1. Dual-Emissive Tris-Heteroleptic Ruthenium Complexes: Tuning the DNA-Triggered Ratiometric Emission Response by Ancillary Ligands.
- Author
-
Wu SH, Yang R, Sun B, Tang JH, Gong ZL, Ma J, Wang L, Liu J, Ma DX, Shao JY, and Zhong YW
- Subjects
- Animals, Cattle, Molecular Structure, Coordination Complexes chemistry, DNA chemistry, Ruthenium chemistry
- Abstract
Three tris-heteroleptic mononuclear Ru(II) complexes with dual fluorescence and phosphorescence-[Ru(dpma)(bpy)(phen)]
2+ ( 12+ ), [Ru(dpma)(bpy)(dppz)]2+ ( 22+ ), and [Ru(dpma)(phen)(dppz)]2+ ( 32+ )-have been designed and used as ratiometric light-response probes for DNA, where dpma is di(pyrid-2-yl)(methyl)-amine, bpy is 2,2'-bipyridine, phen is 1,10-phenanthroline, and dppz is dipyridophenazine, respectively. Single crystals of complex 2 (PF6 )2 have been obtained and studied by X-ray analysis. The interactions of these complexes with different DNAs are investigated by means of spectroscopic methods, viscosity measurements, and molecular modeling. In the presence of calf thymus DNA, complexes 2 (PF6 )2 and 3 (PF6 )2 show the emergence of a new lower-energy phosphorescence emission band; meanwhile, the higher-energy fluorescence emission band is essentially unchanged, functioning as an intrinsic internal reference. These two complexes exhibit stronger preference for calf thymus DNA over single-strand DNA (d(A)16 and d(C)16 ). In contrast, no binding interaction between 1 (PF6 )2 and calf thymus DNA is observed. The intrinsic binding constants ( Kb ) of 2 (PF6 )2 and 3 (PF6 )2 with calf thymus DNA are determined to be (1.4 ± 0.4) × 105 and (9.5 ± 0.15) × 104 M-1 , respectively. In addition, these spectroscopic results are compared with those of the prototype complex [Ru(bpy)2 (dppz)]2+ ( 42+ ), and density functional theory and time-dependent density functional theory calculations are employed to elucidate these experimental findings.- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF