Search

Rugby union is a popular sport played across the world. The physical contact inherent in the game means that players are at increased risk of concussive injury. In 2019, World Rugby created a new category of permitted headgear under Law 4 as a medical device. This established a pathway for headgear designed to reduce peak accelerations to be worn in matches. Investigations of the potential of soft-shelled protective headgear to reduce head impact accelerations have been mostly limited to the analysis of linear kinematics. However rotational head impact accelerations have long been implicated as far more injurious. The aim of this study, therefore, was to assess the linear and rotational acceleration reduction brought about by soft-shelled rugby headgear. A Hybrid III headform and neck were dropped onto a modular elastomer programmer impact surface, impacting at four different velocities (1.7-3.4 m/s) in five different impact orientations. Impact surface angles were 0°, 30°, and 45°. Peak linear and rotational accelerations, PLA and PRA respectively, were recorded. All headgear significantly reduced PLAs and PRAs when compared to a no headgear scenario. The new generation, headgear reduced all measures significantly more than the older generation of headgear. Impact locations offset from the center of mass of the headform resulted in the highest PRAs measured. As the impact surface angle increased, both PLAs and PRAs decreased. The study demonstrated that headgear tested lowered PLAs by up to 50%, and PRAs by up to 60% compared to the bare headform. Our data suggest that new generation headgear could make a difference on the field in reducing injurious impact accelerations in a collision., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential of soft-shelled rugby headgear to reduce linear impact accelerations. A hybrid III head form instrumented with a 3-axis accelerometer was used to assess headgear performance on a drop test rig. Six headgear units were examined in this study: Canterbury Clothing Company (CCC) Ventilator, Kukri, 2 nd Skull, N-Pro, and two Gamebreaker headgear units of different sizes (headgears 1-6, respectively). Drop heights were 238, 300, 610, and 912 mm with 5 orientations at each height (forehead, front boss, rear, rear boss, and side). Impact severity was quantified using peak linear acceleration (PLA) and head injury criterion (HIC). All headgear was tested in comparison to a no headgear condition (for all heights). Compared to the no headgear condition, all headgear significantly reduced PLA and HIC at 238 mm (16.2-45.3% PLA and 29.2-62.7% HIC reduction; P < 0.0005, η p 2  = 0.987-0.991). Headgear impact attenuation lowered significantly as the drop height increased (32.4-5.6% PLA and 50.9-11.7% HIC reduction at 912 mm). There were no significant differences in PLA or HIC reduction between headgear units 1-3. Post hoc testing indicated that headgear units 4-6 significantly outperformed headgear units 1-3 and additionally headgear units 5 and 6 significantly outperformed headgear 4 ( P < 0.05). The lowest reduction PLA and HIC was for impacts rear orientation for headgear units 1-4 (3.3 ± 3.6%-11 ± 5.8%). In contrast, headgear units 5 and 6 significantly outperformed all other headgear in this orientation ( P < 0.0005, η p 2  = 0.982-0.990). Side impacts showed the greatest reduction in PLA and HIC for all headgear. All headgear units tested demonstrated some degree of reduction in PLA and HIC from a linear impact; however, units 4-6 performed significantly better than headgear units 1-3., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Nick Draper et al.)