Search

Cellular processes are controlled by the thermodynamics of the underlying biomolecular interactions. Frequently, structural investigations use one monomeric binding partner, while ensemble measurements of binding affinities generally yield one affinity representative of a 1:1 interaction, despite the majority of the proteome consisting of oligomeric proteins. For example, viral entry and inhibition in SARS-CoV-2 involve a trimeric spike surface protein, a dimeric angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) cell-surface receptor and dimeric antibodies. Here, we reveal that cooperativity correlates with infectivity and inhibition as opposed to 1:1 binding strength. We show that ACE2 oligomerizes spike more strongly for more infectious variants, while exhibiting weaker 1:1 affinity. Furthermore, we find that antibodies use induced oligomerization both as a primary inhibition mechanism and to enhance the effects of receptor-site blocking. Our results suggest that naive affinity measurements are poor predictors of potency, and introduce an antibody-based inhibition mechanism for oligomeric targets. More generally, they point toward a much broader role of induced oligomerization in controlling biomolecular interactions., Competing Interests: Competing interests statement:P.K. is a nonexecutive director, shareholder of and consultant to Refeyn Ltd., J.L.P.B. and W.B.S. are shareholders of and consultants to Refeyn Ltd. W.B.S. and P.K. received the University of Oxford’s COVID-19 Research Response Fund. P.K. has filed a patent for the contrast enhancement methodology and its application to mass measurement of single biomolecules. G.R.S. is on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board, a founder shareholder of RQ biotechnology and Jenner investigator. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.

BA.2.86, a recently described sublineage of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, contains many mutations in the spike gene. It appears to have originated from BA.2 and is distinct from the XBB variants responsible for many infections in 2023. The global spread and plethora of mutations in BA.2.86 has caused concern that it may possess greater immune-evasive potential, leading to a new wave of infection. Here, we examine the ability of BA.2.86 to evade the antibody response to infection using a panel of vaccinated or naturally infected sera and find that it shows marginally less immune evasion than XBB.1.5. We locate BA.2.86 in the antigenic landscape of recent variants and look at its ability to escape panels of potent monoclonal antibodies generated against contemporary SARS-CoV-2 infections. We demonstrate, and provide a structural explanation for, increased affinity of BA.2.86 to ACE2, which may increase transmissibility., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board, consults for AstraZeneca, and is a founder member of RQ Biotechnology. D.I.S. consults for AstraZeneca. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to SARS-CoV-2 mAbs discovered in G.R.S.’s laboratory. S.J.D. is a scientific advisor to the Scottish Parliament on COVID-19., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

COVID-19 patients at risk of severe disease may be treated with neutralising monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). To minimise virus escape from neutralisation these are administered as combinations e.g. casirivimab+imdevimab or, for antibodies targeting relatively conserved regions, individually e.g. sotrovimab. Unprecedented genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK has enabled a genome-first approach to detect emerging drug resistance in Delta and Omicron cases treated with casirivimab+imdevimab and sotrovimab respectively. Mutations occur within the antibody epitopes and for casirivimab+imdevimab multiple mutations are present on contiguous raw reads, simultaneously affecting both components. Using surface plasmon resonance and pseudoviral neutralisation assays we demonstrate these mutations reduce or completely abrogate antibody affinity and neutralising activity, suggesting they are driven by immune evasion. In addition, we show that some mutations also reduce the neutralising activity of vaccine-induced serum., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Highly transmissible Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 currently dominate globally. Here, we compare neutralization of Omicron BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2. BA.2 RBD has slightly higher ACE2 affinity than BA.1 and slightly reduced neutralization by vaccine serum, possibly associated with its increased transmissibility. Neutralization differences between sub-lineages for mAbs (including therapeutics) mostly arise from variation in residues bordering the ACE2 binding site; however, more distant mutations S371F (BA.2) and R346K (BA.1.1) markedly reduce neutralization by therapeutic antibody Vir-S309. In-depth structure-and-function analyses of 27 potent RBD-binding mAbs isolated from vaccinated volunteers following breakthrough Omicron-BA.1 infection reveals that they are focused in two main clusters within the RBD, with potent right-shoulder antibodies showing increased prevalence. Selection and somatic maturation have optimized antibody potency in less-mutated epitopes and recovered potency in highly mutated epitopes. All 27 mAbs potently neutralize early pandemic strains, and many show broad reactivity with variants of concern., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board and is a founder member of RQ Biotechnology. