Search

The objective of this study was to evaluate herd characteristics and management practices associated with presence of Salmonella in the farm environment and in bulk tank milk (BTM) in US dairy herds. Herd management data, environmental culture, BTM and in-line milk filter polymerase chain reaction results for Salmonella from 260 US dairy herds surveyed during the National Animal Health Monitoring System Dairy 2007 study were analysed. Herd characteristics and management practices were screened by univariate analysis, and selected variables were used to construct a logistic regression model to identify factors associated with the presence of Salmonella in environmental samples. To identify factors associated with the occurrence of Salmonella in BTM and milk filters, a priori selected variables that were related to milking procedures were analysed univariately and a logistic regression model was constructed. The presence of Salmonella in the farm environment was associated with location of the operation in the East (OR = 4.8; CI: 1.9-11.6), not using a broadcast manure spreader (OR = 3.2; CI: 1.4-7.5), use of bovine somatotropin (BST) (OR = 2.7; CI: 1.5-5.0) and use of anionic salts (OR = 2.2; CI: 1.2-3.9). In the final multivariable model, herds with fewer than 100 cows were at decreased odds (OR = 0.3; CI: 0.1-0.7) of being culture positive for Salmonella as were herds with between 100 and 499 cows (OR = 0.4; CI: 0.2-0.8) compared with herds having 500 or more cows. The presence of culture-positive environmental samples and herd size were significantly associated with Salmonella BTM contamination. The herd-level factors identified in this study were in agreement with prior studies but also identified other potential factors that can be targeted in Salmonella control programmes., (© 2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.)

Although dairy cattle are known reservoirs for salmonellae, cattle that are shedding this organism are often asymptomatic and difficult to identify. A dairy herd that was experiencing a sustained, subclinical outbreak of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Cerro was monitored for 2 years. Fecal samples from the lactating cows were collected every 6 to 8 weeks and tested for the presence of Salmonella. Fecal prevalence of Salmonella fluctuated throughout the observation period and ranged from 8 to 88%. Manure composites and water trough samples were collected along with the fecal samples, and bulk milk and milk filters were cultured for the presence of Salmonella on a weekly basis. Over 90% of the manure composites--representing high-animal-traffic areas-were positive at each sampling. Salmonella was detected in 11% of milk samples and in 66% of the milk filters. Results of weekly bulk milk quality testing (i.e., bulk tank somatic cell score, standard plate count, preliminary incubation count) were typically well within acceptable ranges. Milk quality variables had low correlations with herd Salmonella fecal prevalence. When observed over time, sampling period average prevalence of Salmonella in milk filters closely paralleled fecal prevalence of Salmonella in the herd. Based on results of this study, milk filters appear to be an effective method for monitoring shedding prevalence at the herd level. In-line filter testing is also a more sensitive measure of Salmonella, and perhaps other pathogens, in raw milk than testing the milk alone.

