Search

The objectives of this manuscript are (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of on-street bicycle lane in reducing crashes involving bicyclists on urban roads, (2) to quantify and compare risk to bicyclists on road segments with and without on-street bicycle lane, (3) to evaluate the effect of on-street bicycle lane on other road network users (all crashes), and, (4) to assess the role of on-network characteristics (speed limit, the number of lanes, the width of on-street bicycle lane, the width of the right-most travel lane, and, the numbers of driveways, unsignalized approaches and signalized intersections per unit distance) on risk to bicyclists. Data for thirty-six segments with on-street bicycle lane and twenty-six segments without on-street bicycle lane in the city of Charlotte, North Carolina were extracted to compute and compare measures such as the number of bicycle crashes per center-lane mile, the number of bicycle crashes per annual million vehicle miles traveled (MVMT), the number of all crashes per center-lane mile, and the number of all crashes per MVMT. The results obtained from analysis indicate that bicyclists are three to four times at higher risk (based on traffic conditions) on segments without on-street bicycle lane than when compared to segments with on-street bicycle lane. An analysis conducted considering all crashes showed that on-street bicycle lanes do not have a statistically significant negative effect on overall safety. An increase in annual MVMT (exposure) and the number of signalized intersections per mile increases the number of bicycle crashes, while an increase in on-street bicycle lane width or right-most travel lane width (if on-street bicycle lane cannot be provided) decreases the number of bicycle crashes. Installing wider on-street bicycle lanes, limiting driveways to less than 50 per mile and unsignalized approaches to less than 10 per mile, increasing spacing between signalized intersections, and, facilitating wider right-most travel lane if on-street bicycle lane cannot be provided reduces occurrence of bicycle crashes and lowers risk to bicyclists on roads., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This paper focuses on an analysis of pedestrian and motorists' actions at sites with pedestrian hybrid beacons and assesses their effectiveness in improving the safety of pedestrians. Descriptive and statistical analyses (one-tail two-sample T-test and two-proportion Z-test) were conducted using field data collected during morning and evening peak hours at three study sites in the city of Charlotte, NC, before and after the installation of pedestrian hybrid beacons. Further, an analysis was conducted to assess the change in pedestrian and motorists' actions over time (before the installation; 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the installation). Results showed an increase in average traffic speed at one of the pedestrian hybrid beacon sites while no specific trends were observed at the other two pedestrian hybrid beacon sites. A decrease in the number of motorists not yielding to pedestrians, pedestrians trapped in the middle of the street, and pedestrian-vehicle conflicts were observed at all the three pedestrian hybrid beacon sites. The installation of pedestrian hybrid beacons did not have a negative effect on pedestrian actions at two out of the three sites. Improvements seem to be relatively more consistent 3 months after the installation of the pedestrian hybrid beacon.

Objective: The time left to cross the street displayed on pedestrian countdown signals can be used by pedestrians as well as drivers of vehicles, though these signals are primarily provided to help pedestrians make better crossing decisions at signalized intersections. This article presents an evaluation of the effect of pedestrian countdown signals in reducing vehicle-pedestrian crashes and all crashes at signalized intersections., Methods: A before-and-after study approach was adopted to evaluate the effect considering pedestrian countdown signals installed over a 5-month period at 106 signalized intersections in the city of Charlotte, North Carolina., Results: Analysis conducted at 95 percent confidence level showed that there has been a statistically insignificant decrease in vehicle-pedestrian crashes but a statistically significant decrease in all (includes vehicle-pedestrian and vehicle(s) only involved) crashes after the installation of pedestrian countdown signals. No negative consequences were observed after the installation of pedestrian countdown signals. Sixty-eight percent of the signalized intersections saw a decrease in the total number of all crashes, and 4 percent of the signalized intersections have not seen any change in the number of all crashes after the installation of pedestrian countdown signals. Improvements in terms of decrease in the total number of all crashes was high at signalized intersections with greater than 10 crashes per year during the before period. Likewise, decrease in the number of all crashes was high at signalized intersections with traffic volume between 7 AM to 7 PM greater than 20,000 vehicles during the before period., Conclusions: Based on results obtained, it can be concluded that pedestrians as well as drivers are making better decisions using the time left to cross the street displayed on pedestrian countdown signals at signalized intersections in the city of Charlotte, North Carolina.