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-Astra Zeneca vaccine. A.J.P. is Chair of UK DHSC Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI) but does not participate in the JCVI COVID-19 committee and is a member of the WHO’s SAGE. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI, or WHO. The University of Oxford has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca on coronavirus vaccine development. T.L. is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was a consultant to Vaccitech for an unrelated project whilst the study was conducted. The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication. S.J.D. is a Scientific Advisor to the Scottish Parliament on COVID-19., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Alpha-B.1.1.7, Beta-B.1.351, Gamma-P.1, and Delta-B.1.617.2 variants of SARS-CoV-2 express multiple mutations in the spike protein (S). These may alter the antigenic structure of S, causing escape from natural or vaccine-induced immunity. Beta is particularly difficult to neutralize using serum induced by early pandemic SARS-CoV-2 strains and is most antigenically separated from Delta. To understand this, we generated 674 mAbs from Beta-infected individuals and performed a detailed structure-function analysis of the 27 most potent mAbs: one binding the spike N-terminal domain (NTD), the rest the receptor-binding domain (RBD). Two of these RBD-binding mAbs recognize a neutralizing epitope conserved between SARS-CoV-1 and -2, while 18 target mutated residues in Beta: K417N, E484K, and N501Y. There is a major response to N501Y, including a public IgVH4-39 sequence, with E484K and K417N also targeted. Recognition of these key residues underscores why serum from Beta cases poorly neutralizes early pandemic and Delta viruses., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.S.D. is a consultant for Inbios, Vir Biotechnology, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Carnival Corporation, and on the Scientific Advisory Boards of Moderna and Immunome. The M.S.D. laboratory has received unrelated funding support in sponsored research agreements from Moderna, Vir Biotechnology, and Emergent BioSolutions. G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board and is a founder member of RQ Biotechnology. The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Administration of potent anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) monoclonal antibodies has been shown to curtail viral shedding and reduce hospitalization in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the structure-function analysis of potent human anti-RBD monoclonal antibodies and its links to the formulation of antibody cocktails remains largely elusive. Methods: Previously, we isolated a panel of neutralizing anti-RBD monoclonal antibodies from convalescent patients and showed their neutralization efficacy in vitro . Here, we elucidate the mechanism of action of antibodies and dissect antibodies at the epitope level, which leads to a formation of a potent antibody cocktail. Results: We found that representative antibodies which target non-overlapping epitopes are effective against wild type virus and recently emerging variants of concern, whilst being encoded by antibody genes with few somatic mutations. Neutralization is associated with the inhibition of binding of viral RBD to ACE2 and possibly of the subsequent fusion process. Structural analysis of representative antibodies, by cryo-electron microscopy and crystallography, reveals that they have some unique aspects that are of potential value while sharing some features in common with previously reported neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. For instance, one has a common VH 3-53 public variable region yet is unusually resilient to mutation at residue 501 of the RBD. We evaluate the in vivo efficacy of an antibody cocktail consisting of two potent non-competing anti-RBD antibodies in a Syrian hamster model. We demonstrate that the cocktail prevents weight loss, reduces lung viral load and attenuates pulmonary inflammation in hamsters in both prophylactic and therapeutic settings. Although neutralization of one of these antibodies is abrogated by the mutations of variant B.1.351, it is also possible to produce a bi-valent cocktail of antibodies both of which are resilient to variants B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and B.1.617.2. Conclusions: These findings support the up-to-date and rational design of an anti-RBD antibody cocktail as a therapeutic candidate against COVID-19., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: This work has been described in pending patent applications (Taiwan, File No. 110116981; PCT, File No. PCT/CN2021/093083)., (© The author(s).)

