Search

A working hypothesis for the pathogenesis of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) involves the aberrant sequestration of an alternative splicing regulator, MBNL1, by expanded CUG repeats, r(CUG)(exp). It has been suggested that a reversal of the myotonia and potentially other symptoms of the DM1 disease can be achieved by inhibiting the toxic MBNL1-r(CUG)(exp) interaction. Using rational design, we discovered an RNA-groove binding inhibitor (ligand 3) that contains two triaminotriazine units connected by a bisamidinium linker. Ligand 3 binds r(CUG)12 with a low micromolar affinity (K(d) = 8 ± 2 μM) and disrupts the MBNL1-r(CUG)12 interaction in vitro (K(i) = 8 ± 2 μM). In addition, ligand 3 is cell and nucleus permeable, exhibits negligible toxicity to mammalian cells, dissolves MBNL1-r(CUG)(exp) ribonuclear foci, and restores misregulated splicing of IR and cTNT in a DM1 cell culture model. Importantly, suppression of r(CUG)(exp) RNA-induced toxicity in a DM1 Drosophila model was observed after treatment with ligand 3. These results suggest ligand 3 as a lead for the treatment of DM1.

Muscleblind-like proteins (MBNL) are RNA-binding proteins that bind to the poly(CUG) and poly(CCUG) sequences that are the causative agents of myotonic dystrophy. It has been suggested that as a result of binding to the repeating RNA sequences, MBNL1 is abnormally expressed and translocated, which leads to many of the misregulated events in myotonic dystrophy. In this work, steady-state fluorescence quenching experiments suggest that MBNL1 alters the structure of helical RNA targets upon binding, which may explain the selectivity of MBNL1 for less structured RNA sites. The removal of one pair of zinc fingers greatly impairs the binding affinity of MBNL1, which indicates that the two pairs of zinc fingers might possibly interact with RNA targets cooperatively. Alanine scanning mutagenesis results suggest that the binding energy may be distributed across the protein. Overall, the results presented here suggest that small molecules that stabilize the helical structure of poly(CUG) and poly(CCUG) RNAs will inhibit the formation of complexes with MBNL1., (Copyright © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an incurable neuromuscular disease caused by expanded CCUG repeats that may exhibit toxicity by sequestering the splicing regulator MBNL1. A series of triaminotriazine- and triaminopyrimidine-based small molecules (ligands 1-3) were designed, synthesized and tested as inhibitors of the MBNL1-CCUG interaction. Despite the structural similarities of the triaminotriazine and triaminopyrimidine units, the triaminopyrimidine-based ligands bind with low micromolar affinity to CCUG repeats (K(d) ∼ 0.1-3.6 µM) whereas the triaminotriazine ligands do not bind CCUG repeats. Importantly, these simple and small triaminopyrimidine ligands exhibit both strong inhibition (K(i) ∼ 2 µM) of the MBNL1-CCUG interaction and high selectivity for CCUG repeats over other RNA targets. These experiments suggest these compounds are potential lead agents for the treatment of DM2.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out to compare the free and bound structures of wild type U1A protein with several Phe56 mutant U1A proteins that bind the target stem loop 2 (SL2) RNA with a range of affinities. The simulations indicate the free U1A protein is more flexible than the U1A-RNA complex for both wild type and Phe56 mutant systems. A complete analysis of the hydrogen-bonding (HB) and non-bonded (VDW) interactions over the course of the MD simulations suggested that changes in the interactions in the free U1A protein caused by the Phe56Ala and Phe56Leu mutations may stabilize the helical character in loop 3, and contribute to the weak binding of these proteins to SL2 RNA. Compared with wild type, changes in HB and VDW interactions in Phe56 mutants of the free U1A protein are global, and include differences in β-sheet, loop 1 and loop 3 interactions. In the U1A-RNA complex, the Phe56Ala mutation leads to a series of differences in interactions that resonate through the complex, while the Phe56Leu and Phe56Trp mutations cause local differences around the site of mutation. The long-range networks of interactions identified in the simulations suggest that direct interactions and dynamic processes in both the free and bound forms contribute to complex stability., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The effects of modifying the electronic characteristics of nonpolar base analogues substituted at positions involved in stacking interactions between SL2 RNA and the U1A protein are described. A surprisingly large difference in the stability between complexes formed with base analogues that differ only in the position of substitution of a single fluorine atom is observed. The results of high-level ab initio calculations of the interactions between the nonpolar base analogue and the amino acid side chain correlate with the experimentally observed trends in complex stability, which suggests that changes in stacking interactions that result from varying the position and degree of fluorine substitution contribute to the effects of fluorine substitution on the stability of the U1A-SL2 RNA complex.

