median decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA, PBMC HIV-1 RNA and DNA over the 18 months of follow-up were 3.6 log (P< 0.005), 1.1 log (P< 0.05), and 1.0 log (P<0.001), respectively. HIV-1 DNA was detected in 92.3% of PBMC samples at baseline and at month 18. In LNMC, 100% of samples were detectable for HIV-1 DNA., Conclusion: In this highly selected population of patients with excellent plasma virological response under HAART, HIV-1 DNA showed a progressive decrease but was still detectable in 92.3% of samples at month 18, whereas all LNMC samples tested scored positive for HIV-1 DNA. The utility of proviral HIV-1-DNA monitoring was not clearly demonstrated in this 18-month follow-up of HAART-treated primary-infected patients. However, this finding could be reconsidered when using other therapeutic strategies such as structured treatment interruptions, reinforced treatment or additive immunotherapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate residual viral replication by assessing the HIV load of circulating infected cells in patients given an effective antiprotease-containing treatment for 1 year. PBMC HIV RNA and HIV DNA was quantified by techniques standardized and evaluated by interlaboratory quality control testing. Viral markers identified in a multicenter study were validated in a cross-sectional study of 121 patients beginning treatment. A longitudinal study of 3 viral markers was carried out in 18 patients, each of whom had fewer than 200 copies of HIV RNA per milliliter of plasma after 12 months of treatment. The cross-sectional study showed that viral replication in PBMCs was correlated with the number of circulating infected cells (Spearman rank correlation; p = 0.0001, r = 0.35) and the concentration of virus particles in the plasma (Spearman; p = 0.0001, r = 0.54). The longitudinal study showed that the decrease in HIV RNA levels was smaller in PBMCs than in the plasma. The largest decrease in HIV DNA levels after 12 months of treatment was recorded in patients with low levels of intracellular replication (Spearman; p = 0.005, r = 0.69). PBMC HIV RNA and HIV DNA levels were very informative markers, complementary to plasma HIV RNA levels. They should be used in future trials evaluating the long-term efficacy of new associations of highly active antiretroviral treatments.

We compared the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 assay with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma in the Stadi trail, which evaluated a stavudine plus didanosine combination therapy in 52 patients. HIV-1 RNA baseline values measured with AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 were significantly higher than those measured with QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0, and decreases in HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline were also found to be significantly higher when measured with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay. The frequency of HIV-1 RNA levels below the lower limit of quantitation was significantly higher with QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 than with AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0. Reanalysis of these results by an ultrasensitive procedure of AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 or by a modified version of the test that included additional primers adapted for non-B HIV-1 clades yielded greater differences between the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 assay and the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay. Our results indicate that a valid comparison of the virological efficacies obtained with different antiretroviral drug regimens requires the use of the same viral load quantitation procedure; further standardization between the different HIV-1 RNA quantitation kits is therefore needed.