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has undergone progressive change, with variants conferring advantage rapidly becoming dominant lineages, e.g., B.1.617. With apparent increased transmissibility, variant B.1.617.2 has contributed to the current wave of infection ravaging the Indian subcontinent and has been designated a variant of concern in the United Kingdom. Here we study the ability of monoclonal antibodies and convalescent and vaccine sera to neutralize B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.2, complement this with structural analyses of Fab/receptor binding domain (RBD) complexes, and map the antigenic space of current variants. Neutralization of both viruses is reduced compared with ancestral Wuhan-related strains, but there is no evidence of widespread antibody escape as seen with B.1.351. However, B.1.351 and P.1 sera showed markedly more reduction in neutralization of B.1.617.2, suggesting that individuals infected previously by these variants may be more susceptible to reinfection by B.1.617.2. This observation provides important new insights for immunization policy with future variant vaccines in non-immune populations., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests G.R.S. is on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. A.J.P. is Chair of UK Department Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI) but does not participate in the JCVI COVID19 committee and is a member of the WHO’s SAGE. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI, or WHO. The University of Oxford has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca on coronavirus vaccine development. The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication. S.C.G. is co-founder of Vaccitech (collaborators in the early development of this vaccine candidate) and is named as an inventor on a patent covering use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines and a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (PCT/GB2012/000467). T.L. is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was a consultant to Vaccitech for an unrelated project during the conduct of the study., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Terminating the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic relies upon pan-global vaccination. Current vaccines elicit neutralizing antibody responses to the virus spike derived from early isolates. However, new strains have emerged with multiple mutations, including P.1 from Brazil, B.1.351 from South Africa, and B.1.1.7 from the UK (12, 10, and 9 changes in the spike, respectively). All have mutations in the ACE2 binding site, with P.1 and B.1.351 having a virtually identical triplet (E484K, K417N/T, and N501Y), which we show confer similar increased affinity for ACE2. We show that, surprisingly, P.1 is significantly less resistant to naturally acquired or vaccine-induced antibody responses than B.1.351, suggesting that changes outside the receptor-binding domain (RBD) impact neutralization. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 222 neutralizes all three variants despite interacting with two of the ACE2-binding site mutations. We explain this through structural analysis and use the 222 light chain to largely restore neutralization potency to a major class of public antibodies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. A.J.P. is chair of the UK Department Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI) but does not participate in the JCVI COVID-19 committee and is a member of the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) SAGE. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI, or WHO. S.C.G. is co-founder of Vaccitech (collaborators in the early development of this vaccine candidate) and is named as an inventor on a patent covering use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines and a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (PCT/GB2012/000467). T.L. is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and was a consultant to Vaccitech for an unrelated project during the conduct of the study. The University of Oxford has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca on coronavirus vaccine development.The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The race to produce vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began when the first sequence was published, and this forms the basis for vaccines currently deployed globally. Independent lineages of SARS-CoV-2 have recently been reported: UK, B.1.1.7; South Africa, B.1.351; and Brazil, P.1. These variants have multiple changes in the immunodominant spike protein that facilitates viral cell entry via the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor. Mutations in the receptor recognition site on the spike are of great concern for their potential for immune escape. Here, we describe a structure-function analysis of B.1.351 using a large cohort of convalescent and vaccinee serum samples. The receptor-binding domain mutations provide tighter ACE2 binding and widespread escape from monoclonal antibody neutralization largely driven by E484K, although K417N and N501Y act together against some important antibody classes. In a number of cases, it would appear that convalescent and some vaccine serum offers limited protection against this variant., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. A.J.P. is Chair of UK Department Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI), but does not participate in the JCVI COVID-19 committee, and is a member of the WHO’s SAGE. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI, or WHO. The University of Oxford has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca on coronavirus vaccine development. The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

