Search

Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is widely accepted and endorsed by professional societies. Although several studies focusing on the MSRSGC have been published, few have been prospective studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSRSGC in cytopathology practice., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all prospective studies on the MSRSGC. The risk of malignancy (ROM), risk of neoplasm, and diagnostic accuracy for each diagnostic category were calculated. Data were tabulated in Microsoft Excel, and analyses were performed with the Open Meta-Analyst program., Results: Seven prospective and seven retrospective studies were identified. The total number of fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) was 1587 in the prospective studies and 1764 in the retrospective studies. The ROM values for the nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance, benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant categories in prospective versus retrospective studies were 21.0% versus 26.6%, 9.4% versus 8.1%, 34.9% versus 39.6%, 2.4% versus 2.1%, 36.6% versus 31.2%, 86.0% versus 66.0%, and 97.0% versus 96.7%, respectively. Sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios were 83.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.1%-90.8%) versus 89.1% (95% CI, 83.6%-92.9%), 98.4% (95% CI, 96.6%-99.3%) versus 94.9% (95% CI, 91.9%-96.9%), and 310.7 (95% CI, 121.2-796.6) versus 218.8 (95% CI, 107.3-438.1)., Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that the MSRSGC works well in FNA cytopathology practice and improves diagnostic accuracy in all diagnostic categories. The ROMs of prospective studies were in concordance with the MSRSGC reference values., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: Salivary gland lesions possess diagnostic challenges on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) material. They are relatively uncommon, yet present with a wide spectrum of cytomorphology. Herein, we review common salivary gland neoplasms, their cytomorphologic features, their diagnostic pitfalls, and ancillary studies helpful in achieving an accurate diagnosis., Summary: There are many cytomorphologic overlaps between benign and malignant salivary gland entities. Moreover, metaplasia, cystic changes, and degenerative changes are common findings adding to diagnostic dilemmas. These complicating factors contribute to a minute risk of malignancy in salivary gland lesions that are interpreted as benign on FNA. In rare cases, even malignant salivary gland neoplasms are misinterpreted as benign on aspirated material due to the many cytomorphologic overlaps. For example, benign and malignant neoplasms containing stroma such as myoepithelioma and adenoid cystic carcinoma may be misinterpreted as pleomorphic adenoma. Moreover, diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms with basal cell features can be confusing on FNA materials; for example, basal cell adenoma can be misinterpreted as adenoid cystic carcinoma. Mucoepidermoid carcinomas have many different appearances on aspirated material due to variable amounts of mucin, degree of nuclear atypia, cellular content, and squamous metaplasia. Acinic cell carcinoma exhibits large cells with abundant cytoplasm on FNA, which can be mistaken for oncocytic cells in oncocytoma or Warthin tumor. Salivary duct carcinoma shows distinct features of malignancy and thus can be mistaken for secondary tumors involving the salivary glands or other malignant salivary gland tumors. The presence of tumor-associated lymphocytes is another underlying cause of misdiagnosis, especially when considering the differential diagnosis of an intraparotid lymph node. Ancillary studies such as immunohistochemistry and molecular studies are gaining more attention to be utilized on FNA cases. PLAG1 immunostaining, CD117, DOG1, mammaglobin, and androgen receptor (AR) are examples of commonly used immunostains in diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. MYB gene fusion, rearrangements of the MAML2 gene, and ERBB2/HER2 are examples of molecular alterations useful in diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms. In conclusion, the aim of salivary gland cytology is to differentiate benign entities from the malignant ones and to prevent unnecessary aggressive treatments., Key Messages: The diagnostic pitfalls are enormous in salivary gland cytology. Familiarity with cytomorphology of different entities and their cytomorphologic overlaps, and application of ancillary studies improves the diagnostic yield, patient management and prevents unnecessary aggressive procedures., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Cystic salivary gland lesions present diagnostic challenges on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens that are related to sampling limitations and a broad differential diagnosis. This study evaluated the benefit of applying the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) to a series of cystic salivary gland lesions., Methods: The pathology archives at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were searched to identify cystic salivary gland FNA specimens over a 19-year period (2000-2018). Patient demographics, cytomorphologic features, and clinical and surgical follow-up were recorded. The MSRSGC was applied to the cases. The risk of malignancy (ROM) and the risk of neoplasia (RON) were calculated for each category., Results: One hundred seventy-eight cases were identified (96 males and 82 females) with a mean age of 53 years (range, 4-90 years). After the MSRSGC was applied, there were 52 nondiagnostic cases (29.2%), 80 nonneoplastic cases (44.9%), 35 cases