Search

In self-incompatible Solanaceous species, the pistil S-RNase acts as cytotoxin to inhibit self-pollination but is polyubiquitinated by the pollen-specific non-self S-locus F-box (SLF) proteins and subsequently degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), allowing cross-pollination. However, it remains unclear how S-RNase is restricted by the UPS. Here, we first show that Petunia hybrida (Ph) S3-RNase is largely ubiquitinated by K48-linked polyubiquitin chains at three regions, R I, II and III. R I is ubiquitinated in unpollinated, self- and cross-pollinated pistils, indicating its occurrence prior to PhS3-RNase uptake into pollen tubes, whereas R II and III are exclusively ubiquitinated in cross-pollinated pistils. Second, removal of R II ubiquitination resulted in significantly reduced seed sets from cross-pollination and that of R I and III in less extents, indicating their increased cytotoxicity. In consistent, the mutated R II of PhS3-RNase resulted in marked reduction of its degradation, whereas that of R I and III in less reductions. Taken together, our results demonstrate that PhS3-RNase R II functions as a major ubiquitination region for its destruction and R I and III as minor ones, revealing that its cytotoxicity is primarily restricted by a stepwise UPS mechanism for cross-pollination in P. hybrida.ONE SENTENCE SUMMARYBiochemical and transgenic analyses reveal that Petunia hybrida S3-RNase cytotoxicity is largely restricted by a stepwise ubiquitination and degradation pathway during cross-pollination.

RNA 2′-O-methylation is widely distributed and plays important roles in various cellular processes. Mycoplasma genitalium RNase R (MgR), a prokaryotic member of the RNase II/RNB family, is a 3′-5′ exoribonuclease and is particularly sensitive to RNA 2′-O-methylation. However, how RNase R interacts with various RNA species and exhibits remarkable sensitivity to substrate 2′-O-methyl modifications remains elusive. Here we report high-resolution crystal structures of MgR in apo form and in complex with various RNA substrates. The structural data together with extensive biochemical analysis quantitively illustrate MgR’s ribonuclease activity and significant sensitivity to RNA 2′-O-methylation. Comparison to its related homologs reveals an exquisite mechanism for the recognition and degradation of RNA substrates. Through structural and mutagenesis studies, we identified proline 277 to be responsible for the significant sensitivity of MgR to RNA 2′-O-methylation within the RNase II/RNB family. We also generated several MgR variants with modulated activities. Our work provides a mechanistic understanding of MgR activity that can be harnessed as a powerful RNA analytical tool that will open up a new venue for RNA 2′-O-methylations research in biological and clinical samples.

The role of archetypal ribonucleases (RNases) in the physiology and stress endurance of the soil bacterium and metabolic engineering platform Pseudomonas putida KT2440 has been inspected. To this end, variants of this strain lacking each of the most important RNases were constructed. Each mutant lacked either one exoribonuclease (PNPase, RNase R) or one endoribonuclease (RNase E, RNase III, RNase G). The global physiological and metabolic costs of the absence of each of these enzymes were then analysed in terms of growth, motility and morphology. The effects of different oxidative chemicals that mimic the stresses endured by this microorganism in its natural habitats were studied as well. The results highlighted that each ribonuclease is specifically related with different traits of the environmental lifestyle that distinctively characterizes this microorganism. Interestingly, the physiological responses of P. putida to the absence of each enzyme diverged significantly from those known previously in Escherichia coli. This exposed not only species-specific regulatory functions for otherwise known RNase activities but also expanded the panoply of post-transcriptional adaptation devices that P. putida can make use of for facing hostile environments.

Background To investigate the effect of circular RNA circ ACAP2 on apoptotic phenotype of rat cardiomyocytes and its molecular mechanism. Methods Left anterior descending ligation was used to establish a rat myocardial infarction (MI) model, and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to detect the expression of circ ACAP2 in apoptotic rat cardiomyocytes. The stability of circ ACAP2 was tested by actinomycin D and RNase R. H9C2 cells were infected by recombinant circ ACAP2 adenovirus (rAd-circ ACAP2), and the expression of apoptotic related genes Bax and BCL-2 in H9C2 was detected. Double luciferase reporter gene experiment, RNA antisense purification experiment and RNA Pull-Down experiments verified the binding effect of circ ACAP2 and miR-29. Results RT-qPCR results showed that the expression of circ ACAP2 was increased in cardiomyocytes of MI rats. Actinomycin D and RNase R experiment confirmed that circ ACAP2 had better stability and resistance to RNase R degradation than its host gene ACAP2 mRNA. Overexpression of circ ACAP2 promotes apoptosis. The double luciferase reporter gene assay, RNA antisense purification assay and RNA Pulldown assay consistently confirmed the specific binding effect between circ ACAP2 and miR-29, and circ ACAP2 promoted the apoptotic phenotype in rats. Conclusions The expression of circ ACAP2 increased in cardiomyocytes after MI and promoted apoptosis by binding to miR-29.

Thousands of eukaryotic protein-coding genes generate circular RNAs that have covalently linked ends and are resistant to degradation by exonucleases. To prove their circularity as well as biochemically enrich these transcripts, it has become standard in the field to use the 3′-5′ exonuclease RNase R. Here, we demonstrate that standard protocols involving RNase R can fail to digest >20% of all highly expressed linear RNAs, but these shortcomings can largely be overcome. RNAs with highly structured 3′ ends, including snRNAs and histone mRNAs, are naturally resistant to RNase R, but can be efficiently degraded once a poly(A) tail has been added to their ends. In addition, RNase R stalls in the body of many polyadenylated mRNAs, especially at G-rich sequences that have been previously annotated as G-quadruplex (G4) structures. Upon replacing K+ (which stabilizes G4s) with Li+ in the reaction buffer, we find that RNase R is now able to proceed through these sequences and fully degrade the mRNAs in their entirety. In total, our results provide important improvements to the current methods used to isolate circular RNAs as well as a way to reveal RNA structures that may naturally inhibit degradation by cellular exonucleases.

Bacterial and eukaryotic hibernation factors prevent translation by physically blocking the decoding center of ribosomes, a phenomenon called ribosome hibernation that often occurs in response to nutrient deprivation. The human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus lacking the sole hibernation factor HPF undergoes massive ribosome degradation via an unknown pathway. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we find that inactivating the 3′-to-5′ exonuclease RNase R suppresses ribosome degradation in the Δhpf mutant. In vitro cell-free degradation assays confirm that 30S and 70S ribosomes isolated from the Δhpf mutant are extremely susceptible to RNase R, in stark contrast to nucleolytic resistance of the HPF-bound 70S and 100S complexes isolated from the wild type. In the absence of HPF, specific S. aureus 16S rRNA helices are sensitive to nucleolytic cleavage. These RNase hot spots are distinct from that found in the Escherichia coli ribosomes. S. aureus RNase R is associated with ribosomes, but unlike the E. coli counterpart, it is not regulated by general stressors and acetylation. The results not only highlight key differences between the evolutionarily conserved RNase R homologs but also provide direct evidence that HPF preserves ribosome integrity beyond its role in translational avoidance, thereby poising the hibernating ribosomes for rapid resumption of translation. IMPORTANCE Ribosome hibernation is pivotal for the rapid recovery of translation after quiescence in both bacteria and eukaryotes. Ribosome hibernation factors sterically occlude the entry of mRNA and tRNA and are thought to primarily maintain ribosomes in a translation-repressive state, thereby providing a pool of readily recyclable 70S or 80S complexes upon dissociation of the hibernation factors. Ribosomes in Staphylococcus aureus cells lacking the sole hibernation factor HPF are extremely unstable. Here, we show that HPF binding inhibits ribosome degradation by the evolutionarily conserved exoribonuclease RNase R. The data not only uncover a direct protective role of HPF in ribosome stability but also reinforce the versatility of RNase R in RNA processing, decay, and ribosome quality control.