This work describes the rational design, synthesis, and study of a ligand that selectively complexes CUG repeats in RNA (and CTG repeats in DNA) with high nanomolar affinity. This sequence is considered a causative agent of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) because of its ability to sequester muscleblind-like (MBNL) proteins. Ligand 1 was synthesized in two steps from commercially available compounds, and its binding to CTG and CUG repeats in oligonucleotides studied. Isothermal titration calorimetry studies of 1 with various sequences showed a preference toward the T-T mismatch (K(d) of 390 +/- 80 nM) with a 13-, 169-, and 85-fold reduction in affinity toward single C-C, A-A, and G-G mismatches, respectively. Binding and Job analysis of 1 to multiple CTG step sequences revealed high affinity binding to every other T-T mismatch with negative cooperativity for proximal T-T mismatches. The affinity of 1 for a (CUG)(4) step provided a K(d) of 430 nM with a binding stoichiometry of 1:1. The preference for the U-U in RNA was maintained with a 6-, >143-, and >143-fold reduction in affinity toward single C-C, A-A, and G-G mismatches, respectively. Ligand 1 destabilized the complexes formed between MBNL1N and (CUG)(4) and (CUG)(12) with IC(50) values of 52 +/- 20 microM and 46 +/- 7 microM, respectively, and K(i) values of 6 +/- 2 microM and 7 +/- 1 microM, respectively. These values were only minimally altered by the addition of competitor tRNA. Ligand 1 does not destabilize the unrelated RNA-protein complexes the U1A-SL2 RNA complex and the Sex lethal-tra RNA complex. Thus, ligand 1 selectively destabilizes the MBNL1N-poly(CUG) complex.

The fluorescence properties of two adenosine analogs, 2-(3-phenylpropyl)adenosine [A-3CPh] and 2-(4-phenylbutyl)adenosine [A-4CPh], are reported. As monomers, the quantum yields and the mean lifetimes are 0.011 and 6.22 ns for A-3CPh and 0.007 and 7.13 ns for A-4CPh, respectively. Surprisingly, the quantum yields of the two probes are enhanced 11- to 82-fold upon incorporation into RNA, while the mean lifetimes decrease 23-40%. The data suggest that a subpopulation of molecules is responsible for the fluorescence characteristics and that the distribution of emitting and non-emitting structures is altered upon incorporation of the probes into RNA. Thus, although both adenosine analogs have low quantum yields as monomers, their fluorescence signals are significantly enhanced in RNA. Thermodenaturation experiments and CD spectroscopy indicate that incorporation of the adenosine analogs into three different RNAs does not alter their global structure or stability. Therefore, these probes should be useful for probing events occurring close to the site of modification.

RNA folds into diverse structures that form unique targets for small molecules and thus provide significant potential for controlling biological processes involving RNA with small-molecule ligands. We are investigating molecular recognition of tetraloop RNA by small molecules. RNA tetraloops are four-nucleotide stem loops with unusual stability that are involved in biological processes involving RNA by forming binding sites for proteins and other RNAs. We have sequentially used the docking programs DOCK and AutoDock to screen 1990 small molecules in the NCI diversity set to identify molecules selective for RNA tetraloops over double-stranded RNA. The compounds predicted to bind to tetraloop RNA were evaluated for binding RNA tetraloops using 1H NMR spectroscopy and fluorescence techniques. An aminoacridine derivative (AD2) was identified that binds to a GAAA tetraloop in a 2:1 ratio with dissociation constants of 1.0 and 4.0 microM. AD2 binds with approximately 20-fold and 9-fold higher affinity to tetraloop RNA than to double- and single-stranded RNAs, respectively.

Cooperative interactions play an important role in recognition and binding in macromolecular systems. In this study, we find that cross-correlated atomic fluctuations can be used to identify cooperative networks in a protein-RNA system. The dynamics of the RRM-containing protein U1A-stem loop 2 RNA complex have been calculated theoretically from a 10 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The simulation was analyzed by calculating the covariance matrix of all atomic fluctuations. These matrix elements are then presented in the form of a two-dimensional grid, which displays fluctuations on a per residue basis. The results indicate the presence of strong, selective cross-correlated fluctuations throughout the RRM in U1A-RNA. The atomic fluctuations correspond well with previous biophysical studies in which a multiplicity of cooperative networks have been reported and indicate that the various networks identified in separate individual experiments are fluctuationally correlated into a hyper-network encompassing most of the RRM. The calculated results also correspond well with independent results from a statistical covariance analysis of 330 aligned RRM sequences. This method has significant implications as a predictive tool regarding cooperativity in the protein-nucleic acid recognition process.