of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS; 19.7%), 3 benign neoplasms (1.7%), 3 salivary gland neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP; 1.7%), 4 cases suspicious for malignancy (SFM; 2.2%), and 1 malignant case (0.6%). One hundred fifty-six of the 178 patients (87.6%) had follow-up data available. The RON and ROM values for cases with surgical follow-up were 33.3% (3 of 9) and 22.2% (2 of 9) for the nondiagnostic category, 42.9% (9 of 21) and 19% (4 of 21) for the nonneoplastic category, 76.5% (13 of 17) and 29.4% (5 of 17) for the AUS category, 100.0% (2 of 2) and 50.0% (1 of 2) for the SUMP category, and 100% (2 of 2) and 100% (2 of 2) for the SFM category, respectively., Conclusions: Applying the MSRSGC to cystic salivary gland lesions improves patient management by preventing unnecessary surgery for nonneoplastic conditions. The ROM was highest in the SFM category (100%), which was followed by the SUMP, AUS, nondiagnostic, and nonneoplastic categories. Less than adequate specimens may increase the diagnosis of AUS., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) has established distinct diagnostic categories for reporting cytopathological findings, and each is associated with a defined risk of malignancy (ROM). However, the ROM is applied at the overall category level and is not specific for particular morphological entities within a category. Here, the diagnostic performance of the MSRSGC for pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and Warthin tumor (WT) is reported., Methods: The pathology archives of 11 institutions from 4 countries were retrospectively searched to identify all salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies with a differential or definitive diagnosis of PA or WT and all resection specimens with a diagnosis of PA or WT; only paired cases were included. All FNA diagnoses were retrospectively classified according to the MSRSGC., Results: A total of 1250 cases met the inclusion criteria, and they included 898 PA cases and 352 WT cases. The ROM in the benign neoplasm category was 3.0% and 1.3% for cases with a differential or definitive diagnosis of PA and WT, respectively. The ROM in the salivary gland neoplasm with uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) category was 2.7% and 18.8% for PA and WT, respectively (P = .0277). The diagnostic accuracy for PA and WT was 95.1% and 96.1%, respectively., Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy for PA and WT on FNA is high. Furthermore, these findings highlight the difference in the ROMs associated with 2 specific differential diagnoses in the SUMP category: basaloid neoplasms and oncocytoid neoplasms., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Salivary gland lymphadenoma (LAD) is a rare benign neoplasm comprising sebaceous (SLAD) and nonsebaceous (NSLAD) types. Despite established histologic criteria, limited data on cytomorphology, tumor heterogeneity, and overlap with other entities make the diagnosis of LAD by fine needle aspiration (FNA) challenging. We describe a multi-institutional cohort of 14 LADs with cytology, clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic data., Methods: Our cohort included nine SLAD and five NSLAD with corresponding histopathology. Mean patient age and M:F ratio were 60.4 years (range 45-86 years) and 1:2 for SLADs and 57.4 years (range 42-80 years) and 1:1.5 for NSLADs, respectively. One NSLAD patient had a germline predisposition for Cowden syndrome. Glass slides and whole slide images of air-dried Diff-Quik (DQ), alcohol-stained Papanicolaou smears (Pap) and cellblocks were reviewed for key cytomorphologic findings., Results: FNAs from SLAD and NSLADs demonstrated vacuolated and basaloid epithelial clusters within a lymphoid background. Vacuolated cells from SLAD showed sebaceous cells with microvesicular cytoplasm indenting a central nucleus. Vacuolated cells from NSLAD were columnar with eccentric nuclei, corresponding to abluminal glandular cells. SLADs were classified using the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology as nondiagnostic (11.1%), nonneoplastic (44.4%), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS) (22.2%), and salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) (22.2%). NSLADs were classified as AUS (40%), SUMP (40%) and Benign Neoplasm (20%)., Conclusion: Although rare, knowing the cytologic features of salivary LAD is important to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. Vacuolated cells can be prominent in both SLAD and NSLAD aspirates. Diagnostic issues arise from insufficient sampling of all tumor components leading to marked variation in diagnostic classification of LAD., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACCA) is an uncommon primary malignancy of salivary glands and rarely nonsalivary tissue. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ACCA on fine needle aspiration (FNA) material and the associated challenges., Methods: A search on electronic pathology database from 2006 to 2016 at The Johns Hopkins Hospital found 83 cytology specimens diagnosed as ACCA, 49 with histology follow-up., Results: Fifty-two females and 31 males were found ranging from 37 to 95 years old (mean 62.5). The tumor size was 1 to 11.5 cm (mean 3.4). FNAs were performed on 46 salivary glands (54.88%), 12 head and neck masses (14.45%), 9 lymph nodes (10.84%), 9 tracheas/lungs (10.84%), 4 vaginal/perineum/gluteal masses (4.82%), and one for each kidney, liver and abdominal/pelvic mass (1.21%). 