Rifampicin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase. Here we show that rifampicin treatment of Escherichia coli results in a 50% decrease in cell size due to a terminal cell division. This decrease is a consequence of inhibition of transcription as evidenced by an isogenic rifampicin-resistant strain. There is also a 50% decrease in total RNA due mostly to a 90% decrease in 23S and 16S rRNA levels. Control experiments showed this decrease is not an artifact of our RNA purification protocol and therefore due to degradation in vivo. Since chromosome replication continues after rifampicin treatment, ribonucleotides from rRNA degradation could be recycled for DNA synthesis. Rifampicin-induced rRNA degradation occurs under different growth conditions and in different strain backgrounds. However, rRNA degradation is never complete thus permitting the re-initiation of growth after removal of rifampicin. The orderly shutdown of growth under conditions where the induction of stress genes is blocked by rifampicin is noteworthy. Inhibition of protein synthesis by chloramphenicol resulted in a partial decrease in 23S and 16S rRNA levels whereas kasugamycin treatment had no effect. Analysis of temperature-sensitive mutant strains implicate RNase E, PNPase and RNase R in rifampicin-induced rRNA degradation. We cannot distinguish between a direct role for RNase E in rRNA degradation versus an indirect role involving a slowdown of mRNA degradation. Since mRNA and rRNA appear to be degraded by the same ribonucleases, competition by rRNA is likely to result in slower mRNA degradation rates in the presence of rifampicin than under normal growth conditions.

Ribosomes are macromolecular machines that carry out protein synthesis. After each round of translation, ribosome recycling is essential for reinitiating protein synthesis. Ribosome recycling factor (RRF), together with elongation factor G (EF-G), catalyse the transient split of the 70S ribosome into subunits. This splitting is then stabilized by initiation factor 3 (IF3), which functions as an anti-association factor. The correct amount of these factors ensures the precise level of 70S ribosomes in the cell. RNase R is a highly conserved exoribonuclease involved in the 3ʹ to 5ʹ degradation of RNAs. In this work we show that pneumococcal RNase R directly controls the expression levels of frr, fusA and infC mRNAs, the corresponding transcripts of RRF, EF-G and IF3, respectively. We present evidences showing that accumulation of these factors leads to a decreased amount of 70S active particles, as demonstrated by the altered sucrose gradient ribosomal pattern in the RNase R mutant strain. Furthermore, the single deletion of RNase R is shown to have a global impact on protein synthesis and cell viability, leading to a ~50% reduction in bacterial CFU/ml. We believe that the fine-tuned regulation of these transcripts by RNase R is essential for maintaining the precise amount of active ribosomal complexes required for proper mRNA translation and thus we propose RNase R as a new auxiliary factor in ribosome reassociation. Considering the overall impact of RNase R on protein synthesis, one of the main targets of antibiotics, this enzyme may be a promising target for antimicrobial treatment.

Development of RNA-based technologies relies on the ability to detect, manipulate, and modify RNA. Efficient, selective and scalable covalent modification of long RNA molecules remains a challenge. We report a chemical method for modification of RNA 3'-end based on previously unrecognized superior reactivity of N-substituted ethylenediamines in reductive amination of periodate-oxidized RNA. Using this method, we obtained fluorescently labelled or biotinylated RNAs varying in length (from 3 to 2000 nt) and carrying different 5' ends (including m7G cap) in high yields (70-100% by HPLC). The method is scalable (up to sub-milligrams of mRNA) and combined with label-facilitated HPLC purification yields highly homogeneous products. The combination of 3'-end labelling with 5'-end labelling by strain-promoted azide-alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC) afforded a one-pot protocol for site-specific RNA bifunctionalization, providing access to two-colour fluorescent RNA probes. These probes exhibited fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), which enabled real-time monitoring of several RNA hydrolase activities (RNase A, RNase T1, RNase R, Dcp1/2, and RNase H). Dually labelled mRNAs were efficiently translated in cultured cells and in zebrafish embryos, which combined with their detectability by fluorescent methods and scalability of the synthesis, opens new avenues for the investigation of mRNA metabolism and the fate of mRNA-based therapeutics. ispartof: NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH vol:50 issue:1 ispartof: location:England status: published

RNase R is a conserved exoribonuclease in the RNase II family that primarily participates in RNA decay in all kingdoms of life. RNase R degrades duplex RNA with a 3′ overhang, suggesting that it has RNA unwinding activity in addition to its 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease activity. However, how RNase R coordinates RNA binding with unwinding to degrade RNA remains elusive. Here, we report the crystal structure of a truncated form of Escherichia coli RNase R (residues 87–725) at a resolution of 1.85 Å. Structural comparisons with other RNase II family proteins reveal two open RNA-binding channels in RNase R and suggest a tri-helix ‘wedge’ region in the RNB domain that may induce RNA unwinding. We constructed two tri-helix wedge mutants and they indeed lost their RNA unwinding but not RNA binding or degrading activities. Our results suggest that the duplex RNA with an overhang is bound in the two RNA-binding channels in RNase R. The 3′ overhang is threaded into the active site and the duplex RNA is unwound upon reaching the wedge region during RNA degradation. Thus, RNase R is a proficient enzyme, capable of concurrently binding, unwinding and degrading structured RNA in a highly processive manner during RNA decay.

The same basic set of enzymatic activities exhibited by the eukaryotic RNA exosome are also found in prokaryotes. Bacteria have two predominant and distinct 3'→5' exoribonuclease activities: one is characterized by processive hydrolysis, derived from RNase II and RNase R, and the other by processive phosphorolysis, derived from PNPase. In this chapter we describe methods for (1) the overexpression and purification of these three proteins; and (2) their in vitro biochemical and enzymatic characterization-including RNA binding. The labeling and preparation of a set of specific RNA substrates is also described.

The posttranscriptional addition of nucleotides to the 3′ end of RNA regulates the maturation, function, and stability of RNA species in all domains of life. Here, we show that in flies, 3′ terminal RNA uridylation triggers the processive, 3′‐to‐5′ exoribonucleolytic decay via the RNase II/R enzyme CG16940, a homolog of the human Perlman syndrome exoribonuclease Dis3l2. Together with the TUTase Tailor, dmDis3l2 forms the cytoplasmic, terminal RNA uridylation‐mediated processing (TRUMP) complex that functionally cooperates in the degradation of structured RNA. RNA immunoprecipitation and high‐throughput sequencing reveals a variety of TRUMP complex substrates, including abundant non‐coding RNA, such as 5S rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, and the essential RNase MRP. Based on genetic and biochemical evidence, we propose a key function of the TRUMP complex in the cytoplasmic quality control of RNA polymerase III transcripts. Together with high‐throughput biochemical characterization of dmDis3l2 and bacterial RNase R, our results imply a conserved molecular function of RNase II/R enzymes as “readers” of destabilizing posttranscriptional marks—uridylation in eukaryotes and adenylation in prokaryotes—that play important roles in RNA surveillance.

