Search

Background Recent studies have shown good serological and cellular immune responses in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) after receipt of 2 doses of messenger RNAA (mRNA) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine. Data are missing regarding the response after 3 vaccine doses. Methods We followed up a group of PLWH who received 3 doses of the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine and for whom data of humoral immune response after 2 vaccine doses were available. Patients provided a blood sample 4–6 months after the booster dose. The aim of the study was to measure the serological and cellular response after the third dose and to evaluate factors associated with the vaccine response. Results Fifty patients have provided a serum sample for serological evaluation after the booster. The anti–receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin (Ig) G titers were higher after the booster with a median delta of 3240 arbitrary units/mL. The median CD4+ T-cell count was 660/μL (interquartile range, 515–958/μL) and had no influence on the antibody level. Factors associated with lower delta included higher CD8+ T-cell count (P =.02) and longer time between the third dose and the blood test (P =.01). Higher anti-RBD IgG titer after the second vaccine (P =.03), as well as a longer interval between second and third doses (P =.031) were associated with higher delta. There was no increase in the median number of activated interferon γ+ and tumor necrosis factor α+ CD4+ T cells after the booster (n = 8). Conclusions The anti-RBD IgG level after 3 doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine was higher than the level after 2 doses, suggesting additional value of the booster. Cellular response did not further increase after a booster. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID-19 disease leads to prolonged hospitalisations and adverse outcomes. We describe our strategy for routine early discharge of severe COVID-19 patients with home oxygen during the Delta variant surge. Our strategy included COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen support via nasal cannula, with stabilised but not yet improved respiration (intervention group), that followed strict criteria. Severe COVID-19 patients discharged after improved respiration were considered the control group for comparison. Outcomes included readmissions from active COVID-19 and 30-day mortality. The intervention group included 129 patients, and the control 150. The groups' baseline characteristics were similar, although the control group had more advanced COVID-19 severity. Among the intervention group, 23 (17.8%) had readmissions secondary to active COVID-19, compared to none in the control group. The 30-day mortality rate was similar between the groups (5% vs. 7%). The intervention led to a shorter hospital stay [median 3 days (IQR 2-4) vs. 6 days (IQR 4-9), p <.01], while a very short hospitalisation was associated with readmissions (2.8 vs. 3.5 days, p =.02). A subsequent critical disease or death after the intervention occurred in old (81 years), multimorbid (3.4 ± 1.4) patients with a high percentage of acute kidney injury during their first hospitalisation (50%). Our discharge strategy led to a short hospital stay, a high readmission rate, and similar long-term outcomes. Considering the difference in disease severity before discharge, this intervention cannot be considered safe for our study population. Correct patient selection is crucial to ensure patient safety when considering early discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]