83 FNA diagnoses revealed 3 nondiagnostics (3.61%), 20 neoplasms with unspecified features (24.10%), 30 basaloid neoplasms (36.14%), 18 ACCA (21.69%), and 12 other malignancies (14.46%). The accuracy of FNA in diagnosis of ACCA comparing to histologic follow-up in 49 cases was 87.5% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity, with 92.11% positive predictive value and 54.55% negative predictive value. The most common mimicker was pleomorphic adenoma., Conclusion: ACCA can be diagnosed not only in the salivary gland FNAs, but also respiratory tract, intra-abdominal, kidney, and gynecologic regions. FNA is a preferred technique to assess mass lesions. However, a diagnosis of ACCA on FNA material should be rendered with caution since there are benign and malignant neoplasms with overlapping features. Awareness of prior medical history and ancillary studies can improve the diagnosis., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used for the preoperative evaluation of salivary gland tumors. Tumor grade is a key factor influencing clinical management of salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs). To assess the ability to grade nonbasaloid SGCs in FNA specimens, an international panel of cytopathologists convened to review and score SGC cases., Methods: The study cohort included 61 cases of primary SGC from the pathology archives of 3 tertiary medical centers. Cases from 2005 to 2016 were selected, scanned, and digitized. Nineteen cytopathologists blinded to the histologic diagnosis reviewed the digitized cytology slides and graded them as low, high, or indeterminate. The panelists' results were then compared to the tumor grades based on histopathologic examination of the corresponding resection specimens., Results: All but 2 of the 19 (89.5%) expert panelists review more than 20 salivary gland FNAs per year; 16 (84.2%) of the panelists work at academic medical centers, and 13 (68.4%) have more than 10 years' experience. Participants had an overall accuracy of 89.4% in the grading of SGC cases, with 90.2% and 88.3% for low- and high-grade SGC, respectively. Acinic cell carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma had the highest degree of accuracy, while epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma and salivary duct carcinoma had the lowest degree of accuracy. As expected, the intermediate-grade SGC cases showed the greatest variability (high-grade, 42.1%; low-grade, 37.5%, indeterminate, 20.4%)., Conclusion: This study confirms the high accuracy of cytomorphologic grading of primary SGC by FNA as low- or high-grade. However, caution should be exercised when a grade cannot be confidently assigned., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy (DA), risk of neoplasm (RON), and risk of malignancy (ROM) for the commonly encountered malignant salivary gland tumors mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MECa), acinic cell carcinoma (ACCa), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ADCa) applying The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytology (MSRSGC)., Materials and Methods: The cytology archives from 2007 to 2017 of 9 academic institutions were searched for salivary gland FNAs for the following key words mentioned either in the principal and/or differential diagnosis: MEC, ACCa, and ADCa. The original cytology diagnosis was retrospectively classified according to the MSRSGC. Patient demographics, biopsy site, and available surgical follow-up were recorded. The final analysis included only cases with surgical follow-up., Results: A total of 212 salivary gland FNAs were included. Based on retrospective reclassification according to MSRSGC, 97 of 212 (46%) FNA cases carried a diagnosis of malignancy specific for either MECa, ACCa, or ADCa. In the remaining 115 cases, 24 of 212 (11%) were reclassified as suspicious for malignancy (SM) and 91 of 212 (43%) as salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP). The DA for MECa, ACCa, and ADCa was 78.7%, 75% and 89%, respectively. The RON was 100% for all 3 tumors and the ROM was 93.6% for MECa, 96.8% for ACCa, and 94.4% for ADCa., Conclusions: The DA of 78.7% for MECa, 75% for ACCa, and 89% for ADCa is reasonable in FNA specimens. Although the management of definitive cases of malignancy remains unchanged, the MSRSGC provides a ROM for SM and SUMP categories, which can improve patient management., (Copyright © 2019 American Society of Cytopathology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) is a diagnostic category in the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. The objective of this study was to assess the risk of neoplasm (RON) and the risk of malignancy (ROM) in SUMP cases by evaluating them based on their prominent cytomorphology., Methods: The pathology databases were searched for cases of fine-needle aspiration-diagnosed SUMP at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and Northwestern University from 2013 to 2018. Only cytopathology cases diagnosed as SUMP that had available surgical follow-up were included., Results: Sixty-five patients with SUMP were identified, including 31 men and 34 women who ranged in age from 15 to 87 years (mean age, 55.2 years). Sixty-five cases had histologic follow-up, including 13 (20%) with basaloid features, 13 (20%) with oncocytic features, and 39 (60%) with unspecified features. No cases with clear cell features were found. Overall, the RON in the SUMP category was 95.4% (62 of 65 cases), and the ROM was 33.8% (22 of 65 cases). The RON in SUMPs with basaloid, oncocytic, and unspecified subtypes was 92.3%, 100%, and 94.9%, respectively, whereas the ROM was 38.5%, 7.7%, and 41%, respectively. The most common benign neoplasm was pleomorphic adenoma (23.1%), whereas mucoepidermoid carcinoma (9.2%) was the most common malignant neoplasm., Conclusions: This study shows that the ROM differs significantly based on cytomorphology subtypes, whereas the overall ROM is approximately