RNase R, a ubiquitous 3' exoribonuclease, plays an important role in many aspects of RNA metabolism. In contrast to other exoribonucleases, RNase R can efficiently degrade highly structured RNAs, but the mechanism by which this is accomplished has remained elusive. It is known that RNase R contains an unusual, intrinsic RNA helicase activity that facilitates degradation of duplex RNA, but how it stimulates the nuclease activity has also been unclear. Here, we have made use of specifically designed substrates to compare the nuclease and helicase activities of RNase R. We have also identified and mutated several residues in the S1 RNA-binding domain that are important for interacting with duplex RNA and have measured intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence to analyze the conformational changes that occur upon binding of structured RNA. Using these approaches, we have determined the relation of the RNA helicase, ATP binding, and nuclease activities of RNase R. This information has been combined with a structural analysis of RNase R, based on its homology to RNase II, whose structure has been determined, to develop a detailed model that explains how RNase R digests structured RNA and how this differs from its action on single-stranded RNA.

Background Exoribonucleases are crucial for RNA degradation in Escherichia coli but the roles of RNase R and PNPase and their potential overlap in stationary phase are not well characterized. Here, we used a genome-wide approach to determine how RNase R and PNPase affect the mRNA half-lives in the stationary phase. The genome-wide mRNA half-lives were determined by a dynamic analysis of transcriptomes after transcription arrest. We have combined the analysis of mRNA half-lives with the steady-state concentrations (transcriptome) to provide an integrated overview of the in vivo activity of these exoribonucleases at the genome-scale. Results The values of mRNA half-lives demonstrated that the mRNAs are very stable in the stationary phase and that the deletion of RNase R or PNPase caused only a limited mRNA stabilization. Intriguingly the absence of PNPase provoked also the destabilization of many mRNAs. These changes in mRNA half-lives in the PNPase deletion strain were associated with a massive reorganization of mRNA levels and also variation in several ncRNA concentrations. Finally, the in vivo activity of the degradation machinery was found frequently saturated by mRNAs in the PNPase mutant unlike in the RNase R mutant, suggesting that the degradation activity is limited by the deletion of PNPase but not by the deletion of RNase R. Conclusions This work had identified PNPase as a central player associated with mRNA degradation in stationary phase. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-5259-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

mRNA decay plays an essential role in the control of gene expression in bacteria. Exoribonucleases (exoRNases), which trim transcripts starting from the 5′ or 3′ end, are particularly important to fully degrade unwanted transcripts and renew the pool of nucleotides available in the cell. While recent techniques have allowed genome-wide identification of ribonuclease (RNase) targets in bacteria in vivo, none of the 3′-to-5′ exoRNase targetomes (i.e., global processing sites) have been studied so far. Here, we report the targetomes of YhaM, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), and RNase R of the human pathogen Streptococcus pyogenes. We determined that YhaM is an unspecific enzyme that trims a few nucleotides and targets the majority of transcript ends, generated either by transcription termination or by endonucleolytic activity. The molecular determinants for YhaM-limited processivity are yet to be deciphered. We showed that PNPase clears the cell from mRNA decay fragments produced by endoribonucleases (endoRNases) and is the major 3′-to-5′ exoRNase for RNA turnover in S. pyogenes. In particular, PNPase is responsible for the degradation of regulatory elements from 5′ untranslated regions. However, we observed little RNase R activity in standard culture conditions. Overall, our study sheds light on the very distinct features of S. pyogenes 3′-to-5′ exoRNases.

The RNase II family of ribonucleases is ubiquitous and critical for RNA metabolism. The rnb500 allele has been widely used for over 30 years; however, the underlying genetic changes which result in RNase II thermolabile activity remain unknown. Here, we combine molecular and biophysical studies to carry out an in vivo and in vitro investigation of RNase II mutation(s) that confer the rnb500 phenotype. Our findings indicate that RNase II thermolability is due to the Cys284Tyr mutation within the RNB domain, which abolishes activity by increasing protein kinetic instability at the nonpermissive temperature. These findings have important implications for the design of temperature-sensitive variants of other RNase II enzymes, namely those with yet unknown functions.

YbeY is a highly conserved, multifunctional endoribonuclease that plays a significant role in ribosome biogenesis and has several additional roles. Here we show that overexpression of the conserved GTPase Era in Escherichia coli partially suppresses the growth defect of a ΔybeY strain while improving 16S rRNA processing and 70S ribosome assembly. This suppression requires both the ability of Era to hydrolyze GTP and the function of three exoribonucleases, RNase II, RNase R, and RNase PH, suggesting a model for the action of Era. Overexpression of Vibrio cholerae Era similarly partially suppresses the defects of an E. coli ΔybeY strain, indicating that this property of Era is conserved in bacteria other than E. coli., National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant GM31030), National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant P30ES002109)

Gene expression in Gram-negative bacteria is regulated at many levels, including transcription initiation, RNA processing, RNA/RNA interactions, mRNA decay, and translational controls involving enzymes that alter translational efficiency. In this review, we discuss the various enzymes that control transcription, translation, and RNA stability through RNA processing and degradation. RNA processing is essential to generate functional RNAs, while degradation helps control the steady-state level of each individual transcript. For example, all the pre-tRNAs are transcribed with extra nucleotides at both their 5′ and 3′ termini, which are subsequently processed to produce mature tRNAs that can be aminoacylated. Similarly, rRNAs that are transcribed as part of a 30S polycistronic transcript are matured to individual 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNAs. Decay of mRNAs plays a key role in gene regulation through controlling the steady-state level of each transcript, which is essential for maintaining appropriate protein levels. In addition, degradation of both translated and nontranslated RNAs recycles nucleotides to facilitate new RNA synthesis. To carry out all these reactions, Gram-negative bacteria employ a large number of endonucleases, exonucleases, RNA helicases, and poly(A) polymerase, as well as proteins that regulate the catalytic activity of particular RNases. Under certain stress conditions, an additional group of specialized endonucleases facilitate the cell’s ability to adapt and survive. Many of the enzymes, such as RNase E, RNase III, polynucleotide phosphorylase, RNase R, and poly(A) polymerase I, participate in multiple RNA processing and decay pathways.

tRNA maturation and quality control are crucial for proper functioning of these transcripts in translation. In several organisms, defective tRNAs were shown to be tagged by poly(A) or CCACCA tails and subsequently degraded by 3′-exonucleases. In a deep-sequencing analysis of tRNA 3′-ends, we detected the CCACCA tag also in Escherichia coli. However, this tag closely resembles several 3′-trailers of tRNA precursors targeted for maturation and not for degradation. Here, we investigate the ability of two important exonucleases, RNase R and RNase T, to distinguish tRNA precursors with a native 3′-trailer from tRNAs with a CCACCA tag. Our results show that the degrading enzyme RNase R breaks down both tRNAs primed for degradation as well as precursor transcripts, indicating that it is a rather nonspecific RNase. RNase T, a main processing exonuclease involved in trimming of 3′-trailers, is very inefficient in converting the CCACCA-tagged tRNA into a mature transcript. Hence, while both RNases compete for trailer-containing tRNA precursors, the inability of RNase T to process CCACCA tails ensures that defective tRNAs cannot reenter the functional tRNA pool, representing a safeguard to avoid detrimental effects of tRNAs with erroneous integrity on protein synthesis. Furthermore, these data indicate that the RNase T-mediated end turnover of the CCA sequence represents a means to deliver a tRNA to a repeated quality control performed by the CCA-adding enzyme. Hence, originally described as a futile side reaction, the tRNA end turnover seems to fulfill an important function in the maintenance of the tRNA pool in the cell.

