Search

Purpose: The management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTB) improves patient survival. The German Cancer Society (DKG) certifies sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, promoting high standards of care. This study investigated the variability in treatment recommendations for localized STS across different German-speaking tertiary sarcoma centers., Methods: In this cross-sectional case-based survey study, 5 anonymized patient cases with imaging data of localized STS were presented to MTBs of 21 German-speaking tertiary referral hospitals. Centers provided recommendations on treatment sequence and modalities, along with the consensus level within their MTB. Agreement percentages were calculated, and consensus levels were rated on a scale of 1 to 10., Results: Five patient cases were discussed resulting in 105 recommendations. Agreement percentages for case 1 to 5 were 14.3%, 61.9%, 33.3%, 52.4% and 9.3%, with a median agreement percentage of 33.3%. Grouping pre- and postoperative therapies as "perioperative" and including recommendations with and without regional hyperthermia raised the median agreement to 47.6%. The mean consensus level within each center across all 5 cases was 9.5., Conclusion: This first case-based analysis of inter-center agreement for STS management in German-speaking countries reveals low inter-center agreement but high intra-center consensus. Our study includes nearly all tertiary sarcoma centers in German-speaking countries, affirming its strong external validity. These findings suggest potential and clinically very relevant differences in treatment standards among sarcoma centers. Enhanced case-based exchanges and collaborative efforts are needed to reduce discrepancies and standardize the management of STS patients., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interest related to the presented work. Ethics approval: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board (EA1/126/23)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Local ablative therapies (LAT) are increasingly used in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), yet evidence-based standards are lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of LAT on survival of metastatic STS patients and to identify prognostic factors., Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 246 STS patients with metastatic disease who underwent LAT on tumor board recommendation between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. A mixed effects model was applied to evaluate multiple survival events per patient., Results: Median overall survival (OS) after first metastasis was 5.4 years with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 93.7, 81.7, and 53.1 %, respectively. A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of liver metastases were positively correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) after LAT (HR = 0.61, p = 0.00032 and HR = 0.52, p = 0.0081, respectively). A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of metastatic lesions in a single organ site other than lung and liver were positive prognostic factors for OS after first LAT (HR = 0.50, p = 0.028 and HR = 0.40, p = 0.026, respectively) while rare histotypes and LAT other than surgery and radiotherapy were negatively associated with OS after first LAT (HR = 2.56, p = 0.020 and HR = 3.87, p = 0.025). Additional systemic therapy was independently associated with a PFS benefit in patients ≤60 years with ≥4 metastatic lesions (for max. diameter of treated lesions ≤2 cm: HR = 0.32, p = 0.02 and >2 cm: HR = 0.20, p = 0.0011, respectively)., Conclusion: This multicenter study conducted at six German university hospitals underlines the value of LAT in metastatic STS. The exceptionally high survival rates are likely to be associated with patient selection and treatment in specialized sarcoma centers., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

With the increasing use of innovative next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms in routine diagnostic and research settings, the genetic landscape of uterine sarcomas has been dynamically evolving during the last two decades. Notably, the majority of recently recognized genotypes in uterine sarcomas represent gene fusions, while recurrent oncogene mutations of diagnostic and/ or therapeutic value have been rare. Recently, a distinctive aggressive uterine sarcoma expressing S100 and SOX10, but otherwise lacking diagnostic morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular features of other uterine malignancies has been presented in a scientific abstract form (USCAP, 2023), but detailed description and delineation of the entity is still missing. We herein describe two high-grade unclassified uterine sarcomas characterized by spindle to round cell morphology and diffuse expression of S100 and SOX10, originating in the uterine body and cervix of 53- and 45-year-old women and carrying an ERBB3 (p.Glu928Gly) and an ERBB2 (p.Val777Leu) mutation, respectively. Both tumors harbored in addition genomic HER2 amplification, ATRX mutation and CDKN2A deletion. Methylation studies revealed a methylome most similar to MPNST-like tumors, but distinct from melanoma, MPNST, clear cell sarcoma, and endometrial stromal sarcoma. Case 1 died of progressive peritoneal metastases after multiple trials of chemotherapy 47 months after diagnosis. Case 2 is a recent case who presented with a cervical mass, which was biopsied. This study defines a novel heretofore unrecognized aggressive uterine sarcoma with unique phenotypic and genotypic features. Given the potential value of targeting HER2, recognizing this tumor type is mandatory for appropriate therapeutic strategies and for better future delineation of the entity., Competing Interests: Declarations Samples were used in