the same as the target rate in the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. Moreover, the RON remains high in the SUMP category among different cytomorphology subtypes. Adequate sampling, immunohistochemical staining, and familiarity with metaplastic and reactive changes may improve the diagnosis., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is routinely performed to evaluate salivary gland lesions, and provides valuable information regarding the cytomorphologic features of the lesions. Occasionally, there are overlaps between benign and malignant conditions due to heterogeneity of the cell types, metaplastic changes, and sampling issues. Herein, the authors present a retrospective study of diagnostic pitfalls in salivary gland cytology and the simulating conditions., Methods: A 20-year retrospective review (1995-2015) of medical records was performed searching for the cytology reports of patients who underwent FNA of the salivary gland with the words "amendment" or "revision." Medical records of the revised cases were reviewed for the subsequent surgical follow-up. All cases with a diagnostic discrepancy between the primary cytologic diagnosis and the final histology diagnosis were included in the current study. The histologic diagnosis was considered the gold standard., Results: A total of 19 cases were included in the current study. The cases were divided into 7 categories based on their cytologic diagnoses: 1) nondiagnostic (1 case); 2) benign, nonneoplastic lesion (2 cases); 3) benign salivary gland neoplasm (2 cases); 4) salivary gland neoplasm (4 cases); 5) epithelial neoplasm, not otherwise specified (1 case); 6) markedly atypical cells suspicious for a malignant neoplasm (1 case); and 7) malignant neoplasms (8 cases)., Conclusions: The interpretation of salivary gland FNA can be influenced by several factors including prominent metaplasia, focal atypia, cystic changes, variable cellular components within the lesions, scant cellularity, variants of neoplasms, and a prior history of malignancy. Multiple passes representing the entire mass, imaging findings, and familiarity with salivary gland cytomorphology may improve the diagnostic accuracy. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:101-11. © 2017 American Cancer Society., (© 2017 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is well accepted as a safe, reliable, minimally invasive, and cost-effective method for the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Salivary gland neoplasms are often difficult to diagnose because of morphologic heterogeneity and a variety of epithelial metaplastic changes. Hence, a number of salivary gland FNA specimens yield indeterminate results. For indeterminate FNA specimens, the suspicious-for-malignancy (SFM) category is used when a specific neoplasm falls short in quantity or quality for the criteria for malignancy. Therefore, the findings are not sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis of malignancy., Methods: This study was designed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) for the SFM group at 5 tertiary medical centers worldwide with the aforementioned criteria. Among 12,606 salivary gland FNA cases between 1997 and 2014, 276 (2.2%) were reported to be SFN. Specifically, 114 suspicious cases (41%) had histological follow-up., Results: Histological follow-up of the 114 suspicious cases showed 95 malignant tumors indicating a risk of malignancy (ROM) of 83.3%. The ROM varied between 74% and 88% for the 5 participating institutions, and a Fisher's exact test with significance set to p<.05 showed no significant difference in ROM among the institutions (p = .78)., Conclusions: Overall, 83.3% of SFM salivary gland FNA specimens turned out to be malignant; there was no significant interinstitutional variability in the ROMs. The SFM category for salivary gland FNA is very homogeneous, and the ROMs are quite similar worldwide. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:94-100. © 2017 American Cancer Society., (© 2017 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is widely used in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Salivary gland FNAs are often difficult to diagnose because of morphologic heterogeneity, a small but significant number of the FNAs yield "atypical" diagnosis. However, systematic evaluation of the risk of malignancy (ROM) of the atypical diagnoses across institutions and the variability of ROM among institutions are still lacking., Methods: Salivary gland FNAs from five tertiary medical centers of United States, Europe and China were reviewed. Cases with "atypical" diagnosis and histological follow-up were included in this study. The diagnostic category of "atypical" was adopted from Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC, personal communication)., Results: Among the 12,606 salivary gland FNAs, 504 (4.0%) cases were reported as "atypical", with 154 cases (30.6%) having histological follow-ups. Histological follow-ups revealed 94 malignant tumors (61.0%, 57 lymphomas, 33 carcinomas, 2 sarcomas, 1 metastatic melanoma, 1 metastatic neuroblastoma), 33 benign tumors (21.4%), and 25 benign lesions (16.2%). ROM in the subset of "atypical" cases with histological follow-up from different institutions vary from 73.08% to 0.00%, the Pearson chi 2  = 24.38 and P < .001., Conclusions: More than half of the subset of "atypical" salivary gland FNAs with histological resection turned out to be malignant tumors; another one-fourth were benign neoplasms. Further, the highly variable ROMs of the "atypical" category amongst different institutions likely reflect the variable practices at each individual institution., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)