Ribonuclease E (RNase E) of Escherichia coli, which is the founding member of a widespread family of proteins in bacteria and chloroplasts, is a fascinating enzyme that still has not revealed all its secrets. RNase E is an essential single-strand specific endoribonuclease that is involved in the processing and degradation of nearly every transcript in E. coli. A striking enzymatic property is a preference for substrates with a 5' monophosphate end although recent work explains how RNase E can overcome the protection afforded by the 5' triphosphate end of a primary transcript. Other features of E. coli RNase E include its interaction with enzymes involved in RNA degradation to form the multienzyme RNA degradosome and its localization to the inner cytoplasmic membrane. The N-terminal catalytic core of the RNase E protomer associates to form a tetrameric holoenzyme. Each RNase E protomer has a large C-terminal intrinsically disordered (ID) noncatalytic region that contains sites for interactions with protein components of the RNA degradosome as well as RNA and phospholipid bilayers. In this review, RNase E homologs have been classified into five types based on their primary structure. A recent analysis has shown that type I RNase E in the γ-proteobacteria forms an orthologous group of proteins that has been inherited vertically. The RNase E catalytic core and a large ID noncatalytic region containing an RNA binding motif and a membrane targeting sequence are universally conserved features of these orthologs. Although the ID noncatalytic region has low composition and sequence complexity, it is possible to map microdomains, which are short linear motifs that are sites of interaction with protein and other ligands. Throughout bacteria, the composition of the multienzyme RNA degradosome varies with species, but interactions with exoribonucleases (PNPase, RNase R), glycolytic enzymes (enolase, aconitase) and RNA helicases (DEAD-box proteins, Rho) are common. Plasticity in RNA degradosome composition is due to rapid evolution of RNase E microdomains. Characterization of the RNase E-PNPase interaction in α-proteobacteria, γ-proteobacteria and cyanobacteria suggests that it arose independently several times during evolution, thus conferring an advantage in control and coordination of RNA processing and degradation.

RNase E is an essential bacterial endoribonuclease with a central role in processing tRNAs and rRNA, and turning over mRNAs. Previous studies in strains carrying mutations in the rne structural gene have shown that tRNA processing is likely to be an essential function of RNase E but have not determined whether mRNA turnover is also an essential function. To address this we selected extragenic suppressors of temperature-sensitive mutations in rne that cause a large increase in mRNA half-life at the non-permissive temperature. Fifteen suppressors were mapped to three different loci: relBE (toxin-antitoxin system); vacB (RNase R); and rpsA (ribosomal protein S1). Each suppressor class has the potential to interact with mRNA and each restores wild-type levels of mRNA turnover but does not reverse the minor defects in tRNA and rRNA processing. RelE toxin is especially interesting because its only known activity is to cleave mRNAs in the ribosomal A-site. The relBE suppressor mutations increase transcription of relE, and controlled overexpression of RelE alone was sufficient to suppress the rne ts phenotype. Suppression increased turnover of some major mRNAs (tufA, ompA) but not all mRNAs. We propose that turnover of some mRNAs is one of the essential functions of RNase E.

Gene expression not only depends on the rate of transcription but is also largely controlled at the post-transcriptional level. Translation rate and mRNA decay greatly influence the final protein levels. Surveillance mechanisms are essential to ensure the quality of the RNA and proteins produced. Trans -translation is one of the most important systems in the quality control of bacterial translation. This process guarantees the destruction of abnormal proteins and also leads to degradation of the respective defective RNAs through the action of Ribonuclease R (RNase R). This exoribonuclease hydrolyzes RNAs starting from their 3′ end. Besides its involvement in trans -translation, RNase R also participates in the quality control of rRNA molecules involved in ribosomal biogenesis. RNase R is thus emerging as a key factor in ensuring translation accuracy. This review focuses on issues related to the quality control of translation, with special emphasis on the role of RNase R.

RNase R, which belongs to the RNB family of enzymes, is a 3' to 5' hydrolytic exoribonuclease able to digest highly structured RNA. It was previously reported that RNase R possesses an intrinsic helicase activity that is independent of its ribonuclease activity. However, the properties of this helicase activity and its relationship to the ribonuclease activity were not clear. Here, we show that helicase activity is dependent on ATP and have identified ATP-binding Walker A and Walker B motifs that are present in Escherichia coli RNase R and in 88% of mesophilic bacterial genera analyzed, but absent from thermophilic bacteria. We also show by mutational analysis that both of these motifs are required for helicase activity. Interestingly, the Walker A motif is located in the C-terminal region of RNase R, whereas the Walker B motif is in its N-terminal region implying that the two parts of the protein must come together to generate a functional ATP-binding site. Direct measurement of ATP binding confirmed that ATP binds only when double-stranded RNA is present. Detailed analysis of the helicase activity revealed that ATP hydrolysis is not required because both adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) and adenosine 5'-(β,γ-imino)triphosphate can stimulate helicase activity, as can other nucleoside triphosphates. Although the nuclease activity of RNase R is not needed for its helicase activity, the helicase activity is important for effective nuclease activity against a dsRNA substrate, particularly at lower temperatures and with more stable duplexes. Moreover, competition experiments and mutational analysis revealed that the helicase activity utilizes the same catalytic channel as the nuclease activity. These findings indicate that the helicase activity plays an essential role in the catalytic efficiency of RNase R.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) constitute a novel subset in the fascinating world of noncoding RNA, and they are found in practically all eukaryotes. Most of them exhibit low expression levels but some are extremely abundant. Typically, circRNAs are studied by RT-PCR-based assays, but for certain types of analyses this technique is not suitable. Circular RNA with repetitive exons (circular concatemers) has been observed by us and others when transiently expressing circRNAs in cells, however techniques and assays to study these species have not been established. Here, this chapter outlines three biochemical assays (RNase R-, RNase H-, and alkaline-treatment) that combined with northern blotting are useful to study circRNAs in general and circular RNA concatemers in particular.

3'-5' exoribonucleases are key enzymes in the degradation of superfluous or aberrant RNAs and in the maturation of precursor RNAs into their functional forms. The major bacterial 3'-5' exoribonucleases responsible for both these activities are PNPase, RNase II and RNase R. These enzymes are of ancient nature with widespread distribution. In eukaryotes, PNPase and RNase II/RNase R enzymes can be found in the cytosol and in mitochondria and chloroplasts; RNase II/RNase R-like enzymes are also found in the nucleus. Humans express one PNPase (PNPT1) and three RNase II/RNase R family members (Dis3, Dis3L and Dis3L2). These enzymes take part in a multitude of RNA surveillance mechanisms that are critical for translation accuracy. Although active against a wide range of both coding and non-coding RNAs, the different 3'-5' exoribonucleases exhibit distinct substrate affinities. The latest studies on these RNA degradative enzymes have contributed to the identification of additional homologue proteins, the uncovering of novel RNA degradation pathways, and to a better comprehension of several disease-related processes and response to stress, amongst many other exciting findings. Here, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview on the function, structure, regulation and substrate preference of the key 3'-5' exoribonucleases involved in RNA metabolism.

Differential RNA-Seq is a next-generation technology method to determine the significant transcriptomic differences between two and more samples. With this method it is possible to analyze the total RNA content of different samples making it the best global analysis method currently available to study the roles of exoribonucleases in the cell. These enzymes are responsible for the RNA processing and degradation in the cells and therefore affect the total RNA pool in ways not yet fully understood. In Escherichia coli there are three main degradative exoribonucleases RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase that degrade the RNA from the 3′ to the 5′-end. These enzymes have several roles in the cell and even though they are degradative enzymes RNase II and PNPase can also protect some RNAs from degradation and PNPase can also act as an RNA polymerase under some conditions. The multiplicity of roles of these exoribonucleases leads to a very high number of transcripts that are affected by their absence in the cell. With the differential RNA-Seq it is possible to obtain a much deeper understanding of how these enzymes work and regulate the bacterial gene expression. In this chapter we have described a differential RNA-Seq data analysis protocol applied to the study of exoribonucleases. We also included the protocol for experimental validation of the RNA-Seq data using qPCR and motility assays. Although the methods described in this chapter were applied to the study of the exoribonucleases, they can also be used for other differential RNA-Seq studies.