SARS-CoV-2 has caused over 2 million deaths in little over a year. Vaccines are being deployed at scale, aiming to generate responses against the virus spike. The scale of the pandemic and error-prone virus replication is leading to the appearance of mutant viruses and potentially escape from antibody responses. Variant B.1.1.7, now dominant in the UK, with increased transmission, harbors 9 amino acid changes in the spike, including N501Y in the ACE2 interacting surface. We examine the ability of B.1.1.7 to evade antibody responses elicited by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. We map the impact of N501Y by structure/function analysis of a large panel of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies. B.1.1.7 is harder to neutralize than parental virus, compromising neutralization by some members of a major class of public antibodies through light-chain contacts with residue 501. However, widespread escape from monoclonal antibodies or antibody responses generated by natural infection or vaccination was not observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests G.R.S. sits on the GSK Vaccines Scientific Advisory Board. Oxford University holds intellectual property related to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. A.J.P. is Chair of UK Department Health and Social Care’s (DHSC) Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation (JCVI) but does not participate in the JCVI COVID19 committee and is a member of the WHO’s SAGE. S.G. is co-founder of Vaccitech (collaborators in the early development of this vaccine candidate) and named as an inventor on a patent covering use of ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines and a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. T.L. is named as an inventor on a patent application covering this SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and consultant to Vaccitech. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of DHSC, JCVI, or WHO. The University of Oxford has entered into a partnership with AstraZeneca on coronavirus vaccine development. The University of Oxford has protected intellectual property disclosed in this publication., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Under pressure from neutralising antibodies induced by vaccination or infection the SARS-CoV-2 spike gene has become a hotspot for evolutionary change, leading to the failure of all mAbs developed for clinical use. Most potent antibodies bind to the receptor binding domain which has become heavily mutated. Here we study responses to a conserved epitope in sub-domain-1 (SD1) of spike which have become more prominent because of mutational escape from antibodies directed to the receptor binding domain. Some SD1 reactive mAbs show potent and broad neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants. We structurally map the dominant SD1 epitope and provide a mechanism of action by blocking interaction with ACE2. Mutations in SD1 have not been sustained to date, but one, E554K, leads to escape from mAbs. This mutation has now emerged in several sublineages including BA.2.86, reflecting selection pressure on the virus exerted by the increasing prominence of the anti-SD1 response. Due to the focus of vaccination on the SARS CoV-2 spike protein, spike has been associated with high levels of viral mutation and subsequent immune escape. Here the authors study a conserved epitope in SARS CoV-2 sub-domain-1 and characterise the neutralising antibody response and evasion in contemporary SARS COV-2 viral strains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neutralization titers against BA.4.6 were significantly reduced compared to BA.4/5 for both breakthrough BA.1 (1.5-fold; I P i = 0.0006) and BA.2 (1.2-fold; I P i = 0.0384) serum samples. A small non-significant increase in neutralization titers against BA.4.6 was observed in the BA.4/5 breakthrough cohort compared to BA.4/5. It is not clear why the BA.2 and BA.4/5 neutralization titers using BA.2 and BA.4/5 serum respectively were not higher than titers for other SARS-CoV-2 variants as one might expect. [Extracted from the article]

Variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have caused successive global waves of infection. These variants, with multiple mutations in the spike protein, are thought to facilitate escape from natural and vaccine-induced immunity and often increase in affinity for ACE2. The latest variant to cause concern is BA.2.75, identified in India where it is now the dominant strain, with evidence of wider dissemination. BA.2.75 is derived from BA.2 and contains four additional mutations in the receptor-binding domain (RBD). Here, we perform an antigenic and biophysical characterization of BA.2.75, revealing an interesting balance between humoral evasion and ACE2 receptor affinity. ACE2 affinity for BA.2.75 is increased 9-fold compared with BA.2; there is also evidence of escape of BA.2.75 from immune serum, particularly that induced by Delta infection, which may explain the rapid spread in India, where where there is a high background of Delta infection. ACE2 affinity appears to be prioritized over greater escape. [Display omitted] • BA.2.75 affinity for ACE2 is increased 9-fold compared with BA.2 • N460K increases neutralization escape and likely increases ACE2 affinity • The revertant R493Q decreases neutralization escape but increases ACE2 affinity • Affinity to ACE2 appears to be prioritized over neutralization escape Huo et al. characterize the SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.75 (originally identified in India). Its affinity for ACE2 is increased 9-fold over BA.2, and there is evidence of escape of BA.2.75 from immune serum, particularly from Delta infection. ACE2 affinity appears to be prioritized over greater escape via the R493Q reversion mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibodies are crucial to immune protection against SARS-CoV-2, with some in emergency use as therapeutics. Here, we identify 377 human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing the virus spike and focus mainly on 80 that bind the receptor binding domain (RBD). We devise a competition data-driven method to map RBD binding sites. We find that although antibody binding sites are widely dispersed, neutralizing antibody binding is focused, with nearly all highly inhibitory mAbs (IC 50 < 0.1 μg/mL) blocking receptor interaction, except for one that binds a unique epitope in the N-terminal domain. Many of these neutralizing mAbs use public V-genes and are close to germline. We dissect the structural basis of recognition for this large panel of antibodies through X-ray crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy of 19 Fab-antigen structures. We find novel binding modes for some potently inhibitory antibodies and demonstrate that strongly neutralizing mAbs protect, prophylactically or therapeutically, in animal models. [Display omitted] • Map 