A complete understanding of gene expression relies on a comprehensive understanding of the protein-RNA recognition process. However, the study of protein-RNA recognition is complicated by many factors that contribute to both binding affinity and specificity, including structure, energetics, dynamical motions, and cooperative interactions. Several recent studies have suggested that energetic coupling between residues contributes to formation of the complex between the U1A protein and stem loop 2 of U1 snRNA as a consequence of a cooperative network of interactions. We have performed molecular dynamics simulations on the U1A-RNA complex, including explicit water and counterions, and analyzed the results based on the calculated positional cross-correlations of atomic fluctuations. The results indicate that cross-correlations calculated on a per residue basis agree well with the observed inter-residue cooperativity and predict that the networks identified to date may also be coupled into an extensive hyper-network that reflects the intrinsic rigidity of the RNA recognition motif. In addition, we report a comparison of the MD calculated correlations with the results of a positional covariance analysis based on the sequences of 330 RNA recognition motifs, including U1A. The calculated inter-residue cross-correlations agree very well with the results of the sites exhibiting positional covariance. Collectively, these results strongly support the hypothesis that collective fluctuations contribute to cooperativity and the corresponding observed thermodynamic coupling. Predictions of additional sites in U1A that may be involved in cooperative networks are advanced.

RNA tetraloops are common secondary structural motifs in many RNAs, especially ribosomal RNAs. There are few studies of small molecule recognition of RNA tetraloops although tetraloops are known to interact with RNA receptors and proteins, and to form nucleation sites for RNA folding. In this paper, we investigate the binding of neomycin, kanamycin, 2,4-diaminoquinazoline, quinacrine, and an aminoacridine derivative (AD1) to a GAAA tetraloop using fluorescence spectroscopy. We have found that AD1 and quinacrine bind to the GAAA tetraloop with the highest affinity of the molecules examined. The equilibrium dissociation constant of the AD1-GAAA tetraloop complex was determined to be 1.6 microM. RNase I and lead acetate footprinting experiments suggested that AD1 binds to the junction between the loop and stem of the GAAA tetraloop.

The RNA recognition motif (RRM), one of the most common RNA binding domains, contains three highly conserved aromatic amino acids that participate in stacking interactions with RNA bases. We have investigated the contribution of these highly conserved aromatic amino acids to the affinity of the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein and stem loop 2 of U1 snRNA. Previously, we found that substitution of one of these conserved aromatic amino acids, Phe56, with Ala resulted in a large destabilization of the complex. Here, we have modified A6, the base in stem loop 2 RNA that stacks with Phe56, to compensate for a portion of the destabilization caused by the Phe56Ala mutation. We have designed two modified adenosines, A-3CPh and A-4CPh, in which a phenyl group is linked to the adenosine such that it may replace the phenyl group that is eliminated by the Phe56Ala mutation in the complex. We have found that incorporation of A-3CPh into stem loop 2 RNA stabilizes the complex formed with Phe56Ala by 0.6 kcal/mol, while incorporation of A-4CPh into stem loop 2 RNA stabilizes this complex by 1.8 kcal/mol. Either base modification destabilizes the wild-type complex by 0.8-0.9 kcal/mol. Experiments with other U1A mutant proteins suggest that the stabilization of the complex between the Phe56Ala U1A protein and stem loop 2 RNA is due to a specific interaction between the Phe56Ala U1A protein and A6-4CPh stem loop 2 RNA.

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is one of the most common RNA binding domains. There have been few investigations of small molecule inhibitors of RRM-RNA complexes, although these inhibitors could be valuable tools for probing biological processes involving RRM-RNA complexes and would have the potential to be effective drugs. In this paper, the inhibition by small molecules of the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein and stem loop 2 of U1 snRNA has been investigated. An aminoacridine derivative has been found to promote dissociation of the U1A-stem loop 2 RNA complex with an IC(50) value of 1 microM. Fluorescence experiments indicate that two aminoacridine ligands bind to each RNA target site. RNase A footprinting suggests that one binding site may be near the base pair that closes the loop and the other may be in a more flexible region of the loop. The addition of the aminoacridine derivative to stem loop 2 RNA increases the susceptibility of other portions of the loop to digestion by RNase A, which implies that binding of the ligand changes the conformation or dynamics of the stem loop target site. Either direct binding to the RNA or indirect alteration of the structure or dynamics of the loop would be likely to inhibit binding of the U1A protein to this RNA.