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is a major component of ribosomes and is fundamental to the process of translation. In bacteria, 16S rRNA is a component of the small ribosomal subunit and plays a critical role in mRNA decoding. rRNA maturation entails the removal of intervening spacer sequences contained within the pre-rRNA transcript by nucleolytic enzymes. Enzymatic activities involved in maturation of the 5'-end of 16S rRNA have been identified, but those involved in 3'-end maturation of 16S rRNA are more enigmatic. Here, we investigate molecular details of 16S rRNA maturation using purified in vivo-formed small subunit (SSU) assembly intermediates (pre-SSUs) from wild-type Escherichia coli that contain precursor 16S rRNA (17S rRNA). Upon incubation of pre-SSUs with E. coli S100 cell extracts or purified enzymes implicated in 16S rRNA processing, the 17S rRNA is processed into additional intermediates and mature 16S rRNA. These results illustrate that exonucleases RNase R, RNase II, PNPase, and RNase PH can process the 3'-end of pre-SSUs in vitro. However, the endonuclease YbeY did not exhibit nucleolytic activity with pre-SSUs under these conditions. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that multiple pathways facilitate 16S rRNA maturation with pre-SSUs in vitro, with the dominant pathways entailing complete processing of the 5'-end of 17S rRNA prior to 3'-end maturation or partial processing of the 5'-end with concomitant processing of the 3'-end. These results reveal the multifaceted nature of SSU biogenesis and suggest that E. coli may be able to escape inactivation of any one enzyme by using an existing complementary pathway.

Previous studies in our laboratory showed that the RNA debranching enzyme (DBR1) is not required for early steps in HIV cDNA formation but is necessary for synthesis of intermediate and late cDNA products. To further characterize this effect, we evaluated the topology of the 5′ end of the HIV-1 RNA genome during early infection with and without inhibition of DBR1 synthesis. Cells were transfected with DBR1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) followed 48 h later by infection with an HIV-1-derived vector containing an RNase H-deficient reverse transcriptase (RT). RNA was isolated at several times postinfection and treated with various RNA-modifying enzymes prior to rapid amplification of 5′ cDNA ends (5′ RACE) for HIV-1 RNA and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). In infected cells, DBR1 knockdown inhibited detection of free HIV-1 RNA 5′ ends at all time points. The difference in detection of free HIV-1 RNA 5′ ends in infected DBR1 knockdown versus control cells was eliminated by in vitro incubation of infected cell RNAs with yeast or human DBR1 enzyme prior to 5′ RACE and qRT-PCR. This was dependent on the 2′-5′ phosphatase activity of DBR1, since it did not occur when we used the catalytically inactive DBR1(N85A) mutant. Finally, HIV-1 RNA from infected DBR1 knockdown cells was resistant to RNase R that degrades linear RNAs but not RNAs in circular or lariat-like conformations. These results provide evidence for formation of a lariat-like structure involving the 5′ end of HIV-1 RNA during an early step in infection and the involvement of DBR1 in resolving it. IMPORTANCE Our findings support a new view of the early steps in HIV genome replication. We show that the HIV genomic RNA is rapidly decapped and forms a lariat-like structure after entering a cell. The lariat-like structure is subsequently resolved by the cellular enzyme DBR1, leaving a 5′ phosphate. This pathway is similar to the formation and resolution of pre-mRNA intron lariats and therefore suggests that similar mechanisms may be used by HIV. Our work therefore opens a new area of investigation in HIV replication and may ultimately uncover new targets for inhibiting HIV replication and for preventing the development of AIDS.

The endoribonuclease RNase E participates in mRNA degradation, rRNA processing, and tRNA maturation in Escherichia coli , but the precise reasons for its essentiality are unclear and much debated. The enzyme is most active on RNA substrates with a 5′-terminal monophosphate, which is sensed by a domain in the enzyme that includes residue R169; E. coli also possesses a 5′-pyrophosphohydrolase, RppH, that catalyzes conversion of 5′-terminal triphosphate to 5′-terminal monophosphate on RNAs. Although the C-terminal half (CTH), beyond residue approximately 500, of RNase E is dispensable for viability, deletion of the CTH is lethal when combined with an R169Q mutation or with deletion of rppH . In this work, we show that both these lethalities can be rescued in derivatives in which four or five of the seven rrn operons in the genome have been deleted. We hypothesize that the reduced stable RNA levels under these conditions minimize the need of RNase E to process them, thereby allowing for its diversion for mRNA degradation. In support of this hypothesis, we have found that other conditions that are known to reduce stable RNA levels also suppress one or both lethalities: (i) alterations in relA and spoT , which are expected to lead to increased basal ppGpp levels; (ii) stringent rpoB mutations, which mimic high intracellular ppGpp levels; and (iii) overexpression of DksA. Lethality suppression by these perturbations was RNase R dependent. Our work therefore suggests that its actions on the various substrates (mRNA, rRNA, and tRNA) jointly contribute to the essentiality of RNase E in E. coli . IMPORTANCE The endoribonuclease RNase E is essential for viability in many Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli . Different explanations have been offered for its essentiality, including its roles in global mRNA degradation or in the processing of several tRNA and rRNA species. Our work suggests that, rather than its role in the processing of any one particular substrate, its distributed functions on all the different substrates (mRNA, rRNA, and tRNA) are responsible for the essentiality of RNase E in E. coli .

trans-Translation, orchestrated by SmpB and tmRNA, is the principal eubacterial pathway for resolving stalled translation complexes. RNase R, the leading nonstop mRNA surveillance factor, is recruited to stalled ribosomes in a trans-translation dependent process. To elucidate the contributions of SmpB and tmRNA to RNase R recruitment, we evaluated Escherichia coli-Francisella tularensis chimeric variants of tmRNA and SmpB. This evaluation showed that while the hybrid tmRNA supported nascent polypeptide tagging and ribosome rescue, it suffered defects in facilitating RNase R recruitment to stalled ribosomes. To gain further insights, we used established tmRNA and SmpB variants that impact distinct stages of the trans-translation process. Analysis of select tmRNA variants revealed that the sequence composition and positioning of the ultimate and penultimate codons of the tmRNA ORF play a crucial role in recruiting RNase R to rescued ribosomes. Evaluation of defined SmpB C-terminal tail variants highlighted the importance of establishing the tmRNA reading frame, and provided valuable clues into the timing of RNase R recruitment to rescued ribosomes. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that productive RNase R-ribosomes engagement requires active trans-translation, and suggest that RNase R captures the emerging nonstop mRNA at an early stage after establishment of the tmRNA ORF as the surrogate mRNA template.

During pre-mRNA splicing, exons in the primary transcript are precisely connected to generate an mRNA. Intron lariat RNAs are formed as by-products of this process. In addition, some exonic circular RNAs (circRNAs) may also result from exon skipping as by-products. Lariat RNAs and circRNAs are both RNase R resistant RNAs. RNase R is a strong 3' to 5' exoribonuclease, which efficiently degrades linear RNAs, such as mRNAs and rRNAs; therefore, the circular parts of lariat RNAs and the circRNAs can be segregated from eukaryotic total RNAs by their RNase R resistance. Thus, RNase R resistant RNAs could provide unexplored splicing information not available from mRNAs. Analyses of these RNAs identified repeating splicing phenomena, such as re-splicing of mature mRNAs and nested splicing. Moreover, circRNA might function as microRNA sponges. There is an enormous variety of endogenous circRNAs, which are generally synthesized in cells and tissues.

