Search

Objective: This nationwide cohort study compared the incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) between adenoviral vector-based (ChAdOx1) and mRNA-based (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines., Methods: A targeted trial emulation study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service database. Vaccinees aged 18-85 years who had received at least one dose of ChAdOx1 or an mRNA-based vaccine were identified. The 42-day risks of AESIs were calculated., Results: A total of 1 767 539 ChAdOx1 vaccinees were matched exactly with mRNA vaccinees according to their risk factors. The 42-day risks of adverse events were low (∼0 to 176 events per 100 000 persons in both vaccine groups), and the incidence rates of AESIs were comparable between the two platforms, except for a higher occurrence of acute cardiac injury (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.35), myocarditis or pericarditis (IRR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.14-4.04), and arrhythmia (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.71) in mRNA vaccinees. The incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (IRR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69), vasovagal syncope (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), radiculopathy (IRR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), and aseptic arthritis (IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93) was significantly lower in mRNA-based vaccinees compared with ChAdOx1 vaccinees., Discussion: A remarkable platform-dependent difference was observed in the safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for myocarditis or pericarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. However, the overall risk of AESIs was low for both vaccine platforms., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Concerns have been expressed that some drugs may increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In contrast, other drugs have generated interest as potential therapeutic agents., Methods: All adults aged ≥18 years who were tested for COVID-19 were included. Exposure was defined as a prescription of study drugs which would have been continued until 7 days prior to test for COVID-19 or later. The outcome measures were the diagnosis of COVID-19 and severe COVID-19. Disease risk score matching and multiple logistic regression was used., Results: Matched claims and testing results were available for 219,961 subjects, of whom 7,341 (3.34%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Patients were matched to 36,705 controls, and the subset of 878 patients of severe COVID-19 also matched with 1,927 mild-to-moderate patients. Angiotensin receptor blockers were not associated with either the diagnosis of COVID-19 (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.15) or severe disease (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.87-1.42). The use of hydroxychloroquine was not associated with a lower risk for COVID-19 (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.53-1.66) or severe disease (aOR, 3.51; 95% CI, 0.76-16.22)., Conclusions: In this national claims data-based case-control study, no commonly prescribed medications were associated with risk of COVID-19 infection or COVID-19 severity., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)