Three highly conserved aromatic residues in RNA recognition motifs (RRM) participate in stacking interactions with RNA bases upon binding RNA. We have investigated the contribution of one of these aromatic residues, Phe56, to the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the spliceosomal protein U1A and stem-loop 2 of U1 snRNA. Previous work showed that the aromatic group is important for high affinity binding. Here we probe how mutation of Phe56 affects the kinetics of complex dissociation, the strength of the hydrogen bonds formed between U1A and the base that stacks with Phe56 (A6) and specific target site recognition. Substitution of Phe56 with Trp or Tyr increased the rate of dissociation of the complex, consistent with previously reported results. However, substitution of Phe56 with His decreased the rate of complex association, implying a change in the initial formation of the complex. Simultaneous modification of residue 56 and A6 revealed energetic coupling between the aromatic group and the functional groups of A6 that hydrogen bond to U1A. Finally, mutation of Phe56 to Leu reduced the ability of U1A to recognize stem-loop 2 correctly. Taken together, these experiments suggest that Phe56 contributes to binding affinity by stacking with A6 and participating in networks of energetically coupled interactions that enable this conserved aromatic amino acid to play a complex role in target site recognition.

Stem-loop 3 RNA (SL3) in ψ-RNA is a highly conservedmotifin different strains of HIV-1 and serves as a principle determinantfor viral packaging. Viral encapsulation is critical for viral replication,and disruption of the nucleocapsid−ψ-RNA complex interfereswith viral replication. We have used SL3 RNA as a target for identificationof small molecule inhibitors of the interactions of nucleocapsid protein(NCp7) and ψ-RNA. We report the use of computational and high-throughputscreening approaches to identify 16 compounds that bind SL3 RNA withmicromolar affinities. Among the identified ligands, two molecules,compounds 7and 17, bind with higher affinityto SL3 RNA than to double- and single-stranded RNAs. Four of the 16SL3 RNA ligands inhibit interactions between SL3 RNA and NCp7 withmicromolar inhibition constants. In general, the identified SL3 ligandshave simple molecular structures and low molecular weights and are,therefore, possible lead compounds for the development of ligandsthat target the elements of ψ-RNA of HIV-1 with high affinityand specificity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The binding of a quinoline derivative (QD2) to a small RNA stem loop containing a 3′-dangling end (RNA1) has been studied. The compound was identified by first performing a similarity search of the NCI database of 250,000 compounds and then using computational docking with autodock to evaluate the binding of the resulting compounds to RNA1. Binding experiments using fluorescence and ITC methods revealed that QD2 binds cooperatively to four binding sites on RNA1 with equilibrium binding dissociation constants ranging from 8.2 (±0.3) to 12.5 (±4.2) μM. CD and UV titration experiments suggested that binding of QD2 changes the conformation of both RNA1 and the QD2 chromophore and stabilizes RNA1. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is one of the largest families of RNA binding domains. The RRM is modulated so that individual proteins containing RRMs can specifically recognize RNA targets with diverse sequences and structures. Understanding the principles governing this specificity will be important for the rational modification and design of RRM-RNA complexes. Results: In this paper we have investigated the origins of specificity of the N terminal RRM of the U1A protein for stem loop 2 (SL2) of U1 snRNA by substituting modified bases for essential purines in SL2 RNA. In one series of modified bases, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors were replaced by aliphatic groups to probe the importance of these functional groups to binding. In a second series of modified bases, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors were incorrectly placed on the purine bases to analyze the origins of discrimination between cognate and non-cognate RNA. The results of these experiments show that three different approaches are used by the U1A protein to gain specificity for purines. Specificity for the first base in the loop, A1, is based primarily on discrimination against RNA containing the incorrect base, specificity for the fourth base in the loop, G4, is based largely on recognition of the donors and acceptors of G4, while specificity for the sixth base in the loop, A6, results from a combination of direct recognition of the base and discrimination against incorrectly placed functional groups. Conclusion: These investigations identify different roles that hydrogen bond donors and acceptors on bases in both cognate and non-cognate RNA play in the specific recognition of RNA by the U1A protein. Taken together with investigations of other RNA-RRM complexes, the results contribute to a general understanding of the origins of RNA-RRM specificity and highlight, in particular, the contribution of steric and electrostatic repulsion to binding specificity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

7-Deazaguanine (7-DeG) was developed as a hydrogen-bonding module capable of enhanced recognition of uracil (U) and thymine (T); a water-soluble derivative displayed high affinity and selectivity toward DNA and RNA duplexes containing single T- and U-bulges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]