Ribonucleases play an important role in RNA metabolism. Yet, they are also potentially destructive enzymes whose activity must be controlled. Here we describe a novel regulatory mechanism affecting RNase R, a 3' to 5' exoribonuclease able to act on essentially all RNAs including those with extensive secondary structure. Most RNase R is sequestered on ribosomes in growing cells where it is stable and participates in trans-translation. In contrast, the free form of the enzyme, which is deleterious to cells, is extremely unstable, turning over with a half-life of 2 min. RNase R binding to ribosomes is dependent on transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA)-SmpB, nonstop mRNA, and the modified form of ribosomal protein S12. Degradation of the free form of RNase R also requires tmRNA-SmpB, but this process is independent of ribosomes, indicating two distinct roles for tmRNA-SmpB. Inhibition of RNase R binding to ribosomes leads to slower growth and a massive increase in RNA degradation. These studies indicate a previously unknown role for ribosomes in cellular homeostasis.

Quality control of ribosomes is critical for cellular function since protein mistranslation leads to severe physiological consequences. We report evidence of a previously unrecognized ribosome quality control system in bacteria that operates at the level of 70S to remove defective ribosomes. YbeY, a previously unidentified endoribonuclease, and the exonuclease RNase R act together by a process mediated specifically by the 30S ribosomal subunit, to degrade defective 70S ribosomes but not properly matured 70S ribosomes or individual subunits. Furthermore, there is essentially no fully matured 16S rRNA in a ΔybeY mutant at 45°C, making YbeY the only endoribonuclease to be implicated in the critically important processing of the 16S rRNA 3' terminus. These key roles in ribosome quality control and maturation indicate why YbeY is a member of the minimal bacterial gene set and suggest that it could be a potential target for antibacterial drugs.

Although already discovered in 1976,1 circular RNAs (circRNAs) remained largely unrecognized in the following decades or were even disregarded as transcriptional artifacts. Recent advances in RNA-sequencing technology and computational approaches, however, lead to the identification of numerous circRNAs in different transcriptomes.2 On the molecular level, circRNAs are generated primarily by a specific form of alternative splicing, so-called back-splicing, catalyzed by the spliceosomal machinery. Generally, little is known about the expression, regulation, and function of circRNAs. In the cardiovascular field, a recent study identified numerous hypoxia-responsive circRNAs in endothelial cells and showed a proangiogenic function for the circular transcript of ZNF292 (zinc finger protein 292).3 In addition, two more bioinformatically oriented studies profiled circRNAs in human, mouse, and rat heart tissue and provided a comprehensive catalog of RNase R-resistant circRNA species.4,5 Recently, a heart-related circRNA was proposed to control hypertrophy,6 suggesting that circRNAs may elicit functions in cardiomyocytes as well. Article, see p 996 In this issue of Circulation Research , Khan et al7 performed whole-transcriptome–based circRNA profiling in left ventricle RNA samples, comparing control individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and identified 826 back-splice junctions common to these 3 sample groups. Strikingly, approximately one tenth of these shared back-splice sites arose from the titin transcript solely. A detailed biochemical survey of 22 selected candidate circRNAs established them as bona fide circRNAs because they were shown to be resistant to RNase R, enriched in poly(A)-negative fractions, and validated on sequence level by Sanger sequencing, a finding that is consistent with the results from Werfel et al5 who also reported and validated titin circRNAs. Moreover, an RT-PCR–based differential expression analysis uncovered a reduction of circRNA formation from the titin host gene in DCM samples, whereas linear titin transcript levels were …

Although normally stable in growing cells, ribosomal RNAs are degraded under conditions of stress, such as starvation, and in response to misassembled or otherwise defective ribosomes in a process termed RNA quality control. Previously, our laboratory found that large fragments of 16S and 23S rRNA accumulate in strains lacking the processive exoribonucleases RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase, implicating these enzymes in the later steps of rRNA breakdown. Here, we define the pathways of rRNA degradation in the quality control process and during starvation, and show that the essential endoribonuclease, RNase E, is required to make the initial cleavages in both degradative processes. We also present evidence that explains why the exoribonuclease, RNase PH, is required to initiate the degradation of rRNA during starvation. The data presented here provide the first detailed description of rRNA degradation in bacterial cells.

RNase R is a 3' to 5' hydrolytic exoribonuclease that has the unusual ability to digest highly structured RNA. The enzyme possesses an intrinsic, ATP-dependent RNA helicase activity that is essential in vitro for efficient nuclease activity against double-stranded RNA substrates, particularly at lower temperatures, with more stable RNA duplexes, and for duplexes with short 3' overhangs. Here, we inquired whether the helicase activity was also important for RNase R function in vivo and for RNA metabolism. We find that strains containing a helicase-deficient RNase R due to mutations in its ATP-binding Walker motifs exhibit growth defects at low temperatures. Most importantly, cells also lacking polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), and dependent for growth on RNase R, grow extremely poorly at 34, 37, and 42 °C and do not grow at all at 31 °C. Northern analysis revealed that in these cells, fragments of 16S and 23S rRNA accumulate to high levels, leading to interference with ribosome maturation and ultimately to cell death. These findings indicate that the intrinsic helicase activity of RNase R is required for its proper functioning in vivo and for effective RNA metabolism.

Exoribonucleases are vital in nearly all aspects of RNA metabolism, including RNA maturation, end-turnover, and degradation. RNase II and RNase R are paralogous members of the RNR superfamily of nonspecific, 3′ → 5′, processive exoribonucleases. In Escherichia coli , RNase II plays a primary role in mRNA decay and has a preference for unstructured RNA. RNase R, in contrast, is capable of digesting structured RNA and plays a role in the degradation of both mRNA and stable RNA. Deinococcus radiodurans , a radiation-resistant bacterium, contains two RNR family members. The shorter of these, DrR63, includes a sequence signature typical of RNase R, but we show here that this enzyme is an RNase II-type exonuclease and cannot degrade structured RNA. We also report the crystal structure of this protein, now termed DrII. The DrII structure reveals a truncated RNA binding region in which the N-terminal cold shock domains, typical of most RNR family nucleases, are replaced by an unusual winged helix–turn–helix domain, where the “wing” is contributed by the C-terminal S1 domain. Consistent with its truncated RNA binding region, DrII is able to remove 3′ overhangs from RNA molecules closer to duplexes than do other RNase II-type enzymes. DrII also displays distinct sensitivity to pyrimidine-rich regions of single-stranded RNA and is able to process tRNA precursors with adenosine-rich 3′ extensions in vitro . These data indicate that DrII is the RNase II of D. radiodurans and that its structure and catalytic properties are distinct from those of other related enzymes.

