Search

Background: Based on earlier clinical and preclinical studies, we conducted a phase II trial in metastatic sarcoma patients of the combination of 41.8 degrees C (x60 min) radiant heat (Aquatherm) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) with 'ICE' chemotherapy. The ICE regimen consists of ifosfamide (5 g/m(2)), carboplatin (300 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (100 mg/m(2)), concurrent with WBH, with etoposide also on days 2 and 3 post-WBH., Methods: Therapy was delivered every 4 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients received filgrastim or lenograstim., Results: Of 108 patients enrolled as of September 2001, 95 are evaluable for response. Of the evaluable patients (mean ECOG performance status approximately 1; mean age 42.3; 58% male) 33 had no prior therapy for metastatic disease, and 62 were pretreated (mean: 1.5 prior regimens). The overall response rate was 28.4% (4 complete remissions and 23 partial remissions) with stable disease (SD) in 31 patients. For no prior therapy, the response rate was 36%; in pretreated patients it was 24%. The median overall survival by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 393 days (95% CI 327, 496); the median time to treatment failure was 123 days (95% CI 77, 164). The major toxicity (287 cycles) was grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia seen in 79.7 and 60.6% of treatments respectively; there were 7 episodes of infection (grade 3/4) with 2 treatment-related deaths, bot involving disease progression and ureteral obstruction., Conclusion: These results are consistent with continued clinical investigation of this combined modality approach., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Although whole-body hyperthermia combined with specific genotoxic chemotherapy can be shown to enhance neoplastic cell killing without a concomitant rise in bone marrow toxicity, nephrotoxicity can become treatment-limiting. This study compares the kidney toxicity to the kidney of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy alone, and ICE chemotherapy combined with either extracorporeal (e-WBH) or radiant-heat-induced hyperthermia (r-WBH) in 43 patients with refractory sarcoma. Within 3 days of ICE chemotherapy treatment there was a significant increase in urinary protein excretion and a reduction of the glomerular filtration rate. These effects were more pronounced if WBH was added. The use of immunoluminometric assays revealed a predominance of low-molecular-mass proteins. This increase in protein excretion persisted in the e-WBH-treated group, whereas it vanished within 3 weeks in both the group treated with ICE alone and that treated with r-WBH. Our findings suggest that ICE chemotherapy causes transient tubular and glomerular damage, which is enhanced by WBH. In terms of long-term nephrotoxicity e-WBH was more nephrotoxic than r-WBH. This finding is consistent with our clinical observations.

Previous in vitro studies of sarcoma and normal cell lines exposed to 41.8 degrees C (x 60 min) demonstrated selective increased expression of members of the heat shock protein (HSP) family 70 on the cell surface of the sarcoma cells only. One implication of these data relates to the clinical application of targeting a stress-inducible, tumor-specific immune response. We therefore elected to measure immune response parameters (i.e., serum antibodies against HSP70i, 60, and 27) in six patients with sarcoma using a Western blot technique. These study patients received one to four successive 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) x 60-min treatments (given every 3 weeks). We also tested the serum of 10 untreated healthy control subjects for the same parameters. In all patients, baseline HSP antibody levels were detectable; in no case did WBH result in an increase in HSP antibodies. The serum of one patient with sarcoma demonstrated a strong nonfluctuating reaction against HSP27 before and after WBH that had no obvious correlation; this was not observed in the sera of the control subjects. This study suggests that WBH does not induce a B-cell response to HSP family 70 antigens; these data, however, do not exclude the possibility of NK cell activation due to HSP antigen presentation.

Preclinical studies are consistent with the concept that 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) can enhance the therapeutic index of specific chemotherapeutic agents. These laboratory investigations resulted in 2 phase I clinical studies, which also support this hypothesis. These trials were extended to 2 sequential phase II investigations of WBH plus ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for refractory sarcoma patients. The first study (involving 12 patients) using extra-corporeal WBH was prematurely closed to adopt a less toxic WBH technology, i.e., the radiant heat Aquatherm. To date, 12 patients have been accrued to the Aquatherm trial. Projections regarding reduced morbidity were correct. The response rate for ICE/WBH is currently 63%. The review to follow will summarize the results of these trials, as well as the laboratory and clinical data which serve to explicate the dramatic clinical results observed to date.