377 mAbs: 19 of 80 recognizing the RBD are potent neutralizers; 1 potent NTD binder • 19 Fab-antigen complex structures; 80 mAbs mapped on RBD and clustered into 5 epitopes • Most potent mAbs are ACE2 blockers, neutralize with few ACE2s, some Fabs glycosylated • mAbs reveal unique examples of NTD binding, RBD binding mode, and LC optimization Dejnirattisai et al. present an in-depth study of the human antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. By characterizing 377 human mAbs from recovered COVID-19 patients, and determining 19 protein structures, they construct a map of antibody footprints on the RBD that describes in great detail its antigenic anatomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are as yet no licensed therapeutics for the COVID-19 pandemic. The causal coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) binds host cells via a trimeric spike whose receptor binding domain (RBD) recognizes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, initiating conformational changes that drive membrane fusion. We find that the monoclonal antibody CR3022 binds the RBD tightly, neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, and report the crystal structure at 2.4 Å of the Fab/RBD complex. Some crystals are suitable for screening for entry-blocking inhibitors. The highly conserved, structure-stabilizing CR3022 epitope is inaccessible in the prefusion spike, suggesting that CR3022 binding facilitates conversion to the fusion-incompetent post-fusion state. Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis confirms that incubation of spike with CR3022 Fab leads to destruction of the prefusion trimer. Presentation of this cryptic epitope in an RBD-based vaccine might advantageously focus immune responses. Binders at this epitope could be useful therapeutically, possibly in synergy with an antibody that blocks receptor attachment. • CR3022 binds the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 and shows strong neutralization • Neutralization is by destroying the prefusion spike conformation • CR3022 binds a highly conserved epitope that is inaccessible in prefusion spike protein • CR3022 could have therapeutic potential alone or in synergy with a receptor blocker Huo et al. find that the antibody CR3022 binds tightly to the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike at a site different to that used by the receptor. CR3022 effectively neutralizes the virus, and cryo-EM reveals that it disrupts the spike. Such antibodies could have potential as COVID-19 therapeutics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On 24th November 2021, the sequence of a new SARS-CoV-2 viral isolate Omicron-B.1.1.529 was announced, containing far more mutations in Spike (S) than previously reported variants. Neutralization titers of Omicron by sera from vaccinees and convalescent subjects infected with early pandemic Alpha, Beta, Gamma, or Delta are substantially reduced, or the sera failed to neutralize. Titers against Omicron are boosted by third vaccine doses and are high in both vaccinated individuals and those infected by Delta. Mutations in Omicron knock out or substantially reduce neutralization by most of the large panel of potent monoclonal antibodies and antibodies under commercial development. Omicron S has structural changes from earlier viruses and uses mutations that confer tight binding to ACE2 to unleash evolution driven by immune escape. This leads to a large number of mutations in the ACE2 binding site and rebalances receptor affinity to that of earlier pandemic viruses. [Display omitted] • Large reduction in Omicron neutralization titers, ameliorated by the 3rd booster vaccine • Failure of many potent mAbs to neutralize Omicron • Complex pattern of mutations balances ACE2 binding and antibody escape • Omicron RBD is structurally similar but the most antigenically distant variant A comprehensive analysis of sera from vaccinees, convalescent patients previously infected by multiple variants, and potent monoclonal antibodies from early in the COVID-19 pandemic reveals a substantial overall reduction in the ability to neutralize the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, which seems to ameliorate with a third vaccine dose. Structural analyses of the Omicron RBD suggest that selective pressure balances key changes that increase affinity for ACE2 with other changes in the receptor-binding motif that disfavor ACE2 binding but facilitate immune escape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Omicron lineage of SARS-CoV-2, which was first described in November 2021, spread rapidly to become globally dominant and has split into a number of sublineages. BA.1 dominated the initial wave but has been replaced by BA.2 in many countries. Recent sequencing from South Africa's Gauteng region uncovered two new sublineages, BA.4 and BA.5, which are taking over locally, driving a new wave. BA.4 and BA.5 contain identical spike sequences, and although closely related to BA.2, they contain further mutations in the receptor-binding domain of their spikes. Here, we study the neutralization of BA.4/5 using a range of vaccine and naturally immune serum and panels of monoclonal antibodies. BA.4/5 shows reduced neutralization by the serum from individuals vaccinated with triple doses of AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccine compared with BA.1 and BA.2. Furthermore, using the serum from BA.1 vaccine breakthrough infections, there are, likewise, significant reductions in the neutralization of BA.4/5, raising the possibility of repeat Omicron infections. [Display omitted] • BA.4/5 resist neutralization by triple-dosed vaccinee serum more than BA.1 and BA.2 • BA.1 vaccine breakthrough serum shows reduced neutralization of BA.4/5 • Activity of SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic antibodies against BA.4/5 is reduced • L452R and F486V mutations both make major contributions to BA.4/5 escape SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 sublineages bear mutations that lead to their reduced neutralization by sera from triple-vaccinated individuals when compared with the more recent BA.1 and BA.2. Importantly, sera from individuals with breakthrough BA.1 infections also show reduced neutralization, suggesting that repeat Omicron infections are likely in the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]