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNA) are widely expressed in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Eukaryotic ncRNAs are commonly micro- and small-interfering RNAs (18–25 nt) involved in posttranscriptional gene silencing, whereas prokaryotic ncRNAs vary in size and are involved in various aspects of gene regulation. Given the prokaryotic origin of organelles, the presence of ncRNAs might be expected; however, the full spectrum of organellar ncRNAs has not been determined systematically. Here, strand-specific RNA-Seq analysis was used to identify 107 candidate ncRNAs from Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts, primarily encoded opposite protein-coding and tRNA genes. Forty-eight ncRNAs were shown to accumulate by RNA gel blot as discrete transcripts in wild-type (WT) plants and/or the pnp1-1 mutant, which lacks the chloroplast ribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (cpPNPase). Ninety-eight percent of the ncRNAs detected by RNA gel blot had different transcript patterns between WT and pnp1-1, suggesting cpPNPase has a significant role in chloroplast ncRNA biogenesis and accumulation. Analysis of materials deficient for other major chloroplast ribonucleases, RNase R, RNase E, and RNase J, showed differential effects on ncRNA accumulation and/or form, suggesting specificity in RNase-ncRNA interactions. 5′ end mapping demonstrates that some ncRNAs are transcribed from dedicated promoters, whereas others result from transcriptional read-through. Finally, correlations between accumulation of some ncRNAs and the symmetrically transcribed sense RNA are consistent with a role in RNA stability. Overall, our data suggest that this extensive population of ncRNAs has the potential to underpin a previously underappreciated regulatory mode in the chloroplast.

RNase R is a highly processive, hydrolytic 3′-5′ exoribonuclease belonging to the RNB/RNR superfamily which plays significant roles in RNA metabolism in bacteria. The enzyme was observed to be essential for growth of the psychrophilic Antarctic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae Lz4W at a low temperature. We present results here pertaining to the biochemical properties of RNase R and the RNase R-encoding gene ( rnr ) locus from this bacterium. By cloning and expressing a His 6 -tagged form of the P. syringae RNase R (RNase R Ps ), we show that the enzyme is active at 0 to 4°C but exhibits optimum activity at ∼25°C. The enzyme is heat labile in nature, losing activity upon incubation at 37°C and above, a hallmark of many psychrophilic enzymes. The enzyme requires divalent cations (Mg 2+ and Mn 2+ ) for activity, and the activity is higher in 50 to 150 mM KCl when it largely remains as a monomer. On synthetic substrates, RNase R Ps exhibited maximum activity on poly(A) and poly(U) in preference over poly(G) and poly(C). The enzyme also degraded structured malE-malF RNA substrates. Analysis of the cleavage products shows that the enzyme, apart from releasing 5′-nucleotide monophosphates by the processive exoribonuclease activity, produces four-nucleotide end products, as opposed to two-nucleotide products, of RNA chain by Escherichia coli RNase R. Interestingly, three ribonucleotides (ATP, GTP, and CTP) inhibited the activity of RNase R Ps in vitro . The ability of the nonhydrolyzable ATP-γS to inhibit RNase R Ps activity suggests that nucleotide hydrolysis is not required for inhibition. This is the first report on the biochemical property of a psychrophilic RNase R from any bacterium.

RNase II and RNase R are the two E. coli exoribonucleases that belong to the RNase II super family of enzymes. They degrade RNA hydrolytically in the 3′ to 5′ direction in a processive and sequence independent manner. However, while RNase R is capable of degrading structured RNAs, the RNase II activity is impaired by dsRNAs. The final end-product of these two enzymes is also different, being 4 nt for RNase II and 2 nt for RNase R. RNase II and RNase R share structural properties, including 60% of amino acid sequence similarity and have a similar modular domain organization: two N-terminal cold shock domains (CSD1 and CSD2), one central RNB catalytic domain, and one C-terminal S1 domain. We have constructed hybrid proteins by swapping the domains between RNase II and RNase R to determine which are the responsible for the differences observed between RNase R and RNase II. The results obtained show that the S1 and RNB domains from RNase R in an RNase II context allow the degradation of double-stranded substrates and the appearance of the 2 nt long end-product. Moreover, the degradation of structured RNAs becomes tail-independent when the RNB domain from RNase R is no longer associated with the RNA binding domains (CSD and S1) of the genuine protein. Finally, we show that the RNase R C-terminal Lysine-rich region is involved in the degradation of double-stranded substrates in an RNase II context, probably by unwinding the substrate before it enters into the catalytic cavity. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ribosomal RNAs are generally stable in growing Escherichia coli cells. However, their degradation increases dramatically under conditions that lead to slow cell growth. In addition, incomplete RNA molecules and molecules with defects in processing, folding, or assembly are also eliminated in growing cells in a process termed quality control. Here, we show that there are significant differences between the pathways of ribosomal RNA degradation during glucose starvation and quality control during steady-state growth. In both processes, endonucleolytic cleavage of rRNA in ribosome subunits is an early step, resulting in accumulation of large rRNA fragments when the processive exoribonucleases, RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase are absent. For 23S rRNA, cleavage is in the region of helix 71, but the exact position can differ in the two degradative processes. For 16S rRNA, degradation during starvation begins with shortening of its 3′ end in a reaction catalyzed by RNase PH. In the absence of this RNase, there is no 3′ end trimming of 16S rRNA and no accumulation of rRNA fragments, and total RNA degradation is greatly reduced. In contrast, the degradation pattern in quality control remains unchanged when RNase PH is absent. During starvation, the exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R are important for fragment removal, whereas for quality control, RNase R and PNPase are more important. These data highlight the similarities and differences between rRNA degradation during starvation and quality control during steady-state growth and describe a role for RNase PH in the starvation degradative pathway.

The translation machinery deciphers genetic information encoded within mRNAs to synthesize proteins needed for various cellular functions. Defective mRNAs that lack in-frame stop codons trigger non-productive stalling of ribosomes. We investigated how cells deal with such defective mRNAs, and present evidence to demonstrate that RNase R, a processive 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease, is recruited to stalled ribosomes for the specific task of degrading defective mRNAs. The recruitment process is selective for non-stop mRNAs and is dependent on the activities of SmpB protein and tmRNA. Most intriguingly, our analysis reveals that a unique structural feature of RNase R, the C-terminal lysine-rich (K-rich) domain, is required both for productive ribosome engagement and targeted non-stop mRNA decay activities of the enzyme. These findings provide new insights into how a general RNase is recruited to the translation machinery and highlight a novel role for the ribosome as a platform for initiating non-stop mRNA decay.

The amount of RNase R, an important degradative exoribonuclease, increases 3–10-fold under a variety of stress conditions. This elevation is due to posttranslational regulation in which the highly unstable RNase R protein becomes stabilized during stress. Here we identify two components of the trans-translation machinery, transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and SmpB, that are responsible for the short half-life of RNase R in exponential phase cells. The absence of either lengthens the half-life of RNase R in vivo >6-fold. SmpB directly interacts with RNase R in vitro and is stimulated by tmRNA. The C-terminal region of RNase R, encompassing its basic region and adjacent S1 domain are required for the interaction; their removal eliminates binding and stabilizes RNase R in vivo. However, the binding of SmpB and tmRNA does not alter RNase R activity. These data define a previously unknown regulatory process in which the stability of an RNase is determined by its interaction with an RNA and an RNA-associated protein.

The continuous degradation and synthesis of prokaryotic mRNAs not only give rise to the metabolic changes that are required as cells grow and divide but also rapid adaptation to new environmental conditions. In bacteria, RNAs can be degraded by mechanisms that act independently, but in parallel, and that target different sites with different efficiencies. The accessibility of sites for degradation depends on several factors, including RNA higher-order structure, protection by translating ribosomes and polyadenylation status. Furthermore, RNA degradation mechanisms have shown to be determinant for the post-transcriptional control of gene expression. RNases mediate the processing, decay and quality control of RNA. RNases can be divided into endonucleases that cleave the RNA internally or exonucleases that cleave the RNA from one of the extremities. Just in Escherichia coli there are >20 different RNases. RNase E is a single-strand-specific endonuclease critical for mRNA decay in E. coli. The enzyme interacts with the exonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), enolase and RNA helicase B (RhlB) to form the degradosome. However, in Bacillus subtilis, this enzyme is absent, but it has other main endonucleases such as RNase J1 and RNase III. RNase III cleaves double-stranded RNA and family members are involved in RNA interference in eukaryotes. RNase II family members are ubiquitous exonucleases, and in eukaryotes, they can act as the catalytic subunit of the exosome. RNases act in different pathways to execute the maturation of rRNAs and tRNAs, and intervene in the decay of many different mRNAs and small noncoding RNAs. In general, RNases act as a global regulatory network extremely important for the regulation of RNA levels.