accordance with ethical guidelines for the use of retrospective tissue samples provided by the local ethics committee of the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (ethics committee statements 24.01.2005 and 18.01.2012). Conflict of interest None. Disclosures AA is the Editor-in-Chief of Virchows Archiv. JKD, JMG and MM serve as members of the editorial board of Virchows Archiv. The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Small blue round cell sarcomas (SBRCSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with overlapping morphologic features but markedly varying prognosis. They are characterized by distinct chromosomal alterations, particularly rearrangements leading to gene fusions, whose detection currently represents the most reliable diagnostic marker. Ewing sarcomas are the most common SBRCSs, defined by gene fusions involving EWSR1 and transcription factors of the ETS family, and the most frequent non-EWSR1-rearranged SBRCSs harbor a CIC rearrangement. Unfortunately, currently the identification of CIC::DUX4 translocation events, the most common CIC rearrangement, is challenging. Here, we present a machine-learning approach to support SBRCS diagnosis that relies on gene expression profiles measured via targeted sequencing. The analyses on a curated cohort of 69 soft-tissue tumors showed markedly distinct expression patterns for SBRCS subgroups. A random forest classifier trained on Ewing sarcoma and CIC-rearranged cases predicted probabilities of being CIC-rearranged >0.9 for CIC-rearranged-like sarcomas and <0.6 for other SBRCSs. Testing on a retrospective cohort of 1335 routine diagnostic cases identified 15 candidate CIC-rearranged tumors with a probability >0.75, all of which were supported by expert histopathologic reassessment. Furthermore, the multigene random forest classifier appeared advantageous over using high ETV4 expression alone, previously proposed as a surrogate to identify CIC rearrangement. Taken together, the expression-based classifier can offer valuable support for SBRCS pathologic diagnosis., Competing Interests: Disclosure Statement None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The sequence of radiotherapy and resection in patients with soft tissue sarcomas is usually discussed on an individual basis. Better understanding of potential differences of health-related quality of life (QoL) between patients undergoing adjuvant (ART) versus neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) is therefore helpful for clinical decision making., Methods: Adult sarcoma patients from 39 hospitals completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Differences in global QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, fatigue, pain, and insomnia between ART versus NART were investigated with multivariate regression, adjusting for age, gender, chemotherapy, grading, stage, tumor location, recurrence/distant metastasis, sarcoma type, time since last treatment, and treatment status using validated thresholds., Results: A total of 1110 patients participated. Of them, 340 had received radiotherapy (NART: n = 95, 28%; ART: n = 245, 72%). Global QoL was 59.3 on average after NART and 60.5 after ART (B adj  = 1.0, p = 0.74). Physical functioning was 65.9 compared to 70.5 (B adj  = 4.2; p = 0.16), role function 48.8 vs. 56.7 (B adj  = 7.0, p = 0.08), fatigue 47.5 vs. 45.4 (B adj  = -1.2; p = 0.71), pain 40.2 vs. 34.1 (B adj  = -6.8; p = 0.08), and insomnia 33.7 vs. 41.6 (B adj  = 5.5, p = 0.16). Among patients with NART, clinically relevant QoL impairments were less frequent 2 years after treatment compared to < 2 years thereafter (n = 6 vs. n = 4 on average)., Conclusion: There is little evidence for QoL differences in most domains and overall QoL between the two irradiation groups. However, patients after NART might experience worse role functioning and pain but fewer problems with insomnia compared to patients after ART., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are still preferably delivered sequentially, with or without concurrent hyperthermia. Concurrent delivery of chemo-, radio- and thermotherapy may produce synergistic effects and reduce chemotherapy-free intervals. The few available studies suggest that concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) has a greater local effect. Data on the efficacy and toxicity of adding hyperthermia to CRT (CRTH) are sparse., Materials and Methods: A cohort of 101 patients with STS of the extremities and trunk who received CRT ( n  = 33) or CRTH ( n  = 68) before resection of macroscopic tumor (CRT: n  = 19, CRTH: n  = 49) or re-resection following a non-oncological resection, so called 'whoops procedure', (CRT: n  = 14, CRTH: n  = 19) were included in this retrospective study. CRT consisted of two cycles of doxorubicine (50 mg/m 2 on d2) plus ifosfamide (1500 mg/m 2 on d1-5, q28) plus radiation doses of up to 60 Gy. Hyperthermia was delivered in two sessions per week., Results: All patients received the minimum dose of 50 Gy. Median doses of ifosfamide and doxorubicin were comparable between CRT (75%/95%) and CRTH (78%/97%). The median number of hyperthermia sessions was seven. There were no differences in acute toxicities. Major wound complications occurred in 15% (CRT) vs. 25% (CRTH) ( p  = 0.19). In patients with macroscopic disease, the addition of hyperthermia resulted in a tendency toward improved remission: regression ≥90% occurred in 21/48 (CRTH) vs. 4/18 (CRT) patients ( p  = 0.197). With a median postoperative follow-up of 72 months, 6-year local control and overall survival rates for CRTH vs. CRT alone were 85 vs. 78% ( p  = 0.938) and 79 vs. 71% ( p  = 0.215)., Conclusions: Both CRT and CRTH are well tolerated with an expected rate of wound complications. The results suggest that adding hyperthermia may improve tumor response.