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and fecal coliforms in bulk tank milk in the United States. As part of the NAHMS Dairy 2002 survey, 861 bulk tank milk samples were collected from farms in 21 states. Milk was directly plated on selective agars for direct bacterial enumeration and was enriched in selective broths to increase detection sensitivity. Somatic cell counts (SCC) and standard plate counts (SPC) were also determined. Coliforms were detected in 95% (818 of 860) of the samples, and the average SCC was 295,000 cells/mL. Twenty-two samples (2.6%) were culture-positive for Salmonella, and 9 serotypes were identified: Montevideo (n = 7), Newport (n = 4), Muenster (n = 2), Meleagridis (n = 2), Cerro (n = 2), 44:Z36 (Z38) (n = 2), Dublin (n = 1), Anatum (n = 1), and 9, 12:nonmo-tile (n = 1). Listeria monocytogenes was isolated from 56 (6.5%) samples, and serotyping of these isolates yielded 5 serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, 3b, 4b, and 4c). Of the L. monocytogenes isolates, 93% were serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b, and 4b, the most common human clinical isolates. Regional differences in L. monocytogenes and Salmonella prevalence were observed, but more studies are needed to determine the validity of these differences. There were no apparent relationships between SCC or SPC and incidence of Salmonella or L. monocytogenes. Although the prevalence of L. monocytogenes and Salmonella was low, these pathogens represent a potential risk to consumers of raw milk and raw milk products.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a portable real-time PCR system in detecting Salmonella spp. in raw milk. The 200 bulk milk samples chosen for this study constituted a subset of the samples for a larger study; this subset contained 24 samples that were culture positive for Salmonella and 176 that were culture negative. Milk was both plated directly on selective agar and plated after enrichment in selective media. Presumptive Salmonella colonies were isolated by direct culturing of five samples, while Salmonella was isolated from the remaining 19 positive samples only after enrichment. Presumptive Salmonella isolates were serotyped, and isolates from 22 samples were confirmed to be Salmonella isolates. PCR assays of culture-positive milk prior to enrichment yielded no evidence of Salmonella. DNA extracts of bacterial pellets from the enriched samples were analyzed for Salmonella by real-time PCR with the Ruggedized Advanced Pathogen Identification Device (RAPID). Fifty-four samples from the enrichment pellets tested positive for Salmonella by real-time PCR. Two samples that tested positive for Salmonella by culture and serotyping tested Salmonella negative by real-time PCR. Serotyping identified isolates from these samples as Salmonella Montevideo. All DNA extracts of Salmonella Montevideo isolates tested positive for Salmonella by real-time PCR. Thirty-three samples tested negative by culture and positive by real-time PCR. These results indicate that the portable real-time PCR system appears to be a useful tool for detecting Salmonella in raw milk. Additionally, the combination of enrichment and real-time PCR techniques used in this study can yield results in 24 h, compared with the 48 to 72 h required for traditional culture.

Samples of bulk tank milk from dairies across the United States, taken as part of the National Animal Health Monitoring System Dairy 2002 survey, were analyzed for the presence of Salmonella enterica using a commercially available real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit. Samples from 854 farms in 21 states were collected and enriched in tetrathionate broth to amplify any salmonellae present, and DNA was isolated from the resulting biomass. One hundred one samples (11.8%) were shown to contain Salmonella enterica using the real-time PCR assay, whereas conventional culture techniques detected the pathogen in only 22 (2.6%) of the samples. A conventional PCR assay targeting a different gene from Salmonella enterica confirmed the presence of the organism in 94 of the real-time PCR-positive samples. Thus, assay of milk samples by real-time PCR indicates that the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in US bulk tank milk is substantially higher than previously reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Salmonella is a prominent foodborne pathogen in the US and dairy cattle have frequently been identified as reservoirs for this organism. Here we describe a long-term outbreak of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Cerro that was detected in a Pennsylvania dairy herd during routine monitoring as part of a longitudinal study of several dairy herds. An initial analysis of individual fecal grab samples from the milking herd indicated a very low prevalence of Salmonella (1/102) and Salmonella was not detected in 10 environmental samples. In a subsequent sampling 6 mo later, Salmonella was isolated from 43.5% (47/108) of the cows and 40% of collected environmental samples (10/25). The Salmonella isolated in the first sampling was serovar Typhimurium var. Copenhagen, however isolates from the second herd sampling were serovars Cerro (91.5%) and Kentucky (8.5%). Sporadic environmental sampling between these initial complete milking herd samplings yielded serotypes Kentucky, Typhimurium var. Copenhagen, and Cerro and clinical salmonellosis was observed in several cows shedding Typhimurium var. Copenhagen. The herd was sampled nine additional times over the next 14 mo and fecal prevalence of Salmonella ranged from 8.4% to 89%. Prevalence remained high (58 to 69%) over the following 8 mo, showed evidence of decline over the next 3 mo, and then increased again to 89%. Cerro was the only serotype isolated during this period. Bulk milk was cultured weekly during this 22-mo period and Salmonella was isolated from 5.3% (5/94) of milk samples. For the last 14 mo of the study, milk filters were also cultured for Salmonella on a weekly basis and 65% (37/57) of the filters tested positive. There were no significant health or production concerns in the herd during this outbreak. Based on these observations we conclude that sub-clinical Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Cerro infection can be persistent in a milking herd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]