The Dis3 ribonuclease is a member of the hydrolytic RNR protein family. Although much progress has been made in understanding the structure, function, and enzymatic activities of prokaryotic RNR family members RNase II and RNase R, there are no activity studies of the metazoan ortholog, Dis3. Here, we characterize the activity of the Drosophila melanogaster Dis3 (dDis3) protein. We find that dDis3 is active in the presence of various monovalent and divalent cations, and requires divalent cations for activity. dDis3 hydrolyzes compositionally distinct RNA substrates, yet releases different products depending upon the substrate. Additionally, dDis3 remains active when lacking N-terminal domains, suggesting that an independent active site resides in the C-terminus of the protein. Finally, a study of dDis3 interactions with dRrp6 and core exosome subunits in extracts revealed sensitivity to higher divalent cation concentrations and detergent, suggesting the presence of both ionic and hydrophobic interactions in dDis3-exosome complexes. Our study thus broadens our mechanistic understanding of the general ribonuclease activity of Dis3 and RNR family members.

In Escherichia coli, translational arrest can elicit cleavage of codons within the ribosomal A site. This A-site mRNA cleavage is independent of RelE, and has been proposed to be an endonucleolytic activity of the ribosome. Here, we show that the 3'-->5' exonuclease RNase II plays an important role in RelE-independent A-site cleavage. Instead of A-site cleavage, translational pausing in DeltaRNase II cells produces transcripts that are truncated +12 and +28 nucleotides downstream of the A-site codon. Deletions of the genes encoding polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and RNase R had little effect on A-site cleavage. However, PNPase overexpression restored A-site cleavage activity to DeltaRNase II cells. Purified RNase II and PNPase were both unable to directly catalyse A-site cleavage in vitro. Instead, these exonucleases degraded ribosome-bound mRNA to positions +18 and +24 nucleotides downstream of the ribosomal A site respectively. Finally, a stable structural barrier to exoribonuclease activity inhibited A-site cleavage when introduced immediately downstream of paused ribosomes. These results demonstrate that 3'-->5' exonuclease activity is an important prerequisite for efficient A-site cleavage. We propose that RNase II degrades mRNA to the downstream border of paused ribosomes, facilitating cleavage of the A-site codon by an unknown RNase.

RNase R and RNase II are the two representatives from the RNR family of processive, 3' to 5' exoribonucleases in Escherichia coli. Although RNase II is specific for single-stranded RNA, RNase R readily degrades through structured RNA. Furthermore, RNase R appears to be the only known 3' to 5' exoribonuclease that is able to degrade through double-stranded RNA without the aid of a helicase activity. Consequently, its functional domains and mechanism of action are of great interest. Using a series of truncated RNase R proteins we show that the cold-shock and S1 domains contribute to substrate binding. The cold-shock domains appear to play a role in substrate recruitment, whereas the S1 domain is most likely required to position substrates for efficient catalysis. Most importantly, the nuclease domain alone, devoid of the cold-shock and S1 domains, is sufficient for RNase R to bind and degrade structured RNAs. Moreover, this is a unique property of the nuclease domain of RNase R because this domain in RNase II stalls as it approaches a duplex. We also show that the nuclease domain of RNase R binds RNA more tightly than the nuclease domain of RNase II. This tighter binding may help to explain the difference in catalytic properties between RNase R and RNase II.

Polyadenylation is an important factor controlling RNA degradation and RNA quality control mechanisms. In this report we demonstrate for the first time that RNase R has in vivo affinity for polyadenylated RNA and can be a key enzyme involved in poly(A) metabolism. RNase II and PNPase, two major RNA exonucleases present in Escherichia coli, could not account for all the poly(A)-dependent degradation of the rpsO mRNA. RNase II can remove the poly(A) tails but fails to degrade the mRNA as it cannot overcome the RNA termination hairpin, while PNPase plays only a modest role in this degradation. We now demonstrate that in the absence of RNase E, RNase R is the relevant factor in the poly(A)-dependent degradation of the rpsO mRNA. Moreover, we have found that the RNase R inactivation counteracts the extended degradation of this transcript observed in RNase II-deficient cells. Elongated rpsO transcripts harboring increasing poly(A) tails are specifically recognized by RNase R and strongly accumulate in the absence of this exonuclease. The 3′ oligo(A) extension may stimulate the binding of RNase R, allowing the complete degradation of the mRNA, as RNase R is not susceptible to RNA secondary structures. Moreover, this regulation is shown to occur despite the presence of PNPase. Similar results were observed with the rpsT mRNA. This report shows that polyadenylation favors in vivo the RNase R-mediated pathways of RNA degradation.

RNase R is a processive 3′-5′ exoribonuclease with a high degree of conservation in prokaryotes. Although some bacteria possess additional hydrolytic 3′-5′ exoribonucleases such as RNase II, RNase R was found to be the only predicted one in the facultative intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila . This provided a unique opportunity to study the role of RNase R in the absence of an additional RNase with similar enzymatic activity. We investigated the role of RNase R in the biology of Legionella pneumophila under various conditions and performed gene expression profiling using microarrays. At optimal growth temperature, the loss of RNase R had no major consequence on bacterial growth and had a moderate impact on normal gene regulation. However, at a lower temperature, the loss of RNase R had a significant impact on bacterial growth and resulted in the accumulation of structured RNA degradation products. Concurrently, gene regulation was affected and specifically resulted in an increased expression of the competence regulon. Loss of the exoribonuclease activity of RNase R was sufficient to induce competence development, a genetically programmed process normally triggered as a response to environmental stimuli. The temperature-dependent expression of competence genes in the rnr mutant was found to be independent of previously identified competence regulators in Legionella pneumophila . We suggest that a physiological role of RNase R is to eliminate structured RNA molecules that are stabilized by low temperature, which in turn may affect regulatory networks, compromising adaptation to cold and thus resulting in decreased viability.

In Escherichia coli , the cold shock response is exerted upon a temperature change from 37°C to 15°C and is characterized by induction of several cold shock proteins, including polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), during acclimation phase. In E. coli , PNPase is essential for growth at low temperatures; however, its exact role in this essential function has not been fully elucidated. PNPase is a 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease and promotes the processive degradation of RNA. Our screening of an E. coli genomic library for an in vivo counterpart of PNPase that can compensate for its absence at low temperature revealed only one protein, another 3′-to-5′ exonuclease, RNase II. Here we show that the RNase PH domains 1 and 2 of PNPase are important for its cold shock function, suggesting that the RNase activity of PNPase is critical for its essential function at low temperature. We also show that its polymerization activity is dispensable in its cold shock function. Interestingly, the third 3′-to-5′ processing exoribonuclease, RNase R of E. coli , which is cold inducible, cannot complement the cold shock function of PNPase. We further show that this difference is due to the different targets of these enzymes and stabilization of some of the PNPase-sensitive mRNAs, like fis , in the Δ pnp cells has consequences, such as accumulation of ribosomal subunits in the Δ pnp cells, which may play a role in the cold sensitivity of this strain.