Purpose: Retroperitoneal (RPS) sarcomas are associated with poor local and abdominal tumor control. However, the benefit of preoperative radio- or chemotherapy alone for these entities is currently unclear. Moreover, as intermediate- and high-grade sarcomas have a tendency toward early metastasis, exploration of neoadjuvant strategies is of high importance. This analysis reports the results of our 20-year single-institution experience with preoperative neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation., Methods: From 2000-2019, 27 patients with intermediate- or high-grade RPS (12 dedifferentiated liposarcoma, 10 leiomyosarcoma, 5 others) were treated with radiotherapy (median dose: 50.4 Gy; range 45-75 Gy) and two cycles of chemotherapy (doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2 BSA/d3 q28 and ifosfamide 1.5 g/m 2 BSA/d1‑5 q28) in neoadjuvant intent. Chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin alone in two cases and ifosfamide alone in one case. Fifteen patients (56%) additionally received deep regional hyperthermia., Results: The median follow-up time was 53 months (±56.7 months). 92% of patients received two cycles of chemotherapy as planned and 92% underwent surgery. At 5 and 10 years, abdominal-recurrence-free survival was 74.6% (±10.1%) and 66.3% (±11.9%), distant metastasis-free survival was 67.2% (±9.7%) and 59.7% (±11.1%), and overall survival was 60.3% (±10.5%) and 60.3% (±10.5%), respectively. CTC grade III and IV toxicities were leukocytopenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (33%), and anemia (11%). There were no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with and without hyperthermia for retroperitoneal sarcomas is feasible and provided high local control of intermediate- and high-grade sarcoma., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze major complication rates and different aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with or without radio (chemo) therapy and surgery., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent Extremity STS excision from 2004 to 2014 (182 patients included). Patients' data were collected from patients' records. HRQoL was assessed by using EORTC QLQ-C30., Results: A total of 182 patients underwent sarcoma resection. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT), the major-complication rate amounted to 28% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p <  0.001). Major-complication rates after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) occurred in 8% (vs. 7%, no radiotherapy, p = 0.265). Comparison QoL scores between treating with neoadjuvant RCT or without RT revealed significant worse scores with neoadjuvant RCT. Further stratification of disease control of these patients showed significant reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT compared to irradiated disease-free patients., Discussion: To date, there have only been a few investigations of QoL in STS. Retrospective study on quality of life have limitations, like a lack of baseline evaluation of QoL. Patient candidated to radiation therapy could have had worse QoL baseline due to more advanced disease. Disease status of the patients who answered the questionnaires could have been an influence of QoL and we could show reduced scores in the group of disease-free patients with neoadjuvant RCT, but not for the patients with recurrence or metastasis, so it is very hard to discriminate whether radiation therapy could really have an impact or not., Conclusion: This study might assist in further improving the understanding of QoL in STS patients and may animate for prospective studies examining the oncological therapies impact on HRQoL.

Purpose: There is a sound theoretical basis but little clinical evidence substantiating the benefits of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with two-drug chemotherapy for locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Our five-year data on the feasibility and effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with systemically effective doses of adriamycin and ifosfamide combined is presented here., Patients and Methods: Between 2000 and 2011, 53 patients with UICC (2010) stage I (n=1, 1.9%), II (n=12, 22.7%) or III (n=40, 75.5%) nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2)/day, d1-5, q28) and doxorubicin (50mg/m(2)/day, d3, q28) plus concurrent radiotherapy with a target dose of 50-64 Gy (median 60 Gy). The treatment of 34 patients (64.2%) was combined with hyperthermia., Results: At five years, the local control rate was 89.9% (± 5.7%), distant metastasis-free survival 66.6% (± 7.6%), and survival 83.3% (± 6%). The R0 resection rate was 81.1%. Radiotherapy was completed as planned in all patients and chemotherapy in 42/53 (70.2%). Grades III (n=21, 29.6%) and IV (n=18, 34%) leukopenia was the main acute adverse event. All acute and chronic non-hematologic toxicities were moderate., Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma is associated with good feasibility, manageable acute and late toxicities, and high local efficacy., (Copyright © 2015 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)