Preclinical data is consistent with the concept that the timing of chemotherapy during radiant heat-whole body hyperthermia (WBH) should affect therapeutic index. In order to test this hypothesis, a controlled clinical investigation was initiated. Patients received carboplatin (CBDCA) on an early or late schedule with respect to achieving target temperature (i.e. 41.8 degrees C) in alternating treatment cycles. The first cycle was randomized between patients regarding the early or late schedule for two planned sets per patient (i.e. four cycles). Ifosfamide, etoposide and granulocyte colony stimulating factor were delivered during all cycles with a standardized schedule. A total of 53 cycles involving 17 patients were analyzed. Detailed toxicity evaluation (i.e. delay in therapy secondary to thrombocytopenia, need for platelet transfusions, and days of hospitalization) taken collectively demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant advantage to delivering CBDCA 10 min after target temperature, during the plateau phase of WBH.

Tumor size is a significant prognostic variable for attaining complete regression (CR) with local hyperthermia (HT) and radiation therapy (RT). The addition of weekly chemotherapy was evaluated to improve the efficacy of thermoradiotherapy in poor-prognosis lesions (i.e. > or = 7 cm2 or > or = 14 cm3) which have an expected CR rate of approximately 30 +/- 8%. Patients were entered into a two-arm phase-II study: arm 1 = breast cancer (10 patients), ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2) + epirubicin (20 mg/m2) + HT + RT; arm 2 = sarcoma (7 patients) and head and neck cancer (9 patients), cisplatin (40 mg/m2) + HT + RT. Therapy encompassing 106 triple-modality sessions was generally well tolerated for both arms; 2 instances of grade-3 and 1 of grade-4 (arm 2) local toxicity (WHO criteria) were observed. There were 4 instances of grade-3 myelosuppression (arm 1). The CR rates for arms 1 and 2 were 70 and 19%, respectively, suggesting that the combination of ifosfamide/epirubicin/HT/RT deserves further investigation in the context of localized breast cancer.

Two earlier studies resulted in the design of a phase II trial of 41.8 degrees C (x 60 min) extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia (WBH) with ICE, i.e. ifosfamide (5 g/m2), carboplatin (300 mg/m2), and etoposide given with WBH, as well as, day 2 and 3 post-WBH (100 mg/m2) for adult patients with refractory sarcoma. 12 patients entered this trial; all were evaluable. 8 patients had a history of prior chemotherapy associated with disease progression. Following WBH/ICE, 7 partial remissions were observed (58%); 3 patients experienced disease stabilisation; the aforementioned 10 patients each received four cycles of therapy. 2 patients exhibited progressive disease. Episodes of WHO graded (grade 3; grade 4) toxicity observed included: anaemia (2;2); leucopenia (5;7); thrombocytopenia (1;6); renal (0;1). Other toxicities (grade 1 and 2) included: anasarca, diarrhoea, ventricular arrhythmias, pressure sores, and perioral herpes simplex.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, biological interactions, and toxicities of ifosfamide and carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 1 h in a pilot clinical study. Nineteen patients with refractory sarcoma or malignant teratoma were treated. To obtain baseline pharmacokinetic data for ifosfamide, the first chemotherapy course was given without WBH in six patients. This enabled comparison of systemic toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the drug combination with and without WBH (+/- WBH). All other patients received three thermochemotherapy treatments every 3 weeks. Ifosfamide was escalated from 5 to 10 g/m2 with a fixed carboplatin dose of 480 mg/m2. WBH was induced by extracorporally heated blood (in a hemodialysis apparatus) with general anesthesia. The drugs were given at target temperature. A total of 49 thermochemotherapy treatments was administered. The use of the hemodialysis device resulted in an approximate one-third reduction of blood concentrations of 4-hydroxyifosfamide, one activated intermediate metabolite of ifosfamide and carboplatin, but in an increase of chloroacetaldehyde, the other main ifosfamide metabolite. The WBC counts and the platelet nadirs (up to WBH grade 4) were not significantly different +/- WBH. Of 19 evaluable patients, 7 partial remissions, 8 disease stabilizations (average duration, 3 months), and 4 patients with progressive disease were observed. There was no WBH-related mortality. Toxicities observed included mild (anasarca, diarrhea, pressure sores, and perioral herpes simplex) and severe (reversible neuropathy, cardiopulmonary distress, and severe renal dysfunction). No hepatic or central nervous system toxicity occurred. Nephropathy was the dose-limiting toxicity. In conclusion, ifosfamide and carboplatin can be administered with extracorporally induced WBH with acceptable toxicity. Results obtained are consistent with continued evaluation of this combined modality approach.